More

Shark Fin Trade Banned In California: Jerry Brown Signs Bill

Shark Fin Trade California

By JUDY LIN   10/ 7/11 06:03 PM ET   AP

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- California's governor announced Friday that he signed a bill banning the sale, trade and possession of shark fins to protect the world's dwindling shark population.

Gov. Jerry Brown signed AB376 over objections that the fins are used in a soup considered a delicacy in some Asian cultures.

California joined Hawaii, Washington, Oregon and Guam in the ban that environmental and animal rights activists hailed for closing off Pacific ports in the U.S. to the shark fin trade.

"The practice of cutting the fins off of living sharks and dumping them back in the ocean is not only cruel, but it harms the health of our oceans," Brown wrote in a statement.

The bill had split the Asian delegation in the California Legislature.

Assemblyman Paul Fong, D-Cupertino, who authored the bill, said it was needed to protect endangered shark species, but others called the measure racist because the fins are used in a soup. The fins can sell for $600 a pound, and the soup can cost $80 a bowl.

The California market for shark-fin soup is the largest outside Asia. During a legislative debate, Sen. Ted Lieu, D-Torrance, noted the bill would ban only part of the shark while permitting the continued consumption of shark skin or steaks.

"I respect the governor's decision and now hope the proponents of AB376 will focus on protecting sharks, such as the spiny dogfish shark, from being endangered due to consumption of its meat, such as in steaks and fish and chips," Lieu said in a statement.

Critics of shark finning, which already is restricted in U.S. waters, estimate that fishermen kill 73 million sharks each year for their fins. They said it is particularly cruel because the wounded sharks often are returned to the ocean to die after their fins are removed.

"Californians can be proud of their role in giving these remarkable top predators a chance to recover their populations and helping to restore balance to our oceans," said Assemblyman Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, who co-authored the bill.

Brown said researchers have estimated that some shark populations have declined by more than 90 percent.

"In the interest of future generations, I have signed this bill," he wrote.

The ban was supported by celebrities, including actress Bo Derek and retired NBA center Yao Ming of China. It also was backed by the Humane Society of the United States and Humane Society International, and other environmental advocates.

Brown signed another bill by Fong, AB853, that allows existing stocks of on-hand shark fins to be sold until July 1, 2013. It also makes it clear that sport fishermen who catch a shark can still eat the fin or have the shark stuffed and mounted as a trophy.

It also clarifies that the ban would not affect stuffing and mounting of sharks, nor the donation of fins to research or medical institutions.

"Sharks need their fins, and we don't," said Jennifer Fearing, the Humane Society's California director. "The momentum to protect sharks globally has taken a huge step forward."

The ban will take effect Jan. 1, 2012.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SAN FRANCISCO

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- California's governor announced Friday that he signed a bill banning the sale, trade and possession of shark fins to protect the world's dwindling shark population. Gov. Jerry B...
SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- California's governor announced Friday that he signed a bill banning the sale, trade and possession of shark fins to protect the world's dwindling shark population. Gov. Jerry B...
Filed by Carly Schwartz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 67
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:24 AM on 12/01/2011
Do you think the Asian-trade shark hunters really care...? They are still killing illegal rhinos and monkeys for their bones!
photo
Stacey Linck-Citraro
vegetarian and lifetime advocate
11:04 AM on 11/05/2011
Definitely a historic victory for these creatures, but sadly too late for those who have already suffered. This movement needs to keep on moving and shark finning should be illegal across the board. I would also like to see any fishing/involvement with sharks banned. These historic and magnificent creatures should not be harvested for anything, why do we have to USE and CONSUME everything on the fricken planet??? Sharks are beautiful and graceful creatures who lived to see the age of the dinosaurs and then we come along and kill them off? They do have a very bad reputation - which we as a society have given them - but people need to get over that. Can you say entertainment? Have we no fricken shame? I think we need to take 'kind' out of mankind.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gsocratesasks
Dammit Gumby!
01:58 PM on 10/10/2011
Look, another law that puts people in jail and ends employment.
photo
angryoldman
No1 told me when 2 run I missed the starting gun
10:11 PM on 10/10/2011
You are stupendously st%p1d.
12:24 AM on 12/01/2011
Sorry you will have to cross off shark hunter from the "special skills" portion of your extras resume.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:48 PM on 10/10/2011
Had shark fin soup last year in Tokyo. It doesn't taste that great, and isn't worth the money or ecological devastation.

I support this ban. Asian superstitions are going to cause a lot of species to go extinct, including Rhinos, Tigers, and Elephants.
12:25 AM on 12/01/2011
Why did you have it? Your actions got a shark killed!
12:36 PM on 10/10/2011
I don't believe that this has anything to do with racism, I know that sharkfin costs a lot.. like 700$ at the least
10:14 PM on 10/09/2011
Shark fins have no flavor. The Chinese eat it because they're superstitious and think eating shark fins will increase potency or prevent cancer among a list of fictitous health benefit claims that have no scientific or medical support.
12:27 PM on 10/10/2011
EXUSE ME? Do not make assumptions about Chinese people if you don't even KNOW them. I don't care what you heard, but obviously, you only heard it from a TV channel or one of your friends. Chinese people ARE NOT ALL supersticious. The chinese eat it FOR PLEASURE, not because they are supersticious and think it will help their health. I don't hurt sharks, I get the vegetarian shark fin, as you can see there's nothing supersticious about that. Same thing as spaghetti has no flavor before you put the sauce on, sharkfin won't have flavor until you put it in the soup. This is way beyond just a sharkfin problem, you just made things personal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gsocratesasks
Dammit Gumby!
01:59 PM on 10/10/2011
yes...he's your typical enlightened leftist. Prejudice and ignorent.
12:42 PM on 10/09/2011
The bill was symbolic at best. Even more wasteful at worst.

I bet you had a vision of a guy with a fishing pole catching a shark brought live into the boat, to have its fins cut off. Wrong, most shark are caught by long lining or drift gill netting.

The long liner, puts out a long cable with baited hooks every 6 ft or so. That line is put out for many hours and let to sit. At the end of the allotted time the line is pulled up, as the deck hands remove and sort the take. Most of the fish are dead having thrashed, spun and otherwise given up. Most sharks are pelagic, meaning they need to swim to put oxygen rich water over their gills to "breath". So being stuck on a hook, and not being able to swim is a death sentence. Thus if shark fin cannot be possessed, the fisherman tosses the dead shark back in the ocean. Thus you have the same outcome, and dont even get the fin. The shark died for nothing. (Note the pictures of live sharks being finned and spinning bodies sent to the bottom
are the vast exception to the rule. most are long dead)
12:42 PM on 10/09/2011
see above for the start of post.

Drift gill nets are the same, except the shark doesnt see the mono-filament line, and swims into the net and gets stuck up to the gills and cannot back out. Hopelessly entangled they die, being unable to swim. Hours later their dead carcasses are pulled in. to be dumped like trash also.

So how do you really have an impact. Ban indiscriminate forms of fishing such as drift gill nets and long liners. It will grossly raise seafood prices and dramatically reduce the take of many species that are not netted by trawlers, so you will know it will not come without cost and effect.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KevinFitzz
Pleased to meet you, meat to please you!
05:37 PM on 10/08/2011
Great news! Now if we can ban republ.....
12:24 PM on 10/09/2011
Doesnt matter Republicans in Ca are an endangered species in need of protection more than any endangered species.

The legislature has been dominated by Democrats for decades now. Soon the tax and spend days will be over as their continued policies and unfunded pension liabilities come home to roost (like Reverend Wrights famous) as the Democrat's chickens. Bankruptcy and a receiver running Ca is coming, sooner than you think.

But people like you will continue to vote (if you do vote) in Democrats like a man in a hammock with a giant hole in his roof on a sunny day in late November.

All of a sudden it will dawn on you that, we are broke and payment for gold plated pensions will endanger the ability of the state to provide current services (when I say state, this is happening at all levels state, county and local govt). So your strategy will be to raise taxes.. not on yourself but on the rich.. Tax the Rich will soon be the call.

But with the Ca Final Solutions Global Warming Act, high regulation and already one of the highest combined tax burdens in the nation, Businesses are leaving state, Rich taxpayers are leaving the state, even retired public employees on pension are leaving the state. In the end it will fail, the state will be bankrupt, and you will have no one (really) to blame but your Democrat selves.

Too bad you will take us down with you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KevinFitzz
Pleased to meet you, meat to please you!
11:18 PM on 10/09/2011
And I quote, "We're going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that allow some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share. In theory, some of those loopholes were understandable, but in practice they sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while the bus driver was paying ten percent of his salary, AND THAT'S CRAZY.
Do you think the millionaire ought to pay more in taxes than the bus driver or less"?

Ronald Reagan
June 6, 1985

Teah, I'm taking you down. funny. Is that a foil h....?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hursh 4 ever
Smart Commenter - logical and wise
04:19 PM on 10/08/2011
If they start harvesting shark just for their fin, would that make everyone happy? cruel things are done to many animals we eat... GET REAL hypocrites.
mothergrace
If they knock you down, bite 'em on the ankle.
07:12 PM on 10/08/2011
What are you talking about? They were harvesting shark just for their fins and then throwing the rest of the animal back in the ocean. Does that make any sense?

Far better to have a control on shark hunting and use every part of the animal for food.
12:57 PM on 10/09/2011
The problem is most species of shark are not edible, they would end up as fertilizer or pet food.

Most shark species have high urea counts in their cells. Much like horse meat, shark should not be eaten on a regular basis. Moreover, I can attest, many shark and ray species taste greatly of ammonia. Even the most tolerant pallet will reject it. So the species that are preferred such as thresher and short fin makos, fisherman already take the whole fish to market. It will be the others, where the only commerical market is for the fin, that will be converted to pet food and or fertilizer.

Most shark are long dead when pulled onto the boat, victims of long liners and drift gill netting, and are actually just ancillary to the intended species targeted. A fisherman under requirement to either sell the whole shark at minimal reward for fertilizer or pet food will dump the dead shark to the bottom, and not even the fin will be taken. Possibly a worse outcome.

But that is what happens when you have people who have no clue, but are reacting on feelings design a bill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hursh 4 ever
Smart Commenter - logical and wise
04:17 PM on 10/08/2011
There are so many other types of soups out there geez! they make it seem like shark fin soup is the only soup available.... go eat wonton soup, or new england clam chowder or something geez louisse!
12:59 PM on 10/09/2011
All ready Chinese are saying the bill is discriminatory, as it targets them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
June25
03:27 PM on 10/08/2011
What if I have no shark fins but I still wish to have soup,can I do so without being racist?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hursh 4 ever
Smart Commenter - logical and wise
04:17 PM on 10/08/2011
No soup for you!
01:00 PM on 10/09/2011
If you ask the question, then you are one.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
luvobama
Hospice volunteer...
02:45 PM on 10/08/2011
Nothing says educated and evolved more than pillaging our waters for the wealthy.

You should see what they do to our abalone here in Northern CA.

Disgusting by any standards.
01:15 PM on 10/09/2011
For the wealthy?

If you were actually aware, Abalone take is against the law south of point arena. North of point arena you cannot take abalone with scuba gear, you must snorkel. That makes it a lot harder. Second only Red Abalone can be taken. third only 24 abalone can be taken in a whole year in that area. tags must be affixed to all take and reporting cards sent. If somehow DFG game wardens find you in possession of untagged or unreported abalone, you are in big trouble.

So really the vast portion of the take is for recreational divers, under for the most part, difficult circumstances as free divers.

Any other method of take is illegal and you should report it.

The days of commerical fisherman pillaging abalone beds ended decades ago. And in most cases you would be hard pressed to find califonia abalone in a fish market or on a menu at any price.
12:35 PM on 10/10/2011
I don't need a social studies lesson
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
PRONESE
Somewhat Opinionated Curmudgeon
10:24 AM on 10/08/2011
No Soup For You!
R/ PRONESE
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibertarianCentrist
Dems/GOP..... Exactly the same....
09:43 AM on 10/08/2011
Wow... Foie, now Shark Fin?? What's next?? When they ban beef, I'll never be visiting California again... after banning Foie, I'm already thinking of never going back.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aleks Hunter
Keep your greedy Mitt off our country!
11:24 AM on 10/08/2011
Take a good looka at real industrial shark finning, and tell us all what is defensible about the practice.

http://www.youtube.com/user/qwiddle?blend=5&ob=5#p/u/0/1aEYkQG9eKk

THe flesh in those sharks is edible, budt does not command the price that the fins do. over 95% of the food value of these caught fish is tossed. Wasteful by any standard. The environmental damage is also staggering. These fish evolved to serve a purpose inthe oceans.
01:32 PM on 10/09/2011
you are passing off facts that are not true.

Most shark is taken as a byproduct to intended catch by long liners and drift gill netters. Other than Thresher Shark there is not any market for shark meat. Short finned makos are ok eating also, but I have yet to see it sold commercially in any amount.

The rest of the shark and ray species are generally not salable (except for the fin). Reason: shark meat has high urea content, and should be eaten rarely to avoid health problems. Same reason you dont see horse meat often if ever in any store. The flesh of many sharks and rays taste of ammonia, thus would only have a market for pet food or fertilizer.

The video you show is from Mexico, the fact that Mexicans who sell most any take are dumping the shark overboard tells you something about the commerical viability of selling shark meat. Moreover the regulation Brown signed is for CA. Rod and reel commerical fishing went out in the 1930's here. In Ca most shark is taken by long line or drift gill net. Thus since sharks need to swim to breath, only a few are still alive when boated. So the Ca law will have little effect. Dead shark harvested by the indiscriminate fishing methods will just be dumped all the same, without a fin even being used.

If you want to stop finned go to Mexico and other nations where they practice what you show.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madbunny
Prison Guard - FireFighter - now a School Teacher
02:31 PM on 10/08/2011
You know what, if you can't handle a place that doesn't serve Foie or sharkfin, then GTFO.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibertarianCentrist
Dems/GOP..... Exactly the same....
03:53 PM on 10/08/2011
I live in NYC where I can get Foie anywhere, however, I did have some amazing Foie in San Francisco however, which is now illegal, sad.