More

HuffPost Social Reading

Majority Of Global Investors Support Buffett Rule's Millionaire Tax: Poll

Global Investors Buffett Rule

First Posted: 09/30/2011 11:28 am Updated: 11/30/2011 4:12 am

The majority of global investors support boosting taxes on households earning at least $1 million, according to a Bloomberg poll released Friday.

Sixty-three percent of global investors said they support the so-called Buffett rule -- named for billionaire Warren Buffett, who proposed raising taxes on the "super-rich" in an op-ed in The New York Times. American investors were less supportive than their colleagues around the world; forty percent backed the rule, according to the poll.

But the majority of American voters are in favor of taxing the rich. Nearly three-quarters of Americans said they supported the Buffett rule, according to a poll released earlier this week by the website Daily Kos. Two-thirds of Americans also support raising taxes on households earning more than $200,000, a recent Gallup poll found.

And A majority of Republicans also support the rule, according to the Daily Kos poll. Still, the partisan rhetoric surrounding the measure may tell a different story. After Obama proposed the Buffett rule earlier this month as part of a larger plan to cut the national deficit using a combination of tax cuts and spending increases, Republican leaders accused him of stoking “class warfare.”

In the op-ed, Buffett wrote that his tax rate is lower than that of everyone else working in his office. Buffett suggested raising tax rates on those making $1 million or more both as a way to “stop coddling” the rich and as a way to spur economic growth.

Still, some argue that even if the Buffett rule were to survive and become law, it would do little to curb the budget deficit. Daniel Indiviglio of The Atlantic wrote earlier this month that if tax rates on the rich went back to pre-Bush-tax-cut levels they would bring in 4.5 percent of the 2009 national deficit.

But many governments around the world think a Buffett rule-type law would help to solve their budget woes. France and England have boosted taxes on their wealthy, according to The New York Times, and Spain, Greece, Japan and Italy are considering doing the same.

European investors had the highest level of support for the Buffett rule at 78 percent, the Bloomberg Poll found, while 69 percent of Asian investors back it.

The Buffett rule may have less than half the support of U.S. investors, according to the Bloomberg poll, but it’s backed by one prominent American. Def Jam co-founder Russell Simmons told MSNBC on Thursday that he wants the U.S. government to raise his taxes. The hip-hop mogul, who is worth an estimated $340 million, took a page out of Buffett's book saying in the interview: "All my employees -- every single one -- paid more taxes than I did."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

The majority of global investors support boosting taxes on households earning at least $1 million, according to a Bloomberg poll released Friday. Sixty-three percent of global investors said they ...
The majority of global investors support boosting taxes on households earning at least $1 million, according to a Bloomberg poll released Friday. Sixty-three percent of global investors said they ...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 72
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
11:10 PM on 10/02/2011
So, let's see. Narly 3/4 of ALL Americans think taxes on the wealthy should be increased. A majority of international investors thinks that taxes on the wealthy should be Increased. But the Tea Party, and all GOP candidates for the Presidency think we should NOT increase taxes on the wealthy. Am I missing something here, or is the GOP ADDLED BY A RIDICULOUS ENSLAVEMENT TO OUTDATED IDEOLOGY. Sorry, it just seems so damn obvious....
10:51 PM on 10/02/2011
Is it the same Buffett that is companies received 72BL from the TARP money?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Caseybug
Religion and WS are businesses without a product
03:21 AM on 10/02/2011
I think that if 3/4 of America wants Congress to change a law, or rule etc. and they won't do it then they are not getting "represented".

That is the same reason we broke away from England. Taxation without representation. Our desires are no longer being represented in Washington. They do what THEY want not what We THE PEOPLE want.

The republicans want to take us back to the times of the early 1900's. I say let's go back to 1776.
12:48 AM on 10/02/2011
There has to be more balance. The private sector can do so much more as can the rich who do not pay their fair share.
05:11 PM on 10/01/2011
The rich agree because this change would not materially effect them. It's all about capital gains and the flattening and simplifying the tax code with the elimination of deductions. Buffett makes his wealth not on his salary....he is disingenuous in presenting this red herring
RJB Boston
Candor vendor
03:30 PM on 10/01/2011
not sure, however noble the outcome, that I'd want my name associated with a tax!!
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrina­tion.
01:42 PM on 10/01/2011
Those in the know are forecasting a double dip recession. Some think it may have already started. The issue is spending. Republicans succeeded early on in shaping the debate as one of debt, which ironically, they created in the first place.

So far, the only thing that first saved us from a full blown depression, and then managed to actually get the economy moving forward, albeit slowly, was the too small and poorly conceived stimulus along with the auto industry bailout. Both involved SPENDING. Together, they account for up to 4.2 million jobs saved or created.

In the meantime, budget cuts at the state and federal levels, pushed mostly by Republicans, have cose upwards of a million jobs already and could cost another million in the mid term. Those have undermined the recovery by lessening any demand Obama's spending managed to create. In short, Republican are pushing us into recession all over again. Even Bush spent on two separate stimulus packages.

If we are going to get out of this, someone, ANYONE, needs to SPEND. The private sector isn't doing it. They are sitting on TRIILIONS of dollars and will not jump in until they see demand. It makes perfect sense that the government step in an do it for them, even if it means taking some of their money to do it with. It's pretty obvious that the vast majority of Americans (up to 75%), agree with the President.
RJB Boston
Candor vendor
03:32 PM on 10/01/2011
thats fine, but the government has to stop stupid spending too....
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrina­tion.
05:54 PM on 10/01/2011
Agreed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
11:28 AM on 10/01/2011
Well, finally the GOP will admit that they have been wrong on this. (laughing hysterically...) Ideological purity Uber Alles!!
06:48 AM on 10/01/2011
In addition, the institute said the Economist, a leading financial publication, had noted the ECRI was the only entity that had correctly called three recessions without any false calls in between. http://bit.ly/q9SxSF
01:26 AM on 10/01/2011
Even buffet doesn't know what the buffet rule is. At least he admits he doesn't have a clue what it means except to say obama's friends are safe.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwxfZ_bHHVw
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
filo
We're all Bozos on this bus.
11:39 AM on 10/01/2011
He said no such thing.
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrina­tion.
11:56 AM on 10/01/2011
He hasn't seen the finalized language, but he supports the president, and says nothing about friends whatsoever. It would be really nice if you folks could learn the meaning of thruth. Then again, with a Bush thumbnail, what more could we expect?
frank1946
Tell the Truth
12:04 AM on 10/01/2011
World Governments are out of MONEY...............where will they get more MONEY ?

John Dillenger LIVES, this time he needs no Machine Gun !

Federal Reserve just Prints It, John ! How much do you need ?
10:39 PM on 09/30/2011
Buffet was interviewed on CNBC today which was very interesting. Buffet is calling for income taxes to be raised on people filing tax returns with incomes greater than $1 million. When asked if he agreed with the President's proposal of the "Buffet Rule", he declined to answer because the President's version includes raising income taxes on people filing tax returns with incomes as low as $200,000 which Buffet never suggested nor does he agree with. Buffet said he would have to wait for the final version of the bill to determine his support.
01:28 AM on 10/01/2011
But buffet did say that obama's friends, like celebrities and pro athletes making over 50 million would have their taxes traised. Pretty sweet for obama's buddies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
builderman55
Featherless Biped
11:30 AM on 10/01/2011
Must you continue to flaunt your Ignorance here? You're making lots of good, intelligent people throw up their pancakes...
photo
webwzrd
Reality is liberal indoctrina­tion.
12:04 PM on 10/01/2011
Dude, you're a |y|ng |d|ot, plain and simple. You have it all backwards.

What Buffet said was that his proposal was for raising the taxes for rich who made their money from investements. This means raising the capital gains tax. Anyone making millions as a SALARY would not be affected, because that's regular income.

Obama is proposing raising INCOME taxes on everyone making over 250k. which WILL affect athletes, celebrities, CEOs and anyone else making millions as a salary. Exactly the OPPOSITE of what you imply.
07:35 PM on 09/30/2011
This is how Warren further repays the taxpayers who subsidize his tax-free foundation:
http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2011/09/how-warren-buffett-is-helping-new.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shankapotomus
07:10 PM on 09/30/2011
LOL Buffet doesn't even back Obama's Buffet rule.
07:08 PM on 09/30/2011
IT is the corporations and BANKS that THINK they are too good to pay THEIR fair share of taxes.
How about we change the rules a little - JUST tax the profits of the banks and corporations AND their books will be monitored by outsiders so there can be no cheating?