More

PCIP Enrollment Far, Far Below Expectations In First Year


First Posted: 10/05/11 03:14 PM ET Updated: 12/05/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Enrollment in a new federal program for the uninsured is far below expectations from when the program launched following the enactment of health care reform last year.

Since its creation in July 2010, the Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan has insured 30,395 people, according to the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees the program. Officials initially estimated the initiative could reach as many as 375,000 by the end of 2010. There are up to 25 million uninsured Americans who have pre-existing conditions like heart disease or diabetes.

The most recent enrollment numbers are the first to reflect HHS efforts to make the program more affordable and more accessible, according to an HHS official. In the 23 states where the federal government runs the program directly, enrollment in July jumped to 8,712, a 15 percent boost from the previous month, before new lower premiums took effect.

The PCIP provides market-rate health coverage for uninsured people shunned by the health insurance industry. A recent government audit said the biggest obstacles to higher enrollment are costly premiums and the requirement that applicants be uninsured for six months to be eligible. Another problem is a lack of awareness about the program.

Olivia Grey Pritchard, a freelance photographer in New Orleans, said she didn't hear about the PCIP until she complained about her fruitless search for insurance on Facebook. Pritchard has been uninsured since returning from Africa earlier this year, where she said her insurance had been provided by the humanitarian organization that had hired her to take pictures.

She said her Facebook complaint went something like this: "I am willing to pay, so it is absolutely ridiculous I can't get coverage because of a benign tumor from seven years ago."

A friend sent her a few informative links. "At first I was really shocked I hadn't come across it," said Pritchard, 30. "Nobody knows about it. Nobody has signed up for it. Nobody's talking about it."

An HHS official said the administration has been doing more outreach to increase the PCIP's enrollment.

"In just the past two weeks we have engaged in over 115 events across the country to highlight the program," the official said. "These events work to educate people about the program, especially those most likely to interact with people potentially eligible for PCIP -- pharmacists, social workers, providers at local health community centers, etcetera."

Monthly premiums for the PCIP in Louisiana can be as low as $193, but Pritchard is waiting to sign up. She said that when she called HHS to ask about a policy, she was told the $1,000 deductible would reset in January -- meaning that she'd have to pay $1,000 for her own care between now and then before the plan started covering her costs. She's waiting until the beginning of next year to apply so that she can get the most out of the program.

Though the requirement that applicants be uninsured for six months has been cited as a main reason for low enrollment, several people have told HuffPost they canceled expensive policies just so they could sweat out six months for a more affordable plan.

Richard Vieira, a 54-year-old accountant who lives near San Francisco, Calif., said he dropped his $1,100-per-month policy in December and received PCIP coverage in July, but not without some trouble. He said that in April, he had to go to the hospital for an appendectomy that cost more than $100,000. (Vieira said he hired a consulting firm to negotiate with the hospital, resulting in a drastically lower bill.)

"It was just about right in the middle of my wait. I felt pretty unlucky," Vieira said. "Prior to that I was hardly using the insurance at all."

Arthur Delaney is the author of "A People's History of the Great Recession," HuffPost's first e-book.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Enrollment in a new federal program for the uninsured is far below expectations from when the program launched following the enactment of health care reform last year. Since its creat...
WASHINGTON -- Enrollment in a new federal program for the uninsured is far below expectations from when the program launched following the enactment of health care reform last year. Since its creat...
WASHINGTON -- Enrollment in a new federal program for the uninsured is far below expectations from when the program launched following the enactment of health care reform last year. Since its creat...
WASHINGTON -- Enrollment in a new federal program for the uninsured is far below expectations from when the program launched following the enactment of health care reform last year. Since its creat...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,363
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (17 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
Icantbelieveher 08:37 PM on 10/05/2011
Since America is the only industrialized country to have for-profit health care, it's no wonder we spend more on health care than any other nation!  If the supreme court does overturn Obamacare, the insurance companies know that they will not be able to stay in business for very long -- they lobbied for that mandate!  That's why they are pushing so hard to raise the age of Medicare eligibility, so  Read More...
redonthehead
Winning trophies for my game face alone
01:44 PM on 10/06/2011
I thought the PCIP was a crisis so big we had to pass the bill without reading it! I thought there was a national outcry for this program. I guess we had to add mountains of new regulation and costs to businesses to pay for this because it was a crisis. What a giant lie.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hank10303
Reality Check
01:01 PM on 10/06/2011
The Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan is being updated for July 2011, including new rates for some enrollees.... ---------------------------- That is on the PCIP web site and this article didn't mention that the cost is being addressed. Is this reporting or attacking? An objective story would have objectively included all the facts, not just the ones to make the story look good. https://www.pcip.gov/
12:52 PM on 10/06/2011
People have paid for Social Security and Medicare. The excuse that we can't pay back Social Security and we can't afford Medicare is so wrong on many levels.

We could have what we paid for working if the taxes were increased.
01:29 PM on 10/06/2011
SisterAnn, Social Security and Medicare should have protected investments with a safe return but when the system starts getting overloaded, you are eventually going to run out of funds. I wonder how many years down the road it is going to be solvent.

In the meantime, you have the elderly, people unable to honestly work and need assistance, they are counting on this support.

My son who is 46 works 7 days a week and is saving for his retirement because he has been working now for over 20 years and paying into the system which without a doubt will be insolvent by the time he gets to the point of getting back "His Money Which Was Deducted From His Paychecks."

A lot of cleaning up needs to be done. You hand out all this money for recovery which in the end turned into a sick joke because those guys just said, "Got any more?" and did NOT help people out with their mortgages. You would not believe the empty store fronts and businesses that have gone belly up and we live near a town of only 30,000 people. Businesses that have been here over 50 years but this economy is breaking people. It is breaking their spirits. No jobs. No insurance and if you get stuck in the in-between, no job, no insurance, unemployment benefits have run out, you are in big trouble.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DarkandStormyNight
My hoodie keeps me warm!
08:24 PM on 10/06/2011
The system is solvent at least until 2035. By then, us baby boomer will be almost gone and the system will be fine.
11:43 AM on 10/06/2011
This will be Obama's legacy.

"The Republicans could kill it , but only by offering something worse - 'vouchers' for health care. The Democrats couldn't kill it, because it would be calling their baby ugly. The American people detest it, because it simply an insurance company subsidy that does the individual American and his or her family a continuing dis-service. Ironically ,only the right-wing Supreme Court can save us from the 'health reform' that was spawned originally by Nelson Rockefeller, rejuvenated by Mitt Romney, promulgated by Obama and passed by nominal Democrats. Obama dissed sixty-plus years of Democratic domestic policy and set back reform another decade: That's his legacy."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:31 AM on 10/06/2011
Playing devil's advocate, why is it necessarily a good thing to make sure everyone has great health care? What age should everyone be supported, health wise, into living? Financially, is it a good thing to constantly keep everyone alive? What about the obvious viral increases which will become a direct consequence of having everyone on antibiotics (at cheaper costs) so that they may live longer? Is it a good thing to keep those with genetic diseases alive, through tax payer funded systems, so that they may produce and bear offspring - further passing down their genetic disease?

Remember it's just a mind experiment - let's hear some interesting answers..!
12:50 PM on 10/06/2011
I don't want to live past my usefullness and enjoyment of life, but I want to make the decision....not have a republican leader decide.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:54 PM on 10/06/2011
Wait what? Republicans are the ones that let you decide and help you decide - by allowing you to accomplish your future on your own accord without the hurdles of having to help others capping a budget which you will have to tap in to - or am I wrong?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:58 PM on 10/06/2011
I wrote that poorly, auto correct…!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hank10303
Reality Check
12:51 PM on 10/06/2011
Why is it necessary. 1-We have a law that anyone that goes to a hospital in need of treatment must be treated by the hospital. That is the law. 2-Many people that don't have health care insurance go to the emergency room and they can't pay the bill when it comes. So it gets written off and the hospital then increases its rates on those that do have health care insurance and can pay. Then the insurance company increases co-payment, premiums and deductibles on its paying customers. The end result is the cost of the non-paying people in the emergency room are passed on by the hospital and insurance company to you or I - working people with health insurance coverage, which equals higher cost for us. Second, the objective is not for everyone to have "great" health care insurance but adequate health care insurance. Third, accidents happen, just because you haven't had one today, doesn't mean there isn't one in your future. Recalling the example given at the republican debate where a young man was in a car accident, due to no fault of his own, and he didn't have insurance but required surgery because he is in a comma. Because of the law, he must be treated and the cost is passed to insured people. But, if the law were removed, he would be allowed to die. How would you feel about this if you were his spouse, father, mother, sister or brother? You questioned keeping people alive - we will all - every single one of us - become sick or have an accident at some point in our lives. When you have such an event in your life who do you think should determine if you live or die? Considering that the Declaration of Independents, the very grounds on which millions over the 200 plus years of this nation’s history have died to defend and protect - who has the right to say anyone of us should die? "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:16 PM on 10/06/2011
Great response.
jrfromdallas
I find squirrels untrustworthy too...
10:56 AM on 10/06/2011
Just another miscalculation from this awful administration...
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hank10303
Reality Check
12:55 PM on 10/06/2011
And what were the better ideas from the Bush administration, Medicare Part D. A program that cost senior living on fixed incomes more in health expenses. Its easy to point a finger, what's your idea?
10:45 AM on 10/06/2011
PCIP Enrollment Far, Far Below Expectations In First Year

"A recent government audit said the biggest obstacles to higher enrollment are costly premiums"

They needed an audit to come to this conclusion. Do these people actually live in this country........ or was the audit out sourced to China................
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hank10303
Reality Check
12:58 PM on 10/06/2011
I went to the PCIP website. It seems that new rates took effect just one month ago. The article didn't mention that - I wonder why?
photo
Hijeetz Mipanz
November 2012, The End of a Mistake.
10:39 AM on 10/06/2011
Who cares, the Supremes are going to find it unconstitutional soon.
10:47 AM on 10/06/2011
Sure they will................ on a 5/4 vote....what's the mystery............
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrCS
The best things in life .. Aren't Things
03:17 PM on 10/06/2011
There is another possibility. Justice Thomas may have to recuse himself due to the political position of his wife. Then we are 4/4. Now what do we do? Gridlock in the Judicial Branch joins up with the gridlock in the Legislative branch. What a mess. We need health care reform, but we can't seem to come up with the best solution. The ACA is better than nothing, but not by much. It is not the best solution for a number of reasons thanks to our do nothing congress.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
07:29 PM on 10/06/2011
You will need to channel Anthony Kennedy's thoughts to call this one. It all comes down to interpreting the interstate commerce clause for the 21st century. Are we going to go back to states doing their own thing like it was before the New Deal? And keep in mind that striking the law would lessen the influence of the Federal Government, including the Supreme Court's reach!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gaydood
Denied HC? goto PCIP.gov
10:04 AM on 10/06/2011
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TMS3100
Tea Party has run off with his light saber. .

285 Fans
Become a fan

.

8 minutes ago (9:54 AM)
OMG...were is the money going to come from to pay the 2.7 trillion the government owns to the dept of SS? Are you that clueless? Really....

???

no SS has $2.7 trill

the tres owes it apx $220 bill

pls dont be rude
photo
Paul Burke
Author of Journey Home
09:56 AM on 10/06/2011
The congress is full of millionaires - why would they give up their political rhetoric that everyone falls for and loose re-election just to help the country and those less fortunate?

The ones who are willing to take that chance are the ones we need to support - the rest of them should get shown the door.

Real problems need real solutions rooted in practicality - if you are on this comment board or any comment board parroting campaign rhetoric - you don't have a clue and are the one who is being duped and manipulated.

This is a complex society with complex problems and complex situations - pat answers and sound bites solve nothing - when the tornado rips through your house - you'll be looking for uncle sam and FEMA - so stop bullsh**ing yourselves.

Vote for the guy who says no taxes and then watch your highways and bridges crumble - the general public needs a swift kick in the butt - you get what you pay for people - taxes aren't bad its the jackles who try to pocket them for their own personal gain that are. Any politician who doesn't think the oil subsidies are wrong is only looking out for themselves. Get rid of them...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:21 AM on 10/06/2011
The highways in Chile have been privatized and their infrastructure is quickly becoming a world contender.

There also incredibly business friendly and tax very little.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrCS
The best things in life .. Aren't Things
02:13 PM on 10/06/2011
Privatize? What were they doing before? For some reason you seem to think that there is some kind of government public construction company. There isn't. Money for infrastructure would be paid to private companies who win the bidding process for building or rebuilding our infrastructure. We just aren't doing it because ... gasp ... it costs money. Our do nothing congress is to blame for many of our problems. You want to complain about our government? I suggest you start with congress, particularly with the Republicans who have done nothing but obstruct the peoples business since the President was elected.

You think that we currently have a poor business climate in this country? Then tell me why corporations are making record profits and sitting on trillions in cash. Small businesses are suffering because the banks that we bailed out are refusing to loan money to them. There attitude seems to be "Hey, we got ours, suckers. Screw you." while they also sit on a trillion in cash. Why do you think there is a protest going on at Wall Street right now? They are protesting the banks and the reckless moguls on the Street that cost us our homes, retirement plans and livelihoods. Why are not some or all of these criminals in prison?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sloreader
writ this down
07:30 PM on 10/06/2011
You want the USA to be more like Chile?
photo
Paul Burke
Author of Journey Home
09:55 AM on 10/06/2011
Buying into medicare would pump money back into the program - and mitigate the risk (more money in - fewer claims out) because healthier, younger people would be taking part. Its a freakin' no brainer but blocked by for profit health care because they have to pay their CEOs' and politicians who are banking on the hate big govt slogan to get re-elected by the voters who don't do their homework.

No republican would go for that and some republidems as well - why - because of their so called fealty to their veneer of a theology that gov't is bad and taxes to political rhetoric. Keeps them from stepping up to the plate and making real decision based on anything other than - how do I get re-elected. The word gutless comes to mind.

The people trying to make the system better are battling the general public's gullibility in falling for the rhetoric and the inability to look beyond sound bites when electing representatives as well as battling those representatives completely in it for themselves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DarkandStormyNight
My hoodie keeps me warm!
10:12 AM on 10/06/2011
That's right. Medicare for all!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:22 AM on 10/06/2011
I know a couple doctors who no longer accept medicare.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Quitcherbichin
If you are posting here, thank a veteran.
10:32 AM on 10/07/2011
I patronize the largest health care clinic in a medium sized city. I see at least 6 specialists at this clinic. All but one have told me that if Obamacare is upheld by the SC that they will cease to practice medicine. Thanks Obmama.
photo
Paul Burke
Author of Journey Home
09:55 AM on 10/06/2011
Get them out of the emergency room because the emergency room costs the tax payers more. Were do you think people go when they are sick - without the means to pay - 100,000 - for an appendectomy - who do you think pays that bill - it comes out of our tax pool. That's not an efficient way to run things. 1000,000.00 for a simple appendectomy is flat out criminal - and a prime example of the ludicrous so called invisible hand of the free market and where unregulated capitalism and for profit health care has gotten us.

The health-care plan re-routes the emergency room visitors onto PRIVATE insurance rolls and will keep the TAX PAYERS from paying for EMERGENCY ROOM visits - thats a start in the right direction.

Another excellent idea is Medicare E - opened up for a BUY IN - with its LOW administrative costs it is more efficiently run than CORPORATE health-care that pays it CEOS MILLIONS of dollars - and has brought us the 100,000 dollar appendectomy...because you have to pay the CEO's somehow - so rob the sick people. Nice moral society we've built for ourselves - creeps.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Riley Secrist
12:18 PM on 10/06/2011
"prime example of the ludicrous so called invisible hand of the free market" If you think the heavily regulated insurance industry and medical industry didn't help us get into the "$100k appendectomy" situation, you've lost your mind.

Regulation is good, as a minimally invasive protection against fraud....but don't believe whatever you've been told. There are enough doctors out there and hospitals, too, that given a chance to do what they want, that surgery might have cost 10k.
photo
toxicshock
Sassy, snarky, smart
09:37 AM on 10/06/2011
People are too busy trashing "Obamacare" to bother highlighting the pros of this bill. No wonder that woman didn't know!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gaydood
Denied HC? goto PCIP.gov
09:50 AM on 10/06/2011
yup
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Terry
10:24 AM on 10/06/2011
Well give us a few highligaahts of what is good with it. I have read it and I have found nothing that I like. So did miss something? I don't think I did I just think that most have not read it and they have no ideal of how bad this bill is. So please give us some highlights if you think there are some. Don't give me a talking point give us where it is in the bill and why it is good.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrCS
The best things in life .. Aren't Things
02:39 PM on 10/06/2011
You can't just say that you don't like anything without giving at least a few examples. You don't like the preexisting conditions part? Why not? You think its ok to deny people coverage? Why?

I don't like the bill because it doesn't go far enough. I want universal health care. Get the 'for profit' rip off out of it. Medicare for all.

Most people I've talked to that just say repeal the ACA. When I ask them what they would do differently they haven't a clue. They just don't like it, even if they can't give a good reason for it. I guess they want us to go back to being held hostage by the 'for profit' insurance companies and hospitals, etc. That unsustainable system was not working and was one of the main reasons I voted for Obama. I wanted our health care system fixed. We did not get what we asked for due to Republican opposition with their endless amendments and removal of the single payer option on day one. It should be nicknamed Republicare, not Obamacare.

Other presidents have tried and failed to fix health care due to opposition from 'for profit' lobbyists. They want the gravy train to continue.

What is your solution to fixing our health care system?
photo
toxicshock
Sassy, snarky, smart
08:55 PM on 10/06/2011
Really? You don't like the fact that 32 million Americans who are currently uninsured will have coverage? That's a pretty big highlight that isn't a "talking point". MrCS listed some positive aspects as well.
09:10 AM on 10/06/2011
This for-profit health care reform is not a good alternative to a real universal health care system that exists in every other western nation.
09:15 AM on 10/06/2011
You are correct. this health care reform is not a good alternative, even when compaired to other government run insurance programs.

Of course none of them compare to a unrestricted free market program with zero government funding. That of course would increase quality and reduce cost over time. Can't have that though can we.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DarkandStormyNight
My hoodie keeps me warm!
09:43 AM on 10/06/2011
That might have been an option a hundred years ago, but not in this economy. Corporations exist to make money. That is what capitalism is about - making money. You can't depend on capitalism to ensure people have access to quality health care. I doesn't work that way. If think of health care as a right, then it is something that the government must be involved and must be heavily regulated to make sure everyone is covered.
photo
RobBob
Amazed at the inanity
10:24 AM on 10/06/2011
Why would it "of course" increase quality and reduce cost? If you ask me, the OBVIOUS result would be just the opposite (because that's what we've already witnessed!). Only the healthy would be even OFFERED insurance, meaning the elderly and those with pre-existing conditions would have to either spend everything they have on health care, get their health care for "free" (i.e. at the cost of everyone else), or have to forego health care altogether. None of that sounds like quality has improved and costs have been lowered.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DarkandStormyNight
My hoodie keeps me warm!
09:18 AM on 10/06/2011
I agree 100%, but they had to start somewhere in the move to cover the majority of people. For quite a few decades this battle has been fought and this is far better than what we did have which is nothing between US and insurance companies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Riley Secrist
12:36 PM on 10/06/2011
How does healthcare fit into the onus of the US Government to protect life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness?

Life - well, it could be argued that healthcare is needed to protect life. But if that were true, the argument might be made that the govt should discontinue the use of cars, guns, knives, pencils, or anything that could cause harm.

Liberty - hmmm....I am free of disease!

Pursuit of happiness - I'm happy that I'm free of disease!

The Constitution doesn't guarantee that life will be fair and doesn't provide the govt with the power to ensure it is. Forcing people to buy health insurance so that others can benefit is tantamount to villiany.

Should we require all citizens to buy guns in case China invades?
09:07 AM on 10/06/2011
It's like every other Obama 'reform', it helps the health insurance companies more than the people.
Single payer is the way to go, but he didn't even fight for it when he had the majority in Congress and the people behind him. Now he's toast. Even his corporate backers are not backing him this time around. You can't fix stupid.