iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Wisconsin Recall Elections: Record $44 Million Spent By Campaigns, Outside Groups

Wisconsin Recall

First Posted: 09/20/11 11:13 AM ET Updated: 11/20/11 05:12 AM ET

By SCOTT BAUER, Associated Press

MADISON, Wis. -- Nearly $44 million was spent on recall elections targeting nine Wisconsin state lawmakers after a clash over collective bargaining rights, and unions and conservative special interest groups led the way, according to estimates being released Tuesday.

The Wisconsin Democracy Campaign based its estimates on reports filed with the state and assumptions on how much was spent by groups that don't have to report.

Democrats beat two Republican incumbents in the recalls, falling one seat short of what they needed to win majority control in the state Senate. Democrats spun the results as a victory and promised to forge ahead with a recall of Gov. Scott Walker next year. There's also talk of more recalls targeting Republican state senators.

The recall efforts were fueled by the highly publicized debate over Walker's proposal that would strip collective bargaining rights for most public workers. Wisconsin's 14 Democratic state senators fled the state to avoid a vote, and the controversy generated national attention and widespread protests at the state Capitol in Madison.

The report found Democrats and their backers outspent Republicans $23.4 million to $20.5 million in this summer's recalls.

Outside groups outspent the candidates themselves $34.5 million to $8 million. The advantage for Democrats also was seen in outside spending, as they generated $18.6 million compared to $15.9 million for Republicans.

The spending shattered previous norms for Wisconsin as the recalls targeting three Democrats and six Republicans attracted spending from national groups at levels never seen before in the state.

It was more than double the previous high for spending in legislative races, which was just over $20 million for 115 seats in the 2008 election. That comes out to $176,000 per seat, compared with $4.9 million spent per seat in the recalls.

We Are Wisconsin, a political action committee composed of national and Wisconsin unions, spent the most on the recalls at $10.75 million. The group paid for more than 20 television ads and spent the most in support of Democrat Sandy Pasch in her race against Republican Sen. Alberta Darling of River Hills. Darling won.

The estimated $10 million spent on that race was more than any of the others. The second highest, at $7.2 million, was in the race won by Republican Sen. Luther Olsen of Ripon over Democrat Fred Clark.

Club for Growth Wisconsin, the state arm of the national conservative group, was the second highest spender at an estimated $9 million.

Because of the type of campaigning it does, Club for Growth Wisconsin is not required to file the same reports as We Are Wisconsin, and its spending was estimated by the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. It estimated the spending by looking at television ad buys and the cost of comparable activity like mailings, automated phone calls and consulting that is disclosed by others.

The Democratic-backing Greater Wisconsin Committee was third with an estimated $4 million in spending.

Related Video:
FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
By SCOTT BAUER, Associated Press MADISON, Wis. -- Nearly $44 million was spent on recall elections targeting nine Wisconsin state lawmakers after a clash over collective bargaining rights, and unio...
By SCOTT BAUER, Associated Press MADISON, Wis. -- Nearly $44 million was spent on recall elections targeting nine Wisconsin state lawmakers after a clash over collective bargaining rights, and unio...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,372
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
03:09 PM on 09/21/2011
I see the biggest li e by the Democrats was exposed in this article. That Republicans spent more money on these elections than Democrats. Democrats spent more of both backers money and outside groups money. And the Republicans still control the Governorship, the Senate, Legeslature and Supreme Court. And this is in one of the most Liberal states in the Union. Republicans turned out to be alot stronger than you Libs thought, huh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ev3ryWord
"We're not hiring until morale improves."
01:51 PM on 10/27/2011
Yes, the stench of crony capitalism in Wisconsin IS a lot stronger than I thought it would be ....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pappyvet
My God, it's full of stars!
01:51 PM on 09/21/2011
I do worry that were we to have lived 234 years ago,if we
would have stopped bickering at one another long enough to fight
the king and the dukes and barons who were quite content to
keep Americans living "by your leave."
Our founders were not just Washington and Jefferson but every farmer,hun­ter and printer who kissed their families goodbye to
give it up on the battlefiel­d . And so we should listen to
one another as adults and Americans. The first man I worked for when I came home was a man proud of how his dream put into our hands
raised so many children,b­ought houses and gave many the time and money to dream their own American dream and follow it,and he still lived in the biggest house in the neighborho­od. My son used to mow his lawn.
We need to recommit ourselves to the value of our fellow citizens and
have a heart instead of a calculator when discussing the value of those of our brothers and sisters who who have been hit so hard by this depression.
01:26 PM on 09/21/2011
The math in this article doesn't compute. But it looks to me like that in spite of being outspent by millions, the conservatives held on to the gains they made against the progressives. No amount of spin can hide that fact.
10:24 AM on 09/21/2011
Does anyone but me see the problem with Unions helping candidates get elected, then negotiating their contracts with those they helped get elected?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPMac
10:30 AM on 09/21/2011
Our government at work.

And we wonder why corporations should be allowed to spend money on elections?
10:56 AM on 09/21/2011
Union contributions are voluntary donations from it's members. It does not use Union dues to pay for campaigns. So to answer your question... No, I see nothing wrong with people contributing to the candidate they wish to support. I know you guys aren't down with whole lawful electoral process, but in the real America, that's how things work. How bout your Koch boys sending the republican members of the super congress on vacation, is that ok because they're conservatives?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ladder 1
liberal=fair share with others money
10:59 AM on 09/21/2011
Thats a hoot!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:06 AM on 09/21/2011
That wasn't the case in Wisconsin UNTIL Governor Walker's budget repair bill took effect, which the unions and Democrats fought and continue to oppose. Understandably so, they know darn well that given a choice, many, many of those workers aren't going to join the union or make a "voluntary donation." Prior to the passage of that bill, the vast majority of Wisconsin public sector workers had no choice but to join the union as a condition of employment and contributions were automatically deducted from their paychecks without consent. Sounds like you support Governor Walker in allowing Wisconsin public sector workers to actually have a choice. It's the right thing to do.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
booker52
avid reader
10:16 AM on 09/21/2011
The Republicans found that the ruling for Citizens United by a right leaning supreme court can work against them, love it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ladder 1
liberal=fair share with others money
11:00 AM on 09/21/2011
Hows that? They now get to compete with Unions who have always been allowed to fund campaigns.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omnioasis
11:29 AM on 09/21/2011
Exactly, its why the left and unions are fighting to have it repealed. The UFt teachers union disclosed that it spend roughly a billion in the us annualy fighting rulins and obstructing govt reviews and mandates. they have spent close to 300 million in nyc alone in the last 2 years fighting tenure rules and the ability to be graded on their effectiveness at teaching. the courts ruled against them again again , they just continue to appeal. Imagine that they dont want parenst or records to reflect their teaching, In Georgia the union is fighting to prevent all the teachers caught cheating,stealing and lying from being fired.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPMac
10:14 AM on 09/21/2011
This is a great read for all you union loving hacks...I don't have a problem with union members it is the union leadership that are the crocks and here is the proof of how they get people elected to public office to line thier pockets with taxpayer cash!!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-pensions-legislation-watchdog-20110921,0,4724416.story
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wrightthewrong
Medicare for All
12:31 PM on 09/21/2011
I am self employed and would happily join a union if I thought it would make it possible for me to have benefits, steady pay (instead of the 2 cuts I have gotten over the last 2 years), and some reassurance that I might have a job in the future.

When one approaches people by calling them "union loving hacks," and then says "I don't have a problem with union members," this indicates a problem with communication skills.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackranger
12:35 PM on 09/21/2011
Guess you think only the corporations and not the workers should be represented. We all know the power of corporations, why do you so resent the small amount of power for the workers in this country Maybe you think the workers don't count?
03:34 PM on 09/21/2011
I did just great in my working career representing myself. When I worked harder and it showed in my results I climbed a heII of a lot faster than I would have waiting around for a union to negotiate a raise for me. Why would anyone who believes in themselve want to be lumped into a group filled with about half slackers who want to work as little as possible just to get by?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ed Red
09:14 AM on 09/21/2011
So Democrats and Unions spend more money and still did not get the results they wanted.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
08:41 AM on 09/21/2011
Here are some jobs, keep up the good work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sisa
07:05 AM on 09/21/2011
Let's see whats on the to do list this Winter.... Recall Walker, Galloway, Wangaard, Vukmir, and Moulton.
06:43 AM on 09/21/2011
Koch can have Walker .. soon after his recall, but wait isnt walker being investigated in some corruption scheme......Scott Walker, Wisconsin Governor, Eyed In Corruption Probe After FBI Raid On Cynthia Archer's Home.... he might be in jail before hes ever recalled.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/16/scott-walker-cynthia-archer-fbi-raid-wisconsin_n_965899.html
03:41 PM on 09/21/2011
I bet Obama makes it there first with his direct hand in giving 545 million to a cronie bundler of campaign funds to a business he knew was going bankrupt. Soylyndra. Those friends of Obama's have alreadt advised Congress that they will come to Congress Friday and appear but will take the 5th amendment. This was after assuring Congress they would answer all questions 2 weeks ago. They are being represented by 2 law firms that are 2 of Obama's biggest money bundlers. That 545 million is more money than 35 states got last year for Obama's favorite talking point, Infrastructure and school and road repair. How is that for a kick in the pants Libs?
05:14 AM on 09/22/2011
Exclusive Timeline: Bush Administration Advanced Solyndra Loan Guarantee for Two Years, Media Blow the Story
http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/09/13/317594/timeline-bush-administration-solyndra-loan-guarantee/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
05:34 AM on 09/21/2011
The money in politics is shameful. When Carter was running against Regan he said the money spent was mostly from the government. Of course that was before the supreme Court decided that money was free speech and corporations were citizens. Now office can be bought by the highest bidder?
07:15 AM on 09/21/2011
term limits
photo
surfinnonreality
EIT Excellence in Trolling Thanks for the talking
08:19 AM on 09/21/2011
Let's spend dollar for dollar. $1 of union money for every $1 of corporation money. and no funds from the government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Epilef2000
Cafe Con Leche Party
12:45 PM on 09/21/2011
The great thing about that idea is that there arent that many union...compared to private industry associations..and it would drastically limit the money in campaigns
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
04:28 PM on 09/21/2011
I'd rather the dollar or two on you tax return and no other money allowed. That takes money out of politics.
05:21 AM on 09/21/2011
What a waste of money. ! Wisconsin is on it's way to fiscal soundness. Scott Walker has given the USA a blueprint on how to reduce cost and create jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anonani
A woman of substance
05:47 AM on 09/21/2011
Prove that please.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Tommygun264
2Q2BSTR8
07:04 AM on 09/21/2011
With the homes of his top aids being raided by the FBI in their corruption investigation, the only path Snotty Walker is on is to the crowbar hotel.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ladder 1
liberal=fair share with others money
11:06 AM on 09/21/2011
Former. Get it right spammer
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Rayburn
GET YOUR GOVERNMENT OUT OF MY LIVINGROOM
04:48 AM on 09/21/2011
i really hope my state's officals do not get any ideal and decide we need these recall elections, kentucky is election crazy enough and it is illegal to sell alcohol while the polls are open, a person would NEVER be able to buy a beer here if we were allowed to have recalls.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
05:37 AM on 09/21/2011
I think all states and the Federal Government as a whole should have recalls. It would make the politicians fear the people instead of the other way around."What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? " Thomas Jefferson.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackranger
12:37 PM on 09/21/2011
I agree, I hate the idea of term limits, I want to be able to reelect a good representative over and over again. The recall option would mean we could throw the bums out sooner than later and avoid them making the impact they now enjoy,
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:07 PM on 09/21/2011
agree
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScaningTheWaves
11:38 PM on 09/20/2011
Unions, set monpolistic wages, limiting advancement. Protect the people that should be fired. Unions are the problems, especially with setting a salary that the company might not be able to afford.....can go on forever why unions are bad. ask csea members now about ferlo, instead of firing some people, they decided to deduct about $80 out of paychecks for the next 6-8months. yeah my fingers are getting tired of complaining about unions, thats how bad they are.

Obviously they have too much free time and money to spend like that.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
NoahVail
...a curmudgeon from So. Arizona
11:43 PM on 09/20/2011
Instead of complaining about the $80 out of your paycheck, you should reflect on the fact that you still have one.  Do you get paid to post this junk?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:12 AM on 09/21/2011
If he did, he would be a democrat along with you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberalntex
theliberalmiddleclassman on facebook
12:51 AM on 09/21/2011
WOW !! You must be a star in Karl Rove's eye with this post.

So "Unions protect the people that should be fired." What about the people who get fired just before retirement so the company can lower cost??

Wages have gone flat for 13 years with the decline in the number of Americans protected by Unions. I guess that is good news for you and the Tea Baggetts.

Americans don't take vacation anymore and our health insurance is expensive so we can pay a CEO 300 times the average employee and a investor a profit.

I guess you have to post crap like this to hide the fact the the United States Workforce standard of living is becoming that of a cheap Asian worker.

With the decline in Unions, CEO pay has gone from 50 times the ave. employee to 300 and we have lost pensions and good benefits.

How much longer will "your" Fox News Proganda hold???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennidus1680
05:40 AM on 09/21/2011
Until it bites him in the ass.
photo
surfinnonreality
EIT Excellence in Trolling Thanks for the talking
08:26 AM on 09/21/2011
The decline in unions is their own fault. Unions came about because there were massive wrongs that needed to be corrected in the work force. The unions were a force for good. But as those wrongs were corrected and corporations put in the changes to make the work place safer, the unions became a force for greed. Higher and higher wages and benefits that drove companies overseas or or the refusal to let incompetent workers be fired changed the country's view of what unions are. When the unions change and get rid of the worst of their bad images (rubber rooms for teachers come to mind) then perhaps we will listen to the pro union rant.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nancy66
10:50 PM on 09/20/2011
For those of you that are "against unions," please tell me why they aren't important. I think most workers like to have SAFE workplaces, livable salaries, healthcare, a vacation, etc. Please tell what is wrong with that, and if they choose, they why shouldn't they have people that can negotiate for them?

Think about those 31 miners in West Virginia. This company continually ignored warnings about the unsafe conditions of the mine, and look what happened. I hope none of you or your children will ever have to endure working for companies that really "don't give a d--n about you."
11:06 PM on 09/20/2011
Not against them- as long as there is no secret meetings.with the WH...
..bus to protests and BO gatherings with printed tees and matching signs.
Funding-donors--500,000 union leader salaries...Strikes when ever..even though many would take the job... They are not what they used to be..
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
NoahVail
...a curmudgeon from So. Arizona
11:18 PM on 09/20/2011
They are "not what they used to be" only because you take the products of their hard work and sacrifice for granted.  You would not have weekends without unions.  Much of their gains have been institutionalized by putting work rules into law.  Now there are those that would like to roll the laws back.

Ugh-  I just see who you are.  You should think long and hard about who is your friend and who is using you.  You have much more in common with an unemployed auto worker than you do with one of the nation's 400 billionaires.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joyf1
Glad I live on an island.
11:36 PM on 09/20/2011
Oh, like the Tea Party Express that bussed people all over the country to protest? They also had printed tees and signs, albeit misspelled signs, but signs nonetheless.
photo
surfinnonreality
EIT Excellence in Trolling Thanks for the talking
08:31 AM on 09/21/2011
Having the NLRB in their back pocket and stopping Boeing from setting up a new production facility in SC. Just because it is a right to work state shouldn't be a reason to stop it. 8000 jobs being held up. A job is a job regardless of whether it is union or not and workers should be allowed to decide for themselves if they want to be union. not forced.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nancy66
01:45 PM on 09/21/2011
I live in Seattle, and everyone here feels that Boeing is using this as "pay back" for the machinists's strike. Boeing is a wonderful company, but I know Bill Boeing would be spinning in his grave, if he knew what the corporatists are doing to his company.