More

Airlines And Biofuels: Carriers Look To Alternative Fuels For The Future

Airplanes Biofuels

First Posted: 09/21/11 08:27 AM ET Updated: 11/21/11 05:12 AM ET

Aviation is responsible for an estimated 2 percent of human-generated carbon dioxide emissions. The industry's rapid growth is doing nothing to decrease that figure, but airlines are nonetheless working to scale back their emissions. One tactic that’s been gaining traction: biofuels.

In June, KLM announced that it would begin operating more than 200 flights using biofuel in September. In July, Lufthansa, Finnair and Thomson Airways launched their bio-fueled flights. And in August, Aeromexico flew what it called the first biofuel-powered transcontinental commercial flight.

Among major U.S. carriers, those that have made varying commitments to biofuels include US Airways, United (and a pre-merger Continental), Delta and American Airlines.

“A key pillar of the environmental commitment of the combined company is a commitment to alternative fuels,” said Jimmy Samartzis, managing director for global environmental affairs and sustainability at United.

“We have entered into multiple agreements to purchase alternative fuel for use in aircraft and ground equipment," a spokesperson for US Airways told HuffPost Travel in an email. "These agreements involve the combined purchase of approximately 75 million gallons per year of jet fuel and diesel fuel derived from camelina oils or comparable feedstock.”

Fuels Of The Future

Biofuels are alternative fuels that originates from living organisms -- mostly plants and algae. They can also be derived from recycled cooking oil.

Plants that can potentially serve as biofuel sources for airlines include camelina, jatropha, agave, castor and algae -- crops that are especially useful given their ability to grow on marginal or degraded land.

“Camelina [for instance] doesn’t require the rich soil that corn and soybeans do,” said Jan Jaworski, researcher and principal investigator at the Donald Danforth Plant Science Center in St. Louis, Missouri. “So you can begin using land that is now currently used for other things or not used at all.”

Lisa Mortenson, CEO of Community Fuels, points out that camelina plants can be rotated with others like wheat, growing at a time when fields would otherwise be bare. This method would not only utilize empty land, but it could help to protect the soil and even improve its nutrient content.

Another potential biofuel source, algae, can help to reduce atmospheric carbon. Carbon dioxide can be captured from places like coal power plants and injected into algal ponds as fertilizer, according to Richard Sayre, director of the Enterprise Rent-A-Car Institute for Renewable Fuels at the Danforth Center. These ponds can also recycle wastewater from municipal treatment facilities and feedlots, and they can be placed on marginalized land.

Given that biofuels are likely to be consumed near where they’re produced, they offer potential additional benefits: emissions released during transportation will be reduced, as will transit time. Therefore, while biofuels and petroleum-based fuels have virtually the same shelf life, biofuels won’t lose as much life in transit, Mortenson pointed out. Biofuels are also unlikely to be stored underground or on a tanker in the same quantities as petroleum-based fuels, Jaworski said, which lessens the associated danger of spilling.

Using biofuels could have economic benefits as well as environmental ones. “I think there’s a tremendous opportunity to develop a domestic, sustainable energy policy that will reduce the dependence on foreign oil,” said Sayre. “If we made that oil in the United States, not only would we keep that money in the country, we could create jobs.”

Not So Fast

But biofuels aren’t without their challengers. Timothy Searchinger, research scholar and lecturer at Princeton University, points out an important nuance to the carbon-reduction argument. “Land grows plants whether you use them for biofuels or not,” he said. “So, those plants were already absorbing carbon from the atmosphere. The only way you would get a [CO2] reduction when using biofuels from plant growth is if you grow additional plants.”

Others argue that rainforests (and other lands) are being slashed to make way for biofuel crops, and that food crops are being diverted from peoples' mouths to engines.

Some airlines have already moved to address these concerns. Lufthansa posted the following announcement on its website: “In the procurement of biofuel, Lufthansa ensures that it originates from a sustainable supply and production process. Lufthansa guarantees that the production of its biofuel is not in direct competition with food production and that no rainforests are destroyed.” The company says it will require suppliers to provide proof it is using sustainable production methods and meet the criteria outlined by the European Parliament and the Council in the Renewable Energy Directive.

Jaworski believes that the food vs. fuel question is only an issue today because ethanol is currently derived from corn, which he believes will change in the future. “In the next five to 15 years this argument will no longer be a point of discussion."

A Good Investment

While jet fuel is currently the biggest cost for airlines, some believe that using biofuels will help stabilize fuel prices and supply.

“We face a lot of volatility with fuel pricing because of crude oil volatility," said Samartzis, of United. “We look at this as a potential way to manage that to some degree.”

Yet like any new technology, biofuels will initially be expensive, raising questions about whether that cost will be passed to the consumer.

“We don’t expect that we will have to face that challenge," said Samartzis. "As far as we can tell … we can get the cost to be competitive with conventional jet fuel.”

Cost issues aside, biofuels have the highest energy density of all fuels currently available. Airlines looking to become more efficient are taking notice.

“We as a company and [an] industry have made a commitment to achieving certain fuel efficiency improvements and carbon reduction goals long term," Samartzis said. "In order to achieve those on a collective industry basis, alternative fuels are a key component.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TRAVEL

Aviation is responsible for an estimated 2 percent of human-generated carbon dioxide emissions. The industry's rapid growth is doing nothing to decrease that figure, but airlines are nonetheless worki...
Aviation is responsible for an estimated 2 percent of human-generated carbon dioxide emissions. The industry's rapid growth is doing nothing to decrease that figure, but airlines are nonetheless worki...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Mochilero
Have backpack, will travel
02:24 AM on 09/22/2011
When is the United States going to catch on to this approach? Probably not until the dying petroleum industry has completed their demolition of the economy.
05:34 PM on 09/21/2011
The idea of looking into alternative fuels is a great step toward the future. http://www.perspectivestv.com
Zip Zinzel
If a Nation expects to be both Ignorant & Free . .
12:37 PM on 09/21/2011
============
"Another potential biofuel source, algae, can help to reduce atmospheric carbon. Carbon dioxide can be captured from places like coal power plants and injected into algal ponds as fertilizer, according to Richard Sayre, director of the Enterprise Rent-A-Car Institute for Renewable Fuels at the Danforth Center. These ponds can also recycle wastewater from municipal treatment facilities and feedlots, and they can be placed on marginalized land"
==================

I DON'T KNOW THE SCIENCE HERE,
BUT
I think our Government ought to be working with Universities to MASSIVELY FUND
"Public-Domain" research into this type of science
THIS LOOKS LIKE SUPER WIN-WIN

Where we can help absorb existing Carbon, and produce hopefully cleaner,
. . . and renewable fuels at the same time
03:15 PM on 09/21/2011
One of the problems with producing bio fuel from algae is contamination by other bacteria. When that happens, the entire system has to be sterilized and restarted. This easily happens to ponds. It also happens in the closed systems called biogenerators. There are research projects trying to solve it.
Zip Zinzel
If a Nation expects to be both Ignorant & Free . .
03:57 PM on 09/21/2011
Thanks for the update
12:22 PM on 09/21/2011
The price of oil, coal and nuclear keep going up.

It is time to transition to safe, clean alternative energy. Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste are the future.

It is time to end the oil monopoly on transportation fuels.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
12:08 PM on 09/21/2011
yeah, traveling round the world by plane is so much more important than ...eating.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
I Think
11:50 AM on 09/21/2011
Big oil wants you to think that bio fuels drive up the price of food production by taking land needed for food.
They are LYING.
The biggest factor in the price of food is the price of petro fuel for tractors and trucks.
If the US stopped paying farmers to keep land out of production, there would be lots of land available for oil production. Also there is enough waste cooking oil being dumped to produce bio diesel to replace about 5% of our truck fuel.
Big oil does not want to allow bio diesel because you can make it in your own back yard as thousand of people already are doing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:23 AM on 09/21/2011
Biofuel could become a larger environmental hazard than any fossil fuel. How much land is required for large scale biofuel production? Are we burning what we should be eating? If the US were to switch over to BF entirely would it be produced in some 3rd world nation, ultimately at the expense of their populace? Since BF crops aren't for consumption, are pesticides more loosely and generously applied? What does it mean for exposed watersheds or biodiversity?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
I Think
11:44 AM on 09/21/2011
You are not reading the article, there is enough land that the government pays to keep out of production to produce millions of gallons of veggie oil per annum.
Also Algae ponds may deliver thousands of gallons per acre per annum.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:15 PM on 09/21/2011
Yeah. I read the article. Millions of gallons won't go very far. The US currently burns through 20 million barrels of oil per day (42 gallons per barrel). If BF is to be used on any real scale, not just as novelty to run a few planes and trucks, we're going to need inordinate tracts of land to maintain production levels whether it's produced with algae or crab grass.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
12:12 PM on 09/21/2011
all of their 'modern technological' answers will fail us. but people are desperate to believe something will pop up and 'fix' everything so they may continue to live as they do now.

it ain't gonna happen and we clearly aren't going to transition voluntarily into power down mode. the next 2 decades aren't going to resemble the last 2 and perhaps then, when it's far too late to return the earth to any life giving state of health it will sink in. we're heading towards peak everything and polluted everything.
photo
tinri
The New Confederacy - Taliban Occupied America
10:46 AM on 09/21/2011
The world is already flying on renewable bio-fuels and America is still just considering it. Sometimes, this place is just too embarrassing for words. Especially if you must travel to other countries in your job.
photo
FoxIslander
Fox Island...no relation to Fox News
12:12 PM on 09/21/2011
I feel your pain. Fly into Singapore, Hong kong, or Bangkok...modern new airports...then return home to LaGuardia, or LAX...we look like a former Soviet republic. Sad.
12:39 PM on 09/21/2011
sadthat you cannot see beyond the fancy buildings in those countries....the US infrastructure is MUCH older the n Singapore or HKK or KL etc..they are building from what was truly third world runways and WW2 huts..so EVERYTHING is new.....the US system is oldand aging and VERY toug ht o constantly upgrade..it IS happening but we also have MORE airports then ANY country worldwide....I saw the same disparity in telephones in the far east...they went from wind up and operator phones t odigital..we went rotary-touch tone-digital...evolutuion of systems THEIRS was revolution....you MUSY consider the shear SIZE of the systems before you shake down the US and its HUGE infrastructure...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UncleDale
retired librarian fromMaine,living in Florida.
10:40 AM on 09/21/2011
How about some thin film solar cells on planes and at 30,000 feet,lots of electricity? And part of the journey by electric engines?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tribilin219
AND NO ONE IN JAIL YET, Why?
11:10 AM on 09/21/2011
Sounds good to me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
desertdweller
I didn't know him but he knew me.
12:04 PM on 09/21/2011
Nice thought, but solar would barely provide enough power to operate the avionics systems. Commercial aircraft contain a small turbine, usually located at the tail, to generate the amounts of electricity required to power all onboard systems.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tholin
12:19 AM on 09/25/2011
Inevitably, weight would be the factor deciding against an airborne solar application, as battery storage would be required to gather and dispense electricity efficiently throughout all conditions of the flight environment.

While aloft, aircraft electrical power is supplied exclusively via engine-driven generators; the auxiliary power unit you refer to is used as sparingly as possible during ground ops before engine start.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:34 AM on 09/21/2011
Only problem with biofuels? What will happen to the price of food?
The entire food chain is based on corn, wheat, right?
I don't think this is the right answer - price of food.

Has to be some more research.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tribilin219
AND NO ONE IN JAIL YET, Why?
11:08 AM on 09/21/2011
Read the article before you post.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
12:18 PM on 09/21/2011
the article doesn't go into the realities of all the challenges facing us. it's a feel good, we've got an answer so there kind of piece.

even with running your car on biofuels...it still takes oil to make many of your car parts like your tires. 8 gallons a tire to be precise. we're not going to keep this jet set, shipping food all over the planet lifestyle in place indefinitely. i don't care how many great sounding ideas you hear, even all of them together will not provide the lifestyle cheap petro did for the past 100 or more years. we can't replace what we had and what we've come to rely so heavily upon with any combination on the scale it would be required to maintain what we have now.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jack Davies
orange rabblerousing radical moderate!
10:17 AM on 09/21/2011
Oh crap! There goes the last of Mexico's food sources.....