iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Whooping Cough Vaccine Only Effective For 3 Years: Study

Whooping Cough Vaccine

First Posted: 09/19/11 03:04 PM ET Updated: 11/19/11 05:12 AM ET

ATLANTA — The whooping cough vaccine given to babies and toddlers loses much of its effectiveness after just three years – a lot faster than doctors believed – and that could help explain a recent series of outbreaks in the U.S. among children who were fully vaccinated, a study suggests.

The study is small and preliminary, and its authors said the results need to be confirmed through more research. Nevertheless, the findings are likely to stir debate over whether children should get a booster shot earlier than now recommended.

"I was disturbed to find maybe we had a little more confidence in the vaccine than it might deserve," said the lead researcher, Dr. David Witt, chief of infectious disease at the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in San Rafael, Calif. Witt presented his findings Monday at the American Society for Microbiology conference in Chicago.

The study was done in California, where whooping cough vaccinations are a hot-button issue. The state had a huge spike in whooping cough cases last year, during which more than 9,100 people fell ill and 10 babies died. California schools have turned away thousands of middle and high school students this fall who haven't gotten their booster shot.

Government health officials recommend that children get vaccinated against whooping cough in five doses, with the first shot at age 2 months and the final one between 4 and 6 years. Then youngsters are supposed to get a booster shot around 11 or 12. That means a gap of five to eight years.

Witt's study looked at roughly 15,000 children in Marin County, Calif., including 132 who got whooping cough last year. He found that youngsters who had gone three years or more since the last of their five original shots were as much as 20 times more likely to become infected than children who had been more recently vaccinated. The largest number of cases was in children 8 to 12 years old.

Whooping cough, or pertussis, is a highly contagious bacterial disease that in rare cases can be fatal. It leads to severe coughing that causes children to make a distinctive whooping sound as they gasp for breath.

Marin County has a reputation for anti-vaccine sentiment, and Witt said that when he started the study he expected to see the illness concentrated in unvaccinated people. But more than 80 percent of the children who developed whooping cough in Witt's study were fully vaccinated.

California health officials told doctors last year that they could give the booster to kids as young as 7 in an effort to stifle the outbreak. Federal health officials said that they are still studying the issue and that it is too soon to make that a standard practice.

At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which makes recommendations on childhood shots, officials acknowledged that the vaccine's protection declines, but they said the agency's own studies show the drop-off is not as pronounced as Witt's research found.

The CDC has estimated that the risk of the disease can increase fourfold several years after vaccination, not 10 to 20 times. One reason may be differences in how a case of whooping cough is defined: Witt counted positive test results, while the CDC also requires more than a week of symptoms.

CDC officials stressed that the vaccination is still much better than nothing – it reduces how sick a child becomes. Also, the nation no longer sees thousands of whooping cough deaths each year, as it did before there was a vaccine.

The shots "are still our best protection against pertussis, and they still protect well against fatal disease," said Dr. Tom Clark, who leads the CDC's epidemiology team focused on vaccine-preventable diseases.

Versions of the vaccine are made by two companies – Sanofi Pasteur and GlaxoSmithKline. The companies have acknowledged that the immunity conferred by the vaccine wanes over time, but they declined to comment on Witt's study.

The type of vaccine given in the U.S. has been in use since the late 1990s. It is typically administered in a combination shot that also protects against tetanus and diphtheria. Nearly every state requires children to get the full series of shots before enrolling in school.

Periodic outbreaks still occur in places with high vaccination rates.

The short-term effectiveness of the vaccine has been shown to be 90 percent or higher in the first couple of years. The long-term effectiveness is not well understood, but researchers thought it was more than three years.

A preliminary study conducted by the CDC last year found the five-dose vaccination for children was about 70 percent effective five years after the last shot. Witt's research suggests the effectiveness may drop much lower than that, perhaps below 50 percent after just three years.

Witt also found that shots work great in the short term. Rates of whooping cough dropped dramatically after kids were age 11 and 12, when many get the booster shot.

The long-term effectiveness of that booster also is not known and has received relatively little study. Health officials are also discussing whether additional boosters may one day be recommended for teenagers or adults.

"It's a little too soon to say much" about the longer-term effectiveness of that booster, said Lara Misegades, a CDC epidemiologist.

MORE:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

ATLANTA — The whooping cough vaccine given to babies and toddlers loses much of its effectiveness after just three years – a lot faster than doctors believed – and that could help explain a rece...
ATLANTA — The whooping cough vaccine given to babies and toddlers loses much of its effectiveness after just three years – a lot faster than doctors believed – and that could help explain a rece...
Filed by Amanda L. Chan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 78
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
05:52 PM on 09/24/2011
Seems like this study also shows how well the vaccine works in the short term. We know vaccine efficacy declines after a few years, but I understand natural immunity also declines with pertussis. And the main danger time for people is when they are infants - which is when the disease can be fatal, and is when the vaccine is at its most protective. It appears pertussis vaccine is a good thing to keep having, by all accounts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Richard Smith
Social Justice Advocacy
08:24 AM on 09/22/2011
You have to have a range of safe and efficacious regimes in place.

At least we can stop pointing the finger at so called "vaccine critics".

I believe from earlier reports in the recent California outbreak it was low socio-economic ethnic groups that bore the brunt of infant deaths.

http://www.emaxhealth.com/1024/whooping-cough-takes-life-tenth-california-infant

According to the CDPH, as of October 19, California had recorded more illnesses due to whooping cough (5,978) than in any year since 1955, when the disease caused 4,949 illnesses. In 1950, there were 6,613 cases reported.

More than half (57%) of the hospitalized cases of whooping cough involved infants less than than 3 months of age. Nearly three quarters (74%) of the hospitalized cases involved infants less than 6 months of age, and most of these were Hispanic (76%).

Of the ten infant deaths reported, 9 (90%) were Hispanic infants. Nine of the deaths were infants less than 2 months of age. None of them had received any doses of pertussis-containing vaccine. The other death involved an ex-28 week preemie that was 2 months of age who had received the first dose of DTaP only 15 days prior to disease onset (no time to develop immunity).

Relying on one strategy has the potential for very clear failure.

There is also some evidence of whooping cough strains mutating ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Richard Smith
Social Justice Advocacy
08:10 AM on 09/22/2011
Whooping Cough and also Mumps (MMR)

Ongoing outbreak of mumps infection in Oban, Scotland, November 2010 to January 2011

http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=19803

We report on an ongoing outbreak of 119 cases of mumps virus infection in the Oban area of Scotland, from 29 November 2010 to 31 January 2011. The median age of cases was 20 years, with the highest incidence in the 13-19-year­-olds.

A total of 53 cases had received two doses of measles-mu­mps-rubell­a (MMR) vaccine, in accordance with the United Kingdom vaccinatio­n schedule, while 33 had received only one dose and 30 had not been vaccinated­.

* Nearly 45% were fully vaccinated
* A further 28% had one dose vaccine
* 25% were unvaccinat­ed

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­---------

Children 18 and under

Only 2 cases out of 54 were unvaccinat­ed

----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­--------

Not everything follows a simplistic course ...
04:46 AM on 09/21/2011
So much for the magic bullet theory of vaccinology! Pertussis vaccines were never very effective, had to be given to an infant 3 times initially, could cause brain damage, and it seems could cause the strain to mutate. In 2007 a "consultation" in the UK by the prestigious Nuffield Council on Bioethics gave pertussis as an example of a disease which had been eradicated by vaccine, which was so far from the truth it was laughable. The farce was compounded by the fact that only very educated people were likely to respond to the consultation, nevertheless the authors were happy to parade outrageous fiction as the premise on which the question could be answered.

And, of course, because the product is no good - never can be - the only answer medical orthodoxy has now is to use ever more of it. Why don't they examine their own greed and stupidity?

Excellent references here:

http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/vaccine-efficacy-how-often-do-vaccines-work/dtap/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Richard Smith
Social Justice Advocacy
08:28 AM on 09/22/2011
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/whooping-cough-strain-now-immune-to-vaccine/story-e6freuy9-1225828959714

THE bacteria that causes whooping cough has mutated, eroding the protection provided by the vaccine now given to children, scientists warned yesterday.

University of NSW researchers have identified significant changes in the two most common strains of the bordetella pertussis bacteria, which they also traced back to events in the late 1990s.

"A key issue is that the whole cell vaccine contained hundreds of antigens, which gave broad protection against many strains of pertussis," UNSW School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences associate professor Ruiting Lan said.

"But the (targeted) acellular vaccine contains only three to five antigens. Our findings suggest that the use of the acellular vaccine may be one factor contributing to these genetic changes."

The research team analysed more than 200 samples of the bacterium collected over the past 40 years in Australia and compared them with samples from Japan, Canada, USA and Finland.

They found while the vaccine now in use was effective against some of the strains circulating in Australia it may no longer protect against two strains, known as MT27 and MT70."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Parents who opt out of this child vaccination process were thought to have contributed to the rise in cases."

Which just shows you shouldn't let prejudice and bias over rule science.
10:14 PM on 09/20/2011
Amazing, they stick junk in you, then three years later they want to do it again, just to increase their profits, this is just getting worse by the day. It won't be long before everyone is disabled.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amdachel
07:35 PM on 09/20/2011
Parents need to educate themselves. See the book, Vaccine Epidemic http://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Epidemic-Corporate-Coercive-Government/dp/1616082720 and the National Vaccine Information Center http://www.nvic.org/.

Anne Dachel, Media editor: Age of Autism
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amdachel
07:34 PM on 09/20/2011
A recent investigative report on HDNet TV exposed the fact that while health officials continue to tell us studies show no link, the federal government has paid out millions of dollars for compensation for vaccine injuries that included autism. Seeing these children who were born healthy and were suddenly and dramatically affected by their vaccinations should give us all pause. The U.S. Vaccine Court has paid out over $2 billion for severe injuries, including death over the two 20 years. We are now learning that the Court has recognized autism as part of the damage.

http://www.ebcala.org/news/video

Anne Dachel, Media editor: Age of Autism
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amdachel
07:33 PM on 09/20/2011
There have been endless stories in the news blaming non-vaccinating parents for the spread of the disease. I find it interesting that suddenly officials are saying that loss of immunity is behind recent outbreaks of whooping cough. Any adult or teenager could also have no immunity. What other vaccines is this also true for? How many times are people going to have to have booster shots for all the vaccines now in the schedule? What is this really saying about the effectiveness of the vaccine program?

Anne Dachel, Media editor: Age of Autism
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
amdachel
07:32 PM on 09/20/2011
Nothing is said here about why there is "anti-vaccine sentiment." The truth is vaccines like any medical product have risks and a growing number of parents are frightened that the dramatically increased vaccination schedule is behind the explosion in autism, now affecting one percent of children including almost two percent of boys.

Tens of thousands of parents report that their children were born healthy and were developing normally until they received certain routine vaccinations. Suddenly they got sick with things like seizures, bowel disease, and sleep disorders. Many stopped talking and lost learned skills, ending up with an autism diagnosis. Doctors say autism has no known cause. They only thing they're sure of is that their ever-expanding vaccine schedule isn't to blame and they have lots of pharma-funded studies to prove it.

Anne Dachel, Media editor: Age of Autism
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:30 PM on 09/20/2011
Why are we living much longer now even when we eat unhealthy and have so many other bad habits ? I can tell you why ...Vaccines and good medicine... Medicines that weren't available years ago . We should be thankful that we have them whether we choose to use them or not .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Heather XW
10:07 PM on 09/21/2011
You should read the statistical details happyone. Chronic disease is rampet in our citizenry from childhood to our elderly. Our infant mortality rates are below third would countries. We do a great job managing the chronic disease but quantity never trumps quality. 6 million children are on anti-psycotics. 1:6 children have neuro-developmental disabilities that require special education services. Cancer and other immuno/neuro diseases keeps rising. Your utopia isn't so lovely when you look at the details.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Heather XW
10:08 PM on 09/21/2011
typo: "world"
04:02 PM on 09/20/2011
I had pertussis in December when I was 14, which is six years ago, even though I was vaccinated when I was a baby. It wasn't a national tragedy, and my parents didn't go ballistic and start railing against the health care system and the vaccines. I had to stay home from school for a month so that nobody else got sick, because although my parents and sisters were all vaccinated, people at school might not be.

I think vaccines probably save far more lives than they end.. Nevertheless, disease happens. People aren't perfect, so why would man-made vaccines be perfect?

As for germophobia, well, duh, who wants to get sick?
photo
GOODDOC1
"civil war" is an oxymoron
05:10 PM on 09/20/2011
You're exactly correct. Most adults with pertussis ("whooping cough) actually think they just have a bad case of bronchitis. It's the babies who are un- or incompetely-vaccinated who have a problem. Also, anyone with a compromised immune system, whether by direct disease, or treatments they're taking for other diseases. They're usually exposed to adults who don't know they've got pertussis. I cared for a 6-week old (so not yet vaccinated) girl who spent more than a month in PICU with Pertussis. It can be a deadly disease. And vaccines do save lives.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
01:17 PM on 09/21/2011
Exactly. The polio vaccine had to be improved in the late 80s as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smp276dp
free us from the craziness
02:44 PM on 09/20/2011
The FDA at work. That is a section of the government we could dismantle and no one would miss them.
02:59 PM on 09/20/2011
Except Big Pharma who uses them give "credibility" to the poisons they push.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
01:16 PM on 09/21/2011
The FDA?

If the data's corroborated, someone will need to work on a better vaccine or vaccine schedule. That's about the end of the story.

The FDA, for all their problems, didn't miss anything here.
02:42 PM on 09/20/2011
What we were told with our kids in the 70's is that it only takes one effective immunization of the DPt's but that they don't know which ones are effective and that is why they did the 3 and another at 5 years. My daughter, had problems after the immunization and they withheld her immunizations until 5, but pertussis wasn't as bad as it is now and immunizations were only 10 dollars or free. Now we've got an influx of illegals who are more than likely not immunized when entering, a different set of rules for bugs who may have mutated a bit over time and people who aren't affording the huge costs of immunization, yet are not in the brackets who can get free shots. On top of that, the immunizations just might not be effective- not that one immunization that offers prevention. Blindly I went through life thinking I was covered for measels, but when going on to nursing school, I had to be reimmunized, became pregnantant and also worked in nurseries, they figured I was covered only to go to work at a children's hospital and labs pulled made me be reimmunized again. Sojust because someone is immunized does not necessarily mean we're safe from getting and spreading childhood diseases. Adults are not given Pertussis immunizations, we get the DT's, so with reimmergence, can only kids get pertussis or if we had it as a kid can we get it again, or as adults are we immune?
04:16 PM on 09/20/2011
I got pertussis at 17 and had it for 6 months before they figured out why I had this cough that wouldn't go away, was a volunteer in a pediatric ER at the time, which is probably where I got it. I was vaccinated for it. I got revaccinated with the Tdap (includes pertussis) a few months later even though I wasn't due for a tetanus shot for another 5 years. 4 years later, at 21, they did some immune system bloodwork and found I have no immunity to pertussis. I have seen multiple cases at work in the Pediatric ER recently, more than ever before, so it is definitely coming back in larger numbers. I am terrified of getting it again. This study makes complete sense as to why I am no longer immune to it, and I thought I was just weird since I am not immune to it despite being vaccinated for it 4 1/2 years ago.
04:32 AM on 09/22/2011
Thanks, for the info. I am waiting on the shingles vaccine because I had it several months ago. I still have some long lasting effects from it, so next drs. appt. will talk immunizations.
photo
GOODDOC1
"civil war" is an oxymoron
05:15 PM on 09/20/2011
No, adults are not immune, unless they had the disease itself. In the 1990's, we were taught that the DTP was good for 10 years, but they didn't give the Pertussis vaccine to adults because of some problems. (They never told us what those problems were, however.) You got DT or dT or Tet Tox for Tetanus prophylaxis. The reason they are giving the DTAP now (both to children and to adults) is because the scellular Pertussis does not give the neurological problems that the DTP did. (The D is for Diptheria.)
04:35 AM on 09/22/2011
Thanks. I think it is time to ask once more about immunizations next drs. visit.
12:41 PM on 09/20/2011
My son is a statistic as he is vax.injured - after everything we, as a family,have had to go through, and are still going through, there is NO WAY anything will EVER be injected into our bodies - the best thing to do BEFORE allowing ANYTHING to be put into your childs body is RESEARCH, QUESTION, and RESEARCH some more. I wish I had - BEFORE - I live with the guilt everyday BECAUSE I allowed something to enter his body without researching what could AND DOES happen.
12:28 PM on 09/20/2011
Wow- it's amazing how jaded and conspiracy theory oriented people are against the medical and pharmacy industry. People have a MUCH longer life expectancy and more comfort generally because of the medical industry! I thank God for the people who study hard and have to look closely at illness and disease and blood and all sorts of things that would make me faint, all in the name of making people feel better. They are not all money grubbing liars. Let's look at the alternative medicine industry, making tons of money from desperate people every year, acting like they are doing it only out of the goodness of their hearts. They also get paid. Good money. Some of it I am sure has some benefit, but much of it is just snake oil. No regulations. Little testing. Just testimonials. Medicine is not perfect, but it is science and full of very educated and intelligent people following guidelines to improve the general health of other human beings. Let's all shout a big ol' thank you that we aren't suffering from Polio or Mumps or Measles! We have antibiotics so we won't necessarily die from things like pneumonia! Hip Hip Hooray!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gardinsprite13
02:54 PM on 09/20/2011
There are people who study hard but its not reported.
And there is evidence to show how harmful Vaccines are,but you will not hear about it.
DR Gershwin 90 years ago discovered the cure Cancer when he did study's and tried to get the word out and had documented cases he was Murdered wonder who would kill a man who found a cure for Caner?
The Dentist who studied and gave warnings about the dangerous Mercury and Fluoride he lost his Licence to practice Dentistry why,because Drug Company's are IN CONTROL OF THIS NATION AND ALL THE MEDICAL INDUSTRY'S.