More

Samsung's Lee Younghee: 'Apple Is Free Riding'

Samsung Lee Younghee

By KELLY OLSEN   09/23/11 09:35 AM ET   AP

SEOUL, South Korea -- A top Samsung executive says the company will take a bolder stance in its patent battle with smartphone and tablet rival Apple, which Samsung claims has been "free riding" on its patented wireless technologies.

"We'll be pursuing our rights for this in a more aggressive way from now on," Lee Younghee, head of global marketing for mobile communications, said Friday in an interview.

Lee, a senior vice president at Samsung, did not say what form the South Korean company's stronger stance would take or if there would be more lawsuits. But her remarks suggest a definite change in tone. She described its previous approach as "passive."

So far, Samsung has mostly spoken about the dispute through press releases and comments by anonymous company officials in South Korean and foreign media. The public nature of the comments appeared to back up recent South Korean media speculation the company was planning to go on the offensive.

The fight began when Apple sued Samsung in April in the United States, alleging the product design, user interface and packaging of Samsung's Galaxy devices "slavishly copy" the iPhone and iPad.

Samsung has responded with its own lawsuits accusing Apple of violating its intellectual property. The fight has spread to 10 countries, according to Samsung, including the U.S., South Korea, Germany, the Netherlands and Australia.

The battle is all the more complex as Apple and Samsung are not only competitors in the fast-growing global market for smartphones and tablet computers, but also have a close business relationship.

Samsung Electronics Co., the world's biggest manufacturer of memory chips and liquid crystal displays, supplies some of the key components that go into Apple Inc. products.

Lee said that Samsung has kept that relationship in mind amid the dispute with the Cupertino, California-based company, and has largely been pulling its punches.

"We've been quite respectful and also passive in a way" in consideration of those links, Lee said during the interview in her office at Samsung's headquarters building in southern Seoul. "However, we shouldn't be ... anymore."

Lee said that Samsung holds numerous patents covering wireless telecommunications technology. Samsung says such patents cover key functions including allowing a mobile phone user to speak on the phone and receive an e-mail at the same time.

"We believe Apple is free riding" on such Samsung patents, Lee said.

Apple reacted to Lee's comments by reiterating its claim Samsung has violated its intellectual property.

"It is no coincidence that Samsung's latest products look a lot like the iPhone and iPad, from the shape of the hardware to the user interface and even the packaging," said Seoul-based spokesman Steve Park. "This kind of blatant copying is wrong and we need to protect Apple's intellectual property when companies steal our ideas."

Lee's comments came after a German court ruled earlier this month that Samsung cannot directly sell its new Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet in the country, saying the design too closely resembles Apple's iPad 2. Samsung has appealed the decision.

Samsung ranked No. 2 globally in smartphones behind Apple in the second quarter of this year, according to U.S.-based market research firm IDC, which cited the growing global popularity of the Galaxy S smartphones. In overall mobile phones, Samsung ranks second behind Finland's Nokia Corp.

The Suwon, South Korea-based company got a late start in smartphones after Apple shook up the industry with the launch of the iPhone in 2007, but has come on strong.

Lee painted an optimistic portrait of Samsung's future growth and said she believes it can eventually take the No. 1 spot in smartphones and mobile phones.

"We are striving to continue this growth momentum and someday we can imagine that we can be in the leading position," she said, emphasizing that Samsung has a broad array of hardware, functions, operating systems – Google's Android, Microsoft's Windows and Samsung's own bada – prices and presence in global markets.

"We are aware of the importance of branding so we'll be reinforcing this Galaxy branding," she said of the Android-based devices.

Regarding Google Inc.'s proposed $12.5 billion deal to buy mobile phone maker Motorola Mobility, Lee said the plan has not changed Samsung's relationship with the Mountain View, California-based search engine.

"We still have a very good relationship," she said. "We are working very closely with Google."

Lee joined Samsung in 2007 from French cosmetics maker L'Oreal. Makeup and mobile phones have a lot in common, she said, in that both are focused on individual expression.

Mobile phones, she said, are not just technology, but "a culture and showing who I am, where I belong, how trendy I am."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

SEOUL, South Korea -- A top Samsung executive says the company will take a bolder stance in its patent battle with smartphone and tablet rival Apple, which Samsung claims has been "free riding" on its...
SEOUL, South Korea -- A top Samsung executive says the company will take a bolder stance in its patent battle with smartphone and tablet rival Apple, which Samsung claims has been "free riding" on its...
Filed by Ramona Emerson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 125
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
03:47 PM on 09/26/2011
All these people talking about Samsung stealing from Apple need to go see all the technology Apple stole from the Xerox PARC facility. Apple made their name stealing other people's technology (http://www.mac-history.net/the-history-of-the-apple-macintosh/rich-neighbour-with-open-doors-apple-and-xerox-parc), for them to be upset with other companies now is comical.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThaGovna
I walk on water, eat bullets, and poop ice cream.
12:18 PM on 09/26/2011
"Samsung cannot directly sell its new Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet in the country, saying the design too closely resembles Apple's iPad 2." Yeah, like a car from Ford too closely resemble a car from Chevy. Their effing cars!!!!! Unless one is a car and the other is a helicopter guess what??? They are going to look like each other!!! Does Samsung need to make it the shape of a triangle not to be accused of stealing??? Lol! It's a tablet! Is anyone really surprised that ALL tablets basically look the same? I'm not. F APPLE!
08:28 PM on 09/25/2011
Samsung: don't shamelessly copy rivals; instead come up with something even better. Then we'll talk.
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
03:45 PM on 09/26/2011
Funny, since that Apple device you think is so special is running on Samsung parts on the inside. This is going to turn into a case of Apple biting the hand that feeds it. Apple does not have the manufacturing facilities to make their own chips or devices and will find themselves at the mercy of their overseas production facilities if they continue to bite the hand that feeds them.
08:51 PM on 09/30/2011
1. It doesn't matter that Apple uses Samsung parts. What matters is how those parts are put together to make a final product. Samsung couldn't do that without shamelessly copying Apple.

2. Apple is not 'biting the hand that feeds them,' at least not in any way that would harm them. Sure, Apple doesn't have the production plants, but there are plenty of parts suppliers would who love to jump on the Apple bandwagon, because they know that no matter what product Apple puts out, their electronic parts are going to be in high demand. Apple will have no problem finding other suppliers.
05:06 PM on 09/25/2011
Bit rich considering how much Android has allegedly ripped off the people who created it's underlying technologies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
v650
01:32 PM on 09/25/2011
I don't know where they have been buying their apple products but FREE is not anywhere in apple's vocabulary.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MUDPUPPY
04:08 AM on 09/25/2011
I have an old PC that is running fine with the Windows Millennium Edition OS. Bet it is the only one in existence.
08:18 PM on 09/24/2011
Go!!!! Sammy
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
06:40 PM on 09/24/2011
funny samsung has been openly working on the tablet for years , long before Apple even talked about theirs. Yet Apple claims Samsung is the copyright infringer on the tablet. I hope Samsung takes Apple down a notch or 2 with all of Apples patent infringements they have been stealing.
04:43 PM on 09/24/2011
I'll try this again. Must not have taken.
Apple was not the first with a GUI nor did they originate it nor were they first with a tablet. Look here for an early tablet concept from 1972 (iPad size and touchscreen with a hardware keyboard (like Blackberry).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynabook

Take a look at Dynabook again, follow the other links, the Xerox Star (1981/2) Xerox PARC desktop office from 1971 and Diana Merry's BitBLT routine from 1973 (and later improvements) which allows instantly overlapping windows on a screen, Xerox electronic desktop in 1991 concept with multi-touch surface (horizontal flat screen) in large size directly replacing physical-only desktops (big tablet), even tablets on Star Trek (original).

There is so much prior art here that I really don't get Apple having the huztpa to claim it is all their invention. That is just wrong historically not to mention irritating. If you remember they used 1970's prior art and patent claim from a British inventor to defend themselves from someone else's claim against the iPod a few years ago.

It is really a lot of accomplishment that Apple managed to develop products and concepts others failed on and make them work, sometimes spectacularly. Nothing wrong with that. Shades of the old Soviet jokes where (fill in the blank with anything) was always invented in Russia. Sheeeeesh!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
buddhistMonkey
My micro-bio is no longer empty
04:49 PM on 09/25/2011
((( "iPad size and touchscreen with a hardware keyboard (like Blackberry)." )))

The DynaBook, as you point out, looks nothing like an iPad, since it has a hardware keyboard. Had Samsung released a tablet that looked like the DynaBook, instead of aping the look of the iPad's hardware, home screen, icons, packaging, and advertising, Apple wouldn't have sued them.

((( "There is so much prior art here that I really don't get Apple having the huztpa to claim it is all their invention." )))

That's not their claim at all, and Apple has never said anything of the kind. Their case against Samsung is based on a long list of traits specific to the iPad that, taken as a whole, constitute a patented trade dress that Apple owns. If you're going to play armchair patent lawyer, at least familiarize yourself somewhat with the case in question:

http://thisismynext.com/2011/04/19/apple-sues-samsung-analysis/
09:57 AM on 09/26/2011
I introduce you to the HP Compaq TC1100, released in 2003:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TC1100-1.JPG

Everything that Apple claims it invented in terms of design is there. Large screen, a bezel devoid of buttons, a metallic finish, etc... Of course, this being 2003, it was nowhere as thin as the iPad came to be, but all the elements are there, the iPad looks like a mere evolution of it.

Apple has no reason to go crying to the courts. The iPad is a mere evolution of tablet design, enabled by technological advances. Trying to force competitors to resort to weird designs for their tablets is just another proof of Apple's unwillingness to face competition from anyone else.

This attitude is why I am swearing off Apple products altogether. As they say, consumers vote with their cash, and Apple will not get mine anymore until they stop acting like dumb bullies.
02:45 PM on 09/24/2011
Oh, please. "The fight began when Apple sued Samsung in April in the United States, alleging the product design, user interface and packaging of Samsung's Galaxy devices "slavishly copy" the iPhone and iPad."
Product design? A tablet computer is going to be rectangular, and as thin as practical. User interface? One GUI is pretty much the same as another, isn't it? Just click on the icons. Packaging? They probably both get their packaging from Boxes-R-Us; who cares?

I'm more interested in expandability (RAM, USB, networking), reliability, and length of support than I am the nameplate.
01:39 PM on 09/24/2011
The dilemma in recognizing intellectual property is how to nurture individual creativity and reward labor without going too far be creating monopolies and stifling creativity in others. After all, creativity thrives on imitation. The law of intellectual property is full of careful balances of what ideas are protected as private property and for how long and what ideas are not protected. Downey v. General foods Corp..

To avoid monopoly and encourage competition, the common law commonly allows copying and imitation of ideas, as opposed to their expression. Cheney brothers v. Doris silk Corp..
12:53 PM on 09/24/2011
I bought my first mac in 1990 and have used Apple products ever since then. I have also used Windows machines for as many years. I will used any OS that works. It makes no difference to me. What I strongly object to is Apple's arrogance-not to mention their annoying mindless lemmings.

Competition is always good. The problem is when Apple creates a device it dictates what software it uses; it has to be pre-approved by Apple. I would have more respect for Apple if it had the courage to adapt instead of trying to control the market. What is Apple so scared of? If Apple thinks its devices are so great then open them up. Samsung doesn't have a problem with opening their devices. I have more respect for Samsung.
05:11 PM on 09/25/2011
Thats not really a problem though. You dislike the approval process, you use Android, what is the problem?

Personally, I prefer knowing what I install on my smartphone is not malware. You can't say the same with the Marketplace. Every App install that isn't from a major company (which you can find on the App Store) is potentially malware.

Most ordinary users of Android probably think the Marketplace is completely safe because it is preinstalled on their phone and is run by Google.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:37 AM on 09/24/2011
Yes, Samsung was just waiting until Apple produced and mass marketed what they had planned all along. Makes sense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheWave
12:02 AM on 09/24/2011
Don't all LCD, LED, and PLASMA TVS look the same?
photo
atx888
micro-bio empty bcuz my brain need the space
05:00 AM on 09/24/2011
Not after you turn it on. I can see the difference.
01:13 PM on 09/24/2011
Tablets look different after you turn them on, too. But just like televisions, they all have the same basic shape.
11:23 PM on 09/23/2011
Come on and take a free ride! Come on and take me by your side!

Come on and take a FREE RIDE!!!