More

Latinos And Terrorism: In The Name Of National Security

Latinos And Terrorism

First Posted: 09/09/11 04:58 PM ET Updated: 11/09/11 05:12 AM ET

In an analysis of post 9/11 security measures, journalist Michelle Garcia looks at the intersection of fear and national security and its impact on Latinos

The 2001 attacks carved a deep gash into Lower Manhattan, and scarred the minds of New Yorkers with memories of the collapsing Twin Towers that left 2,753 people dead. Ten years later, the nation can count two wars and a sprawling national security apparatus as a part of the legacy of that bright autumn day.

Less obvious in the calculus of the ‘post 9/11’ world that emerged is the 700-mile fence on the U.S.-Mexico border, the unmanned drones that cruise into Mexico on the hunt for drug traffickers, an unprecedented level of immigrant deportations and one baggy pant wearing baby-faced Mexican kid known as ‘Puebla’—New York state’s first and only convicted terrorist.

With the term terrorist left undefined in the state laws adopted after the attacks, the profile of a ‘terrorist’ turned up unexpected face in 2004 when the Bronx district attorney unsealed an indictment Edgar Morales, aka "Puebla," on charges of terrorism in the killing of 10-year-old Malenny Mendez.

The DA argued that he and the other members of the St. James Boys street gang ‘terrorized’ the civilian neighborhoods of the West Bronx. But Michael Balboni, the Republican senator who sponsored New York’s anti terrorism statute, has said publicly that he envisioned the use of the ‘terrorism’ law in scenarios involving mass destruction and that its use in the Morales case was an “unanticipated application.”

Morales’ parents were shocked at the charge they associated with the 2001 attacks. “What is happening with the laws here,” asked Lourdes Morales, his mother told me in 2005. “Isn’t there a limit?”

A policy of mass deportation

Terrorism, which is a technique of violence, rather than an enemy, was housed within DHS and alongside with agencies responsible for two ongoing domestic issues-immigrants and drugs. After securing the nation against terrorism, DHS names securing the border and immigration as its top missions. The 9/11 Commission recommended improved screening at borders to detect potential threats and improvements to an “immigration system not able to deliver on its basic commitments, much less support counterterrorism.”

The effect was immediate in Washington Heights where Raquel Batista, then the executive director of the Northern Manhattan Coalition for Immigrant Rights, remembers the immigrant families that overwhelmed her office after a surge of Dominicans in deportation proceedings, many for drug convictions. “We felt the difference with immigration (agents) coming into communities to do raids and knocking on people’s doors in the morning,” Batista said. “People would come to my office and tell me they would come and say they had closed down the street on 179th for a raid.”

Since the 2001 attacks, the number of deportations has tripled with a record number of 400,000 immigrants removed last year alone. “There is a domestic component to the culture of fear--the fear of immigrant,” said Roberto Lovato, an activist and writer who has covered the intersection of national security and immigration. “We imported the fear of Al-Qaeda.”

Border security

Soon after, the federal government began work on a multi-billion dollar 700-mile fence on the U.S. Mexico border ostensibly to protect against terrorists, although suspected terrorists have entered through the northern border with Canada and with visas through airports. Drones used in Afghanistan have been deployed along the border and into Mexico in the fight against drug traffickers who have been deemed a threat to national security.

“It wasn’t accidental that counterterrorism is housed with immigration and customs because conceptually the two had been long linked,” said Strozier. “All of that had to be in the political culture and social culture of fear where people are willing to turn a blind eye.”

Last November, a state appeals court reduced Morales’ sentence saying his crime did not fit the definition of terrorism. The Bronx District Attorney declined requests for comment. Earlier this year an internal report compiled by the Transportation Security Administration found that security screeners at the Newark Airport regularly singled out Mexican and Dominican passengers for scrutiny of travel documents as a way to appear more ‘productive.’

A decade later the ‘war on terror’ fits firmly within the paradigm of national security. In July, the Obama Administration announced a new strategy against ‘transnational organized crime groups” that pose a threat to national security and threaten to destabilize nations. Among the four groups listed was the Zetas, a Mexican organized crime group responsible for countless killings and tied to the ongoing and lucrative human and drug smuggling trade.

A decade after then President George W. Bush said, “the object of terrorism is to try to force us to change our way of life,” one might argue that the fight against terrorism was grafted onto our way of life.

This article is part of a 9/11 Anniversary series from El Diario, to read more, please click here.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LATINO VOICES

In an analysis of post 9/11 security measures, journalist Michelle Garcia looks at the intersection of fear and national security and its impact on Latinos The 2001 attacks carved a deep gash int...
In an analysis of post 9/11 security measures, journalist Michelle Garcia looks at the intersection of fear and national security and its impact on Latinos The 2001 attacks carved a deep gash int...
Filed by Cristina Costantini  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
inthedesert
Those who never question will fall for anything.
05:16 PM on 09/10/2011
Hey, the writer's name IS Garcia...just sayin. She apparently feels that America has no right to protect it's southern border from the hordes of poor Mexicans coming here. How do we know that some of those dark-skinned people are not actually Middle Eastern terrorists? She seems to be saying that ANY kind of border fence is wrong. LOL. So...Miss Garica, how do you feel about the way Mexico handles it's illegals from Central and South America? PLEASE COMMENT MISS GARCIA OR YOUR CRED WILL BE SERIOUSLY QUESTIONED...............LMAO. Should Mexico remove it's border fences ALSO? INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS.
02:36 PM on 09/11/2011
Those dark-skinned people? there are differences between Hispanics and people from the Middle East. We look different and we certainly talk, dress, and behave very differently.
Even if "westerners" share more in common, it's still pretty easy to say who is French and who is an American right???? it's common sense!
For most South American countries ( if not all ) you don't need a Visa just a passport, so it's almost impossible to be an "illegal" . I am not sure about Mexico tho, but for what I can remember ( some of my friends have been there) you don't need a Visa.
Finally, I am not saying that Americans don't have the right to built a Fence. But, in the midst of an economical crisis, to construct a 700 B fence to protect yourself from terrorist that don't use that border to enter, makes no sense. Even if its to keep "out" Mexicans, it still makes no sense economically. This administration has deported -in less than two years- a million of "illegals", and the number of deportations is expected to grow in the next years, if you add to this the tougher border controls that have been put in place ( making impossible to cross without a coyote and their 5,000 + price ) you have the policies that in the long run will take care of illegal immigration. This will save Americans 700 billions + all the billions of keeping the fence working. It's simple common sense!
03:03 PM on 09/10/2011
I see AOL'c moderators do not like the truth.
02:48 PM on 09/10/2011
Someone please explain to me why it is ok for people to enter our country without permission, overstay their visas and almost every latino thinks this is the correct thing to do. I would also like to know why many Americans also think it is ok. I am tired of hearing we are all immagrants, to me this is a lie. People came from all countries to the new world before it was a nation. Thjey fought for freedom from a tyrannical king in England and won their freedom. At this point a new nation was formed, anyone here auto matically became a citizen. Myself I have traced my people back to at least the mid 1700's and 1 of those people happened to be a native American. I'm not saying that makes me a Native American ( Indian ) but it does give me the right to get disgusted when everyone yells we are all immagrants. Please I am waiting for someone to explain this and why some of the American people deny sovereinty for this Nation. And why it is permissible for the Mexicans to invade this Country. I only used Mexican becayse they are the largest percent of Illegals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pebblesvanpeebles
Americans: Free to do as we are told.
05:32 PM on 09/10/2011
You are the product of nationalist educational propaganda and it shows in your comment. You should be thanking your stars that all immigrants are doing is coming in illegally to do the jobs you don't want to do, and not wiping out entire nations of people based on theories of racial superiority as our ever-deified founders, their forebears, and their descendants continued to do in various ways for a long, long time. No, people were NOT automatically citizens by simply being in America, or by being born there. If you knew anything about American foreign policy in Mexico, you might understand why so many Mexicans are unemployed and have no choice but to come here for a better life... which is still the American dream, by the way, or is the Statue of Liberty just something pretty for you to look at and not a symbol of American ideals?
07:08 PM on 09/10/2011
BULLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

Let them come legally get a Visa and when Visa expire get to stepping and apply for legal ships and wait in line that's the right thing to do...I don't feel sorry for those who want to cheat their way in our Country bla bla bla
08:06 PM on 09/10/2011
I'm not getting upset about your remarks I would like for you to explain, why it is right for any citizen of foreign couintry to sneak into my nation, I have no idea what nation you are from. I happen to love my Country and have served in the armed forces of this Country. What have you done for this Nation accept to grow up in it, have all it's priileges and then deny i t's right to say who comes in or who stays home. I do not deny people who come to this country legally. Now do not start saying i am a racist. I do not have a racist bone in my body, I hate everyone Equally.
photo
Picosa
dedicated to FACTS & TRUTH
01:31 PM on 09/11/2011
For every action there is a reaction.Get the U.S.gov and corporations out of Mexico and and other countries south of the border and immigrants wont be forced to come here.

The maquilador­a system has proven so advantageo­us to U.S. capitalism that every American president of the last four decades has actively sought to expand the program and push it ever deeper into Mexico.

The advantage to U.S. capitalism was swift and substantia­l -- by 1983 two thirds of the foreign investment in Mexico was concentrat­ed in the maquilador­as and, in one year (between 1982 and 1983), wages were cut in half (from $1.38 to $.67 per hour). The superprofi­ts realized by America firms helped pull the U.S. out of its own economic crisis and attracted even more American capital to Mexico.

A major milestone in the U.S. quest to further exploit Mexico and her people was the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) of 1994.

Current estimates indicate that since the passage of NAFTA wages have decreased by 30 percent while the cost of living in Mexico has increased by 250 percent. Rather than improving the lives of Mexican workers, most of the new wealth created by NAFTA has flowed to the North as superprofi­ts for American capitalism­. The Mexican government estimates that annual pollution damages over the past decade exceeded $36 billion per year.
http://www.houstonculture.org/hispanic/conquest6.html
07:28 AM on 09/13/2011
You may be correct, yet it still does not tell me why it is ok for them to break our laws. Now I do not know if you are a latino or not. I still need to know why 20 to 30 million Amwerican People are out of work in their own Country
11:32 AM on 09/10/2011
Typical claptrap by a writer who favors the Mexican invasion. 400,000 illegals deported last year?
I think that's not the right number but I sure hope it is. A few more years like that and we can begin to think that the US is actually in control of immigration.
01:07 PM on 09/10/2011
Last time I checked my history books, it was the USA who invaded the Mexican territory... Besides, we have about 100,000 undocumented Canadians living and working between Oregon and Washington alone (I live in Seattle.) I bet you don't care about deporting them. They're the right skin color and speak the right language... Right? And even more, not all Latinos/as are Mexicans, and some of us have been citizens since the US INVADED our countries (i.e. Puerto Rico)
04:52 PM on 09/10/2011
I say Deport all of them, if they are not legal get rid of them
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
inthedesert
Those who never question will fall for anything.
05:13 PM on 09/10/2011
What is the basis for your claims about the number of Canadians here illegally? What is YOUR SOURCE MATERIAL? LOL. Why on Earth would Canadians want to come to America anyway....they have great jobs in Canada. I don't believe a word you have said. LOL.
07:09 PM on 09/10/2011
Thats a lie they want us to believe...I don't buy it!!!!