iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

K-12 Education Funding: Most States At Levels Lower Than Pre-Recession, Cut Spending This Year

The Huffington Post   Emmeline Zhao First Posted: 10/07/2011 1:31 pm Updated: 08/08/2012 1:50 pm

Most states have cut state funding for schools this year, and a majority of states are funding K-12 education at levels lower than before the recession, after adjusting for inflation.

A survey published Thursday by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities examined 46 states -- where 95 percent of the country's elementary and secondary students reside. Delaware, Idaho, Indiana and Washington were excluded because the way they report funding data makes historical comparisons difficult, the researchers note.

Of the states studied, 37 have trimmed K-12 educational funding since last year, after adjusting for inflation -- 19 of those states cut funding by more than 5 percent.

Looking back to before the recession, at least 30 states are funding schools at levels lower than they were in 2008. More than half of those -- 17 -- have cut funding by more than 10 percent, while Arizona, California, Hawaii and South Carolina saw the deepest spending cuts, slashing educational funding by more than 20 percent since pre-recession.

Since nearly half of all education spending is state-funded, according to the report, state cutbacks force districts to raise revenue on their own -- which is difficult -- or trim resources like educational services and lay off teachers -- thus threatening educational reform efforts. The cuts have also hurt economic recovery, as 194,000 school jobs nationwide were lost between August 2010 and August 2011 -- more than three times the cuts in the year before.

The loss of educational funding across the country results from various factors, including depressed revenues, difficulty in raising new funds, rising costs and depleting emergency federal aid, according to the report.

Still, a few states have increased educational funding for various reasons. Some states like Maryland, Massachusetts and Iowa have prioritized and focused on sustaining or improving education funds amid tighter finances. Alaska, Montana, North Dakota and Wyoming have faced fewer budget cuts and can draw on large oil and gas revenues.

The results of the CBPP report are more telling than shocking, as it sums and contextualizes what prolific reports on school budgets have spotlighted over the last few years. While states balance their budgets, they also face the added burden of less federal support as $100 billion in federal stimulus money for education dries up.

Michigan saw the 8th largest cuts in educational funding dollars this year compared to last, according to the report. For Detroit Public Schools alone, the district has been looking for every way to close a $327 million deficit. Measures include major cuts to teacher pay and workforce.

Earlier this year, Texas cut public education funding by $5 billion amid a $15 revenue shortfall statewide. Texas' cuts place it right next to Michigan, ranking 7th in the dollar amount reduced since last year and 3rd for percent change in spending per student since last year. Analysts predict that the cuts will cost Texas 49,000 education jobs over the next two years.

Wisconsin in June adopted a budget that drops $800 million from state education funding. The state had the 2nd largest cuts in dollar amounts for per-student spending since last year.

The CBPP report's authors Phil Oliff and Michael Leachman suggest that states consider other measures to raise revenue and calls on the federal government to increase educational support like that of the American Jobs Act that aim to hire and retain teachers.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

 
 
  • Comments
  • 106
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
05:15 AM on 10/09/2011
How is it that one of the poorest states, West Virginia, has raised it's education budget by 8.1%, the highest of the states increasing it's funding for education? And, because it didn't vote for Obama in 2008, it has not gotten much of the stimulus funding to help with it's budget problems. Maybe it is because the state has introduced "fracking" to recover natural gas reserves within the state and prefers to support the education of their children higher on their priority list then catering to environmentalists who have undermined the coal industry in the state. Maybe all of the states should reconsider their energy industry regulative policies to increase revenues instead of looking for handouts from the federal government.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zSpin2001
All your base are belong to us.
11:36 AM on 10/08/2011
It looks like our children are going to join the 99%.
11:37 PM on 10/07/2011
Now that's the way to fight our way to back to number 1 in the world :-) You have just got to give those Republicans credit, small government and small lifestyle may be exactly what we need for the bottom 98%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TINA ANDRES
How did this happen?
10:11 PM on 10/07/2011
I have five classes this year. I normally have six but I have a two period class of 28 sixth graders who are working at about a 2nd-3rd grade level in math, among them are 12 special education students and more than half of them are English language learners. That is my smallest class, the other four classes have 40, 36, 37 and 40 students. Those students are not even at grade level but because they are "close" they get to be in classes of 40 or near 40. There is no money for anything else. I am working extremely hard, no breaks, no lunch just to make an attempt at providing something that resembles a decent education. In my district, we took a pay cut seven years ago during the good times and everything has remained stagnant since then. I am thankful that I have a job and do not expect a pay raise within the next 10 years or so but I really can only do so much under these circumstances. I understand that there is no money but of course, we spend billions of dollars on tests and books. We have no library left, that disappeared years ago. I don't know what the answer is.
10:38 PM on 10/07/2011
Tina, thank you for being a teacher, and for sticking with it. Having you there is better than not having you there.
Part of the answer is awareness. Talking about the situation constantly and in public will help that. Unless one has a child in public school, one probably has no idea how common situations like this are (even some in public school dont know this). And maybe more importantly, that there are some schools where the environment is the total opposite (and where the same exact 'system' works just fine). Most politicians' kids never see the inside of a public school. And many voters as well (ironic that the most likely to vote are the most affluent, who are also the most likely to attend private schools (and in some areas, charter schools)).
I read a story the other day where the former head of a huge investment bank was interviewed. He was asked specifically about california and its budget deficit. He pointed out that the deficit amounted to only about 1% of the state's GDP and that a 1% increase in taxes would solve the problem. I think the question will be whether the recession will force more people back into public schools sooner than 'the interests' can destroy public education. In that sense, it feels like a race to me.. :-P
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
graywolf68
Is that true or did you hear it on Fox News?
09:51 PM on 10/07/2011
Thirty seven states have cut education funding resulting in districts having to trim educational services and lay off teachers. Yet many top district administrators across the nation enjoy salaries in excess of $300,000. Really? Am I the only person that is bothered by the fact that the allocation of funds in our education system is seriously skewed and backwards?
10:06 PM on 10/07/2011
lausd has like 33,000 teachers. pay their superintendent $0 and you'd be able to add about 5 teachers (based on average salary). While some people may not think the supers' salaries are appropriate, they are not the problem in education funding.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
roaddawg31
12:05 AM on 10/08/2011
But then, you would also acknowledge that the Supt. isn't the only higher up in LAUSD (and elsewhere), and that there is a large amount of OTHER bureaucrats and administrators... and that if you cut ALL their salaries... while it wouldn't turn a district around, it would make a much bigger dent than adding "5 teachers" to the staff right? Not to mention that it would set a positive example that THEY too, are tightening belts.
02:58 AM on 10/09/2011
The salaries of management is not the problem but the "thinking" behind it is. In LAUSD, many senior management positions received raises the last few years. The reason they received it while everyone else got a pay cut, was because they "think" they are better and more valuable then everyone else. I know, I've worked with the lowest paid workers, the medium and the highest senior management. I know exactly how they think.

Also, when you have management increasing the salary between the rich and the poor (workers), that tells you they are willing to fudge budget numbers.

Having said that, it's also true the health, retirement and other benefits in LAUSD are extremely generous and costing huge amounts of money. There are also horrible union employees that should be removed.

I don't see a way out of it anytime soon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
06:48 AM on 10/08/2011
And most of those six-figure per year administrators (or, rather, bureaucrats) sorely mismanaged their budgets for decades. Just audit a school system's books, especially anything having to do with a bond issuance and vendor contract award. In most instances, if needless federal regulations were eliminated the district could lay off 75% of their administration and re-direct those funds to "real" education -- like paying teachers a reasonable wage...for running cell blocks known as public school classrooms.
04:26 PM on 10/08/2011
Bond money can't be used for education purposes, so while they may be run sketchily, that has nothing to do with how many teachers you have or how much they are paid. Federal funds only make up about 10% of k-12 budgets. And most of that federal money is designed for poverty kids. I'm not sure eliminating federal regulations would help that much (except for getting rid of nclb).

Btw I heard there was a district in California that refused their nclb money so they could avoid the impact of going into program improvement. Nice.
09:19 PM on 10/07/2011
We have the most expensive education regime on the planet - how is it working for you? It's about time some changes were implemented, with declining wages and unemployment - who is going to keep paying for this. Cut Gov waste across the board - we are sinking in debt. People just want to keep throwing money at education without getting any positive results. If parents will not be accountable for their kids, then who - Big Brother - it doesn't work. People better wake up, we are living the new reality - jobs are not coming back - they have been shipped over seas or replaced with machines - start thinking trade schools - not everyone can be an engineer or work on Wall Street. Get your heads out of the sand and take a look around - what great achievements have we accomplished lately? Get the hell out of the Middle East, implement a new tax structure and demand getting rid of loopholes - we are no longer a free Country - we are owned and operated by Wall Street and the IMF and the Fed - they are NOT interested in your well being.
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
06:40 AM on 10/08/2011
You're just so simply deluded. We're not sinking in debt. Look at Wall Street and their bonuses. Look at the income gains made by the to 2% over the last 20 years as tax receipts have fallen. Look at the amount we're wasting in two wars and unfunded drug company support. What we are drowning in is a failure of priority. Our politicians talk about education yet underfund it while turning more and more money over to private corporate charter schools. What we need to make sure is that public money goes to the public good.
08:34 AM on 10/08/2011
Massachusetts schools do the best in the nation. Massachusetts has increased its education funding. We (as a state) are competitive with the rest of the world. The rest of you who cut education funding so the rich don't have to pay are dragging us down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tiggy
09:11 PM on 10/07/2011
Children should be treated as the Investments they ARE! Seeing how little importance and support given it is no wonder we have such idiots creating laws.
We billions abroad in the name of foreign aid yet cut programs for our own. How are our children to compete on a global level if we keep cutting and slashing education?
Education should be the last cut made because education is the teacher for our future leaders.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hugatree
Retired teacher, writer
09:08 PM on 10/07/2011
We really need to cut educational funding in this country because we've proven we have the most intelligent voting public. Just take a look at the TeaBaggers and the followers of Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. Intelligent and sooo knowledgeable about U.S. History and the Constitution. Yep.
09:20 PM on 10/07/2011
No one has lived by the constitution in years or the Bill of Rights - that's why we are losing our rights!
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
06:42 AM on 10/08/2011
That's just a ridiculous statement. Fear is why we're losing our rights. It started with Reagan and exploded after 9/11. We've become a country too afraid of everything to do anything.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFT
It's the poverty, stupid.
09:02 PM on 10/07/2011
The oligarchs have won.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tiggy
09:05 PM on 10/07/2011
Only if you let them!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:54 PM on 10/07/2011
How else would you add members to the republican base?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dixdarlin
08:20 PM on 10/07/2011
Give that money to pro-ball players! That makes America great!
$24 million for Manning who isn't working!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tiggy
09:17 PM on 10/07/2011
I just saw on the news where the NFL is charging ESPN so much to broadcast the games that cable is having to increase rates in order to keep ESPN! If every one stopped watching ESPN, stopped buying sports products and boycotted games that pay would go down!
OldSchool4942
just passin through
02:39 PM on 10/08/2011
Notice how they always have enough money for sports in HS education?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rdsmith627
09:54 PM on 10/09/2011
That's why some states are looking at cutting athletics. Many programs are self sustaining.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dixdarlin
08:18 PM on 10/07/2011
We's Ignernt and proud!
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
06:43 AM on 10/08/2011
let me correct you... it should be We's Ignernt and prowd
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
OneTop
Uh, is that a beer hall?
07:57 PM on 10/07/2011
Education isn't important to Americans.

The military, Oil and Gas subsidises, Bank & other Private bailouts and such are what is really important!

It should be more than obvious to all, regardless of your Political leanings.

After all, we have a National Party (1 of 2) who make the demonization of education a major Policy initiative and they get votes for doing so.
07:57 PM on 10/07/2011
This is insane. Who will rebuild and run our nation in the future? It's incredibly short-sighted.
09:22 PM on 10/07/2011
There isn't going to be a nation to run - it's going to be a banana republic run by the elite and the rest of us are serfs to keep the wheels running,
photo
logansteele1
You can't have it both ways.
10:50 PM on 10/07/2011
You've got that right! Democrat or Republican, it really doesn't matter. Government is on auto pilot and headed for the ground.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]