iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Jobs Plan Could Add Well Over One Million Jobs: Analysis

First Posted: 09/09/11 09:55 AM ET Updated: 11/09/11 05:12 AM ET

(Stella Dawson) - President Barack Obama's jobs package could lift economic growth by one to three percentage points in 2012, add well over one million jobs and lower the unemployment rate by at least half a percentage point, judging by early estimates.

It might not exactly deliver the "jolt" Obama claimed in his speech to Congress Thursday night, but it would be enough to make a difference.

The basic idea is to give a sufficient boost to get the stalled recovery over the hump where households, banks and businesses have paid down more of their debt loads and regained the confidence to start spending, lending and hiring again.

Once demand picks up, the private sector will kick in and begin hiring, and the fiscal props can fall away.

It would deliver the economic medicine prescribed in recent weeks by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and the International Monetary Fund to prevent a worrisome slowdown in global economic growth from turning into recession.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner also can assure his fellow finance officials at the G7 meeting of top industrial nations in Marseilles on Friday the United States is pulling its weight.

The wild card of course is whether a Republican-dominated House of Representatives will agree to the full $447 billion package, an unlikely prospect given their criticism that the $830 billion stimulus program of February 2009 failed to deliver lift-off for the economy and added to the huge budget deficit.

The U.S. economy is so scarred by the 2007 housing credit implosion, the bank failures it triggered in 2008 and the deepest recession in 70 years that it is taking a very long time to recover and create jobs.

"What you come down to is that there is no silver bullet, no magic bullet that this president or anyone can propose that would drive unemployment down to 5 percent in the next year," said Joel Prakken, chairman of Macroeconomic Advisers, an economic modeling firm in St. Louis.

"It has to come from the private sector and for that you have to work through the overhang from the housing crisis that is suppressing aggregate demand," he said.

This suggests that Obama's jobs program most likely would serve as a palliative, not a cure, leaving room for the Federal Reserve to provide further monetary stimulus to keep the economy from slipping back into recession.

BUILD AMERICA

Analysts at Capital Economics estimated that Obama's plan is equivalent to 3 percent of U.S. GDP and should be enough to add significantly to 2012 growth if passed in full by Congress.

The biggest single boost could come from a $250 billion reduction in payroll taxes. Obama proposes extending an existing 2 percent cut in the payroll tax and increasing its size to 3.1 percent for workers, and adding a cut for employers.

"These payroll tax reductions are the proposals that have the greatest chance of getting passed by Congress because it will be harder for Republicans to vote against proposed tax cuts," said Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist for Capital Economics.

The tax cuts could add as much as $375 billion to economic output to the $14 trillion U.S. economy, based upon Congressional Budget Office estimates in August of the economic impact that fiscal stimulus programs can have on GDP.

But not all of that would be fresh stimulus money, since a $112 billion payroll tax cut is already in place and would simply be extended. Additionally, the full impact would be lessened because it does not target lower income workers.

"It gives money disproportionately to people at the top of the income scale. Higher income individuals are more likely to save the money, they don't need to spend it on essentials, so the effective impact is lessened," said Roberton Williams, senior fellow at the centrist Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center.

Still Macroeconomic Advisers estimated that the 2 percent payroll tax cut extension alone would add 400,000 jobs and boost GDP in 2012 by 0.5 percent. The larger sum might increase that to roughly 0.7 percent GDP and 600,000 jobs.

The second biggest element in Obama's plan is the $105 billion in infrastructure investment, which could add as much as $262 billion to the economy, based on the CBO figures.

Macroeconomic Advisers estimates that could create about 150,000 new jobs in the first year and add over half a million jobs over three years -- good news but small for an economy that usually generates over two million jobs a year when in good health.

The challenge also would be to find "shovel-ready" projects where highways, railroads or school renovation plans are on the drawing board awaiting funding. Otherwise it can take years to get major construction projects under way.

Extending unemployment benefits, which total $49 billion in Obama's plan, also has a significant impact. It could add up to $102 billion to the economy. Macroeconomic Advisers estimates it would add 0.25 percent to GDP growth in 2012 and create 200,000 new jobs by putting extra cash in consumers' pockets.

Economists were re-running computer models late on Thursday to update their figures. Based on a smaller $300 billion stimulus package that Obama unveiled, Ian Shepherdson, U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics, had estimated a 1.3 percent boost to GDP and 1.7 million jobs over the life of the programs.

Their initial reaction was if it were adopted in full, which is quite unlikely, the plan would lower the 9.1 percent unemployment rate closer to 8 percent in 2012 and give a welcome boost to an economy that grew at a 1 percent annual rate in the second quarter. But it is does not guarantee solid recovery.

"Is this going to be more than a panacea for our problems? It is hard to tell," said Williams. "This downturn has been deeper and longer than anything we have seen since the 1930s and we don't fully understand it. What we do know is that what we did in 2009 was not big enough."

(Editing by Mary Milliken and Philip Barbara)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
(Stella Dawson) - President Barack Obama's jobs package could lift economic growth by one to three percentage points in 2012, add well over one million jobs and lower the unemployment rate by at l...
(Stella Dawson) - President Barack Obama's jobs package could lift economic growth by one to three percentage points in 2012, add well over one million jobs and lower the unemployment rate by at l...
Filed by Harry Bradford  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 304
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
12:30 PM on 09/12/2011
The adminstration is full of it !!! they bring in these analysts to say what ever the Obama administration wants said. This administration doesnt have a clue !! THIS SAME THING didnt help last time what makes you think it will this time. IT WONT another 500 billion of our grandkids money down a rat hole of corrupt politics !! The GOP better no approve this or you will see a total revamping of Congress - got it Boehnor ????
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
02:38 PM on 09/12/2011
The value of money is what it buys. You can't eat today the bread that is baked tomorrow. Our grandkids will handle the debt the same way we have done, they will monetize it and let the buying value of the dollar readjust. We are paying right now today for the money we "borrow" from the Fed in higher prices (the equivalent of a price plus a tax) or when we use unemployment to resist inflation -- even while this means many people who want to work do not get to make their contribution to America's wealth.

As we talk of experts who support the administration's programs, the point is not that they are government employees supporting the government's programs BUT that they were hired as experts to design the government's programs and are now talking them up in order to set up the programs that experts approved.
09:59 AM on 09/12/2011
The government hasn't got anything right in the last decade, they've lied about everything, they've stolen wealth from the people, totally messed up the economy, and we are expected to believe them this time... "I don't think so Tim"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
02:30 PM on 09/12/2011
I am inclined to agree the federal government was badly managed during the past decade, particularly during the years of the Bush administration. Some think the Obama administration is making two kinds of mistakes: 1) They are continuing Bush policies and 2) they are not following Bush policies. Frankly, I think this administration would do better if Congress approved their appointees and they had a full team.
06:01 AM on 09/12/2011
Obama needs to become pro business. Shrink government by eliminating most of the new czars, and other worthless agencies he created, something like 140+ new agencies, and use the money saved to pay for infrastructure. Stop the NLRB suit. I would also say stop the DOJ suit against AT&T, the jobs were going to be lost otherwise as T-Mobile planned on halting US operations anyway. Get rid of even half of the 100's of new regulations that have been instituted by this Administration to show a pro-business stance. Finally, America has to recognize the good and the BAD that Unions can cause. Let's regulate Unions. Obama needs to be more concerned about what is right for America than where he is going to get the funds for reelection.
05:57 AM on 09/12/2011
But this is so typical of Obama and the Democrats. He wants to spend $ 1/2 trillion dollars, which he claims will be paid for in some way (read revenue enhancement or more taxes) to create 1 million jobs. This is $500,000 per job!!!! Just give every American $25,000 and be fair. It's called redistributing the wealth. What is really sad is that 1 move and some changes in attitude will create 1 million new jobs. Obama has done nothing to stop the NLRB suit against Boeing. The NAM says they have 1 million jobs on hold waiting to see what happens for fear they would be next if they expanded in the wrong state. This whole jobs problem could be fixed with a few simple changes in attitude.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
02:24 PM on 09/12/2011
Boeing officials bragged to the press that they were illegally punishing their workers for exerting their legal rights. The NLRB chose to enforce the laws. Yes, union jobs are good jobs for people who sweat and actually make things. Is it really necessary for America to disrespect such people?
06:43 PM on 09/12/2011
Bill W, must be an alcoholic. Show m the page where Boeing made such a statement, ludicrous. Boeing built a new factory in South Carolina at the state's request. They created over 1000 new jobs. They took none from Washington. The UNION asked the NLRB to stop the move because South Carolina is a right to work state. Grow up and start telling the truth. Let people know the real truth and make decisions based on truth not BS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PARepublican
Advocate for personal responsibility
11:08 PM on 09/11/2011
This sounds like the Health Care bill. Pass it and we will save Billions.
06:02 AM on 09/12/2011
And don't read it until after we pass it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
02:44 PM on 09/12/2011
People with good health insurance policies will have their bills paid and can use all of the health care services rather than wait until dire straits bring them to the emergency rooms. This will involve more medical aides rather than doctors -- whom we may have too few -- and include the kind of care that will relieve the pressure on the ERs.

This will save LIVES.
09:45 PM on 09/11/2011
can't wait for jobs saved claims.....
photo
rabiddog6708
This Dog's bite is Worse Than his Bark
05:23 PM on 09/11/2011
It is simple math. Obama's jobs plan is $450 billion and several economists predict that it would create 1 million jobs. That is something like $400,000 per job. The government could hire people directly like FDR did with the WPA in the Great Depression at $50,000 per job and pur 9 million people to work. Over half of Obama's jobs plan is tax cuts.....h­is stimulus bill was 40% tax cuts.....t­ax cuts do not create jobs, if they did than after 10 years of Dubya's tax cuts, we would not have the unemployme­nt problem we have today. 70% of our economy comes from consumer spending and people are not spending because they have no money or holding back for fear of losing their jobs. 9 million new jobs at $50,000 wages would give them money to spend, which would create demand and this would lead businesses to hire even more people to meet this demand. Give a guy a tax break and he may or may not use it to hire someone, but get 9 million more people buying things with their wages (many from this guy) and he is going to hire new workers to service these new customers.
06:08 AM on 09/12/2011
I agree. The real way to create jobs is to help businesses create jobs. Pull the NLRB off Boeing's back. Pay those on unemployment to take the new jobs created. Reform Unions, who make everything cost more. Reform entitlement programs to be sure people really qualify. Control liability issues to make it easier to make new products. While I would love lower taxes, now is not the time.
06:12 AM on 09/12/2011
Also if Obama would stop his demand for insourcing. When he took office insourcing became mandatory. It costs the government 150% of what it costs private labor to do the same job. If you stop insourcing and reverse all those done in the last 3 years, you reduce government costs by 23%, eliminating the deficit, and there is no loss of jobs, just shifting them. You also increase tax income, actually creating a surplus. Unfortunately obama won't do this because the bigger benefactor of insourcing were African Americans, the govt goes by points for being a minority, etc., while the private sector goes by competence and job performance.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
05:02 PM on 09/11/2011
with this rosy outlook why didnt they pass this instead of the stimulus.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Botany5000
02:23 PM on 09/11/2011
Obama claimed the ARRA stimulus plan was Keynesian.
It wasn't.
Keynes requires that the government spend its money in the private sector
ONLY on infrastructure jobs that increase productivity.

Nearly half of the ARRA money ended up in the pockets of police, fire,
school teachers, state and local bureaucrats for ding the jobs they already had
-----------------------------------------------distinctly non stimulus.

Why should we expect him to do anything different from the first time?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
04:07 PM on 09/11/2011
I believe you are essentially right. There is another way to frame this: The state and local bureaucrats could have lost their jobs. The stimulus was more a stubborn retreat than an attack. 38k government jobs lost in one month this year must roll through the economy, cutting consumption, carrying others along in the retreat.

Keynes was more versatile than you allow him. He and Harry Dexter White established the Bretton Woods accord which had prevented a return of the Depression without vast stimulus subsidies and until now when it has largely been revoked. Besides, consider the TVA which provided cheap power to the Tennessee Valley. The shovels were federal but the modern power was commercial. The jobs of building the TVA were real work with good wages while the lifestyle improvement was personal and general.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
05:05 PM on 09/11/2011
keynes also should have some positive hope with it....instead of beating up capitalism and not helping with consumer confidence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
02:19 PM on 09/12/2011
Can you seriously say that this administration is beating up capitalism while companies and investment banks are making record profits? Consumers have more to worry about. A case has been cited of a woman who lost her job, then found another at half the pay. She said, she is spending less now.

Well, duh...
12:34 PM on 09/11/2011
My belief is that if you work with the people who are putting out that effort in a plan to help themselves but can't fully spur profits for business due to the lack of hours and earnings; then why don't you focus on what you can do to help. If Company A can't hire someone full-time (if they haven't done so why start now) perhaps Company B can make available a few hours per day to help spur the economy on or perhaps help Company A increase earnings and hours for employees (they should be getting the money and tax credits) for the seasonals, part-timers, underemployed (start there is what I'm saying).
12:19 PM on 09/11/2011
My belief is that if you didn't have a plan then work with people who at the very least are putting out that effort themselves; they need your support and that is the underemployed and part-timers work with them to increase spending and spur job growth with what we already have!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
It's better than a reality show.
08:17 PM on 09/11/2011
The corporations will not increase the part-timers hours. They are more profitable by keeping them in this capacity. No worries about paying benefits of any kind, and highly disposable.
12:16 PM on 09/11/2011
As far as I am concerned businesses should have been hiring if they could have and should have; they don't need to be waiting on a $4,000 tax credit which only adds to the confusion. People working for two months for free isn't going to spur increased spending; personally I liked the other ideas from the other programs which I know for a fact would have increased spending immediately which is what we need so that business can hire!
06:16 AM on 09/12/2011
The NAM has said that they have over 1 million jobs on hold because of the antibusiness attitude of this administration. The Boeing suit by the NLRB is directly cited by over 50% of the members. I agree we don't need tax credits. We need to stop the mandatory insourcing that Obama instituted when he took office. Govt does the same job at 150% of the cost. They hire based on a point system, highest points to Inuit women from Alaska. The care not about ability or job performance.
12:08 PM on 09/11/2011
The problem is that there isn't enough money in the hands of people who could use that money to spend on purchases that would make a difference in productivity in this country and that is underemployed or part-time (increase earnings or hours or both; that is where I believe an effective jobs plan should start!
photo
stingjim
Conservative
03:06 PM on 09/11/2011
Have you noticed we are BROKE. 46 cents of every dollar America has is borrowed money. China owns us and all Obama wants to do is borrow more and you really believe you will receive other people's money??. Keep Drinking That Obama Koolaid.!!!
03:19 PM on 09/11/2011
You are misunderstanding what I am saying; what are you proposing with YOUR JOBS plan then asking people who can't afford more taxes to do!!!
03:21 PM on 09/11/2011
I'm NOT included in YOUR Jobs plan!
12:03 PM on 09/11/2011
Nobody I know is going to go down the road of consuming on future expectations!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billw8017
History looks like this
04:24 PM on 09/11/2011
Except, of course, month by month by credit card borrowings. If more people paid cash for their homes, we wouldn't have this mortgage crisis.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
glassbender
'nothing to see here'
08:09 AM on 09/11/2011
it wont, thanks to the gop,'whity keeping the blackman DOWN'
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Botany5000
02:26 PM on 09/11/2011
Had your union English teachers taught you how to write an English sentence,
perhaps you might be creditable.
BUT
Considering that didn't, what I can decipher makes no sense, anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arts4u
It's better than a reality show.
08:24 PM on 09/11/2011
credible, not creditable. Your second sentence is incorrect as well.

Perhaps your English teacher let you down as well?