More

White House: Jobs Bill Would Save Unemployment Benefits For 6 Million Next Year


First Posted: 09/19/11 07:02 PM ET Updated: 11/19/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration says that if Congress fails to reauthorize extended unemployment insurance, 6 million people will lose benefits next year.

Starting in January, laid-off workers will be ineligible for further federal benefits after they've used up 26 weeks of state benefits (some states now provide fewer than 26 weeks). The average unemployed person as of August had been out of work for more than 40 weeks.

Over the course of 2012, the White House says, 6 million people will find themselves still unemployed after exhausting their state benefits -- an estimate that reflects the bleak prospects for a speedy economic recovery. The administration included a reauthorization of the benefits in the $450 billion jobs bill it sent to Congress last week.

Congress, which routinely grants the jobless extra weeks of benefits during recessions, gave the unemployed up to 73 additional weeks of benefits in response to the downturn that started in 2007. Congress has never dropped extended benefits with a national unemployment rate above 7.2 percent, but Republicans have said they are opposed to keeping the aid for another year because of its $50 billion cost.

Even if the benefits are reauthorized, the money will be no help to the more than 2 million people who have already been out of work for 99 weeks or longer.

Cheryl Greene of Sheboygan, Wis., told HuffPost that she lost her job at a Holiday Inn back in September 2009 and that her unemployment benefits ran out earlier this year. She said she and her husband are three months behind on their rent and afraid they'll be evicted.

Greene said they've been bouncing from job to job for the past decade, and debt has been a constant problem. "We both can't get a job at the same time," said Greene, 49. "It's never been enough to ever get ahead."

She said they both applied for jobs this summer at a new grocery store that opened in town last week. A spokesman for the Festival Foods company told HuffPost that "several thousand" people applied for the store's 230 new jobs. The Greenes didn't make the cut, though Cheryl Greene said her husband recently landed a minimum-wage job at a packaging company.

Without the unemployment income, Greene said, they don't have enough money to pay the electric bill, the gas bill and the rent. "You either pay this or pay that," she said. "It's either-or."

Greene is one of the 4 million Americans who the White House estimated would run out of benefits without finding work this year.

Arthur Delaney is the author of "A People's History of the Great Recession," HuffPost's first e-book.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration says that if Congress fails to reauthorize extended unemployment insurance, 6 million people will lose benefits next year. Starting in January, laid-off work...
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration says that if Congress fails to reauthorize extended unemployment insurance, 6 million people will lose benefits next year. Starting in January, laid-off work...
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration says that if Congress fails to reauthorize extended unemployment insurance, 6 million people will lose benefits next year. Starting in January, laid-off work...
WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration says that if Congress fails to reauthorize extended unemployment insurance, 6 million people will lose benefits next year. Starting in January, laid-off work...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 765
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
billhodges 04:51 PM on 09/20/2011
With the introduction of The American Jobs Act, Americans may soon witness a rerun of the Obama healthcare struggle. Much like its predecessor, president Obama’s newest bill contains certain provisions that would appear to benefit those who wrote the bill more than those for whom the bill was supposedly written.
For instance, buried deep, deep on page 133 of the bill Read More...
photo
guveqzero
Inventor and Innovator
01:28 PM on 09/25/2011
Cutting off benefits now will hasten the revolution, that is extreme forfeiture of the rich. Do it or not, it is too late to stop change. They should be worried.
09:29 PM on 09/23/2011
We can either pay for the long term unemployed now or later. If you have 3 or 6 million people with no job, and no viable way to get food, or keep a roof aboove their heads; what will happen is we will end up with more people on welfare, and food stamps which is paid for my tax dollars anyway.
04:49 PM on 09/23/2011
YOU dont get to use the 99ers as a punching bag for these benifits....WE ARE NOT PART OF IT....WE are not PART Of the job creation...So stop lumping the 99ers in with the people who will benifit from this bill...WE ARE DONE TAKING PUNCHES for the newly unemployed, the unions and not to mention all the right and left crazies out there....GET YOUR FACTS straight and if your reading comprehension is lacking that bad you should just keep your comments to yourself until such a time as you can grasp the concept of FACTS>>>
12:43 AM on 09/22/2011
Increased taxes for the richest 10%, and especially the richest 0.1%, should not only be accepted, but mandatory. With the country in such a bad point in its economic history, it seems as if everyone in America has had to make sacrifices; everyone but the rich. It’s a little ironic that the corporate monsters who created this mess in the first place, are the ones benefiting from it the most. They take the most and give back the least from society therefore a higher tax rate is not only logical, but morally right. As for “class warfare”; the Obama Jobs Bill is not the one who initiated this imaginary war. If anything it was the corporate billionaires who fired the first shot by letting American wages stagnate while their wallets got fatter and fatter. Not only does the current income inequality sink our economy deeper into debt and depression but it is slowly eroding the pillars that our democracy is built on. Something must change for our equality as American citizens is not to become something of the past.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ASherbuck
market anarchist
02:42 PM on 09/21/2011
Which means it will keep costing us money.

Stop giving these people our money.
11:24 AM on 09/21/2011
If we keep paying people not to work they will never find jobs.
09:33 PM on 09/23/2011
spoonbill you must be independently wealthy. If not I hope you never lose your job and can't find one atfer looking for 1, or 2 years. People that have never been in that situation can't relate, and simply don't get it. I wouldn't wish that bad luck on anyone
08:23 PM on 09/20/2011
The administration feels the need to do something... anything. But how can this be logical? The bill will raise taxes on some small businesses (permanently) to offer a tax break to other small businesses (temporarily). What? http://bit.ly/omqqsp
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billhodges
Self Reliant Yet Charitable
04:51 PM on 09/20/2011
With the introduction of The American Jobs Act, Americans may soon witness a rerun of the Obama healthcare struggle. Much like its predecessor, president Obama’s newest bill contains certain provisions that would appear to benefit those who wrote the bill more than those for whom the bill was supposedly written.
For instance, buried deep, deep on page 133 of the bill, it states:
SEC. 376. FEDERAL AND STATE IMMUNITY.
(a)    Abrogation of State Immunity- A State shall not be immune under the 11th Amendment to the Constitution from a suit brought in a Federal court of competent jurisdiction for a violation of this Act.
Come again? Under the bill’s authority, states are not immune from federal prosecution if they “violate” the act. In the event this bill passes, it will override a state’s sovereign authority as defined and protected under the 11th amendment:
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.
By what authority does a bill that seeks to “create jobs” and concern itself with things such as “payroll relief” and “teacher stabilization” have the right to override the 11th amendment?
It gets even better:
(A) WAIVER- A State’s receipt or use of Federal financial assistance for any program or activity of a State shall constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity, under the 11th Amendment to the Constitution or otherwise, to a suit brought by an employee or applicant for employment of that program or activity under this Act for a remedy authorized under Section 375(c) of this Act
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ebay Seller Len
07:49 AM on 09/21/2011
Um, instead of simply cutting and pasting, it would be useful for you to actually READ the 11th amendment. It isn't that long.

It has nothing to do with prosecuting states. The 11th amendment limits the federal government's role in lawsuits brought against the state. In otherwords, NY could dismiss a lawsuit brought against it by any of its citizens (or citizens of other states) simply because they choose to do so. They need no reason, and the Federal government has no say in it. These are civil cases.

Since the Federal government is handing over the money, they are now saying the federal government has a role and responsibility to ensure that the money is spent according to the provisions of the law.

Hardly the insidious intrusion into the Constitution the RP'ers would have others believe.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:28 PM on 09/20/2011
Would one of you libs who keep proclaiming that the rich need to pay their fair share, define what the fair share is?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverstreet
All you need is love
04:34 PM on 09/20/2011
Oh dubbadee, it's been reported over and over and over again. The rich should pay at least the percentage of their income -- total income -- that the average middle class person pays. The rich now pay less than they have paid in more than 60 years. The billionaires don't need your sympathy. They can manage, even if their tax rate goes to what it was during Reagan's presidency. The richest 1% now own most of the wealth of this nation -- and the rest of us are struggling. Don't be a sucker.
04:49 PM on 09/20/2011
I'm not struggling, we're doing well in my house and I don't consider myself "rich".
09:41 PM on 09/23/2011
dubbadee: I'm for getting rid of all taxes. I wonder how the country would be if neither the poor, middle class or wealthiest amongst us paid taxes? Let's fire all government employees...close down all sectors of the government, and TOTALLY DEPEND ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR TO HIRE US ALL. I wonder how that would work out?!? What do u think? Of course I'm being kurt!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmySeow
02:54 PM on 09/20/2011
Collecting a benefit is NOT a job. People need to work - and that means we need:
1. A gold standard
2. Small localized economies
3. Depopulation to equal job availability.

http://www.wix.com/andrewcostell3/simple-wealth-book
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tomteboda
05:25 PM on 09/20/2011
Depopulation sounds kind of scary.
03:56 PM on 09/23/2011
Oh yes lets kill people off so that all those on the lucky train can survive...GET OUT OF MY COUNTRY you dont belong here..
Califishing
I work smart
02:05 PM on 09/20/2011
The Republicans are out of touch or don't care. http://www.celebritynetworth.com/category/richest-politicians/republicans/
12:52 PM on 09/20/2011
Republicans want to end the EPA. They want to end FEMA. They want to end Medicare and give you a voucher. They want to end Social Security and give you a 201K.

The Republicans are too extreme.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billhodges
Self Reliant Yet Charitable
04:53 PM on 09/20/2011
We simply believe in accepting responsibility for your choices and being more self reliant and not dependent on the government taking money from the producers and giving it to the recipient class.
03:59 PM on 09/23/2011
Then accept responsibility that some really horrible policies have made over 25 million people who was self reliant to be POVERTY stricken when you get that threw your thick heads maybe you will finally get off the Terrorist Train and realize how bad it is for millions in AMERICA...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
juna
gardens and organic vegies (veggies)
09:47 AM on 09/21/2011
To say the least. These policies will destroy people and the planet simultaneously. If I believed in any god(s) I would now be praying to him/her/them to save us from the Republicans.
12:44 PM on 09/20/2011
Republicans want more tax cuts for the top 2% and big corporations.

They want to cut benefits for the poor and middle class.

THe middle class is on life support and the Republicans want to pull the plug.
11:25 AM on 09/20/2011
A Thought: We do not want to help people who have worked all their lives to build America. We do want people to have a monthly check until their child turns18 years old on TANF=TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES or SSI. Oh yes TANF customers receive a raise on having their second child. This child is capped meaning no more increase for third or fourth child. The five year TANF clock in most states can be stopped so TANF customers can have more time then their 5 year limit. Let their families help them out.

A Thought: Let their families help them that is what families are for. Most unemployed families have family members that are struggling to make ends meet. Unless you have a congress person in your family.

A Thought:
This is the direction the haves want our country to go. We who are unemployed,exhausted benefits, over worked, scared of losing their job are being led like sheep to , well you know!!!

A thought: If one has exhausted their benefits 99ers then how will the state or federal government determine the weekly allowance since their is no income to base it on.

A Thought: A National Day of Prayer for all.Prayer does change things.It might even bring us together for the average American to find a solution or start a revolt.
11:19 AM on 09/20/2011
Where are those "Job Creators"? Offshore counting their non-taxable profits?
Maybe Dubya is hosting a little billionaire brothers bash down at his Paraguayan retreat.
11:49 AM on 09/20/2011
BO's next speech is come to you from Cuba where everyone works for the government. Is Cuba considered off shore??
I know BO's policies are considered failures.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverstreet
All you need is love
04:36 PM on 09/20/2011
You don't get it. The billionaires have it all -- and we are left with the scraps.