iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Cleve Foster Case: U.S. Supreme Court Halts Texas Execution

Cleve Foster Supreme Court Texas Ececution

First Posted: 09/20/11 05:57 PM ET Updated: 11/20/11 05:12 AM ET

By MICHAEL GRACZYK, Associated Press

HUNTSVILLE, Texas -- A former Army recruiter who for the third time this year was hours away from his scheduled execution for the rape-slaying of a woman in Fort Worth nearly 10 years ago was granted yet another reprieve by the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday.

Cleve Foster, 47, was set to die Tuesday evening in Huntsville.

The high court twice earlier this year stopped Foster's scheduled lethal injection. The latest court ruling came about 2 1/2 hours before Foster could have been taken to the Texas death chamber.

Foster was meeting with one of his lawyers in a small holding cell a few feet from the death chamber when a Texas Department of Criminal Justice spokesman delivered the news.

"He thanked God and pointed to his attorney, saying this woman helped save his life," prison spokesman Jason Clark said.

He also said Foster repeated his insistence that he was innocent.

"I did not do this crime," Foster told him. "I know there are those out there who have hard feelings against me, but I did not do this."

Unlike his previous trips to the death house in Huntsville, the reprieve came before he was served his requested final meal, which included two fried chickens and a five-gallon bucket of peaches.

Instead, he immediately was returned to death row, at a prison about 45 miles to the east.

Foster was one of two men convicted and sent to death row for fatally shooting a 30-year-old woman whose body was found in a ditch by pipeline workers in Fort Worth in February 2002. His partner died last year of cancer.

The court's brief order said the reprieve would remain in effect pending the outcome of Foster's request for a review, known as a petition for a writ of certiorari. If the writ is denied, the reprieve is lifted, clearing the way for a new execution date to be set.

"You're always hoping for the best and fearing the worse," Maurie Levin, the attorney who was with Foster when word of his reprieve was delivered to him. "I'm thrilled. It's extremely unusual to get three stays from the Supreme Court in nine or 10 months."

In January, just before the start of a six-hour window when Foster could be strapped to the death chamber gurney for injection, he won a reprieve so the justices could further review an appeal in his case. The court later denied a hearing, the reprieve was lifted and a new date was set. Then in April, the high court again halted his execution when lawyers sought a rehearing on arguments he was innocent and had poor legal help at his trial and in early stages of his appeal.

His lawyers returned to the court with similar arguments he was innocent and had previous deficient legal help, specifically asking the court to decide whether prisoners like Foster had a constitutional guarantee for a competent lawyer when he first raised claims in a state appeals court. State lawyers said the issues had been resolved by the courts, that the Supreme Court has ruled there's no constitutional right to a competent state-provided lawyer for appeals, and the last-day appeal was just another attempt to delay Foster's punishment.

Looming before the Supreme Court is consideration of a non-death penalty case out of Arizona that deals with appellate legal representation and Levin speculated that could be related to the court's actions in Foster's case.

"After that, it's tea leaves," she said.

The Texas attorney general's office, which contested Foster's appeals, had no additional comment Tuesday beyond its arguments to the courts.

Lucy Nashed, a spokeswoman for Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who also is a Republican presidential candidate, said the reprieve was "a matter for the courts," and declined further comment.

Foster's reprieve was the second in less than a week in Texas. The Supreme Court on Thursday halted the execution of Duane Buck, a black man convicted of a double murder in Texas 16 years ago. Buck's lawyers contended his sentence was unfair because a psychologist testified during his trial that black people were more likely to commit violence.

Foster would have been the 11th Texas prisoner executed this year. On Wednesday, Lawrence Russell Brewer, 44, was set to die for participating in the notorious dragging death case in Jasper in East Texas. Brewer was one of two white men condemned for the death of a black man, James Byrd Jr., more than 13 years ago, in a hate crime that shocked the nation for its brutality.

Foster was one of two men convicted and sent to death row for fatally shooting Nyaneur Pal. Her body was found on Valentine's Day 2002.

"I didn't do this," he said recently from outside his cell on death row. "I'll fight it to the end."

Foster and a companion, Sheldon Ward, were convicted of fatally shooting Pal, who came to the U.S. from Sudan and was known as Mary. Pal, who worked at a country club, was seen talking with Foster and Ward at a Fort Worth bar. Evidence showed she had been shot once in the head and raped.

A gun identified as the murder weapon was found in a motel room where Foster and Ward were living. Authorities determined the same gun was used two months earlier to kill another woman, 22-year-old Rachel Urnosky, at her Fort Worth apartment. She also had been raped.

Foster and Ward were implicated but never tried in her slaying.

An aunt and uncle of Pal and the parents of Urnosky were to witness the execution. They had not yet arrived at the Huntsville Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, where executions are carried out, when the court ordered the punishment stopped.

A phone message seeking comment was left Tuesday evening by The Associated Press with Terry Urnosky, the victim's uncle.

Foster blamed Pal's death on Ward, who was one of his Army recruits. Prosecutors said evidence showed Foster actively participated in the woman's killing, offered no credible explanations, lied and gave contradictory stories about his sexual activities with Pal.

Her blood and tissue were found on the weapon and DNA evidence showed both men had sex with her. Ward said the sex was consensual. Foster said he was passed out from sleeping pills at the time Pal would have been murdered.

Ward died of cancer last year while on death row.

Foster also denied any involvement in Urnosky's slaying in December 2001. He told detectives he and Ward were at her apartment but they left when she refused to have sex with them. The Texas Tech honors graduate was found dead in her bed after she failed to show up for work.

In appeals, attorneys referred to Ward's several statements claiming sole responsibility for Pal's murder.

"The most striking feature of Ward's `confessions' is that they are incompatible with each other," state lawyers said in their responses to the appeals courts.

Foster grew up in Henderson, Ky., and spent nearly two decades in the Army, reaching the rank of sergeant first class. He was deployed to the Middle East during Desert Storm and was assigned to Fort Worth as a recruiter. Records showed court martial proceedings were started against him after allegations he gave alcohol to underage students as a recruiter and had sex with an underage potential recruit. He was denied re-enlistment in the Army and had been out of the service only a short time when the slayings occurred.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
By MICHAEL GRACZYK, Associated Press HUNTSVILLE, Texas -- A former Army recruiter who for the third time this year was hours away from his scheduled execution for the rape-slaying of a woman in For...
By MICHAEL GRACZYK, Associated Press HUNTSVILLE, Texas -- A former Army recruiter who for the third time this year was hours away from his scheduled execution for the rape-slaying of a woman in For...
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,702
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdecisneros
my micro bio is empty because I went to the micro
09:50 AM on 09/22/2011
It is good to be white.
09:52 PM on 09/21/2011
A third stay?! How disappointing. This guy continues to to get consideration after consideration of his life when one of the girls he helped murder, Rachel Urnosky, was never given a chance at her life. I have know the Urnosky family for a very long and I knew Rachel, she would have NEVER, NEVER allowed Foster or Ward into her apartment. The fact that Foster admits that he was in Rachel's apartment proves his guilt right there! Interesting that these 2 guys 'didn't do this' yet 2 innocent women were raped and killed. At this point, the Supreme Court needs to make a decision...either allow the execution to happen OR change his sentence to life in prison with no parole. Personally I would rather he rot in prison for the rest of his life than get off easy with execution. It has been 10 years and unfortunately the Court is not thinking about the families. How many more times do the families have to continue to live this nightmare over and over with all these stays? So Supreme Court....stop with these delays. Everytime they delay, a month later they allow the execution to continue. Clearly there is no evidence that points to his innocence. Please remember the victims and their families....justice must be served!
IWantTofu
Evolution. Now a political position.
09:43 PM on 09/21/2011
For Foster and Davis, you are entitled to be tried and found guilty if its beyond a reasonable doubt. You are not entitled to be found guilty beyond all doubt what so ever. You can't get a trial which found either guilty, and after a decade when memories fade and use that as a reason for introducing reasonable doubt. The courts are doing the right thing, temporarily stopping both executions to determine whether to hear an appeal whether there is "new" evidence that has been brought forth which may mitigate the executions, but you can't rerun the trials decade after decade until you get the result you want.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
08:51 PM on 09/21/2011
Didn't Scalia say about a year ago the court system doesn't care about guilt or innocence?
11:41 AM on 10/12/2011
One of my professors said the law is not concerned about the truth, just proof.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jsgaetano
Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus
12:21 PM on 10/12/2011
As it turns out, Scalia isn't concerned about anything except a guilty ruling.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuperDaveOsborn
07:43 PM on 09/21/2011
Professional Jurors - is the only ANSWER to the problem of corruption on the part of the prosecutors, the injustice that occurs when moms kill their children & get away with it, and an assorment of other horrendous things that we hear about more and more - and yet no one but Super Dave Osborn "hits the nail on the head" as to core of the problem !

Jurors of our Peers are the reason that 3% of the Prison Population is languishing,( here in this Country of FREEDOM) though innocent of charges, and these Citizen Jurors are also the reason that evil men & women get away with their crimes, because they are simply NOT trained to see beyond the fancy lawyer dances, the exclusion of evidence procedures, and worst of all The Judges' Instructions - that a Professional Juror would be able to sort out for the betterment of society !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tater Salad
How can I be a quitter when haters dont stop?
11:50 AM on 09/22/2011
Wrong! Professional juries is a violation of civil liberties. To have a handful of people selected is going against a jury of peers selected at random. It also opens the door for corruption and payoffs. Simplifying the laws is what is needed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wicked Zen
I am Jack's uninspired micro-bio.
01:11 PM on 09/22/2011
Ceasing state-sanctioned revenge-murders is the correct action.
photo
twain307
Ancora-Imparo
07:21 PM on 09/21/2011
White guy with blood and DNA evidence against him gets a reprieve.
Black guy with coerced and recanted evidence against him gets no reprieve.
We are told that America is a nation of laws and that justice is blind.
Empirical evidence would indicate otherwise.
IWantTofu
Evolution. Now a political position.
09:45 PM on 09/21/2011
The black guy got a reprieve until the supreme court determines whether it's worthwhile to hear the case.

You are right in one matter, in this country it mattered what color you were in terms of the justice you got. It's gotten better, but it's still not color blind.
photo
twain307
Ancora-Imparo
11:09 PM on 09/21/2011
Well, that certainly was neither helpful or long lasting. Worthwhile apparently does not extend to a former FBI Director having serious doubts,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cosmicmom
Mothering the Universe since 1950
06:10 PM on 09/21/2011
If he'd been of a different skin color, especially of the darkest variety, he'd be toast.

Sometimes I'm ashamed to be an American.
photo
jlglaze
A simple man
10:35 PM on 09/21/2011
move
06:07 PM on 09/21/2011
Many people, for, or against, the death penalty seem to call out the
"waste of expense" on appeals, etc. I do not know if all of you are
aware of this, but many, many non-death penalty sentences are
appealed all the time and carry a great deal of expense for those
appeals. And, if you cannot prove that you were wrongly convicted,
the sentence stays. And yes, on occassion, we do find someone
was actually innocent. This is the only reason why I am against the
death penalty - it should not be carried out if there is any reasonable
doubt that the person is not guilty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stockmanson
05:37 PM on 09/21/2011
To those against capital punishment: No body of evidence that convinced a jury a defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt will ever be enough. Theirs is a moral objection not founded on facts in evidence before a court. Capital punishment controversy is about the morality of the state taking a murderers life or rewarding that murderer with life. Our laws reflect societal attitudes capital punishment is one. Before law makers can pass a law to change that, the public must first reject execution as societies moral response to premeditated murder.
photo
twain307
Ancora-Imparo
07:25 PM on 09/21/2011
What so many pro capitol punishment folks never seem willing to admit is that mistakes are made, and innocent people are convicted. If you are going to do it, you'd best be right, because there are no go backs and do overs.
http://www.forensic-evidence.com/site/ID/bitemark_ID.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stockmanson
12:45 PM on 09/23/2011
Your objection to capital punishment seems based on the morality of it, justified by about the inefficiency in our judicial system. I think it unlikely you would suggest raising the bar for the state to prove a capital case because it will never be perfect. If yes you are correct it will not. The bar is already so high it took, from 1989 crime to punishment in 2011 in a recent capital case, and a decade from crime of dragging a man to death behind a truck for Byrd Jr. to receive his due. Your argument is clean and simple black and white - With our imperfect criminal justice system innocents will be executed, therefore no capital punishment. The opposition says in the taking of a life, the murderer, has forfeited their right to life. In some states its people side you the in others the latter. One of the advantages of many states, people can live where they are comfortable. In Texas if you do a crime their is a place to put you. If the crime is capital murder expect to loose your right to keep on living. In Texas in the 80's a murderer could expect to be released on good behavior in 7 1/2 years and do it again. There was recidivism so attitudes changed!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RK Johnston
Good Blood Never Lies...True Love Never Dies!
05:24 PM on 09/21/2011
Once the drugs go into the condemned--there is no "do over."
We cannot apologize for our actions if the execution turned out later to be bogus...and an innocent dies in the place of the truly guilty.

Dead is dead--and the infliction of death, be it by the correctional system or by a private individual--is unpleasant, total, everlasting, and final.

Think about it...and if it must be done, make sure that Justice is being truly served with that blood sacrifice on her altar. Otherwise, it will not be Justice...but Revenge...that is being given it's due when the drugs go in.

--RKJ
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cosmicmom
Mothering the Universe since 1950
06:11 PM on 09/21/2011
Fan #71
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stockmanson
05:23 PM on 09/25/2011
The state must prove a capital case beyond all reasonable doubt. This standard the prosecution speaking for the people, or society, must meet. If the jury of peers agrees it has been met, their finding will reflect that. The standard was established based on the premises that it is better to release ten guilty than condemn one innocent. If the standard could be raised to fifty would that be high enough?
11:22 PM on 09/26/2011
It isn't about quantity. It is about objectivity. It is not "beyond ALL reasonable doubt." It is "beyond A reasonable doubt." These are key distinctions. The prosecution speaks for the people only in theory. Please check your legal procedure prior to arguing for the murder of one innocent at the expense of doing "justice" to ten guilty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
r henry
I live between concrete walls
05:13 PM on 09/21/2011
2 fried chickens and a 5 gallon bucket of peaches? That honestly made me feel queasy.
03:45 PM on 09/21/2011
If the question before the Supreme Court is specifically whether or not there's a constitutional guarantee to competent counsel during the appeals process then it makes me wonder how seriously deficient his lawyers were in arguing his case to the appellate court.

Honestly though, it sounds like this question is bigger than the person and they're using his case to establish precedent. The actual death row inmate in this case is probably the last thing on the Supreme Court Justice's minds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hamp70
03:18 PM on 09/21/2011
Now that we are finding out that many of innocent people have been put to death, I have to wonder what goes on in a persons mind that would allow them to still be for the death penalty. Unbelievable! I have to wonder how they would feel if a loved one of theirs was put to death while being innocent. They sure get upset about the victim being put to death innocently, but when our justice system does the same it is okay. Strange. Am I the only one that has noticed how many of these people are to the right politically? I guess that I will have to rethink my believing that all people are basically the same. Or add at birth. I will stick with at birth so that I can still think that they could have been better humans.
05:01 PM on 09/21/2011
That has never been shown before
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hamp70
11:29 AM on 09/22/2011
So what would be your stand if it was shown?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stockmanson
05:16 PM on 09/27/2011
That you disagree with capital punishment doesn't make you a better human. An anti capital punishment stance is a morally based opinion! Others may hold a murderer accountable for their action as a moral responsibility. Societies charge their government to establish law and order, then maintain it by prosecuting violators. If you accuse juries of finding innocent people guilty as justification to speak against execution, that does not solve innocent people serving time. In other words to point out trial errors is background music to the real issue of capital punishment. (1) Take the life of the life taker, or (2) Reward the life taker with life.
When one asks the victims family their opinion is predictable. When one asked the inmates family that also is predictable. When one asks the prison guards, the inmates all say they are innocent. We have a system of justice to sort that out, imperfect bit getting better.
DNA, portable eye retina scanners etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hamp70
11:36 AM on 09/28/2011
We are humans with animal instincts. We make laws so that people, if they can, will control the animal instincts that are harmful. Murder is wrong all most any way you want to look at it, other than maybe combat and for sure self defense. The death penalty is neither of those and especially when it is killing innocent people. Imprisoning an innocent person is also wrong, but lets not compound the wrong by killing them, even if the society wants it. Once you kill an innocent person and find out that they were innocent you can not bring them back. If you can still condone this, I am definitely a better human than you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
catslegl
03:13 PM on 09/21/2011
While I'm terribly uncomfortable with the death penalty, Foster seems to be at the scene of 2 too many death scenes.
I'm unconvinced of Davis' guilt.
photo
disporting
Weapons not food, not homes, not shoes
12:14 PM on 09/22/2011
I am uncomfortable with the death penalty as well, but the sad fact is that between him or Davis, Davis appears innocent and all the evidence seems to point towards his innocence. This guy, while he may not have committed the crime, he was at the scene and is at least a witness.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
covyzoo
here we go again......
03:12 PM on 09/21/2011
Why did they stop the execution? There was plenty of evidence to show that he did it. DNA evidence and the gun were air tight proof that he was guilty. Now we have to spend more money on a new trial and prison housing for this murderer. The Insanity of Criminal Justice is apparent.
11:27 PM on 09/26/2011
and your comment is, respectfully, evidence of the quality of his "peer jurors." "Plenty of evidence," and reliance thereon is precisely why so many people are sent to death row in Texas...and why DNA evidence is exonerating many of the same people. Evidence is just a thing that makes an event in question more or less likely to be true, to whatever degree. "Plenty of evidence" fails to account for competing evidence that is overlooked by biased jurors. "Plenty of evidence" fails to account for the quality of the evidence, e.g. an "expert" witness testifying that a man was more likely to have had the requisite mental state necessary to kill another person because he was black.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stockmanson
05:06 PM on 10/06/2011
There are just too many factors to make a conclusion. Maybe overlooking better criminal investigations. Higher standards of evidence collection and control of the chain of custody or higher skilled and more aggressive prosecutors. Or that there is something in Texas water that breeds or attracts murderers!