Occupy Wall Street: From March To Melee

Occupy Wall Street Arrests

First Posted: 10/06/11 09:47 AM ET Updated: 12/06/11 05:12 AM ET

Wednesday's anti-Wall Street protest was not one march but two. The first was an orderly, permitted procession on Broadway led by leading local labor unions that boasted 10,000 participants, according to the Associated Press. The second was a quick-moving series of confrontations that resulted in around 28 arrests, accusations of police brutality and fears that Zuccotti Park could soon be cleared out by force.

The day's activities began in Zuccotti Park around 3:30 p.m. EDT. A massive crowd populated "Liberty Square" with a buzz of activity in preparation for the big community and labor march that many thought could serve as a turning point in the movement's impact. The mostly young occupiers were headed north to a union rally in Foley Square. Then, together, the two groups would turn to march back down Broadway to to exchange ideas over what has been dubbed the people's microphone.

Eleanor Moriarty, a 70-year-old retired social worker who was visiting Zuccotti Park for the first time, said she was taken by "the younger people and their energy." Inside the park, Erica Basco, a 21-year-old Purchase College student, painted a pro-union sign and explained that her mother, while a Communications Workers of America member, couldn't attend the rally because she was working a late shift.

"Everybody's been really supportive; everybody's been really great," Basco said of the reaction to her union boosting. "It's heartening for me."

How the mostly young, un-unionized occupiers would mix with the older union members was an open question before the march -- not the least because union tactics, at least in the 21st century, are often so much more staid than last weekend's march onto the Brooklyn Bridge. As for whether there would be arrests, Occupy Wall Street's spokesman, Patrick Bruner, told HuffPost early in the afternoon, "I hope not, but you can never tell."

The scene in Foley Square, when occupiers and unionists became one, was an eclectic mish-mash of ages, races and ideas. Spartacists competed with Socialists, who in turn bumped into strollers. The sounds of the Rude Mechanical Orchestra, a radical marching band, carried over the droning rhythms of the Zuccotti Park drummers and the soul songs of the unions' singers. On the courthouse steps nearby a group of younger people had a banner that read, simply, "REVOLT." National Nurses United's priorities lay closer to "Tax Wall Street Transactions," according to their signs.

Max Breslow, a 29-year-old stagehand sporting sunglasses, a handlebar mustache and a Holga film camera, was impressed. This was the first time he'd made it out to Occupy Wall Street, or to any union rally in the United States, and he thought "the movement's gonna get larger, and the message is going to get more concise."

As a token to just how concise or even downright wonky some would like its message to be, a man nearby was holding a cardboard sign that said "Kill the OTC Derivative Market -- Outlaw Credit Default Swaps."

The 52-year-old actor who was holding the default swap sign, Joe Urla, acknowledged that "people don't realize what the derivatives market is."

Nevertheless, Urla added, "from a political standpoint it boils down to corruption" -- and he thought the people around him, from all their various backgrounds, recognized that problem well.

Everyone seemed to want to connect. A leader from Service Employees International Union 32BJ Local of custodial workers told the crowd "I see in the media, in the news, they say labor's joined the fight. I think that's a poor characterization. Labor's always been in the fight!"

"We're tired of the greedy sons of bitches taking our money," he added. "Does this movement have legs? Shit, Look around you!"

The crowd roared. The president of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union used language equally designed to appeal to the assembled audience.

"If your police department ever, ever reacts again like it did last Saturday," Stuart Applebaum warned Mayor Bloomberg, "stifling dissent and limiting free speech, New Yorkers will not tolerate it!"

Before the night's end, Applebaum's promise would arguably be put to the test. Thousands of New Yorkers streamed out of Foley Square and south towards Zuccotti. Their numbers were so great that progress was painfully slow, and traffic on the thoroughfare was at a standstill.

Inside a Duane Reade on Broadway, a woman in office attire whose bus to Staten Island was disrupted because of the protest shook her head.

"My daughter's involved with this. If I thought it would make a difference, I wouldn't care," she said, obviously holding out far less hope for Occupy Wall Street's long term prospects.

Once they made it down to Zuccotti Park, the union leaders did indeed take to the people's mike. And so did filmmaker Michael Moore, who led the crowd in a rabble-rousing speech aimed at Wall Street.

"I love the human microphone," Moore said. "This isn't just my voice or his voice or her voice, it's all of our voices. Let's keep the movement like this. Let's not let it be corrupted by politicians."

Moore proceeded to make a series of statements about Goldman Sachs and the other Big Banks, words that would not go over well in a Senate Cloakroom.

"They are responsible for ruining millions of lives, hundreds of millions of lives," Moore said, pointing to the office towers that loom over the park. "They organized this. They took their boot and put it on the necks of the American people, and now the American people want that boot removed, now!"

"Come back President Obama," he wistfully concluded, "a lonely nation turns its eyes to you."

Almost immediately after Moore laid down the microphone, people started shouting.

"March on Wall Street! March on Wall Street!" the chant went out. This wasn't in the plan -- in fact, just as the cry went out at 7:30 p.m., the rally was supposed to be ending.

"They can't arrest us all," a girl nearby said. That's also what someone told a freelance reporter for The New York Times before she and 743 other people were arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge.

Thousands of people streamed out of the park and south on Broadway. These people did not seem to be, by and large, the union members who had started in Foley Square. Instead they were the occupiers and other young people, looking for a confrontation.

Where to go was obvious. But what to do near Wall Street was less so, particularly since the NYPD had erected a well-manned barricade at the street's intersection with Broadway. On May 12, for another major union-backed rally, police allowed demonstrators to walk Wall Street's length -- but it was entirely blocked off tonight. Two sit-down sidewalk assemblies later, the group slowly reached a consensus.

The protesters and the media -- HuffPost included -- were cut off from the west side of Broadway by barricades. The atmosphere was tense and claustrophobic.

At 7:48 p.m., a protester near the barrier made an announcement: "If you're willing to get arrested, go in front." The crowd shuffled a little bit, and then with a chant of "three, two, one," scores of protesters attempted to storm the barricades.

The police pushed back, shoving and spraying pepper spray. One white-shirted officer almost immediately started swinging a baton that hit numerous protesters and a Fox 5 reporter. The heavy sound of the baton's contact with human bodies has already reverberated online, spawning accusations of unnecessary force.

Nobody made it over onto Wall Street without being arrested; at least four were taken into custody immediately. For hours afterward, several hundred protesters played a game of cat-and-mouse with police that seemed to stretch all over Lower Manhattan. Setting off on unpredictable, quick-paced marches, the protesters loped around corners and ran through streets, daring the police to arrest them. Sometimes the police did, using batons and force in the process.

There were reports of an attempt to enter Wall Street from another intersection that also ended in arrests. At Beaver and Marketfield the protesters somehow overturned police motorcycles. The department responded by sending in officers on horseback. Twenty minutes or so later, near State Street at Pearl Street, another one of the running sallies resulted in approximately five arrests. The police repeatedly told HuffPost they were only arresting people who left the sidewalks -- but why it was illegal to leave the sidewalks was not explained.

A CBS helicopter caught images of "an officer with a baton hitting a protester as other police surrounded him and tossed the protester to the ground."

By the end of the night, as local TV networks like WABC talked about the evening as "easily one of the most violent confrontations between police and protesters so far," the running marches and the resulting police reaction had cast a shadow over the peaceful, thousands-strong labor and community rally earlier in the day.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

Wednesday's anti-Wall Street protest was not one march but two. The first was an orderly, permitted procession on Broadway led by leading local labor unions that boasted 10,000 participants, according...
Wednesday's anti-Wall Street protest was not one march but two. The first was an orderly, permitted procession on Broadway led by leading local labor unions that boasted 10,000 participants, according...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,803
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (35 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
03:47 PM on 10/28/2011
There are "agent provocateurs" at work among us; always have been; always will be. They've plagued every protest I've joined since the Viet Nam War. They're a vocal minority that knows how to stir up mob mentality, which is done by manipulating anger amongst those protesters whose anger overwhelms the moral high ground of peaceful protest and peaceful civil disobedience as taught and practiced by Mohandas "Mahatma" Gandhi and others like him. For OWS to succeed and win the hearts and minds of at least a majority of the 99%, we must reject all violent confrontation, do what we can to prevent it from within our ranks, and let the police know we are all on the same side, not enemies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ChasG
Unborn, unchanging, undying Universe
03:30 PM on 10/28/2011
I honor all the peaceful protesters. I withhold my honor from those who believe in "confrontation" as a means of protest, because it undermines the moral imperatives for which we protest in peace. Looking for scapegoats against whom to vent generalized anger is going to provoke a response from law enforcement, and they are NOT the enemy. People who advocate this confrontation are either planted in the protest by opponents of the cause, or they are the mob of angry followers of the mindless advocates of confrontation. I've been a peaceful protester since the Viet Nam War, and this pattern of self-destruction plays out over and over again pushing us further away from our goals, not toward them.
medialv2
Capitalism = liars & thieves
03:32 AM on 10/08/2011
I salute all the people there protesting.
They are doing a favor for all the working poor of this country who are too afraid to take time off.

You are doing an honorable thing by doing this.
03:38 PM on 10/07/2011
We have to blame most of our problems on ourselfs for not paying attention to what congress has been doing for decades & blame congress for not doing what's best for the United States of America as a hole & what's good for them & the big money people who got them elected. Congress DOES NOT deserve all the benifits & the time off they get as they "are" part time. Plenty of people will do the job for 1/3 the pay as they are truly PART TIME. We have to make congress do what's right. Why should anyone have to pay $30 or $35,000 to run for office WHY? I would rather have someone without a high school diploma or degree in congress as long as they have good "common sense". Please don't take this the wrong way but I'd rather my "common sense" over the best degree there is. We have to have people in congress that are content with making a living & not getting rich, someone that if they worked as an inspector making $50,000 a year would not take $100,000 to allow 1 gallon of oil to hit the ground. Yes, these people are few & far between & most will turn bad after a few year of temptation. This is why we have to have 2 term term limits for all of congress. Please forgive my english,wording, spelling & punctuation as I never finished my 12th grade year BUT I've got more "common sense"
07:33 PM on 10/07/2011
nothing needs forgiving ...and you certainly do !!!
01:03 PM on 10/07/2011
If these protests are not peaceful, then any message they have will be lost. Instead, the media will focus on the violence.

Our only hope is to remain peaceful 100% of the time. Do not let the police instigate; just turn the other cheek. If you see provocateurs, identify them to other protesters so that they are ignored. Might also want to try turning provocateurs in to the NYPD.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:53 AM on 10/07/2011
WHY IS THIS STORY NOT THE MAIN, HP? DID THE NEW OWNER PUT A DIRECTIVE OUT?
03:26 AM on 10/07/2011
This is only the beginning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
03:06 AM on 10/07/2011
Perhaps a lot of you know this, but I just received a bulletin that states that there are now supportive groups for Occupy Wallstreet in over 250 communities in the US and Canada. Accoding to the message sent to me, many of these groups have already started their own demonstrations, and are calling themselves the 99%, and those who are not yet demonstrating are planning their own events. On the news tonight, my city (Sacramento) had over 100 demonstrators (and adding) & they are calling it Occupy Sacramento to protest Corporate greed from the 99%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Walking an 87-year-old in the sand isn't easy
11:47 PM on 10/06/2011
According to Amped Status (who was THERE), this may have been the work of agent provocateurs.

There were definitely some people who wanted to push through the barricades, but we peacefully remained in place for about 20 minutes. A few guys that I’ve never seen before were really agitating for us to break through. A few other people that I know, were considering it and we were trying to get an assembly together to try to figure out what our next move would be. At this point, the two guys that I’ve never seen before were the first to push into the barricades that were directly in front of about 50 police officers, and the instant that happened, pepper-spray was fired all over the place and the cops were swing their batons wildly.

http://ampedstatus.org/report-from-the-frontlines-police-attack-protesters-more-occupy-wall-street-arrests-videos/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WheresNixon
Only children require 100% agreement! P.S. Nixon
11:36 PM on 10/06/2011
Since so many here seem to be hot on Thomas Jefferson, I will add a quote as well.

"Our legislators are not sufficiently apprized of the rightful limits of their power; that their true office is to declare and enforce only our natural rights and duties, and to take none of them from us. No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another; and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him; every man is under the natural duty of contributing to the necessities of the society; and this is all the laws should enforce on him; and, no man having a natural right to be the judge between himself and another, it is his natural duty to submit to the umpirage of an impartial third. When the laws have declared and enforced all this, they have fulfilled their functions, and the idea is quite unfounded, that on entering into society we give up any natural right. " - Thomas Jefferson 1816
07:36 PM on 10/07/2011
..a great quote...

sadly it will be likely interpreted from frames of reference that are skewed in either direction... in order for it to mean what the reader would like it to mean instead of what it means
photo
KenGirard
"American" is my religion. I have faith in it.
12:55 AM on 10/15/2011
Like that many will focus on that first line "Our legislator­s are not sufficient­ly apprized of the rightful limits of their power;" without consideration that Pres Jefferson was talking about the legislator­s in 1816, and not attempting to say that about all future legislator­s. But read the entire letter here: http://books.google.com/books?id=1mIFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA3&dq=%22Our+legislator%C2%ADs+are+not+sufficient%C2%ADly+apprized+of+the+rightful+limits+of+their+power%22+library&hl=en&ei=0_qYTuzDB8LL0QGhqp29BA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CC4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WheresNixon
Only children require 100% agreement! P.S. Nixon
09:40 PM on 10/06/2011
Has anyone bothered to ask Michael Moore about the house he lives in, the movie theaters he owns, his stock portfolio? He claims he does not own ONE stock. Well I guess that is a true statement since he owns way more than one. At one time his portfolio included Haliburton! Hello, this man is worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The hypocrisy is sickening!
11:30 PM on 10/06/2011
Moore has an estimated worth of $50 million. It's amazing that Moore is condemning capitalism, the same capitalism that made him wealthy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WheresNixon
Only children require 100% agreement! P.S. Nixon
11:47 PM on 10/06/2011
Yes indeed! He lives in a million dollar apartment in Manhattan. Also has a house in the country. Even brags that many of these folks (brokers etc) are his neighbors. He is deplorable to work with and for. Figure that out!
08:02 AM on 10/07/2011
Moore like many of the aristos have a knack of playing it both ways. They play the "I'm on your side great unwashed" role but then make huge contract demands which drives up the price of whatever product they shill for. The movie stars, moguls, singers, media hot shots etc. are rich and their greedy demands are the enemy.
08:26 PM on 10/06/2011
This article isn't telling the complete truth. Last night, the police attempted to kettle the area the protesters were in. Their intentions were not clear, but kettling is a human rights violation in any situation. It involves blockading a group of people to cut them off from food, water, or bathroom resources until they break. One protester sent an urgent plea for help on Twitter last night, saying the police were kettling them off.

The protesters had every right to run the blockade in that situation. It was their fundamental human right to stand up to the authorities who were oppressing them, and it's shameful that the mainstream media - including The Huffington Post - isn't reporting this.
09:39 PM on 10/06/2011
They weren't kettled. And they weren't cut off from food, water or bathroom services.

A group of protesters attempted to storm the police barricades preventing them access to Wall St.

Almost immediately after Moore laid down the microphone, people started shouting.

"March on Wall Street! March on Wall Street!" the chant went out. This wasn't in the plan -- in fact, just as the cry went out at 7:30 p.m., the rally was supposed to be ending.

Thousands of people streamed out of the park and south on Broadway. These people did not seem to be, by and large, the union members who had started in Foley Square. Instead they were the occupiers and other young people, looking for a confrontation.

At 7:48 p.m., a protester near the barrier made an announcement: "If you're willing to get arrested, go in front." The crowd shuffled a little bit, and then with a chant of "three, two, one," scores of protesters attempted to storm the barricades.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/06/occupy-wall-street-march-arrests_n_997628.html
10:11 PM on 10/06/2011
I'm not quite sure why you think linking to a newspaper I already said wasn't reporting the truth proves anything. (This is herooofcamelot, btw. I changed my account because I made the first one for a history website I'm starting. I never thought I'd post on the protest so much, but someone has to get the information out there since it isn't being reported by the mainstream media.)

As I said, one of the protesters sent a message about it with a plea for help on Twitter. Obviously, the media (including Huffington Post, which is owned by AOL/Time Warner) isn't being completely honest with you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MamacitaOfLove
Micro-bio curious
10:54 PM on 10/06/2011
I read the kettling tweets; GlobalRevolution also covered it live.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hjalmar
May the dawn soon come.
08:17 PM on 10/06/2011
Excellent coverage of OWS today on Democracy Now! :

https://www.democracynow.org/

Naomi Klein was there:

“My biggest fear was that the Obama presidency was was going to lead this generation of young people into political cynicism and political apathy,†Klein says. “But instead, they are going to where the power is. They are realizing the change is not coming in Washington because politicians are so controlled by corporate interest, and that that is the fundamental crisis in this country.â€
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WheresNixon
Only children require 100% agreement! P.S. Nixon
08:24 PM on 10/06/2011
Too bad they are not familiar with the world bank! Perhaps London makes a bit more sense... But, why worry about details...
photo
randytut
Liberalism is bliss
08:34 PM on 10/06/2011
Change is not coming because Obama sold liberals a bill of goods all the while selling himself to Wall Street. Liberals are rubes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HuddledMasses
Older I get, less likely I am 2 suffer fools
07:45 AM on 10/07/2011
If you'd have been paying attention you would know that the "libruls" are not depending on O or anyone else for the change we so desperately need. These protests show that we've taken it into our own hands.
medialv2
Capitalism = liars & thieves
03:57 AM on 10/08/2011
Democrats & Republican believers are both rubes. lol

Two sides of the same coin.
08:16 PM on 10/06/2011
"I belive that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armys." -Thomas Jefferson-
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WheresNixon
Only children require 100% agreement! P.S. Nixon
09:16 PM on 10/06/2011
Interestingly enough, you only gave a partial quote!

“I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.â€
― Thomas Jefferson
photo
KenGirard
"American" is my religion. I have faith in it.
01:01 AM on 10/15/2011
They always do, as cherry picking is what they understand.
One needs not just a line, but the full text before and after to develop a context for the words to stand upon. Pres Jefferson did not speak in sound bites.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
02:34 AM on 10/07/2011
I agree! F/f