iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Keystone Pipeline Lobbyist Had Cozy Relationship With State Department Staffers, New Emails Show (UPDATED)

Keystone Pipeline Meetings

First Posted: 10/03/11 09:30 AM ET Updated: 12/03/11 05:12 AM ET

Opponents of the Keystone XL pipeline proposal continued their assault Monday on what they consider a corrupt federal approval process for the project, releasing dozens of new email messages between State Department employees and a lobbyist for the company behind the pipeline, TransCanada.

The emails, part of a growing cache obtained by the environmental group Friends of the Earth, focus on the interaction between TransCanada lobbyist Paul Elliott, a former deputy campaign director for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's failed 2008 presidential bid, and representatives of the State Department, which is currently weighing approval of the Keystone XL project.

While no emails between Clinton and Elliott have been released, the newest messages reveal a cozy and solicitous relationship between Elliott and State Department staff -- particularly one member of the senior diplomatic staff at the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa, Marja Verloop.

"The emails between Verloop and Elliott are extremely friendly and illustrative of a cozy and complicitous relationship," Friends of the Earth said in a memo released Monday morning. "They are filled with emoticons and contain an invitation to visit Ottawa's 'winter wonderland,' acknowledgment that Elliott obtained his job as a lobbyist 'precisely' because of his connections, and an offer by Verloop to hand-deliver an invitation to Elliott. The emails also indicate that Elliott succeeded in securing multiple meetings between TransCanada and high-level officials at the State Department."

In one particular exchange from September of last year, Verloop is seen cheering for Elliott after he secured support for the pipeline from Democratic Montana Senator Max Baucus. "Go Paul!" Verloop writes. "Baucus support holds clout."

A previous cache of emails concerned interaction between Elliott and Nora Toiv, a special assistant to Secretary Clinton's chief of staff, Cheryl Mills. Friends of the Earth suggested those emails provided "evidence of agency bias" and showed that "the State Department was doing favors for TransCanada during the Keystone XL review."

State Department officials have previously argued that the email exchanges only demonstrate that Elliott -- an aggressive lobbyist by any light -- was nonetheless unable to gain audience with key agency decision makers, and was instead routed to lower-level staff with no influence over the permit application.

Wendy Nassmacher, a spokeswoman for the State Department's Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental & Scientific Affairs, which is overseeing the permit application, said in an email message that the agency is "committed to a fair, transparent and thorough process" and that both the State Department and the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa have been in communication with both industry and other stakeholder groups, including "environmental organizations, potentially affected landowners, and native American or First Nations communities, both in the United States and in Canada."

"No individual or group has been given unfair advantage," Nassmacher said. "Our policy was to meet with all interested parties at the Assistant Secretary level or below. In fact, Department of State officials have had over 100 meetings with environmental and industry groups, including with Friends of the Earth."

Elliott did not reply to an email seeking comment, but Shawn Howard, a spokesman for TransCanada, said it was "absurd to suggest that any one person might influence a process" that involves numerous government agencies -- including not just the State Department, but also the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice.

"Mr. Elliott was and is simply doing his job -- no laws have been broken," Howard added. "His role is very similar to the job that over 60 registered -- and unregistered -- DC lobbyists for 10 environmental groups perform."

The TransCanada spokesman said his company would like to see Friends of the Earth produce all email correspondence that its lobbyists have had with government officials. "The environmentalists continue to use sound bites over substance and facts, attacking anyone who disagrees with their point of view."

Last week, Friends of the Earth called on the Justice Department to open an investigation into Elliott for violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which requires that "persons acting as agents of foreign principals in a political or quasi-political capacity to make periodic public disclosure of their relationship with the foreign principal, as well as activities, receipts and disbursements in support of those activities."

Friends of the Earth argued in a letter to DOJ that Elliott failed to register.

The $7 billion, 1,700-mile proposed Keystone XL pipeline would carry crude oil from Alberta across the border with Canada in Montana and traverse five other states before reaching refineries on the Texas Gulf Coast. Because the project would cross an international border, a permit is required from the State Department.

Intense opposition to the pipeline project by a variety of environmental groups and, increasingly, citizens in states where the pipeline would run, have delayed the issuance of a permit for years, but the State Department is expected to render a decision on the project before the end of this year.

Friends of the Earth, along with the Center for International Environmental Law and Corporate Ethics International, sued Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last May after repeated attempts to obtain correspondence between Elliott and the agency through the Freedom of Information Act were rebuffed.

In late August, however, the State Department began to comply with the request, delivering 34 pages of emails. Friends of the Earth says more documents are expected.

UPDATE: This article has been revised to include comments from TransCanada spokesman Shawn Howard and the State Department's Bureau of Oceans and International Environmental & Scientific Affairs.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Opponents of the Keystone XL pipeline proposal continued their assault Monday on what they consider a corrupt federal approval process for the project, releasing dozens of new email messages between S...
Opponents of the Keystone XL pipeline proposal continued their assault Monday on what they consider a corrupt federal approval process for the project, releasing dozens of new email messages between S...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,780
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (41 total)
01:17 PM on 10/08/2011
Tom, I really like your articles. I even subcribe to them by getting email updates anytime you write something, but I gotta say...AND....So What!
Until someone invents an electric car that the common man can afford and own, we have got to get off of our dependency on foreign mid-east oil! And that invention will not come tomorrow. and even if it does, it will take many, many years to trickle down into affordable technology and manaufacturing of said invention/car. Until then, we must escape this grip of foreign oil.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sisa
08:46 PM on 10/04/2011
Cancel pipeline stretch deep into us. Build refineries close to Canadian border in economically depressed areas like North Dakota. Keep pipeline builders happy by building pipeline from Mississippi flood prone regions to drought stricken areas such as Texas and and Nevada and Arizona. Give pipeline flow control to Great Lakes compact states and Provinces to keep them from screaming and divert only as much excess water as heavy snow melt or heavy rains permit to prevent down stream flooding. End result: Refinery builders are working. North Dakotans are working at refineries. Pipeline builders are working. Flood prone areas avoid property and crop loss. Drought areas avoid crop loss... Therefore more Americans working, less Americans losing all their possessions, and more food for all Americans. Economy boosted and less dependence on middle eastern or South American oil. Wow it's a win, win, win, win, win, win, win, win situation! ! ! Vote for me! ! ! But in the end the republicans would screw this up just to TRY to keep Obama from being re-elected.
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
10:29 AM on 10/04/2011
What big corporation or industry doesn't have a cozy relationship with the government or with Senators and Congressmen?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wanderland
Generic white guy
10:13 AM on 10/04/2011
'Elliott did not reply to an email seeking comment, but Shawn Howard, a spokesman for TransCanada, said it was "absurd to suggest that any one person might influence a process" that involves numerous government agencies...'
--------------------------------

Yes, it's preposterous to imagine that a well connected person who has the Sec. of State's ear *might* influence the process! Stop assuming the worst! It's pure coincidence that TransCanada hired former Clinton campaign manager, Paul Elliot as their lobbyist!

People who are willing to scrape off thousands of square miles of earth's surface in order to make a quick buck would never do anything shady or immoral. Besides, these are Democrats. Democrats would never damage the environment for the sake of huge profits.

Or not.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
looneydoone
not a "cookie"
10:51 AM on 10/04/2011
Shrillery is a long time neocon, warhawk, "free trade" globalist/corporatist Notice it's always about "opening markets" with her. How did she ever manage to pass herself off as being a progressive ? Who has authority to sign off on approval for this deal ? She does
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wanderland
Generic white guy
02:11 PM on 10/04/2011
I think it's because for many years, Dems have allowed Republicans and right wing mouths to define them.

Why else would a moderate right president be described as a socialist? Why else would a country that was far to the left of what we are today look back on Reagan's years as some kind of ultra conservative heaven?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:37 AM on 10/04/2011
The only problem with 'cozy relationships' is when your spouse finds out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RONALD MCKENZIE
09:16 AM on 10/04/2011
More reasons why corporate personhood must be replealed if democray has any chance with plutocary in this nation.
08:09 PM on 10/03/2011
Excuse me but wasn't the lobbyist doing his job - isn't that the only way to get anything done in washington....

In any event, we have the oil, you need the oil - if you don't want it, goodness - there is a huge market in China.... Personally, I would prefer to see this refined in Canada and sent to Vancouver and then overseas to Asia...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wanderland
Generic white guy
10:15 AM on 10/04/2011
So would I. Let's see how profitable it is to pump the oil over the rockies.
photo
jetjocki
Somewhere in the middle
11:28 PM on 10/04/2011
Obvoiusly you are well informed - NOT

The pipline is routed entirely over lowlands and crosses no mountian ranges.
07:37 PM on 10/03/2011
Lobbyists, the State Department and Keystone XL TransCanada?

How about Hillary Clinton and Pakistan??

How about Eric Holder, Mexico, and the BATF "Fast and Furious"?

At least, with TransCanada, we got oil.

With Clinton and Holder, we got American corpses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Always Thinkin
Nogoodnik
11:36 PM on 10/03/2011
Uh well this article is about TransCanada so you don't have to worry about them covering Pakistan or gun running.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wanderland
Generic white guy
10:16 AM on 10/04/2011
Obfuscation is key to derailing discussions about the environment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rr52
The fighter still remains...
07:24 PM on 10/03/2011
And this kind of crap will continue on if we don't get rid of lobbyists once and for all, which is a pipe dream now that the U.S. is run by Corp. America. U.S. government employees and lobbyists go hand in hand. The last decade, oil industry personnel were in and out of the EPA. A chief deputy administrator dated someone from Conoco Phillips, even shared a condo and beach house that Conoco Phillips helped purchase. Why do we think the wild mustang horses are being slaughtered? Lobbyists are really cozy with the Interior Dept. Has everyone forgotten the oil industry and their U.S. regulators partying together?

America needs to wake up as to how business is done. It should spur a revolution.
07:00 PM on 10/03/2011
There is one more elephant in the room on this thing. If oil drops below $80.00 bbl., then the deal is off anway because that is the breakeven figure for mining the oil sands, especially expansion. The unemployment rate in Alberta for males 25 and up ( the bulk of the workforce) is a little less than 5% so they really don't care if the thing is completed or not.
07:16 PM on 10/03/2011
Then it sounds like the lobbyists & politicians will do and say what they need to in order to keep it above the $80 mark you mentioned..OR..Just to mess with us, Saudi Arabia LETS the price go down, we start to build, then the price of oil shoots sky high again. Raises the price of construction..a Win Win for these guys! They easy make any money lost right back.
06:40 PM on 10/03/2011
It would be awesome if we could have a WORKER'S STRIKE across the entire country.
07:25 PM on 10/03/2011
Unions most certainly WILL go on strike against President Obama if he doesn't grant the Presidential Approval.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wanderland
Generic white guy
10:19 AM on 10/04/2011
Uh-huh. You really have your finger on the pulse of the unions, don't you?
07:32 PM on 10/03/2011
These guys do not care about workers or a strike anymore than they care about what is happening on Wall St right now. A better use of manpower would be to change ALL the locks on government buildings on their NEXT break..even BHO. Then The People pass a law that says All LEGAL citizens of the United States of America have ONE VOTE for EVERYTHING that comes up to vote on. Our citizens know what is right for Us..not the politicians and their lobbyists $. We can settle immigration just like that..we can settle who's spending what for who just like that. These politicians are getting nothing done w/everything being put off till AFTER the election (like Super Congress). Since they arent doing anything for US..we should enact legislation that also says anything done in the year before election is subject to do-overs..or better yet not allowed to take place at all without citizen voter approval. We could settle everything, and so much better, without THEM..I know its a dream but still..that's still sorta free, isnt it?
This comment has been removed.
06:37 PM on 10/03/2011
OK, don't build this pipeline; instead, import oil from Saudi Arabia or may be from Bush's Iraqi vast oil holdings. That'll work just fine!
12:17 AM on 10/05/2011
How do you know we even need to import any oil ? Because Bush told you ? As the drill baby drill team ruins the Alaska coastline, most people don't realize that oil companies already have unused leases that equal acreage the size of Wyoming, or for the southerners, very close to the size of 2 North Carolinas. These aren't dry hole , no potential areas, but good ones. They want to get as many as they can, then when they ruin another ocean or two, and are stopped, the can fall back on what they have in their back pocket. Another point you may want to research. The Alaska oil pipeline was built to bring oil to America. Check on it , and you'll see most of it is exported. Whose to say the same won't happen with this. After all, the plans are for the thing to go to a Texas Port, (as if their aren't any customers that need gasoline North of Texas!) This is another screw the regular guy deal, just like everything the oil companies do. Gasoline could be sold for $ 2.00 a gallon, right now, and everyone make a profit. Maybe not enough to give all the CEO's $ 2 or 300 million in bonuses. The oil companies don't care in the least about you, or me, even if you work for one. Ask the widows from the gulf oil mess.
photo
Gupdiver
We are in a period of Ineptocracy!
05:43 PM on 10/03/2011
A pipeline will be built, it's just a question whether or not it's to the USA or Canada's west coast so the crude can be shipped to China instead. Until abundant economical renewable energy is available, we need supplies of crude oil to meet our energy demands it's just the simple truth.
photo
gerimd
Not intended to be a factual statement
06:51 PM on 10/03/2011
So let them build to Canada's west coast. If Canada wants its own country destroyed, fine.
photo
Gupdiver
We are in a period of Ineptocracy!
07:01 PM on 10/03/2011
Do you have idea of how many petroleum pipelines crisscross the USA already? So what's your solution that will not affect the poor as fossil fuel is the cheapest energy form? Alternative energy is too expensive currently.
07:21 PM on 10/03/2011
China is taking the water right out of our Lakes, being sold for money by corp. & states..then they want the oil..once they figure out how to block the sun we wont have any energy resources left. Seriously, our WATER..Look at Africa..people can live a little while with no food but we all have to have water.
photo
Gupdiver
We are in a period of Ineptocracy!
08:46 PM on 10/03/2011
I agree that China is a black hole consuming and taking all of the earth's natural resources. Don't be afraid of their military, be afraid of their growing economic might.