iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.S. To Hand Over Iraq Bases, Equipment Worth Billions

First Posted: 09/26/11 08:11 AM ET Updated: 09/26/11 09:31 AM ET

Iraq Equipment
Cargo gets loaded in preparation for U.S. troops to leave their base in Northern Baghdad.

Various Department of Defense officials provided not entirely consistent data on exactly how much has been given away thus far in each category. But the man in charge, Maj. Gen. Thomas Richardson, the chief logistics officer in Iraq, told reporters last month that U.S. forces had given away equipment with a fair market value of $247 million between Sept. 1, 2010, and August of this year -- on top of items worth $157 million that had been transferred before the withdrawal officially started.

The lion's share of donated items falls into the category of excess, non-military property. Major Kimbia Rey, a spokesperson for the U.S. forces in Iraq, told The Huffington Post this week that more than 2.4 million such items have been transferred to the government of Iraq since last September.

Richardson explained that much of that category consists of what they call "FOB in a box." When the Iraqis take over a Forward Operating Base, he said, they also get the things that go with it, such as containerized housing units, water and fuel tanks, air conditioning units, generators, refrigerators, porta-johns, beds and mattresses, office equipment, fences, dining facilities and so on.

According to Lt. Col Melinda F. Morgan, a Pentagon spokeswoman, some 12,490 excess defense items worth $70.5 million have been turned over to the Iraqis, with 7,000 more, worth about $40 million, to go. That category includes such things as older versions of weapons, vehicles, and body armor.

Finally, U.S. forces have also given the Iraqis 1,251 non-excess military items worth $47.7 million, Morgan said. That category includes such items as up-armored Humvees and 50-caliber machine guns, Richardson said.

All of the dollar figures are for what the military calls "fair market value"; the purchase price of those items could, of course, have been much higher.

And Morgan noted that the "heaviest volume of future property transfers" is expected to occur between September and December of this year, although the "quantity and value" of what is still to come has not yet been determined.

Indeed, a Government Accountability Office report issued earlier this month raised concerns that military officials will suddenly find a lot of equipment they didn't expect -- right at the last minute, just when everybody's leaving.

After one of the largest base transitions to date, the GAO reported, "officials said that they were surprised at the amount of unaccounted-for equipment that was left over at the end of the transition process." Senior military officials told the GAO they were particularly worried that unexpected or abandoned contractor equipment -- including expensive and much-in-demand materiel-handling equipment, like forklifts and pallet trucks -- would suddenly show up "likely at the last minute."

Some equipment has simply piled up in Iraq since combat operations began in 2003 and may not be properly logged, the GAO warned, pointing out, for example, that "units sometimes turn in such equipment without paperwork and have even removed identifying markings such as serial numbers to avoid retribution."

And while leaving the equipment in Iraq, especially if it's worn out or particularly bulky, is much cheaper and more expedient than shipping it home, there's no getting around the enormous expense of purchasing it in the first place -- and that some of it is precisely the kind of equipment that was in such desperately short supply when state National Guards tried to respond to domestic natural disasters like Hurricane Katrina in 2005, or the Greensburg, Kansas, tornado in 2007.

Hurlburt's concern is not so much that the U.S. is giving away the bases and the equipment, but that all these things that so much money was spent on aren't necessarily going to do their new owners much good. "At least, you would like if we were leaving them there, they would be useful to Iraqis," she said.

And it's an awful lot of stuff. "I'm thinking about the size of what was wasted there, and thinking about how what we spent in Iraq was all borrowed," she said. "In a crazy way, what we left in Iraq was our good credit rating."

RELATED: HuffPost's Sept. 16 story, "Massive U.S. Embassy In Iraq Will Expand Further As Soldiers Leave."

* * * * *

Dan Froomkin is senior Washington correspondent for The Huffington Post. You can send him an email, bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed, follow him on Twitter, friend him on Facebook, and/or become a fan and get email alerts when he writes.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- With just over three months until the last U.S. troops are currently due to leave Iraq, the Department of Defense is engaged in a mad dash to give away things that cost U.S. taxpayers bi...
WASHINGTON -- With just over three months until the last U.S. troops are currently due to leave Iraq, the Department of Defense is engaged in a mad dash to give away things that cost U.S. taxpayers bi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,605
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (235 total)
photo
AlfredE69
Liberty Lovin' Tree Hugger
08:21 AM on 10/06/2011
AG Holder, do your job and stop arresting people for smoking marijuana. Arrest Bush and Cheney for treason.
11:01 AM on 09/30/2011
This is actuall one of the better stories on HP, it is pretty close to being accurate but still leaves out some things. Most of the living containers and equipment is all set up to run on 220VAC and was baught in the ME so it would not meet US Code anyway. Another thing is that most of this syuff was bought years ago and had about an 18 monthe life expectancy and has been kept working by ongoing maintenance. Most of it would fall apart if moved very far. The real problem was that it was bought locally and not from US companies using US taxpayer money, not to mention the thousands of non US expats hired with that same US taxpayer money while America is and has been facing high unemployment... does not make sense to me. Why hire someone from the Balkans with US taxpayer money at US wages when there are Americans that need a job??
03:13 AM on 09/29/2011
In the former Soviet Union people were shot for stupidity like this. We better be careful before we end up like they did, broke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KMAJ
Iraq war Veteran
01:01 AM on 09/29/2011
There are quite a few details left out of this story. First and foremost, we did NOT "build" many of the bases as claimed in this story. Al Asad Air Base was an existing Iraqi Army base adapted by US forces. Camp Victory was a private palace compound where Al Faw Palace was located and adapted for use as Headquarters for USF-I.

In addition, yes, many of the items we expensive when first brought here to Iraq. But over the past 8 years, much of it has become obsolete. I ask you, how much would you pay to ship something back home that will never be used by us again?

Of course, the thought of abandoning millions is a much more interesting story, Oh yes, there is waste, disgusting, dreadful waste, but there is MORE to this story.
photo
AlfredE69
Liberty Lovin' Tree Hugger
08:22 AM on 10/06/2011
American would have been better off not invading a country that was never a threat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brett y
Frack the frackers!
11:42 PM on 09/28/2011
effing disgusting.
09:07 PM on 09/28/2011
you guys think this is wasted money?

You should see how much of our money was SQUIRRELED WAY by foreign PRTS,
jsim6974
Powderfinger
06:19 PM on 09/28/2011
Too bad Al Quada didn't hide out in Detroit or Pittsburgh.
11:04 AM on 09/30/2011
But they are...... just drive through and take a look
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raejeanowl
06:06 PM on 09/28/2011
The reason that the figures are inconsistent is that they started destroying stuff literally the moment they captured Hussein and started downsizing in general. Requisitions for equipment and supplies could not be stopped in mid-shipping and so they arrived and had to be gotten rid of rather than in some cases fall into the hands of enemies. How? Trucked out into the middle of the desert and buried or destroyed.
05:26 PM on 09/28/2011
How much of this stuff could be brought back to rebuild our own infrastructure? Does the govt. have a deal with US suppliers that promises it won't come back. This just gives product to our own enemies as well as another reason to laugh at how they outsmarted us.
05:00 PM on 09/28/2011
Any piece of equipment more complicated that a wheelbarrow should have a thermite bomb attached and melted into a heap of slag before the Americans depart. Otherwise we will be fighting our own equipment in a few years. Don't leave them anything that can be used in the future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brett y
Frack the frackers!
11:45 PM on 09/28/2011
But that's the plan don't you know? That way, our MIC will need to work on bigger/better ways to kill. And that costs billions...
02:27 PM on 09/28/2011
The US should calculate the cost of the equipment plus the cost of actually winnung the war and come up with a formula to trade it for oil. Have the Iraqi Govt. repay us taxpayers for our goodwill.
They can give us free oil for a couple of years until all of the bills are pay back. No taxpayer increases, just payback in oil.... seems quite simple.... NO?
09:52 PM on 10/10/2011
I don't think Iraq is interested in our remains that much unless it's free.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jonathanzimmel
02:17 PM on 09/28/2011
can they at least give us some oil in return?
01:56 PM on 09/28/2011
Has any one with two brain cells considered shipping to Israel via the nice connecting highway they used in 1973 to get their tanks 30 miles from Bagdad. If we're giving it away give it to someone who deserves our trust. Cost is the concern. Use a calculator. Besides convoys of goods would be too tempting a target for insurgents to pass up. Flushing more into open for "attitude adjustment". Less opporable insurgents when we leave the better. Might even earn some good will. To expensive or politically incorrect. Give it to the Turks we've got stuff there already. Same benifit and same tempting targets.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff Klenck
01:29 PM on 09/28/2011
Another Bush , Rumsfield (the great liar) and Cheney (worst enemy of our country) fiascal...legacy.
02:30 PM on 09/28/2011
Jeff..... you are metally impared or just a nut! Look who's giving it away........ Oh excuse me.... we should just blame Bush....
jsim6974
Powderfinger
06:20 PM on 09/28/2011
It's Bush's war. Plain and simple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennisc443
12:28 PM on 09/28/2011
Just an excuse! Zero Hussein O'Booboo probably ordered it to share the wealth of America along with the soldiers killed....... I just wonder how long it will take to aim the equipment at the departing American Soldiers..