More

9/11 Media Coverage Brings Iraq, Afghanistan Wars Back Home

Obama Television

First Posted: 09/09/11 10:14 AM ET Updated: 11/09/11 05:12 AM ET

NEW YORK -- Afghanistan and Iraq aren't hot-button campaign issues anymore. The price tags of the two wars, in the trillions, gets less attention than deficit debates. And in recent months, top foreign correspondents have been more likely to be en route to countries taking part in the Arab Spring, like Egypt and Libya.

So it's easy to forget, when surfing the internet and flipping through channels, that nearly 50,000 U.S. troops remain in Iraq and twice that many are in Afghanistan; August even marked the deadliest month of the Afghan war for U.S. troops. But as the national media kicks into 9/11 overdrive -- complete with commemorative magazine covers, network documentary specials, where-were-you remembrances, and second thoughts from recovering hawks -- the war-torn countries are once again in the spotlight.

“Right now, because of the anniversary, the two wars are definitely in focus,” said NBC chief foreign correspondent Richard Engel, who recently teamed up with MSNBC's Rachel Maddow for a three-hour documentary, “Day of Destruction, Decade of War.” Engel, who's spent most of the past decade in war zones, said he believes NBC's still reporting "extensively" on Afghanistan. But the network, he acknowledged, has "covered the Iraq war more episodically the last year."

The most notable episode last year was NBC's live coverage of Engel riding along with the last convoy of "combat" troops into Kuwait. And yet the "end of combat operations in Iraq" story ranked as only the 20th biggest evening news story across the broadcast networks last year, according to television analyst Andrew Tyndall. That's less than half as much coverage as Toyota's 2010 gas pedal recall and a far cry from the war's media-saturated early days. In 2003, the same network newscasts provided over 40 times more coverage of Iraq than last year.

Back in 2003 and 2004, Iraq was also a major presidential campaign story -- something that hasn't been the case during the next two cycles.

Pew's Project for Excellence in Journalism broke down 2008 coverage into numerous sub-stories and ranked Iraq as the 11th most-covered campaign story, sitting nine spots behind the Reverend Wright saga. Afghanistan didn't crack the top 25 last time around. So far during this election, journalists and debate moderators haven't been grilling 2012 candidates much on Iraq and Afghanistan, making the “forever war” look like the forgotten war.

“Iraq and even Afghanistan doesn’t get much front page play, doesn’t get much play on the evening news, doesn’t get much, if any, primetime documentaries,” said Dan Rather, anchor and managing editor of HDNet’s “Dan Rather Reports” and former anchor of the “CBS Evening News.” “This shouldn’t be, as long as we have young Americans in peril fighting wars we signed off on.”

"It's really unconscionable to have the nation fighting two major wars, Iraq and Afghanistan, and have the dearth of coverage we now have," Rather said later.

Of course, wars aren't only expensive for the military. News executives couldn't have predicted on Sept. 10, 2001 just how large a chunk of their budgets would be depleted from covering a decade of war.

As U.S. troops headed to Afghanistan in October 2001, the media followed. In 2003, when President Bush shifted the country’s focus from rooting out al Qaeda in Afghanistan to invading Iraq -- a country with no ties to the 9/11 attacks -- the media followed again. (Many high-profile pundits and top Washington journalists even helped promote the administration’s bogus rationale for war along the way.) And when President Obama escalated the supposedly "good" war in Afghanistan six years later, correspondents packed their bags and left Baghdad for Kabul.

All that traveling, along with filling a bureau with security personnel, support staff and Iraqi journalists, doesn't come cheap. Tony Maddox, managing director of CNN International, said that when coverage of the Iraq war was at its peak, the network had an operation of about 40-50 people on the ground. “The bill was huge,” he said. “It ran into millions of dollars.”

Despite the large investment, Maddox said that CNN got a lot in return by producing stories for a 24-hour domestic network, CNN International, HLN and CNN.com.

“For the broadcast networks the model is different -- they still have the same shows they always had,” Maddox said, referring to their having less programming hours for news each day. “The extensive investment in Iraq coverage would impact the bottom line. I do not know how each company dealt with that, but as a viewer I see less of a presence overseas.”

Veteran correspondents who've spent much of the past decade covering Iraq and Afghanistan say the wars still merit coverage, but they also acknowledge the financial strain on news organizations and the need to find compelling angles to interest a war-weary public.

After 9/11, Martha Raddatz, the senior foreign affairs correspondent for ABC News, made so many trips to Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq that preparation became routine. “It’s easier for me to pack to go to Iraq or Afghanistan than it is for California,” she said.

But after reporting 20 times from Iraq, she hasn't made a single stop this year. "That tells you something," she said.

Clearly, Raddatz has no problem heading off for a war zone. But what's harder for her -- and for other foreign correspondents -- is generating interest from editors and executive producers back home. “You can’t do a story on a convoy going out every day,” she acknowledged. "We’ve done that story for 10 years.” So Raddatz has, at times, had to find unique ways get airtime from Afghanistan, such as embedding on a F-15 combat mission.

Raddatz said she understands war fatigue, but she still doesn’t want the public to forget. “Maybe because I’ve been doing it for so long,” she said, “I’m going to be the first to say, 'There are real human beings over there.'”

Engel said he’d “love to have correspondents telling stories about Iraq every day,” but points out that the mission has changed, with U.S. troops primarily training Iraqis and sticking close to bases in preparation for the withdrawal. “It hasn’t been an active war front,” he said.

Jane Arraf, who covers Iraq for Al Jazeera English and the Christian Science Monitor and previously did so for CNN and NBC News, says that the number of journalists stationed in Baghdad is clearly dwindling. Arraf should know, considering that several journalists who've had their passports stamped in Iraq many times describe her as the longest-serving foreign correspondent in the country. “It’s a bit depressing,” she said. “A lot of the major networks don’t keep correspondents there.”

Yet even Arraf acknowledges that it's tough to compete for airtime with revolutions sweeping the Middle East and North Africa. While Arraf will appear live in Baghdad on Sept. 11 this year, she's spending the time before the anniversary covering the Arab Spring. Speaking via Skype from Cairo, she said that the Iraq war “doesn’t make for the most compelling television, but it’s still vitally important and endlessly fascinating because it’s not over yet.”

“We still don’t know which way that country’s going to go,” she said.

But we do know that most U.S. troops are leaving by a Dec. 31 deadline (although the exact number departing remains in flux).

Engel said he's spoken to journalists heading back to Iraq before the end of the year, and that he may return himself. Journalists are likely to use the opportunity, he said, to look back on what has been accomplished in Iraq, examine whether the country can be held together and discuss whether the U.S. mission was a success or failure.

Still, there won't be any V-E Day burst of celebration in the streets -- and journalists trekking to Iraq to cover the drawdown of U.S. military involvement are unlikely to come back with TV-friendly images that show any clear resolution to the nearly nine years of fighting.

“I think there will be renewed interest because it’s an easy milestone," Arraf said. "It’s the end of an era. It is the end of a chapter. It probably won’t be the end of U.S. troops in Iraq. But, again, I think even some editors are expecting that there will be some huge event, some marking that date to recognize the import of it. There won’t be, really."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

NEW YORK -- Afghanistan and Iraq aren't hot-button campaign issues anymore. The price tags of the two wars, in the trillions, gets less attention than deficit debates. And in recent months, top forei...
NEW YORK -- Afghanistan and Iraq aren't hot-button campaign issues anymore. The price tags of the two wars, in the trillions, gets less attention than deficit debates. And in recent months, top forei...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
JoeBlough
The Horror. . .The Horror. . .
03:08 PM on 09/12/2011
The “wars” in Iraq and Afghanistan were trivial pursuits blown out of proportion by the bumbling of Bush/Cheney. It’s hard to take an interest in something that never should have been and has no purpose in continuing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:54 PM on 09/12/2011
Maybe if the media stopped burying the stories, like the over 70 Americans injured by a bomb yesterday in Afganistan which is at the bottom of the World site, we'd do a better job of remembering?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blknightowl
Independent, in thought and voting
06:21 AM on 09/12/2011
Two ongoing wars, secret classified missions, disasters every other day. But hey, they still want to cut taxes.

Yeah, we're patriotic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danglines
03:23 AM on 09/12/2011
And the tea baggers, republicans, and neo-con want more war. How immoral!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:46 AM on 09/12/2011
Wasn't it BHO who involved us in Libya and Yemen?
photo
Boduognat
Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'entrate.
02:06 PM on 09/12/2011
Nopes. Bonzo had Libya bombed 25 years ago whilst he was in Bitburg to salute dead Nazis.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rwaller
My bio never meets guidelines!
11:02 PM on 09/11/2011
The news coverage of Iraq and Afganastan has been a joke. It is the single biggest reason these wars are still going on. This country may be at war but the people have not felt the consequences of war. Only the families of service members have sacraficed and suffered.

This war and all wars should be covered by the press just like they did in Vietnam. Every night the days latest battles and casualties should be broadcast in to every home. It makes it much harder to vote for war if you actually have to witness the carnage.

Americas wars have been sterilized so as to not offend our delicate sensibilities. What we have no feelings about we certainly can't object to.
11:41 PM on 09/11/2011
Viet nam was a friend and ally that was about to get run over by the communist north. That is why we went to help them. And what you fail to realize is the bias of the media. Before I went to Viet nam I was a liberal, But when I came back and saw all the blatant lies and the methods the media was using, like the constant nightly photos of the casualties, but never a report of all the succesful ops and the victories, not a word about all the good things we did for the people there, and I'll never forget the reporter who stuck his microphone in the face of a grieving mother, and said "How do you feel?", I became an instant conservative. And when the people were duped enough to make us pull out of Viet nam, millions died. And now they are a communist country. Happy about that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:19 AM on 09/12/2011
Well said Bob! I watched it on TV as a kid all I seen was hippies bitching and calling troops names! Thx for your sevice already fanned!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rwaller
My bio never meets guidelines!
12:22 AM on 09/12/2011
Usually complete histories are helpful unless you only desire part of the thruth. We got into Vietname because of a treaty Eisenhower entered into with France following the Korean War. Following France's capitulation the US needed a reason to take over and the Gulf of Tonkin was manufactured.

The media was covering a savage war. A war that was driven by body counts. It was US command who wanted the images of dead VC shown, the bodies were the proof. What the command failed to realize is it would be those very images that would turn the American public off to the war. It was NOT a liberal conspiracy. The military would fly the reporters to the scene for the photo ops.

There is no pride in the treatment of Viet Vets, of which I am one. The protesters included the soldier in their rage and that should have never been. It was a disgrace then and now. That does not mean that complete news coverage is not needed. To the contrary, it shows how badly it is needed.
09:45 PM on 09/11/2011
they will start reporting more on the wars when a
Republican is President
most of the press are liberal Dumacrats
so as you can see nothing is reported and
do you notice no protesters?
11:44 PM on 09/11/2011
Exactly....where are all the rioters, and the code pinkers that were demonstrating constantly calling Bush a "war monger"? Nowhere to be seen now. Oh...I forgot...Obama is a democrat. Double standard?????
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:22 AM on 09/12/2011
Yeah since Obamas in office no protests no demanding Gitmo be closed. But watch if someone else becomes POTUS they will be out the next day!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
margiebe
Opinions should be based on some rational thought
04:58 PM on 09/11/2011
The wars should be on the front page of the newspapers daily and should be reported nightly-We have many troops still in harm's way and the reason they are still there is weak-And there should be CONSTANT daily discussion as to how these wars have had a SIGNIFICANT impact on this country's debt-NEVER in the history of this country have we cut taxes during wartime-War is expensive Afghanistan costs 200 million dollars per day-If we are going to have a serious conversation about the deficits this country is running the costs of war need to be included-Otherwise these remembrances on 9-11 of those lost that day and in war is just words
01:48 PM on 09/11/2011
The Wars are not on the Radar for most people, because like Viet Nam, the 2 World Wars, no one in the Country is making a sacrifice for them. Most of the Congressional people certainly don't have any skin in the game, so they can be as reckless as they want to be.


Chaney, Bush did not have any skin in the Game. Mr. Deferment after Deferment Dick Chaney would not know military service if it jumped up and slapped him in the face.

Old Men start wars that young men have to die and fight.

Does that remind you of the Economy. The Congress is not out of a job, retirement benefits, health care, so they could care less about the rest of the Country not having it. Especially the House of Representatives. They want to kill off anything that even resembles helping the Country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The ORF in Largo
Louder than a fart a hurricane
09:00 PM on 09/11/2011
So True and Spot On Our elected officials don't really represent the citizens or listen to them;
its like being in DC is like being in an alternate universe
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sirlarek
∞-1
10:38 PM on 09/11/2011
Cheney had skin in the game....and the service he knew was how much was served to him on a silver platter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bonner99
I want chain-smoking Boehner's healthcare!
10:00 AM on 09/11/2011
Maybe Bush realized that we need the money from oil in Iraq to help fund the war in Afghanistan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Root Wetherell
speaks my mind liberal/ coffeeparty member
01:07 PM on 09/11/2011
thought that was the idea..oil would help finance the war..not sure where that idea went..probably with the billions on a pallat Bush sent to Iraq..not sure we did that either..to enhance Haliburtons profits maybe.???? who knows, but it sure woul dhave helped the deficit here..and selling the oil would have helped cover the war..
Aggiemom
Proud Texas Democrat
06:40 PM on 09/11/2011
Well, one thing we know for sure is that Halliburton made (and continues to make under different names) a few fortunes from the war in Iraq. There is much we will never know about the reasons and profits from that war.
09:16 AM on 09/11/2011
The sad fact is that supporters of President Obama have given him a pass on his wars just like the republicans gave Bush a pass on his and that is why peace has no chance in American foreign policy. Obama is determined to stay in Afghanistan for many years to come even though it is obviously a mission doomed to failure and completely counterproductive at this point on time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Root Wetherell
speaks my mind liberal/ coffeeparty member
01:09 PM on 09/11/2011
he already said he was pulling them out a little at a time..cannot doit all at once..it would be dangerous for the last of them..and Iraq numbers are going down as well...need to stop the wars and cut the war chest funds..that would be a huge help with the budget..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Margo Arrowsmith
Elizabeth Warren in 2016!
07:33 AM on 09/11/2011
Yes, its good to remember the families and their losses, those people were in the wrong place at the wrong time, but certainly didn't deserve what happened to them.

.  Its mandatory to honor the brave people who gave their lives to rescue others. 

But we are still letting those who sacrificed to clean up the mess deal with cancer and other things on their own

And of course, lets forget about all those Americans and even Iraqis who have died and been maimed because 9/11 was used as an excuse for a preplanned war.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Root Wetherell
speaks my mind liberal/ coffeeparty member
01:11 PM on 09/11/2011
well said ..I do agree with that..this war with Iraq wou d have happened anyway..Bush was determined to get Saddam at any costs.. it was more personal than necessary..a look at what it cost us..all based on lies!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:44 AM on 09/11/2011
Headline-with-stupidly-large-font alert.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Traylor
Show your heart first not the fool!
05:30 PM on 09/10/2011
TWO TOWERS TALL

Two majestic towers tall,
From terrorist acts were made to fall.
Tons of rubble caused a quake,
Taking all within its wake.
The mastermind he hid in glee,
The coward said, “Be afraid of me.”
Six thousand people and many more,
Paid the price of hate a fanatic bore.
In the name of Allah he vented his rage,
Then planned a war for others to wage.
So bombs were dropped and soldiers died,
Yet miles away we heard the innocent cry.
As battles rage in the conflict of beliefs,
He made others death his only relief.
Freedom for all is not just a quote,
That some half-baked idiot wrote.
It’s a gift from God to live as we choose,
Without coercion from fanatics turned loose.
The path to use terror is as easy as hate,
But we’ll defend freedom and liberty’s fate.
We always have and we always will,
For our loved ones died to pay the bill.
Steven Traylor
9/11/01
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Root Wetherell
speaks my mind liberal/ coffeeparty member
01:14 PM on 09/11/2011
well written..well said..should be published....F&F.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steven Traylor
Show your heart first not the fool!
05:07 PM on 09/10/2011
A Proclamation to Terrorists of the world
Regardless of all things,

We the People of America and everywhere else that good hardworking people live rebuke you. We do so with a vengeance for life is a gift and a right from whomever or whatever you choose to be your creator.
We believe that anyone who targets children or trains them in acts of violence, or uses them as shields for protection is a TERRORIST.
We also affirm that anyone who targets non-military personnel or military personnel on a peaceful mission is a TERRORIST.
We believe that anyone who uses religion as the justifier of acts of violence is a TERRORIST.
We proclaim in our hearts that those who support or claim acts of violence, as TERRORISTS.
We believe that children are the future of the world and a testament of the joy and laughter that is the right of every man woman and child in the universe.
We proclaim now for the good, dignity, honor and advancement of the human race that we will pursue by every means available to us and our allies those who use or support terrorism and eliminate them whenever they choose to not lay down their weapons and surrender peacefully.
This is now the time to end violence and mend the hatreds of the world and to bring to life the many cultures that makes this earth the most unique collection of peoples living for the good and greatness of humanity.