iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Eric Cantor Staffer Creating Leadership Super PAC

First Posted: 10/05/2011 2:35 pm Updated: 12/05/2011 4:12 am

WASHINGTON -- The deputy chief of staff to House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) is leaving the congressman's office to start a leadership super PAC designed to help retain and expand the Republican majority in the House and enhance Cantor's standing within his caucus.

According to reports from Politico and National Journal, John Murray, Cantor's deputy chief of staff, is set to head a new super PAC that will focus on supporting candidates who fit within the “Young Guns” program run by Cantor, Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and espoused in their 2010 book titled "Young Guns: A New Generation of Conservative Leaders."

Cantor, McCarthy and Ryan started the “Young Guns” program before the 2008 elections in attempt to play offense and flip Democratic seats into the Republican column. The program was incredibly successful in the 2010 midterm elections and freshman lawmakers find Cantor to be more receptive than other members of GOP leadership.

Super PACs are independent political committees that can accept unlimited contributions from corporations, unions, and individuals. A leadership Super PAC would bring these benefits to bear in the internal race for power within party caucuses.

“The office-holder super PAC represents the first time since 1974 that big money donors can provide unlimited contributions to support the efforts of elected office-holders,” said Fred Wertheimer, president of Democracy 21, a campaign finance reform non-profit organization. “This is going to spread like wildfire with members of Congress.”

“It marks the beginning of a new trend that we are seeing,” said Craig Holman of the public interest group Public Citizen. “It is expected that anyone who has a political action committee is going to turn these into super PACs or create a separate super PAC.”

If previous trends in congressional fundraising are any indication, the rise of leadership super PACs will likely spark an arms race among members of Congress to raise unlimited money. A similar fundraising push accompanied the rise of traditional leadership PACs.

Almost half of all current members of Congress currently have a leadership PAC. These committees enable them to raise extra money that they use to help fund the campaigns of fellow lawmakers, raising their own profiles in the process. Leadership PACs, unlike super PACs, are restricted by contribution limits, although those limits are higher than the ones imposed on candidate campaign committees. Money raised by leadership PACs cannot be spent on campaign advertisements or other election-related expenditures; it can only be donated to a fellow lawmaker or candidate's campaign. The lawmaker operating the PAC may also use the money for non-election related activities.

Lawmakers have used leadership PACs to rise within the party ranks since 1979, when Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) used his PAC to contribute to Democratic members of the House Commerce Committee as he sought to leapfrog over more senior members into the chairmanship of the Health Subcommittee. Most members who received Waxman’s financial support voted for him, though some ultimately returned the money. Waxman won the chairmanship and leadership PACs became a necessary device for lawmakers seeking to rise in Congress. There are currently at least 237 active leadership PACs.

Now, more congressmen than ever are starting leadership PACs. Freshmen lawmakers have started 31 leadership PACs this year alone, the highest number of new committees started in at least the past decade. By early October in previous post-election years, the highest number of freshmen leadership PACs created was 11 in 2009; four of these were started before the member was even elected to a full term.

Super PACs have rapidly evolved since Citizens United, the Supreme Court case that paved the way for their formation, was decided in January 2010. At first they were largely committees operated by party insiders or interest groups working to elect broad swathes of candidates. Earlier this year, however, former aides of presidential candidates began to start super PACs intended to support specific presidential candidates. The first was Restore Our Future, a super PAC that backs former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. Then came Priorities USA Action, which supports President Barack Obama. There are currently at least 12 operating super PACs that support various Republican primary candidates.

Lawmakers and candidates are also allowed to raise money for super PACs so long as the candidate does not specifically ask for unlimited contributions. A lawmaker could, however, speak at a fundraiser for a super PAC and be followed by another individual soliciting unlimited donations.

WATCH Paul Blumenthal discuss leadership super PACs on MSNBC's "The Dylan Ratigan Show":

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 300
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
02:52 PM on 10/13/2011
Cantor is an idiot and the whole "young guns" thing is queer.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
amaboss52
Jesus died for your sins...get your moneys worth!
01:50 PM on 10/13/2011
Can'tor is one sorry, useless leader, leading his young goons out the doors of Congress. Get rid of this diseased ho.
photo
MightyAfrodite
Makes me wanna holla; the way they do my life ...
01:45 PM on 10/13/2011
Super PAC? Does Eric see a pink slip in his own future? Sounds to me like he's trying to take the money and run!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
danusgram
aww the flowers of spring are the best
09:08 PM on 10/06/2011
Cantor your approval rating in the republican congress is 11 percent there will be some seat flipping as you and your type are going out of congress ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whats Inaname
Karma: What Goes Around Comes Around
03:34 PM on 10/06/2011
Pretty quiet around here. Has Cantor lost his defenders? Have they finally seen through him? Have they seen the light?

Where are you? Republicans/Tea Party? Anyone out there?

Well, guess they are all at "Occupy Wall Street", or one of the many other cities where they are protesting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whats Inaname
Karma: What Goes Around Comes Around
01:42 PM on 10/06/2011
Follows Ayn Rand,

Ayn Rand (Ann O'Conner) is the originator of a sweeping “moral philosophy” that justifies the privilege of the wealthy and demonizes not only the slothful, undeserving poor but the lackluster middle-classes as well. Yet the very "entitlement" programs she demonizes, Social Security and Medicare, were the very programs she applied for when she was able to receive them and in desperate need of. She was diagnosed with lung cancer and had to receive treatments – which, as we know, cost a lot of money. She believed since she contributed to Social Security she should receive the benefits. Now, had she not had Medicare she would have most certainly lost all her wealth and without Social Security she never would have received Medicare. I am not arguing her belief that she put into it so now she should get it.

My argument, two other women who shared her same beliefs were Rose Wilder Lane and Isabel “Pat” Paterson. The big difference between the two and Ayn Rand is that both rejected Social Security benefits on "principle". Lane, with whom Rand corresponded for several years, once quit an editorial job in order to avoid paying Social Security taxes. The Cato Institute says Lane considered Social Security a “Ponzi fraud” (sound familiar?) and “told friends that it would be immoral of her to take part in a system that would predictably collapse so catastrophically (sound familiar).” Lane died in 1968. Paterson would end up dying a pauper.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
01:03 PM on 10/06/2011
Congressmen for sale - call Eric
photo
realsurfin
Pardon me, can you help out a fellow American
12:57 PM on 10/06/2011
Mr Cantor will be a target of the Occupy wall street crowd when they openly try to buy seats in government. They seem to be blind to what is going on across America with the majority.
02:26 PM on 10/13/2011
everyone else is buying seats, why not? I would rather have a bunch of people who know what it is like to suffer and care enough to want to change things for the good of majority, then some big corporation whose only concern is making more money regardless of what their actions do to others or our country as a whole. they have not been responsible which is why they had to be bailed out. The republicans blame citizens for not being responsible for their actions. Why do they not extend the same accountability to these big banks. why when they say americans shouldn't be getting a hand out do they give them to big business - exxon and the like? are not our corporations capable of being responsible and taking care of themselves????? hypocrites.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chriss0114
the meanderings of a madman
12:10 PM on 10/06/2011
young guns? more like water pistols

they all have derringers no doubt
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chriss0114
the meanderings of a madman
12:02 PM on 10/06/2011
Eric Cantor Puts Up House For Sale

Elections have consequences

with the Citizens united decision coupled with SuperPacs, unlimited sceret donations from multinational corporations as well as the (International) US Chamber of Commerce can use foreign money (influence) to control our government

if this is what you like and want

then vote Republican/Tea--the corporations will take care of you--Soylent green--to serve man
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jie Jones
"Eat me!" -- Jesus, at the Last Supper
11:33 AM on 10/06/2011
Let's hear what Cantor has to say about the Occupy Wall St. protest.
11:27 AM on 10/06/2011
All the Buffoon in charge can do is nothing.

He pretends he is just stopping Obama but in reality he is just incompetent.

How about any idea Eric the Stooge.
11:48 AM on 10/06/2011
SZ--MAN OR GAL YOU NEED SOME MORE KOOL-AID SUGAR FREE OF COURSE REMEMBER SZ--YOUR MERELY A LOONY LIB. SO YOUR REALLY NOT RESPONIABLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS WELL WE ALL KNOW THAT RIGHT LOONY??? HEH HEH HEH WELL I DO SAY
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chriss0114
the meanderings of a madman
12:03 PM on 10/06/2011
UR CAPS LK KEY IS STUCK ON AND YOUR BRIAN LEFT HOURS AGO I DO SAY
photo
AZDave2
Truth is rare...protect it!
11:24 AM on 10/06/2011
This is very simply an advertisement that he is for sale!
11:50 AM on 10/06/2011
AZD--CAN YOU NAME ONE OF THE 535 CROOKS THAT AINT FOR SALE--AT FAIR MARKET VALUE TOO. HEH HEH HEH WELL I DO SAY
photo
Rational Thought Plz
Is the Micro Bio Half
11:22 AM on 10/06/2011
Now I understand why we insist on trying to export democracy. Politician is the only recession proof job.
Norsky
RINO some say. I say Republican.
11:04 AM on 10/06/2011
This story really should have been titled: New player to own Congressmen."