More

Cities Face Staff Cuts, Stopped Construction, Raised Fees: National League Of Cities

City Staff Cuts

By DANIEL WAGNER   09/27/11 06:57 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- More than half of U.S. cities have cut staff, canceled construction projects or raised fees this year, according to a report from the National League of Cities that catalogs the vast damage from shrunken property- and income-tax revenue.

Cities are struggling from the same problems that have left the national economy sputtering: high unemployment, a depressed housing market and weak consumer spending. Those factors have reduced the taxes that cities collect for a fifth straight year. Many have had to make up the gap by laying off employees, freezing pay, cutting services, raising fees or suspending building projects.

Two-thirds of city finance officers said they had delayed or canceled public-works projects this year. Two in five reported raising fees for city services. One in five had cut spending on public safety. Nearly one in three had laid off staffers.

"We hoped the worst would be over at this point, but given where the economic considerations are, that seems to be very unclear here in the fall of 2011," said Christopher Hoene, director of the league's research arm and one of the report's authors.

Cities typically suffer the full force of a recession later than states and the nation as a whole do. That's because many cities rely heavily on property tax revenue, which can take several years to fully reflect falling home prices.

By comparison, states rely mostly on income and sales taxes. Income-tax revenue usually falls steeply within months after layoffs. State sales tax revenue also drops as people spend less.

As states' tax collections fell during the recession, they responded by cutting aid to cities, school districts and localities. Those cuts are expected to peak next year, according to research by the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities cited by the league's report.

Public education is especially hurt because many school districts are funded about half by states and half by property taxes, said Michael Leachman, the center's director of state fiscal policy.

"The bursting of the housing bubble has now caught up with property tax revenues, so that's making it harder for local governments to offset the declines in state aid that they've been seeing," Leachman said.

In Cleveland, the school board was to vote Tuesday night on whether to lay off teachers for the second time this year. The school district says it would have to find more than $10 million in cuts to help balance its budget and save the jobs of more than 300 teachers.

This past summer, the city laid off 319 employees, including 81 police officers.

"Cleveland was chugging along," said Andrea Taylor, press secretary for Mayor Frank Jackson. "It wasn't as if we had a big surplus, but we were managing our share of the budget crisis well. We weren't set to have any layoffs at all."

But she said Ohio's recently enacted budget slashed state aid to the city by 25 percent in fiscal year 2011 and 50 percent in 2012. The budget was adopted in late June and enacted in July – a timeline so quick that Cleveland couldn't react without laying off workers, Taylor said.

The combination of state cuts and falling tax revenue amounts to a "double-whammy" for city residents that's likely to persist for years, said Scott Pattison, executive director of the National Association of State Budget Officers.

"States really are not in a position to go back and restore those cuts," Pattison said. "Money is so tight, they don't have it to start giving it back."

Over time, the cuts tend to dampen growth by making companies reluctant to spend and hire, said Mark Vitner, senior economist at Wells Fargo Securities.

"If it becomes tougher for business to get done because of government cutbacks, or if businesses have a harder time finding skilled workers as the education system crumbles, it can create a nasty feedback loop that can go on for years," Vitner said.

In South Carolina, cities and counties are receiving 35 percent less from the state than in the 2008-2009 budget year. To close the gap, Clinton, S.C., had to cut 10 workers from its roughly hundred-person payroll this year. Three of the 10 worked in public safety.

Interim city manager Frank Stovall said Clinton can still provide basic services. But he said some services like recreation and community policing had been cut and utility rates increased.

"We have a plan to build bike paths and green spaces and parks," Stovall said. "It's been sitting on our shelf now since 2003 with no hope of implementing it."

In the Columbia, S.C. suburb of Cayce, garbage collection has been reduced from twice to once weekly. And Greer, S.C., near Greenville, has eliminated mosquito spraying and reduced leaf collection pick-ups.

The hardest-hit cities have been those that depend most on income from property taxes, the report said. Many are in the Northeast, Hoene said. By contrast, Midwestern cities tend to have steeper income taxes. And cities in the West, South and Southeast typically rely more on sales-tax revenue.

All three categories of tax revenue are expected to decline in 2011, Hoene said.

The report is based on a survey taken this spring and summer, before worsening economic data and fears about Europe's debt woes hurt consumer confidence and caused wild swings in the stock market.

"There may be a reconsideration of that as this year continues to unfold," said another co-author, Michael Pagano, dean of the College of Urban Planning at the University of Illinois and Chicago. "We're looking at at least another two or three years of very troubling fiscal signals for cities and municipalities."

The report is based on an annual survey of finance officers from cities and municipalities with more than 10,000 residents.

___

Associated Press writers Seanna Adcox in Columbia, S.C., and Kantele Franko and Andy Brownfield in Columbus, Ohio, contributed to this report.

___

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- More than half of U.S. cities have cut staff, canceled construction projects or raised fees this year, according to a report from the National League of Cities that catalogs the vast dam...
WASHINGTON -- More than half of U.S. cities have cut staff, canceled construction projects or raised fees this year, according to a report from the National League of Cities that catalogs the vast dam...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 21
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
englishman545
English Born, Brooklyn Raised
02:30 PM on 09/28/2011
That's ANY misspellings (Damn Jack Hammer)
photo
englishman545
English Born, Brooklyn Raised
02:29 PM on 09/28/2011
Workers are still working on the repiping of my house, please excuse ams misspellings.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
12:40 PM on 09/28/2011
Some US citizens believe that there is no limit to the amount of US Dollars that the US government can take from the US taxpayers and borrow more US Dollars back from wealth producing foreigners in the foreign industrial nations to spend for any and all sorts of additional government bureaucratic jobs, government contracts, and government benefits for those US citizens whom the politicians think will vote for those same politicians that pass laws to give those citizens more and more "free" government money.

The USA will become a third world nation of mostly unemployed starving beggars after the US government deficit spending destroys the purchasing power of the US dollar.

US citizens should demand RE-INDUSTRIALIZATION of the USA because that will create a bigger economic pie, create more jobs for US citizens, and create more NATIONAL WEALTH in the USA that could be subjected to taxation to pay for our ever increasing government expenses and maybe to PAY OFF SOME OR ALL OF THE US NATIONAL WEALTH.
realitybaby
Livin in realitybaby!
01:05 PM on 09/28/2011
so true - but sadly most people dont go this deep - some dont think past today.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:16 AM on 09/28/2011
THESE ARE THE REASONS TO OUTLAW UNIONS REPRESENTATING EMPLOYEES THAT ARE WORKING FOR TAX SUPPORTED ORGANIZATIONS.

Public Service Unions representing the Government Elite Bureaucrats have an unfair advantage when they are negotiating wage and benefit contracts with the same elected politicians that the same unions helped to elect with campaign contributions from union member’s dues!

The Government Elite Bureaucrat's Unions negotiate with the same elected politicians that they financially contributed money (union dues) to in the elections for the union member's requests to take more money from the taxpayers and then give that tax money to the Government Elite Bureaucrats!

If the elected politicians do not give the Government Elite Bureaucrats as much tax money as their unions ask for, then the Government Elite Bureaucrat's Unions will donate union money to other politicians in the next elections who will be more sympathetic to the union compensation demands.

The politician is not forfeiting any of the politicians money to pay for increased pay and benefits that the politician is giving away the taxpayer's money to help him collect political contributions for his personal political re-election expenses.

Other union and non-union employees negotiate with the business owner to get more of the business owner's money into the union member’s pockets, and this is OK by me?

How many of the Government Elite Bureaucrats can the taxpayers afford to support, before the resulting higher taxes drive the businesses and the non-government jobs away to another state or some foreign country?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:33 AM on 09/28/2011
The Elite Government Bureaucratic state and local Union employees in Madison, Wisconsin were protesting to require that the State Government take more money from the wealth creating taxpaying businessmen, taxpaying non-government workers, and the property owners to then give that tax collected money to the Elite Government Bureaucratic Union Workers that do not create any wealth but only consume wealth in the form of more pay and benefit.

What happens if the businesses leave that state to escape these additional taxes, and take their non-government jobs with them?

In Egypt, Bahrain, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia and Libya the wealth producing, taxpaying businessmen and the taxpaying, non-government, wealth producing workers are protesting to reduce the amount of money and oil royalties that the wealth consuming, tax supported, politically connected, family connected, non-productive, Elite Government Bureaucratic employees are taking from the government revenues to pay for the salaries of the non-producing government (politically connected) bureaucrats!

The new leader will probably create another new Elite Government Bureaucracy that will only hire the new leader's family and friends, and then take most of the government oil and tax revenues to pay for new bloated salaries for the new leader's family and friends.

At least in the USA you have the opportunity to work hard and join the rich, as compared to foreign countries where you have to be politically and/or family connected and/or bribe some government official to get a government license to become a businessman!
11:05 AM on 09/28/2011
The Revolution HAS begun!! Occupy Wallstreet in NY is now spreading to Chicago,DC,LA,SF,MN,etc!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zgr3DiqWYCI&sns=fb
AND
http://www.livestream.com/globalrevolution
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:27 AM on 09/28/2011
I do not want to see any revolution in the USA.

Chaos and total lawlessness will prevail during and long after the start of any US revolution or economic upheaval.

Only the very meanest and the most evil will survive in this climate.

We will have then totally destroyed our civilization.

You will then have to comply with the will of any and every armed person that you encounter, unless you are sufficiently armed and deadly proficient in the use of your weapons.

Will all of the city residents starve after a revolution?

Most of the US urban population is not knowledgeable enough to live off of the land anymore.

The city dwellers might foray into the country, kill the farmers, take over his farm, and steal the farmer's food to feed their own families.

Food might become more valuable than piles of freshly printed paper US dollars.

If any future US revolution to overthrow the US government occurs (maybe to change the economic situation), where will all of the food, fuel, water, sanitation, medicine, and other necessities to support the population come from after the revolution? These necessities will not exist within hours after the revolutionary hostilities start.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ruolivert
04:24 PM on 09/28/2011
You're basically saying that the vast majority of US citizens cannot function with out support of the government that is keeping this country from re-industrializing. That's already a pretty bleak out look and I guess because I'm a jaded 20-something I'm not as optimistic about our citizens being the change we need them to be
photo
AlanBannacheck
President of the Deep Thoughts Association (DTA)
09:49 AM on 09/30/2011
But they can learn how to live off the land. When you factor in an aging population and obesity, the aforementioned sounds a little bit doomeristic, and some optimism is warranted.
realitybaby
Livin in realitybaby!
01:07 PM on 09/28/2011
u gotta be kidding cause there aint no occupation here - yes they have signs and they are marching and banging a drum but its not 1969 - the heart and soul of it isnt here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
05:30 PM on 09/28/2011
And they are unarmed, so do not worry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
10:26 AM on 09/28/2011
States, Counties, Cities, Hospital Districts, School Districts and other taxing authorities that have payroll and benefit expenses that are larger than their incomes (tax collections) should de-incorporate or declare bankruptcy and allow the neighborhoods to fend for themselves.

How about all governments at every government level reducing the salaries, pensions, benefits, and the number of bureaucrats to the numbers that the taxpayers can afford to support with the amount of their tax collections that the various governments collect from the taxpayers?

Maybe the taxpayers cannot afford to pay for smaller classroom sizes, special education classes, Bi-lingual education classes, fast police, medical and fire response times, etc,

Maybe the taxpayers need to expect slower police and fire response times, free emergency medical EMT response instead of paying for a taxicab ride to the hospital, more potholed in the streets, etc.

Making others pay for the higher level of my public services with Federal stimulus funds, and/or the excessive benefits that I pay my bureaucrats WAS NOT FAIR to others that only paid their bureaucrats as much as they could afford!
realitybaby
Livin in realitybaby!
01:11 PM on 09/28/2011
there is a total inequity of pay and benefits. The private sector cannot and really should not be responsible to pay pension and benefits for public employees for 30 40 50 years.
photo
englishman545
English Born, Brooklyn Raised
02:28 PM on 09/28/2011
Then we would only have i Cingressman, one senator, and no Vice President, That's what we can afford.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
10:17 AM on 09/28/2011
The only way to create and pay for Tax Supported federal, state, school district, and municipal government bureaucratic jobs and government contracts is for some or the NATIONAL WEALTH created by the private sector to be FORCIBABLY TAKEN from the private sector in the form of taxes, and/or to obligate the wealth creating private sector though bonded indebtedness to create and pay for the funds to pay the public bureaucrat employee's salaries and benefits and also to pay for government contracts to perform some government service or create new infrastructure.

If the nation, states, school districts, hospital districts, counties and cities cause their businesses and their tax bases to relocate due to high taxes, rules, and regulations to the point that the local government cannot afford to pay for public bureaucratic services, then those US citizens might have to provide their own police, firefighters, teachers, medicine, water, sewer, roads, bridges, welfare, social services, and other bureaucratic provided services as best as they can with whatever their limited resources can afford.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
10:21 AM on 09/28/2011
Cities, states, counties, school districts, hospital districts and nations should un-incorporate or declare bankruptcy if they can not pay for the costs of the bureaucrats and their other benefits and retirement pensions even if previous elected administrations committed the current taxpayers to pay the bureaucrats whatever previous elected politicians contracted for and obligated the current citizens to pay for.

I believe that it would be totally unfair for Federal funds to be spent to pay local public sector bureaucrats salaries and benefits for their teachers, water system operators, sewage treatment plant operators, police, firefighters, street maintenance, infrastructure replacement contractors, and other similar services.

The local residents should limit the cost of these bureaucrats, infrastructure systems and services to the cost that the wealth producing taxpayers could afford.

The costs of local government bureaucracies are destroying municipal and state governments.
09:53 AM on 09/28/2011
We are in a death spiral. Loss of employment reduces income and sales taxes. Loss of homes reduce property taxes. Loss of taxes reduces government employment and the cycle repeats.

When a patient is in a death spiral drastic means are needed to shock them back to life. That is what this country needs, a huge shock to get our hearts pumping again. I would propose a huge 5 to 10 year program to accomplish a lofty goal that requires tremendous federal, state and local government spending, such as becoming free from dependency on fossil fuels; or, building high speed rails connecting every major city in the U.S.

Then we have a life spiral. More spending equals more jobs. More Jobs equals more sales and income taxes. More jobs equals improved housing prices and increased property taxes. Government spending creates government revenues. If this can't be done by raising taxes then it needs to be done through sale of bonds. Instead of War Time Bonds we need Employment Bonds. Buy an employment bond and put your kids back to work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:21 AM on 09/28/2011
Are you proposing that the US government print up a bunch of freshly printed paper US Treasury Bonds and then sell them at public auction as needed to get some of the US dollars back from the foreign industrialized countries that we paid a lots of US dollars to make the things that we consumed, and then use these borrowed US dollars for payment to US contractors to re-build and expand the US infrastructure (Pork Barrel Projects) in order to reduce unemployment?

These borrowed US dollars would probably be spent on imported foreign manufactured earth-moving machinery, imported materials (Steel, Cement, Equipment, Pipe and Wire), illegal alien labor, outsourced engineering, outsourced CAD drafting, etc., and the US manufacturing workers will still be mostly unemployed.

Any Economic Stimulus Spending should also prohibit any imported products (even if we no longer manufacture those products) from being purchased with any of these funds, and also prohibit all outsourcing of the Labor Required.

Will the industrialized countries of the world loan back enough US dollars that US citizens paid the foreigners to make our imported consumer goods the USA to pay US citizens to work at jobs to repair our infrastructure?

What happens after these projects end, and these temporary "Pork Barrel" jobs disappear?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
11:22 AM on 09/28/2011
This is a short term solution that will mostly economically benefit foreign manufacturers of industrial and consumer goods that we will import, US salesmen for the foreign manufactured equipment, materials, etc., and the people working in the distribution of the imported things for our infrastructure improvements, but the balance of trade will still require sending borrowed US dollars back overseas to pay for these things that we import, and only the NATIONAL DEBT WILL BE INCREASED.