iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

U.S. Banks Losing Ground In Combating Credit, Debit Card Fraud: Report

Credit Cards

First Posted: 10/04/11 05:35 PM ET Updated: 12/04/11 05:12 AM ET

(Ross Kerber) - U.S. banks are losing ground in the battle to combat credit and debit card fraud, a new report shows, underscoring the growing threat thieves and hackers pose for the financial system.

Globally, security is improving in the payment industry, according to data released this week by The Nilson Report, a California trade publication. For every $100 worth of credit and debit card transactions last year, 4.46 cents were lost to fraud worldwide in 2010, down from 4.71 cents in 2009.

But many of the security gains were at banks in Europe and Asia, which have adopted stricter security procedures such as issuing cards with computerized chips to help verify purchases, said Nilson Report publisher David Robertson.

Meanwhile, U.S. banks and merchants have balked at the expense of conversion. As a result, fraud in the United States accounted for 47 percent of global fraud losses last year -- up from about 46.5 percent in 2009 and 44 percent in the middle of the last decade, Robertson said.

"We have a disproportionate percentage of the global total, and a considerable part of that is because we have an old infrastructure," Robertson said in an interview. "The U.S. will account for a steadily rising share of the global total until it embraces chip-based card security."

Robertson said the trends reflect more than technical issues. For instance, some Asian financial institutions are more likely to decline a transaction that appears risky compared to U.S. institutions, which face more competition because their customers often carry multiple credit cards.

Total fraud losses worldwide were $7.6 billion in 2010, up 10 percent from 2009, his report found.

The banking industry has suffered from some high-profile breaches this year. Citigroup Inc said in May that hackers broke into its network and seized data from some 200,000 Citi credit card holders.

Nonfinancial companies including Google Inc and Lockheed Martin Corp also have suffered recent cyber break-ins, bringing scrutiny from regulators.

WIDER ADOPTION

Robertson's figures are in line with past trends, and he noted that the losses for U.S. banks are still manageable given how profitable their payment card operations have become. Retailers also lose far more to theft that does not involve payment cards, he added.

Still, banks in Europe and elsewhere have moved to deploy so-called "chip-and-pin" card systems that make it harder for thieves to produce counterfeit payment cards, a vulnerability for U.S. cards carrying data on magnetic strips.

After TJX Companies suffered a massive breach at the hands of hackers that emerged at the start of 2007, executives at the retailer called for wider adoption of the chip-and-PIN cards.

U.S. merchants and banks will only spend the millions of dollars on such upgrades once it becomes worth their while, experts say.

According to Robertson's data, total global card losses have risen almost every year since 1994, when only about $1 billion was lost to card fraud.

But the everyday use of payment cards by consumers has also climbed, leading to a reduced fraud rate overall. Last year's losses of $7.6 billion were a small fraction of the $17 trillion that consumers worldwide transacted with plastic.

(Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by Richard Chang)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
(Ross Kerber) - U.S. banks are losing ground in the battle to combat credit and debit card fraud, a new report shows, underscoring the growing threat thieves and hackers pose for the financial sys...
(Ross Kerber) - U.S. banks are losing ground in the battle to combat credit and debit card fraud, a new report shows, underscoring the growing threat thieves and hackers pose for the financial sys...
Filed by Harry Bradford  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 48
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:37 PM on 11/18/2011
my credit card contacted me and told me that there was a charge of $508.00 made on my credit card and they denied payment. well of course, i did not make the charge and they did not pay it and took it off my bill. so far, my credit is doing all they can do and sent me a new card. the biggest problem is wondering how and who did this?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jay Gould
07:14 PM on 10/27/2011
The reason it is taking so long for EMV cards to come to the U.S. is that credit card companies have been willing to tolerate mag-stripe fraud-related losses. Switching to EMV would cost U.S. issuers about $3 billion, according to one estimate, and merchants would have to pay not much less to upgrade their point-of-sale equipment.

Now that Visa has made it mandatory for all U.S. processors to support acceptance of chip-based transactions by April, 2013 (http://blog.unibulmerchantservices.com/nfc-ascent-pushes-visa-to-speed-up-adoption-of-smart-credit-cards), the dynamics have changed completely. The banks have no option but to build the infrastructure, so once that's done, they might as well start using it. After all, if the U.K. chip-and-PIN experience is anything to go by, switching to it would result in hundreds of millions of dollars in savings from lower fraud losses. U.S. banks would certainly take the windfall if it comes their way.
09:10 PM on 10/10/2011
This article states that the United States accounted for 47% of global fraud losses last year, yet we are unwilling to implement more secure card mechanisms until "it becomes worth [our] while." With the US national debt currently over $14 trillion, is it not "worth our while" to do everything we can to prevent further losses and harm to our economy? Or could it be that implementing security mechanisms to cards would only be difficult and costly resulting in our sinking further into debt?
07:42 PM on 10/06/2011
Banks should offer everyone two checking accounts.
A primary for monthly bill paying and an ATM/DEBIT for daily expenses.

The two should not be linked.
The ATM/debit account should never have more than a weeks worth of cash in it.
WHEN FRAUD OCCURS this would limit losses and prevents the mortgage payment from bouncing.
Lacking this or the willingness to pay a menthly service fee for a 2nd account, customers should demand an ATM ONLY card (no visa logo) and pay cash for everything.

Or use a credit card.
05:25 AM on 10/06/2011
Although this paints a somewhat bleak picture for card holders, there is evidence that security systems in place in many retail outlets, such as chip and pin technology, is having a positive effect in reducing credit card fraud overall. http://www.creditcardshelplines.com/credit-cards-fraud-help.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
h1ren
I am ghostwriting my micro-bio...
07:26 PM on 10/05/2011
Wait a minute, I thought these damn bankers were THE hackers...
05:55 PM on 10/05/2011
....is stealing from a thief a crime......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mbi11
Independent Voter
02:13 PM on 10/05/2011
How much of the need to impose bank fees on debit cards is because overhead is high because of escalating fraud? The banks in the past didn't mind much because they could always raise transaction fees and all banks were experiencing it. Now, fees are capped by the Fed and cost pressures have caused the banks to resort to charging the consumer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhillyKing
03:16 PM on 10/05/2011
doesn't matter... they could have 0 fraud and they'll just find something else to justify high fees... just look at the insurance industry... even though people are eating healthier and exercising more, they still find reasons to raise rates dont they??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
05:16 PM on 10/05/2011
As stated in the article:

"Total fraud losses worldwide were $7.6 billion in 2010, up 10 percent from 2009, his report found."

We gave these banks $700 billion in TARP funds alone. The notion that it's external fraud, rather than their own greed, that causes them to raise fees is laughable.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
01:02 PM on 10/05/2011
$7.6 billion is losses? We dished out $700 billion in TARP funds alone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rMatey
old, recovered Xtian, Liberal
11:13 PM on 10/04/2011
Oh, yeah. Blame it on the hackers. The banks and Wall Street are the biggest frauds in America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wilray
50,000 Screaming Fans (Ignore that other number)
10:33 PM on 10/04/2011
After banking hours, I received a voice mail on Friday, supposedly from Wells Fargo, telling me that my debit card had been deactivated, and it gave me a number to call. It also told that it was a card with the first four numbers "4868." I checked and I did have such a card, but I smelled a rat. I went to my bank's website and looked at my account information. Everything was as it should be. The next day, I went to my bank (a couple blocks away). The bank manager told me, it was a fraudster, and he wrote down the number that was left on the voice mail.

If something like this happens to you, don't get too excited or too upset, but don't respond to their communication. If they leave a number, don't call it. If they send an email with a link don't click on it. Open a browser window and type your bank address, and check to see that the site is secure.

BTW, I realized something was amiss when they told me the first four numbers. When would that ever happen. It would be a really large number of persons that had the same first four numbers.
07:12 AM on 10/05/2011
Most cards have toll-free numbers on the back. Call that number.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
01:00 PM on 10/05/2011
The first four numbers merely note which bank the card is tied to. There could have been some extra sleuthing involved. But, given that this number is the same for everyone in the US that has a Well's Fargo Check Card, if the pool is big enough, it can make a simple phishing attempt easier. Thus, the scammer may have been dialing a lot of numbers owned by people who had no such card with Wells Fargo who, as a result, simply ignored it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:41 PM on 10/04/2011
what, the TBTB banksters are having trouble with fraudsters?

Boo, hoo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoanMeijer
Author of Relentless: The Search For Typhoid Mary
08:04 PM on 10/04/2011
These guys are so greedy and stupid they would rather loose millions than spend thousands. But for a nail the shoe was lost, but for the shoe the race was lost.
photo
planetjeffy
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
12:29 AM on 10/05/2011
the millions
are tax deductible...so you and I am paying for it
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:59 PM on 10/04/2011
I remember when they came out in Europe, the cards had both a chip and a magnetic stripe. They should start phasing these cards in here, and those merchants who want to reduce fraud can invest in the chip readers, those that don't can still use the magnetic stripe. What is the big hesitation?
photo
Captain Hindsight
Seeking the truth is my only agenda.
07:07 PM on 10/04/2011
Too many people must taking the notice to "Swipe Card" in the wrong context.
Most fraud never next noticed since many people never reconcile their statements. The banks get more from fraud that goes unnoticed than they would gain by enforcement. The fed needs to make ID theft and all fraudulent use of financial instruments and official documents a first class felony and switch from the lost "War on Drugs" to a "War on Fraud". Prohibition didn't work with alcohol and it doesn't work with drugs. At least if they legalize drugs they can generate revenue rather than run deficts. And stopping all or at least slowing and aggresively prosecuting all types of fraud will do the same.