More

Irvine 11: Arguments Due In Muslim Students' Speech Case

Irvine 11

AMY TAXIN   09/19/11 10:29 PM ET   AP

SANTA ANA, Calif. — Ten Muslim students broke the law by shouting down a speech by an Israeli diplomat at the University of California, Irvine in a carefully drafted and executed plan that flouted repeated calls to behave by campus officials, a prosecutor said Monday.

Defense attorneys countered that students acted within the law when they stood up, one by one, and read from pre-scripted statements and never intended to halt Ambassador Michael Oren from speaking about U.S.-Israel relations.

Attorneys delivered closing arguments in the case that has stoked a spirited debate about free speech not just in the courtroom but in the affluent suburban community south of Los Angeles.

Many of the facts of the case are not in dispute: The students carefully planned their February 2010 protest and were escorted out by security officials.

Jurors in the case will be asked to decide whether students broke the law or were exercising a right to demonstrate freely.

The students face misdemeanor charges of conspiring to disrupt a meeting and disrupting a meeting. If convicted, they could face sentences ranging from probation with community service and fines to a year in jail.

The case also raised questions about prosecutorial discretion, with some members of the public calling the trial a waste of taxpayers' money. Other community members have said the defendants were being singled out because they are Muslim.

In his closing argument, prosecutor Dan Wagner told jurors the students acted as censors to block the free flow of ideas and infringed on the rights of 700 people who had gone to the campus that evening to hear Oren. He said emails among members of the Muslim Student Union showed students were aware they could be arrested before the protest.

"The right to free speech is not absolute," Wagner said before a packed courtroom of more than 180 people in Orange County, with more observers waiting outside. "If hecklers' vetoes were allowed, then nobody, nobody, none of us would have the right to free speech."

Defense attorney Reem Salahi said the students followed a series of protests at UC Irvine and elsewhere during which demonstrators shouted during lectures but weren't arrested or sanctioned.

In this case, UC Irvine officials expressed their displeasure with students' actions during the demonstration but didn't give hard rules on what was or wasn't permitted, she said.

"This is merely an admonition to be polite," she said. "But in America, we don't prosecute people for being impolite."

Salahi – who represents two of the defendants – said students never intended to stop Oren from speaking but instead wanted to express their views – perhaps unpopular that evening – on the Israeli government's actions in Gaza.

On Monday, Wagner and defense attorneys also showed dueling pie charts breaking down how much time the students demonstrated, how much time their supporters cheered, and how much time Oren spoke in an effort to prove whether the meeting suffered a significant disruption.

Near the end of her argument, Salahi said she wanted to share a personal story related to the trial but Wagner objected and Superior Court Judge Peter J. Wilson said she couldn't proceed.

She paused for a moment then told the jury, "I can't tell you the story – I got shut down," to thunderous applause from the courtroom.

That brought an admonition Wilson, who said he would clear the courtroom if there was another outburst from the public.

Defense attorneys will continue their arguments Tuesday.

In 2010, the students were initially cited, released and disciplined at UC Irvine, which revoked the Muslim Student Union's charter for a quarter and placed it on two years of probation.

Nearly a year later, Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas filed criminal charges against 11 students. The move prompted an outcry from the American Civil Liberties Union and a host of Jewish, Muslim and campus groups.

The filing also sparked a media frenzy, and Wilson eventually issued a gag order to prevent prosecutors and defense attorneys from arguing the case outside the courtroom. The charges against one defendant were later dropped.

Many of the students have since graduated from UC Irvine and the nearby University of California, Riverside.

On Monday, Wagner showed video clips of university officials pleading with demonstrators to behave and respect academic freedom. He also showed numerous emails among members of the Muslim Student Union planning the disruption and calculating who was willing to get arrested.

The correspondence, Wagner said, reveals students knew the risk of their actions and later tried to cover up that the organization was involved in the protest.

"It was always a plan to break the rules," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

SANTA ANA, Calif. — Ten Muslim students broke the law by shouting down a speech by an Israeli diplomat at the University of California, Irvine in a carefully drafted and executed plan that flout...
SANTA ANA, Calif. — Ten Muslim students broke the law by shouting down a speech by an Israeli diplomat at the University of California, Irvine in a carefully drafted and executed plan that flout...
Filed by Leah Finnegan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:44 PM on 09/20/2011
If another group was doing the same thing would they have the same consequence. That really is the only criteria that should be met.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
02:32 PM on 09/20/2011
It seems that to these *muslim students* that free speech is their exclusive right...one they don't grant to others.
02:52 AM on 09/20/2011
Ridiculous. Of course there should be a criminal charge against people who just plan on heckling a speaker. It's the death of freedom of speech if there are no consequences for doing this. Who would want to speak at an engagement where they know the students are just going to protest and the university and police can't do anything about it?

People don't have an enshrined right to just stand up and disrupt things. That's why a protest has its power - precisely because it ISN'T ensured to be legal when it happens. If the courts make this sort of behavior legal, the freedom of all types of speakers from many different backgrounds to come to a university will be threatened because they won't have the guarantee of having their words heard for the benefit of all who wanted to attend and listen.

Tea party or Muslim crazies both, the loud idiots of this country are threatening to destroy reasoned discourse. For shame. Seeing things like this reminds me of how so many Muslims really don't like this "freedom of speech" thing - freedom of speech is the ability to say what you want WITHOUT receiving a planned heckling, and letting other people speak as well, ALSO without receiving a planned heckling. Period. I don't know how you can maintain "freedom of speech" IF NO ONE CAN EVEN BE HEARD AT THESE EVENTS. I can't believe this debate is even being had.
01:46 AM on 09/20/2011
This is very typical behavior from muslims.A few years ago a cartoonist from Denmark published drawings of the false prophet Muhammed and now he has to live under 24 hour police protection because of the death threats.
09:28 PM on 09/19/2011
The control that Israel have over this Country is frightening. Nobody would have paid any atttention if the ambassador was from any other country.
09:26 PM on 09/19/2011
They are being prosecuted for one reason and that being because they are Muslims.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:46 AM on 09/20/2011
They are being prosecuted for one reason and that is they interrupted a speech. No Muslim who didn't interrupt the speech is on trial.
03:06 AM on 09/20/2011
They are being prosecuted because the individuals involved wanted to make a case out of this, and that's what they got. They want to set a precedent in out court system that it is OK to interrupt a scheduled meeting through beforehand preparation and planning. The prosecutors are trying to take a stand and protect the freedom of speakers to come to campuses and speak with some minimal guarantee that their speech won't be interrupted without at least minor consequences for the individuals involved. Trust me, this is an experimental case and if convicted, these students will get a slap on the wrist at most, and probably a lot of scholarship money if they ever try to go to grad school. All in all, this is a victory for them any way you look at it..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Downrivers
Siskiyou Mountains
09:16 PM on 09/19/2011
Is not the constitutional right to free speech secular?
07:11 PM on 09/19/2011
I find it funny when Muslims lecture on free speech when they have been known to threaten critics. Had it been a group of Jewish students protesting against a Muslim speaker, the Muslim groups would have demanded hate crime charges.
nancynancy
Atheist.
08:31 PM on 09/19/2011
You are exactly right.
06:40 PM on 09/19/2011
They should try that in the countries they come from. The would be shot, or hung without trail in 3 days. Maybe we should do the same. (only kidding) Of course the ACLU is taking the case.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Forbes
Marx was right.
09:12 PM on 09/19/2011
Because other countries wouldn't afford free speech we shouldn't either? That sounds exactly what you are saying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gunrunner99
freedom of speech
02:19 PM on 09/20/2011
Free speech and heckling are two different things,Its also disrespectful to do so, to a guest to our country.
06:39 PM on 09/19/2011
I think the key point is the "israeli" was a Jew. Thank God (or Allah) those courageous Muslim students kept his message from being heard.We can all rest easier because of it
07:25 AM on 09/20/2011
Hay Corwin.
There is ONLY ONE TRUE GOD and it's NOT allah it is the GOD of ISRAEL.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
erehwon2
09:10 AM on 09/20/2011
So the Muslim concept of free speech is "free speech for me but not for thee"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trickery
Gave up private vanity for public insanity
04:14 PM on 09/19/2011
Ooooo, I can see a little of that ladies hair O_o
Rosin the Bow
Hail to the Victors Valiant
03:06 PM on 09/19/2011
Their own emails confirm their guilt.

http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/365.pdf
Rosin the Bow
Hail to the Victors Valiant
03:03 PM on 09/19/2011
These students have attacked one of the values we hold the most dear, the right to free speech, and hypocritically seek to use that value to protect themselves. They have broken Californian law and they should be punished. Everyone has a right to be heard, regardless of politics or persuasion. If these students are allowed to get away with what they did, where does it end?
08:27 PM on 09/19/2011
I suppose you were equally incensed when TP types disrupted town halls being held by Dem congressman?
Rosin the Bow
Hail to the Victors Valiant
09:56 PM on 09/19/2011
Sort of. I didn't think it was appropriate, but it's not the same kind of offense. These students sought to silence Oren.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sonic hedgehog
A true word needs no oath
02:09 AM on 09/20/2011
what kind of an oppressive country can have a law that sentence people for a year in jail for disrupting a speech? Are you agreeing with that too?
Rosin the Bow
Hail to the Victors Valiant
08:23 AM on 09/20/2011
Everyone has the right to speak and be heard. If they don't, then the value of "freedom of speech" becomes meaningless.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gunrunner99
freedom of speech
02:24 PM on 09/20/2011
What would you do? It was planned,it was rude,and if it happened to one of them,they would go to court so fast it would make your head spin.Free speech is one thing,heckling and harrasment is something else.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:55 PM on 09/19/2011
What about the speakers right to speak and the audience's right to hear him? They may riot at home but not here

They could have protested outside, held a counter program, ask questions afterwards, etc. Instean they chose to disrupt the program. They should be found guilty and deported to their home countries where they can practice free speach and the women can face being stoned because they speak out.
Rosin the Bow
Hail to the Victors Valiant
02:57 PM on 09/19/2011
Well said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gunrunner99
freedom of speech
02:25 PM on 09/20/2011
F&F