iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Clergy Sex Abuse Victims File International Court Case Against Pope (VIDEO)

MIKE CORDER and RACHEL ZOLL   09/13/11 09:47 PM ET   AP

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — Clergy sex abuse victims upset that no high-ranking Roman Catholic leaders have been prosecuted for sheltering guilty priests have turned to the International Criminal Court, seeking an investigation of the pope and top Vatican cardinals for possible crimes against humanity. The Vatican called the move a "ludicrous publicity stunt."

The Center for Constitutional Rights, a New York-based nonprofit legal group, requested the inquiry Tuesday on behalf of the U.S.-based Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, arguing that the global church has maintained a "long-standing and pervasive system of sexual violence" despite promises to swiftly oust predators.

The Vatican's U.S. lawyer, Jeffrey Lena, called the complaint a "ludicrous publicity stunt and a misuse of international judicial processes" in a statement to The Associated Press.

The complaint names Pope Benedict XVI, partly in his former role as leader of the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which in 2001 explicitly gained responsibility for overseeing abuse cases; Cardinal William Levada, who now leads that office; Cardinal Angelo Sodano, the Vatican secretary of state under Pope John Paul II; and Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, who now holds that post.

Attorneys for the victims say rape, sexual violence and torture are considered a crime against humanity as described in the international treaty that spells out the court's mandate. The complaint also accuses Vatican officials of creating policies that perpetuated the damage, constituting an attack against a civilian population.

Barbara Blaine, president of the Survivors Network, said going to the court was a last resort.

"We have tried everything we could think of to get them to stop and they won't," she told The Associated Press. "If the pope wanted to, he could take dramatic action at any time that would help protect children today and in the future, and he refuses to take the action."

The odds against the court opening an investigation are enormous. The prosecutor has received nearly 9,000 independent proposals for inquiries since 2002, when the court was created as the world's only permanent war crimes tribunal, and has never opened a formal investigation based solely on such a request.

Instead, prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo has investigated crimes such as genocide, murder, rape and conscripting child soldiers in conflicts from Darfur to this year's violence in Libya. Such cases have been referred to the court by the countries where the atrocities were perpetrated or by the U.N. Security Council.

Also, the Holy See is not a member state of the court, meaning prosecutors have no automatic jurisdiction there, although the complaint covers alleged abuse in countries around the world, many of which do recognize the court's jurisdiction.

"Politically, people do not want to look at this," said Center for Constitutional Rights attorney Pam Spees before walking to the court with victims to hand prosecutors boxes full of documents.

But Spees conceded she was "not hopeful" the court would launch an investigation.

The prosecutor's office said in a statement the evidence would be studied. "We first have to analyze whether the alleged crimes fall under the Court's jurisdiction," it said.

Attorneys for the Survivors Network argued that no other national entity exists that will prosecute high-level Vatican officials who failed to protect children.

In the U.S., no Roman Catholic bishop has been criminally charged for keeping accused clergy in parish jobs without warning parents or police. Within the church, only the pope can discipline bishops. The few who have been publicly punished by the Vatican have been sanctioned for molesting children, not for negligence in supervising priests.

"When a church has been left to its own devices it does nothing. It wouldn't even have the reforms it has now if these cases hadn't begun to bubble up and erupt in the public outside the confines of what the church can control," said Spees.

The Survivors Network and victims are pursuing the case as the abuse scandal, once dismissed as an American problem by the Vatican, intensifies around the world. Thousands of people have come forward in Ireland, Germany and elsewhere with reports of abusive priests, bishops who covered up for them and Vatican officials who moved so slowly to respond that molesters often stayed on the job for decades.

Vatican officials and church leaders elsewhere have apologized repeatedly, clarified or toughened church policies on ousting abusers and, in the U.S. alone, paid out nearly $3 billion in settlements to victims and removed hundreds of priests. Bishops insist they fully grasp the devastation that molestation causes to victims and the limits that dioceses must impose on abusive clergy.

However, the scandal is far from resolved.

The Vatican is fighting on multiple legal fronts in the U.S. against lawsuits alleging the Holy See is liable for abusive priests. Just last month, the Vatican was forced to turn over internal personnel files of an abusive priest to lawyers representing a victim in Oregon.

Those prosecutions also could form an impediment to the ICC taking the case. The tribunal is a court of last resort, meaning it will only take cases where legal authorities elsewhere are unwilling or unable to prosecute.

Also, the court doesn't investigate crimes that occurred before its 2002 creation. A study commissioned by the U.S. bishops from the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York found abuse claims had peaked in the 1970s, then began declining sharply in 1985, as the bishops and society in general gained awareness of the problem.

But Blaine said the abuse continues and she wants church leaders to face justice.

"These priests and church officials live by some other law," she said. "Somehow they're not held accountable like every other citizen of a nation. That would be horrific in and of itself but what must end is shattering the innocence of even one more child."

____

Center for Constitutional Rights: http://ccrjustice.org/

____

Zoll reported from New York. Associated Press writer Nicole Winfield contributed to this report from Rome.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — Clergy sex abuse victims upset that no high-ranking Roman Catholic leaders have been prosecuted for sheltering guilty priests have turned to the International Criminal C...
THE HAGUE, Netherlands — Clergy sex abuse victims upset that no high-ranking Roman Catholic leaders have been prosecuted for sheltering guilty priests have turned to the International Criminal C...
Filed by Eline Gordts  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,637
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (35 total)
08:41 PM on 09/15/2011
ABUSIVE Priests - What A Contradiction
01:08 PM on 09/15/2011
One thing we can do in the States is make sending your child to a Catholic school or leaving them alone in the company of a priest punishable as neglect and endangerment. Considering the amount of intense anxiety the US has on this issue, I'm surprised there isn't something in place where the parents are held accountable, knowing in advance these pedophile priests are miraculously exempt from prosecution... then again. The Vatican got their immunity from the Nazis as reward for not speaking out against the murder of the Jews, so it's pretty suspicious they still have it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bagelmaven
08:41 AM on 09/15/2011
GOOD!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
03:40 AM on 09/15/2011
See this article from "Catholic News":

SYDNEY (CNS) -- The primate of the Traditional Anglican Communion said he left the Catholic priesthood years ago after being sexually abused as a seminarian and young priest in the 1960s and 1970s. Archbishop John Hepworth, leader of the Traditional Anglican Communion, a breakaway group of Anglicans seeking membership in the Anglican ordinariate established by Pope Benedict XVI, told The Australian newspaper about his ordeal after he said his complaint against the one surviving alleged abuser was not investigated by the Archdiocese of Adelaide. Similar complaints filed against two now-deceased priests in the Archdiocese of Melbourne led to a compensation payment to Archbishop Hepworth, the newspaper reported. The case became embroiled in controversy after an Australian senator publicly identified the accused living priest, despite privacy and legal concerns raised by church officials. Cardinal George Pell of Sydney joined the debate when he said that public confidence in the integrity of the Catholic Church's procedures in handling reports of clergy sex abuse is vital in obtaining justice for victims and all concerned parties. Archbishop Hepworth told The Australian that he filed a six-page formal complaint with church officials in Adelaide in March 2008 and followed it up with several other detailed statements. When he inquired about the status of his case earlier this year, Archbishop Hepworth said he was told the archdiocese's inquiry was still in a "preliminary stage" because he had not filed a formal complaint."
11:44 PM on 09/14/2011
the catholic church and especially the vatican never has NOTHING to do with GOD or JESUS.they have been a sanctuary for pedophiles most of the time.there is no word in the bible about celibacy for men or women. another myth is the cross. no mention in the bible that JESUS was put on a cross.on the other hand the bible mentions the fake religions. it s so obvious that the catholic church is one of them.the good news is that all corruption, degeneracy, immorality are going to disappear very soon.
08:59 PM on 09/14/2011
People's reactions come down to one question. Do you believe in God/truth/justice over church system, or do you believe in church system over God/truth/justice. You shouldn't be ashamed of admitting an error in a man-made organization/system and changing it, because we all are only human and prone to mistakes. Admitting a mistake and improving it, would move you closer to God/truth/justice, than denying it and getting defensive.
11:04 PM on 09/14/2011
Or ... it comes down to this question - do you worship God, or do you worship "false idols".

Only false idols would get into God's church and

- rape children by the thousands and thousands (that we know about)
- move known pedophiles to sexually abuse more children
- conceal the truth
- lie about it
- ignore the victims, or fight them when they come forward

Pick a side. On your judgment day, God will want to know if you protected the abused children or the "false idols", and He didn't make the choice complicated.
04:36 PM on 09/14/2011
Why are people defending the Vatican? The pope as well as the higher officials KNEW this was going on and they let those pedophiles move from church to church instead of reporting the matter to the authorities. This shouldn't be seen as an attack on the church, what they did was CRIMINAL there should not be one set of rules for them and a different set for the rest of us. If this didn't involve the Vatican the people defending them right now would be outraged and rightly so. If you see something wrong with prosecuting them there is something wrong with you.
photo
undaunted8
Proud American, Father, Veteran, Democrat..
04:23 PM on 09/14/2011
For me it comes down to something so basic, and I doubt anyone here can disagree. Catholic priests have been sexually abusing children for many years. What does interest me is with all the information available, with this story becoming so large in scale, how does it continue? Are people still allowing children to be in close quarters with a priest? Is your faith so strong it blinds you of the danger in allowing your children to be alone with a priest? Like it or not, the charges are true, and nothing in my mind is more deplorable. What is your God supposed to represent? And for the devout catholic, to those who believe so deeply in your church, what's more important to you.........the good name of the church or the safety of it's children??
lawjok
PackerJohn
04:10 PM on 09/14/2011
Parents need to protect children. That means never alone, never alone with a coach, a piano teacher, a karate instructor, a sunday school teacher, a clergy person. Strange Uncle Joe. Our pediatrition was big on this. He always had someone present during exams and would always tell parents ---never alone. He had seen so many cases. If parents have not learned this by now they never will.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
03:45 AM on 09/15/2011
As a good first step to protecting children it may come down to the Church having to demand all seminarians have their sexual apparatus removed in order to be admitted to the bishop for ordination. Then and only then will the Church start to heal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Auracle
I'd rather be anything but ordinary, please
05:06 PM on 09/20/2011
Do you honestly think that "never alone" is a feasible, let alone wise or healthy solution for a child OR a parent? Did you follow the 'never alone' "rule"? How did that work out for you?

The simple truth is that no parent can be with their child 24/7. It's just not possible, even with one child, let alone with more than that. And in some cases, (one of) the parent(s) is the one abusing the child.

And even if parents could be with their children 24/7, I don't believe it would be healthy for the child, nor would it be good for the sanity of the parent. Sometime, somewhere, somehow in life, children are going to be alone with -someone-, and they have to learn how to deal with that, along with all the other things they have to learn. They have to learn how to defend and protect themselves.

I am by no means suggesting that children simply be tossed in a wolf pit and left to fend for themselves. They need guidance, they need supervision, they need education, they need protection. However, I believe that "never alone" is far too simplistic a solution that in the long run may have worse consequences - children who do not know how to act independently and protect themselves, let alone any children that -they- may someday have.
lawjok
PackerJohn
03:00 PM on 09/21/2011
You obviously don't understand the never alone concept. Never alone means that any facility that deals with children sets the policy. For instance , you take your son to the Scout Meeting and at that Scout Meeting there are always two people present in the company of your child. Your child is never alone with any one of them. The parent is not present, but the leaders are never alone with your child. It has nothing to do with the parent being with the child 24/7. Most organizations have now adopted this policy, it was initially promoted by the Boy Scouts and has worked very well. My own Little League uses it as does my church. Many schools are using a similar vehicle, conferences with students are held with office doors open and a meeting observer outside. It serves as a protection for both student and adult. It has nothing to do with the parent hovering over the child . Your suggestion that you can somehow by experience teach a child to act independently and protect themselves is woefully naive at best and dangerous at worst. Predators have means by which to insure silence, which usually involves a threat. Best that you not put your 9 or 10 or 12 year old in that position and demand that those who deal with children have appropriate policies.
03:57 PM on 09/14/2011
Prey or Pray... Is faith so powerful, it blinds morality? Religion for most is rooted in our parents. Do people think that holding their church accountable is somehow a defection or disrespecting their parents? This issue is similar to Republicans promoting policy which damages our country, just to diminish a Democratic president.
The first, committing a crime to save the church. The second, committing treason to save the country.
photo
moonwolfph
Open the Doors, See All the Sheeple.
02:42 PM on 09/14/2011
So many sheep, so much CRIME...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TBrennan
01:42 PM on 09/14/2011
In high school we had a priest named Father Burrill, we called him the squirrel because he loved your nuts. There were other priests that were known to be sex offenders and no action was taken until decades later. Only the result of widespread exposure, otherwise the catholic church would still (they probably still are) be committing institutionalized sex crimes against minors. It is a despicable institution with a very black history. I would love to see the Pope on trial at the Hague but I doubt it will ever happen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
01:29 PM on 09/14/2011
The Vatican called the move a "ludicrous publicity stunt."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, this from the same drag queens in lace and scarlet who kept telling the world in the 1980s the sexual abuse crisis was largely an American phenomenon, or like Pope Leo X in the 16th century who dismissed Luther's 95 theses as "a monkish squabble".

Is the Vatican just plain stupid, or is it their policy for us to think they are? Time for the Unholy Triumvirate of Ratzinger, Sodano, and Bertone to step down and for the College of Cardinals to accept their resignations and elect a successor to B16.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
champions1
Champion
06:52 PM on 09/14/2011
But you must understand who the real culprit is and he is long gone, for Pete's sake they are trying to make a saint out of him,,,yeah you guessed the Last Pope John Paul,he allowed this to go on for Years, i think he was the pope for about 30 years give or take a few, He is still hiding the biggest crook of all over there The American Cardinal, they say he can never be prosacuted because he is at the VATICAN...just sayin this New Pope has actually tried to fix some of the Priests but Paul was the real culprit....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hysterian68
bureaucrat/historian/ranter
03:48 AM on 09/15/2011
I do understand and John Paul II's right-hand man throughout most of his pontificate is now Pontiff Ratzinger. He must be brought to trial for crimes against humanity just "the Blessed JP2" should have been for ignoring the signs and aiding in the cover-up of countless bishops throughout the Church.
12:42 PM on 09/14/2011
People need to rise up and say enough tax breaks for these churches (not just catholic but all), giving a tax break to people who believe in sky-gods, invisible flying men, etc. should be committed in a looney bin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tater Salad
How can I be a quitter when haters dont stop?
01:25 PM on 09/14/2011
Sounds like NASA.
apduncan
My micro-bio is empty
01:52 PM on 09/14/2011
Amen to that ... it is a business like any other one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
champions1
Champion
06:54 PM on 09/14/2011
apduncan...you said it ...Monkey business
11:45 AM on 09/14/2011
I am surprised to see so many people taking this as an attack against the church. Why can we not take this as a great opportunity to seriously think about the system of it? Or do you think that the system we have at this point of time is the absolute best and there cannot be any improvement at all? It is a fact that there have been many sexual abuse cases in the history of church, and it definitely should be fixed. And let's not invite ridicules by saying "schools etc also have the same problem, so why only accuse church?" because it would only make you sound like a criminal saying to the police officer "but, John also stabbed Jane! I wasn't the only one who killed!" So what? Should the police arrest all the criminals exactly at the same time? The existence of others that have the same problem, doesn't make you any more right.