iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Novak Djokovic Eliminates Roger Federer In U.S. Open Semifinals

Djokovic Federer

EDDIE PELLS   09/10/11 11:49 PM ET   AP

NEW YORK — Facing two match points against a beloved player whose name is already in the history books, Novak Djokovic clenched his jaw, nodded his head and flashed an ever-so-slight glimpse of a smile.

"I would lie if I say I didn't think I'm going to lose," Djokovic said.

Might as well go down swinging then, right?

He turned violently on a wide, 108 mph serve from Roger Federer for a cross-court, forehand winner that barely nicked the line. The fans in Arthur Ashe Stadium, ready to explode for a Federer victory, instead found themselves taking a cue from Djokovic – who raised his hands, asking them to pump up the volume, and give him a little more love.

About 10 minutes later, those fans were dancing with Djoko as he boogied at center court to celebrate an epic U.S. Open semifinal win – one in which he dug out of a two-set hole, then saved two match points to beat Federer for the second straight year.

Top-seeded Djokovic won 6-7 (7), 4-6, 6-3, 6-2, 7-5 Saturday to improve to 63-2 on the year and set up a rematch in the final against No. 2 Rafael Nadal, who beat No. 4 Andy Murray 6-4, 6-2, 3-6, 6-2 in the second semifinal.

In the first match, Djokovic completed only his second career comeback from two sets down, while Federer lost a two-set lead for the second time in less than three months after going 178-0 lifetime before this year's Wimbledon quarterfinals.

It all turned on one shot.

"The forehand return, I cannot explain to you because I don't know how it happened," Djokovic said. "I read his serve and I was on the ball and I had to hit it hard, and it got in, luckily for me."

Nadal beat Djokovic in the final last year, but Djokovic is 5-0 against the Spaniard this year. All the meetings have been in tournament finals, including Wimbledon. On Monday, Nadal must try to stop the losing streak against a player who will come into the final on the high of a win he called definitely the biggest of the year and "one of the biggest wins of the career under the circumstances."

"He's obviously the favorite for the final, and I know I have to do something better than the other matches to try to change the situation," Nadal said.

Djokovic spent much of the first two sets shaking his head, commiserating with the folks in his players box, even folding his hands in mock prayer. Then, he turned things around suddenly and unexpectedly.

He got an early break in the third to capture the momentum, and as the match wore on, the prospect of Federer grabbing it back, let alone getting a match point, seemed bleak.

In the fourth set, Djokovic placed 16 of 20 of his first serves in and tore off his first 15 service points to easily push the match to the distance.

The fifth-set end-game started with Djokovic serving at 3-4 and stringing together an uncharacteristically bad game, getting broken at love on two mishit forehands, a framer of Federer's that set up a winner and a double fault on a second serve that missed the line by about a foot.

After missing a backhand to open his service game at 5-3, Federer hit three straight serves Djokovic couldn't get back. That gave him two match points, same as he had last year against Djokovic in the semifinals, and the fans were squarely on his side, as he stood oh-so-close to making his 24th Grand Slam final and moving a win away from adding to his record 16 Grand Slam titles.

But Djokovic isn't putting together one of the greatest seasons in tennis history for nothing. And Federer wasn't totally convinced the shot that turned the match was legit. He said the Djokovic winner reminded him of shots hit by players he played as a kid – who fall behind, then start taking huge chances when they feel they have nothing else to lose.

"I never played that way," Federer said. "I believe in the hard-work's-going-to-pay-off kind of thing, because early on, maybe I didn't always work at my hardest. So for me, this is very hard to understand how can you play a shot like that on match point. But, look, maybe he's been doing it for 20 years, so for him it was very normal. You've got to ask him."

But Federer couldn't put it away on his second match point, either.

There, his serve hit the back of the line and jammed Djokovic, but somehow Djokovic got it back. Federer cranked a forehand, but it ticked the net and ricocheted out. Federer sprayed a forehand wide at deuce and suddenly, a crowd gearing for a Federer win was shouting "No-vak! No-vak! No-vak!"

Djokovic said it was no insult that the fans had been behind Federer, who makes some kind of history seemingly every time he steps on a court.

Still, the current world No. 1 wasn't giving up on capturing their hearts. Which was why he made a scene between the match points – an awkward time for showmanship, though one Federer said he had no problem with.

"At that stage, you're trying to get as much support as you can," Djokovic said. "You're trying to get energy."

Stoked with that energy, Djokovic won the last four games and, counting the two match points he saved, he took 17 of the final 21 points.

The match took 3 hours, 51 minutes, while Nadal's win was a 3 hour-24 minute affair.

But thanks to the rain that scrubbed two days of play from this tournament and reshuffled the schedule, Djokovic and Nadal will get a day's rest between the semifinal and the Monday final. It's a break from the long U.S. Open tradition of closing things out on back-to-back days on the weekend.

Murray and Nadal were each playing their third match in three days and the toll showed more on Murray, who had the tougher road.

"We knew it was going to be like that for quite a few days and just tried to get through it and deal with it the best way we could," Murray said. "But it was never going to be easy."

Fittingly, given how things have gone lately, the start of the Federer-Djokovic semifinal was delayed for about an hour because showers began falling shortly before the players were supposed to walk on court, which had "9/11/01" painted in white to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks.

That made it an even longer wait for the headliners of the night session, Serena Williams and Caroline Wozniacki, who were scheduled for the featured women's semifinal. In the other women's semifinal, No. 9 Sam Stosur beat Angelique Kerber 6-3, 2-6, 6-2 on the Grandstand Court.

In the men's opener, Djokovic avenged one of his only two losses this season. He fell to Federer in the French Open to snap a string of 43 straight victories – the third-longest win streak in the Open era.

Federer, meanwhile, was trying to win at least one Grand Slam tournament for the ninth straight season and appeared more than ready to keep the quest alive.

For two sets, at least.

After that, Djokovic turned into a steamroller, leaving the unmistakable feeling that a shift of power was being completed – from Federer, who won three Grand Slam tournaments each in 2004, 2006 and 2007, to Djokovic, who is trying to do it this year, along with Nadal, who is still very much in that mix.

Nadal and Djokovic will meet for the third time over the last five Grand Slam finals.

But even with the loss, Federer showed he's not done.

To move within a point of the match after the way Djokovic played the third and fourth sets was a testament to what the 30-year-old still has left in the tank.

"I did all the right things in so many tournaments," Federer said. "But like I said, sometimes in sports it just goes the other way. Maybe you've already won so much that it evens it out a bit sometimes. I don't know."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SPORTS

NEW YORK — Facing two match points against a beloved player whose name is already in the history books, Novak Djokovic clenched his jaw, nodded his head and flashed an ever-so-slight glimpse of ...
NEW YORK — Facing two match points against a beloved player whose name is already in the history books, Novak Djokovic clenched his jaw, nodded his head and flashed an ever-so-slight glimpse of ...
Filed by Michael Klopman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 418
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
02:22 AM on 09/13/2011
I see many comments along the line of "Federer lost, he didn't give him credit for that incredible return, so he is a bad looser". I feel you have to try to understand a bit more of the world of (top-)players.
They asked Murray and Nadal. Murray answered: "He hit it more out of frustration than anything." Nadal saw it as an incredible gambling shot, and felt a bit for Federer that such a thing happened to him. One of them considered it a "2-out-of-10-shot". Djokovic himself admitted he thought he was going to loose. So I think it is fair to say it was a desperate shot by somebody who already considered his case (almost) lost.
Now, the reaction of Federer is much more understandable. From his point of view and his approach to tennis it was very bitter and hard to swallow that an opponent "got away" with such a shot, preventing him from winning, at that point. (Indeed, I can't recall Federer having made a shot like that when down.) That is very different from "sour grapes".
What is true, however, is that, on this occasion, he didn't give a lot of credit to Djokovic, apart from "he played really well the third and fourth set". If you read the whole post-match interview, one cannot help but sense that he doesn't have a lot of admiration/sympathy for Djokovic, in sharp contrast with how he expresses himself about Nadal.
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
01:41 PM on 09/12/2011
One of my favorite matches of all time!!! Go Nole!!
photo
JJovana
Live & let live
01:35 PM on 09/12/2011
Roger is a lifeless robot without personality. The only time he expresses personality is when he's being rude and whiny when he loses. Go Novak :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnrc75
My micro-bio is not empty
07:55 PM on 09/11/2011
Well I guess if Federer didn't have a problem with Djokovic's showmanship after Federer's first wasted match point, then I don't. It was touch-and-go but kudos to Novak for hanging tough. It was a hell of a match. Good luck to both he and Nadal. It should be a great match.
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
01:46 PM on 09/12/2011
Did you hear what Roger said about that shot? It was the first time I ever heard him sound like a poor sport, "I never played that way," Federer said. "I believe in the hard-work's-going-to-pay-off kind of thing,..." As if being able to make that shot did not require hard work nor does being able to play 5 sets while down in score the whole time. Shame Roger.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnrc75
My micro-bio is not empty
02:03 PM on 09/12/2011
Yeah, I hadn't known about this side of Roger. It makes it easier for me to not be a fan of him anymore. It's truly very poor sportsmanship and it's exactly the sort of denial of reality which will ensure he doesn't win another major.
UcheJadore
I Voted Obama/Biden x2
04:29 PM on 09/11/2011
I don't mean to change the subject, but Djokovic needs to see a Dermatologist fast. Did anyone else notice his neck and chest? Couldn't help it.
photo
lisaman
I am a liberal American so get over it
01:47 PM on 09/12/2011
I actually did. Rather spotty. Not sure what would have caused that.
03:13 PM on 09/11/2011
Federer is a class act. He will always be considered one of the best (if not the best) tennis champs in the history of the sport. I was hoping for a Federer vs. Nadal final but now I won't have to decide who to root for......go Nadal all the way!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Montesquieu MM
03:17 PM on 09/11/2011
Class act? I guess you didn't watch the post match interview. I'm still amazed how many people are duped by Federer. One of the best tennis players? Absolutely. But please don't go on about this nonsense about class act.
Greenblue
Whatever doesn't kill you, makes you stranger :P
04:25 PM on 09/11/2011
I know, couldn't believe how b*tthurt he was. Absolutely one of the greatest players of all time but that interview was unprecedented. Not even a beginner would have said those things about his opponent.
06:46 PM on 09/11/2011
well said - it's not been a rare occurrence with him either - he has gotten a boatload of slack over the years after similar utterances - shows alot about one's true character - he just cannot bring himself to pay djokovic any compliment - i mean really the guy is 63 and 2 on the year and he cant laud him in any way? it's because federer has never had a year like it even at his best
photo
blacklace382
â¥â„’ivℯ⣠⤠ღ â„’ovℯâ£áƒ¦ ♥ â„’aughâ
03:31 PM on 09/11/2011
I agree, Federer is the best and is a winner all around, but will be routing for Novak, and actually wished Murray had beaten Nadal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JaneB3
Hillary 2016
02:47 PM on 09/11/2011
Well somebody had to win to play Rafa on Monday. Go Rafa!
savethecountry
We Could Build THE DREAM With Love
01:44 PM on 09/11/2011
This was originally posted yesterday, then it disappeared:

Fed's recent problems with closing out matches in the majors, including dropping 2 matches this year after building 2-set leads (to Tsonga at Wimbledon and to Djokovic today) for the first time in his career, have been more psychological than physical. Against the top players Roger can't keep his focus for much longer than 2 consecutive sets. His win versus Novak at this year's French, halting Djokovic's 43-match winning streak, followed by 3 good sets against Rafa in the French final, his first 2 sets against Tsonga at Wimbledon and his first 2 sets today against Novak prove that Fed's game is still big enough to win majors, but these lapses in focus will prove to be tougher to solve than any problems he might have had with his stroke mechanics or physical conditioning, particularly given Fed's stubbornness to make changes. After establishing the gold standard for grand-slam singles titles for men, is Fed as hungry as he used to be? I don't know.

Djokovic, on the other hand, showed the resilience of a champion today after being outplayed in the first 2 sets. I think he and the other top male players are aware of the psychological chink in Fed's armor and know that if they hang in there Fed's level of play may drop.
photo
blacklace382
â¥â„’ivℯ⣠⤠ღ â„’ovℯâ£áƒ¦ ♥ â„’aughâ
03:32 PM on 09/11/2011
as I have told my kids, you cannot stay on top forever!!!!! Let's see if anyone else can be almost invincible for four years straight.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:39 PM on 09/11/2011
Roger is and always be the best!
11:40 AM on 09/11/2011
WHERE is the story about Serena defeating Wozniacki in the the semis last night??? I guess you'll just include it in the story when Serena wins the final today, right??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Luuke
12:56 PM on 09/11/2011
tabloids are closed on Sunday....Even Nadal's win over Murray isn't posted ....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SalesmanForLife
Feed your intellectual appetite!
01:04 PM on 09/11/2011
This story was reported while Serena was in play so you can relax a bit and know no one is skirting her. Check the sports page, there is a story there.
01:34 PM on 09/11/2011
You're wrong. There is no story about Serena currently on the sports page now, while there IS a story about the lesser known Stosur winning her semifinal match. And the story you're talking about was written BEFORE Serena's match (a prediction) and is now gone from the main sports page.
photo
Dj Tenchu
y u mad tho?
10:49 AM on 09/11/2011
um boooooooo?
10:28 AM on 09/11/2011
Roger quite playing before the match was over. I didn't hear his comments but he did kind of let his mind wander a critical time in the match and let a couple of loose balls fly and that was the difference. I like both players and both played extremely well pushing the contest to 5 full sets and nearly a tie breaker in the fifth set. So kudo's to both, Novak was just a little bit better yesterday.
10:17 AM on 09/11/2011
awww Roger :( you're still the best!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Genep34
stop the nightmare, end the GOP
11:50 AM on 09/11/2011
indeed - and a class act too
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnrc75
My micro-bio is not empty
07:58 PM on 09/11/2011
No, he's not a class act...he could barely acknowledge that first winner at match point was a hell of a shot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Martha T
We ARE the people!!
01:42 PM on 09/11/2011
no, not really.....
10:11 AM on 09/12/2011
to me he is.....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
J0E1
Don't blame me, I'm not a republicrat.
09:58 AM on 09/11/2011
"I never played that way," Federer said. "I believe in the hard-work's-going-to-pay-off kind of thing"
"Maybe you've already won so much that it evens it out a bit sometimes."
Oh and if you actually watched the end of the match he compared Djokovic's shot to that of a desperate Junior level player who knew he was going to lose.

Stay classy Federer.
Dastius-Krazitauc
I wouldn't tech them peas o' hern.
10:50 AM on 09/11/2011
Yeah, I saw the interview. Federer sneered at the suggestion there was anything "confident" about Djokovic's shot.
01:00 PM on 09/11/2011
he got what he deserved, a loss
photo
iRock
and that's all that needs to be said...
09:44 AM on 09/11/2011
I love Djokovic and I'm so glad he won in the fashion he did!

But can someone tell me why there's no story about Serena beating the #1 seed and making her way back to the final after that match last night?

I mean NOWHERE on the sports page.
11:13 AM on 09/11/2011
The only reason Wozniacki is #1 is because the better women have been injured. Nobody expected anything but Serena to win. And today, she will get her trophy back.
photo
iRock
and that's all that needs to be said...
02:27 PM on 09/11/2011
Let's hope so, Rusty!

I can't wait for the match! Something tells me that Stoser is going to give her a run for her money though!
photo
GEM-592
Edit your micro-bio.
12:33 AM on 09/12/2011
Or NOT