More

Catholic Voter Guide 2012: Bishops Release Election Advice

Catholic Voter Guide

RACHEL ZOLL   10/ 4/11 03:05 PM ET   AP

The nation's Roman Catholic bishops have released a voter guide for the 2012 election that repeatedly calls abortion "evil" without making revisions that some conservatives had demanded for an even tighter focus on the issue.

The document, called "Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship," is nearly identical to the bishops' guide published four years ago. It gives high priority to fighting abortion while also highlighting social concerns such as ending poverty and war. Catholics make up about one-quarter of the electorate nationwide but do not vote as a bloc. Most don't base their choice on a politician's stand on abortion.

The bishops have offered similar advice to Catholics before every presidential race since 1976, broadly applying religious teaching to policy concerns of the day. The document has become a point of contention within the church over which issues voters should consider most important: abortion or social justice. These differences have often led to bruising arguments – and an unusual public airing of differences among bishops. By releasing the document now, church leaders hope to minimize the chance for a public debate on the guide at their annual November meeting, although any bishop could ask to revisit the guide.

In an introductory note to the 2012 edition, the bishops highlighted six concerns: abortion, religious freedom, traditional marriage, immigration reform, fighting poverty and ending war. The document was released days after the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops announced they had created a new watchdog committee to challenge what they considered an "assault" on religious liberty from Obama administration policies. Among the threats the bishops cited were a plan that could require Catholic organizations to cover birth control free of charge for their employees and distribute condoms as part of HIV prevention campaigns.

The introductory note warns that "Faithful Citizenship" has sometimes "been misused to present an incomplete or distorted view of the demands of faith and politics." Some bishops have accused liberals of twisting the document's nuanced language to justify Catholic votes for abortion-rights supporters. The bishops also cautioned against attempts "to reduce Catholic moral concerns to one or two matters, or to justify choices simply to advance partisan, ideological or personal issues."

"As Catholics we are not single-issue voters," the bishops wrote in the guide. "A candidate's position on a single issue is not sufficient to guarantee a voter's support. Yet a candidate's position on a single issue that involves an intrinsic evil, such as support for legal abortion or the promotion of racism, may legitimately lead a voter to disqualify a candidate from receiving support."

The guide contains no direct instruction on whether Catholic politicians who support abortion rights should receive Holy Communion. Each bishop has the authority to decide how to approach lawmakers within his own diocese. However, the document does emphasize statements by Pope Benedict XVI on the duty of lawmakers to serve as a "public witness to our faith."

Michael Sean Winters, a Catholic author who blogs at the independent liberal newsweekly National Catholic Reporter, praised the document for "striking not just a balance, but for showing that neither political party really conforms to the fullness of the Catholic moral vision."

"Voters have to make prudential judgments," about which candidate is most likely to follow Catholic social teaching, Winters said.

Deal Hudson, a one-time adviser to the campaign of President George W. Bush, was among those urging stronger language on abortion. He called the introductory note "a positive step toward clarifying some of the ambiguities that were advantageously spun by some seeking to water down church teachings for their own agenda."

In recent years, Catholic bishops have been struggling to reassert their teaching authority within the church. However, a recent survey found that few parishioners knew that the bishops publish a voting guide. The poll conducted in May and June by Georgetown University's Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate found that only 16 percent of adult Catholics had heard of the "Faithful Citizenship." Of those who knew about the document, about three-quarters said it had "no influence at all" on how they voted.

____

Online:

"Faithful Citizenship:" http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/faithful-citizenship/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

The nation's Roman Catholic bishops have released a voter guide for the 2012 election that repeatedly calls abortion "evil" without making revisions that some conservatives had demanded for an even ti...
The nation's Roman Catholic bishops have released a voter guide for the 2012 election that repeatedly calls abortion "evil" without making revisions that some conservatives had demanded for an even ti...
Filed by Josh Fleet  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 654
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
sunshine14 02:25 PM on 10/04/2011
Opinion only My God has never been in man's politics, why Jesus had no palls in mans government. Not God's Kingdom Government or God's Government Laws either is it? It is the church to do its job if one is concerned about abortion, Jesus commands his faith to  spread the good news, Jesus did what He chose not what others told him to do or not do. It always the ministers of God, including all who belief  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Robert Toth
soon to be retired educator
06:29 PM on 10/27/2011
I am Roman Cathollic and have been all of my life. I am rarity in the "bible belt." Let me state, absolutely and unequivocally, NO ONE and I mean NO ONE tells me how to or who to vote for. Nobody.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:22 AM on 10/10/2011
I can't believe that they still have the gall to give advice to anyone.
02:51 PM on 10/09/2011
Sounds like another attempt by the church to keep a lid on critical thinking!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Robert Toth
soon to be retired educator
06:32 PM on 10/27/2011
YEP! I taught in parochial schools for a long while and saw, clearly, how the clergy, in particular Nuns, felt threatened by anyone with an original idea. Control. It was and still is all about control. Forget it Sister Mary Elizabeth. This is America, NOT the Vatican!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
08:18 AM on 10/09/2011
I'm imagining a US Government Guide to Selecting a Religion, with recommendations based on criteria such as concerns for public safety, public health, and consumer protection. The Catholic Church wouldn't come off well in our guide. Come to think of it, most religions would not.
11:18 PM on 10/08/2011
It's time to start taxing these churchs when they start pushing policy and politics, they are no longer tax exempt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
11:10 PM on 10/08/2011
Clericalism in the Catholic hierarchy has greatly diminished their influence among liberal Catholics especially for all of us ex alter boys.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:10 PM on 10/10/2011
"...especially for all of us ex alter [sic] boys. "

I suggest that any boy who wants to be an altar boy take up martial arts with an emphasis on groin kicking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Robert Toth
soon to be retired educator
06:34 PM on 10/27/2011
Hmmm...did you know that only 1.7% of catholic clergy have been convincted of child molestation? That means that 98.3% have NOT been.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ManuOB1
A voice crying in the wilderness
07:09 PM on 10/08/2011
Where's the "Catholic Voter's Guide to Electing Your Bishop?" oh. Wait....
03:52 AM on 10/08/2011
Anything about helping the poor or sick? Because Jesus seemed to care about them an awful lot.
11:22 AM on 10/08/2011
Why, yes, as a matter of fact there is -- which could have been easily discovered if one had actually bothered to read the statement first:
http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/faithful-citizenship/upload/forming-consciences-for-faithful-citizenship.pdf

But of course, reading something means we might actually have to think about what it is saying, and after all, thinking is such hard work...
glesslib
Fox proves you can fool people all the time.
05:08 PM on 10/13/2011
Actually, the Chruch's continued stressing of abortion as the main issue that should be considered when voting has caused more Catholics to ignore the bishops on all matters relating to casting their votes. War is never as important an issue, care for the poor and sick is never as important an issue, the death penalty, justice in our dealings with other countries, the environment, etc. may be mentioned, but these issues are never stressed to the degree that abortion is stressed. So, that's where people get the idea that the deck is really stacked to make certain that Republicans are always given the edge by the hierarchy. Republicans have co-opted this issue for the past 30 plus years. You would think that the Bishops would have figured out by now that they are never going to outlaw abortion because the Republican party gets so many votes from Catholics who are one issue voters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
12:07 PM on 10/09/2011
To the church, a woman's having s*e*x for pleasure and without punishing consequences trumps all other sins. It's mortal sin....to the maximus!
12:05 AM on 10/08/2011
One Question: Did Catholics ever hijack planes and fly them into buildings killing thousands of people?

The people on this site making discriminatory comments about Catholics would never dare say anything about Muslims but have no problem condemning Catholics. Neither approach is right. Judge the individual for his/her actions not entire religions - that goes for all religions including Muslims and Catholics. Doing otherwise just makes it easier to identify the real bigots.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Robert Toth
soon to be retired educator
05:37 PM on 10/27/2011
Valid point, but the catholic church did sponsor the crusades, which ended up being pretty nasty...at one point, wiping out every Muslim soul in the city of Jerusalem when the city was captured.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opinioned1
Am I liberal or just well educated?
08:54 PM on 10/07/2011
Why aren`t these people losing their tax exemption?
jchandjd
Are you one of those faux Christians?
07:58 PM on 10/07/2011
Another vitriolic spewing of hate speech and venom from a group who do so under the thin "guise" of Christian ethics. Shame shame shame!

How about putting in their voter guide punishment of child molesters and those who purposefully assist child molesters to escape justice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
opinioned1
Am I liberal or just well educated?
08:54 PM on 10/07/2011
F&F!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Thomas David DuBois
05:13 AM on 10/08/2011
"Hate and venom?"

Are you so lazy that you can't even read a half page article, or do you just automatically drop this comment any time you see the word "Catholic?"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wulidncr
Believe nothing. Question all. Love boundlessly
06:58 PM on 10/07/2011
They are US Citizens and should be indicted for treason. Every Bishop swears an oath of obedience to the Pope, the absolute monarch of a foriegn state. They are all traitors to the Constitution and belong in prison. Treasonous, seditious, child-torture cover-up cretins.
01:43 AM on 10/08/2011
19th century America called, they want their anti-Catholic bigots back. I hear the KKK of that period could use some good men too.
11:32 AM on 10/08/2011
Treason? What do you think "treason" is? Article 3 of the Constitution (perhaps you have heard of it? No, maybe not...) defines treason; it says "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."

Do you somehow think that Vatican City is at war with the US? Instead of black helicopters, are you seeing Swiss guards skulking about the streets of your neighborhood? Are there Cardinals sniping from the rooftops? If there aren't, then you can't talk of 'treason'.

And as for "child torture cover ups", have you sought the arrest, trial, conviction, and imprisonment of all those people in your own family (for surely there are some...) who have ever done anything inappropriate to a child? Or are you going to pretend that the only kind of sexual abuse is the miniscule number of offenses committed by a tiny minority of priests, while the 25% of women who report having been abused sexually by someone before the age of 18 -- and usually by a family member or a friend of the family -- weren't abused at all, and really deserved, or even enjoyed, what their fathers, stepfathers, uncles, or cousins were doing to them when they were young?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wulidncr
Believe nothing. Question all. Love boundlessly
04:00 PM on 10/08/2011
The nazis were bad too, according to your laughable logic, the church gets a pass because there are other evil doers out there too. And, so far as the Holy (HA!) Roman Catholic Church, I do go after them, and always will, with fact. That is the one thing they cannot stand. Fact to the Catholic Church is like sunlight to a vampire, it will set them ablaze.
03:25 PM on 10/07/2011
My vote is not determined by a religious leader or a business, but the candidate's stance on the issues. If their stance matches mine, then the person gets my vote. If not, forget it. It's that simple.

Any religious group that tries to tell someone who to vote for is meddling in politics and therefore mixing church and state. They should have their tax-exempt status yanked.

To the Catholic Church, I have two words: GLASS HOUSES.
11:36 AM on 10/08/2011
It is mixing church and state to say that people should have well-formed consciences, and should use those consciences when deciding how to vote?

If so, would that there were more of such mixing. It hardly is a route to a better country to say that someone who is an amoral jerk should deliberately vote for other amoral jerks simply because their "stances match."
12:40 PM on 10/08/2011
It is mixing church and state to say that people should vote for a candidate based on what the CHURCH thinks is the right stance. People are entitled to have their own opinions on the issues and vote based on their stance.

What one person thinks is the moral choice can be vastly different from what another person thinks is the moral choice. Look at how many people disagree with the Catholic Church's stance on contraception, or how many people don't think that the GOP candidates of the more fundamentalist Christian stripe have the right to turn this country into a theocracy based on their beliefs. Don't even get me started on how many people vote for a candidate based on being suckered in because of false promises (where are the jobs the GOP promised this country if they got elected, anyway?).

Rational thought and religious beliefs don't always mix too well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:12 PM on 10/10/2011
Don't you find it creepy that the Church is using the phrase "formed consciences" rather than "informed consciences"?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:08 AM on 10/07/2011
Dear Bishop,
Who do I vote for: The candidate who supports a woman's right to choose and a person's right to marry, or the one who supports the death penalty and banning mosques?
09:29 AM on 10/07/2011
"This coming from an organization...."

But if almost 24% of Americans self-identify themselves as Catholic (over 73 million Americans), isn't it good that these guidelines are fair. Would that other religious communities did the same.
03:30 PM on 10/07/2011
It would be better if the RCC recognized the separation of church and state and didn't publish anything or find some other way to try and coerce their membership to vote the way they want.
11:41 AM on 10/08/2011
It woudl be best if you understood that even Catholic citizens -- whcih the bishops are, by the way -- have the right to the free exercise of their religion (which includes applying their beliefs to their actions) and to free speech (whcih includes talking about what they believe.)

I realize that good little totalitarians do not like hearing ideas with which they disagree, and seeing people using their freedoms, but you know, sometimes you just have to grit your teeth and put up with it.