iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Early Draft Of No Child Left Behind Re-Write Reduces Federal Role In Education

Harkin No Child Left Behind

First Posted: 10/10/11 09:31 PM ET Updated: 12/10/11 05:12 AM ET

An early draft of a Senate committee's sweeping rewrite of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act rolls back major accountability provisions of the law's current form, known as No Child Left Behind.

The bill would require states to develop their own standards for student performance with little federal oversight, according to language obtained by The Huffington Post.

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), who chairs the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions, is expected to publicize the committee's finished draft of the bill on Tuesday. The committee will mark up the bill on Oct. 18 before it hits the Senate floor. While various senators have introduced smaller ESEA bills since the law was up for reauthorization in 2007, the Harkin bill is the product of months of negotiations and is the Senate's most comprehensive output to date.

After years of states complaining about the law's onerous reporting and punitive requirements, the draft -- dated Oct. 4 -- amounts to a decreasing federal role in education. Under NCLB, states have to meet rising proficiency targets on math and reading exams, and face increasingly burdensome sanctions if they fail to meet those targets. NCLB requires nearly 100 percent of all students to be proficient in math and reading by 2012.

The Obama administration has argued that this provision has incentivized states to set an extremely low bar for proficiency in anticipation of possible punishments. Instead of NCLB's strict targeting scheme, the new bill would have states define students' mastery of the material with the categories "basic, on-track, and advanced."

"They've gone from the debate over NCLB in terms of the goals being unrealistic, to saying we're not going to require you to have goals at all," said Charlie Barone, director of federal policy for Democrats for Education Reform. "States will probably take advantage of the flexibility to not do much at all. That's the dilemma for us."

A spokesman for the Education Department said he would decline to comment before seeing the final language of the bill. The National Education Association also declined to comment.

Using language reflective of the Obama administration's priorities, the draft of Harkin's bill mandates that states adapt "college and career standards" in math and reading. While states would not be required to prove to the federal Education Department that they are meeting those standards, the Education Department would look at evidence behind the standards themselves.

The draft would require states to use exams that measure individual student achievement and academic growth, and would leave it up to the states to decide whether the exams would be given once a year or several times a year. Tests are mandated at least once between grades 3 and 5, 6 and 9, and 10 and 12.

States' accountability systems would take into account student scores and high school graduation rates for the preparation of publicly-accessible report cards for each school. Instead of NCLB's specific targets, this version of ESEA would only expect "the continuous improvement of all public schools in the state." If states choose to rate schools by the degree to which student test scores have increased instead of the raw number of students who pass the exams, they would have to report their methodology to the federal government.

The secretary of education would use a peer-review process to help states develop accountability plans, and would require states to intervene in 5 percent of their lowest-performing schools and 5 percent of their schools with the largest achievement gaps. The bill would continue to extend all of ESEA's accountability measures to charter schools.

"Federal law is usually the one place where priority is placed on kids whose needs are overlooked at the state and local level," Barone said. "It's not clear that this bill would really do that so much anymore."

It is still unclear what the end game will be for the bill within the House, whose education committee leader Rep. John Kline (R-Minn.) has said he is committed to reauthorizing the bill through piecemeal measures. But civil rights groups are already reportedly preparing to protest. The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, which represents 210 civil rights groups, sent Harkin and Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) a letter in April stressing the importance of accountability.

"The continued commitment of the federal government to equal educational opportunity is more important than ever as states and LEAs face historic budget shortfalls for the foreseeable future," the group wrote.

"Nor can we limit accountability to a small percentage of our schools while ignoring the others, thereby retreating from the long-standing federal role in ensuring that minority students, low-income students, English learners and students with disabilities have access to ... supports that address a range of student needs so that they are better prepared to succeed in the classroom."

CORRECTION: This article has been updated to reflect NCLB's prior coverage of charter schools and the language of Harkin's bill regarding evidence of college and career-ready standards.



FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

An early draft of a Senate committee's sweeping rewrite of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act rolls back major accountability provisions of the law's current form, known as No Child Left Behin...
An early draft of a Senate committee's sweeping rewrite of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act rolls back major accountability provisions of the law's current form, known as No Child Left Behin...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 141
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:24 PM on 10/12/2011
Long long overdue.
photo
JLau
You can't understand the orange experience.
04:15 PM on 10/11/2011
"States will probably take advantage of the flexibility to not do much at all. That's the dilemma for us."

Obviously an "X" theory believer. So only the Federal government cares about education? State governments just don't care?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:48 PM on 10/11/2011
I didn't care for that assumption either. If anything, state governments would push to be more rigorous in order to rise to the top of the rankings. Therefore revenue would increase due to the appeal of those relocating and wanting to establish businesses in that state.
03:59 PM on 10/11/2011
For goodness sake, don't let Arne Duncan get his hands on this bill. He'll find some way to screw it up.
12:57 PM on 10/11/2011
Heard that Harkin put in the awful Race to the Top. The contest decided by the DOE must be stopped. Why change NCLB and leave in Race to the Bottom extortion plot to make schools fire teachers and buy standardized tests? What?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
politicaljungle
Welcome to the Jungle
12:41 PM on 10/11/2011
Hey, anybody remember yesterday's "different color student ID for grades" dialogue?
I seek out adventure, so I answered an ad to grade students tests for a national testing service. You didn't have to have a high school diploma, you just read the little essays, and then applied them to a matrix. I couldn't do it, I could see all the critical thinking errors - but the high school drop out next to me, he had no problem at all sticking an F on the essay, because he plain didn't understand the point. The tests were half subjective, and half multiple choice. I saw the questions, and there were multiple answers and a lot of ambiguity.

The tests were written to target the most common belief among the highest percentage of upper class students - in order to give them a better test score for admissions. I quit, and I needed the money. That's your "No Child Left Behind"
12:32 PM on 10/11/2011
Several people commented that it isn't fair for the wealthy to be taxed for public education. Claiming that the wealthy do not benefit from public education shows a fundamental lack of understanding of how business truly works. Those who use public education, or private schools receiving federal grants or funding, as their primary source of education benefit from that education once (their own education). The wealthy benefit from government assisted education for each person that they hire who used government funded educational programs. The result? The working person gets one benefit from public/government funded education: The wealthy person benefits hundreds or even thousands of times.

Refusing to see that the wealthy depend on federal programs at a greater level than the poor does not change the fact that the USA is falling farther and farther behind the leaders of the industrialized world in matters of education. To keep its workforce trainable and able to do that which is necessary to produce the products and services necessary for our country to financially survive,we need to not only to fund public education, but restructure education to allow for education at a globally competitive rate.

It is time for the wealthy to pick their heads up out of the sands of greed and denial and start paying for the benefits they depend on the government to provide for them. Public education is only one example.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PeachesinBoston
I'm a conservative liberal. Beat that!
12:15 PM on 10/11/2011
My frustration of the NCLB Act's purpose lies in the fact that it was implemented under the guise that it would promote and foster accountability in our public schools. However, eleven years later I find that school officials (especially teachers) and children have been held accountable for the arrogance, disregard and blatant undermining of US education as a whole. Our children are being sentenced to a lifetime of standardized tests in which the material is learned by rote. How is the same method for tying one’s shoes used in educating our youth? A method where you just keep trying until you ‘get it’ right? Is this what we have reduced education to?

Also, undermining the reasons that the NCLB Act was put into place in the first place is really where I become perplexed. It is an act that outside of the above mentioned ‘accountability’ factor, was designed to put more students on a level playing field, bridge the educational gaps between whites and minorities and help persons with learning disabilities better adapt to their studies. However, since this act has been in place, public schools are losing pertinent funding that would otherwise go to fruitful educational activities but now goes to keeping up with the requirements put forth by the NCLB Act. There have been some impossible requirements put on the shoulders of school officials and children alike but yet funding has been slashed in public schools countrywide. This is an oxymoronic concept.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marx Twain
America's homespun Marxist
12:12 PM on 10/11/2011
I'm feeling cautiously optimistic about this one. The federal govt has been screwing up public ed for years, so the idea of then shutting up and letting go is great. I also love the idea of making charters subject to the same accountability measures as traditional schools, this will mean the beginning of the end fir 90% of the charters out there, who have a dismal but hidden record.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
GlennWatson
Two million fans
12:05 PM on 10/11/2011
Thank God. If only this is true.
11:36 AM on 10/11/2011
How many people realize that there is a provision in No Child Left Behind that requires that all Schools provide the names and address of male students entering the 9th grade to Military recruiters unless the parents of the child direct the school not to provide this info. I have several objections to this:

1. Yet another increase in Government regualtion and tracking of private citizens with no tangible benefit as military registration is already required at age 18
2. This requirement never comes up in any discussion of NCLB and many parents aren't even aware of it.
3. Why just boys and not girls? Women serve in the Military.
4. If this is supposed to aid in career options for recruitment why should the Military be the only section of the Government to get this info. Why not the Post Office? Peace Corp? State Dept? EPA?

Just to be clear I'm not opposed to the Military; I'm opposed to the requirement that the schools do this and it is almost unknown with many parents. Also disturbing is the ongoing increase of Government tracking of Individuals with no apperant benefit.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Christine Fowler
Born again Human
11:34 AM on 10/11/2011
As a mother of a child with Borderline Intellectual Functioning, I can honestly say the NCLB did not help our family. Our son was pushed through school just so the high school could show another success. I blame the federal government for sticking their noses where it didn't belong. My son went to school in three different states and none of them knew enough to test my son and to give us a proper diagnosis - we find out after he graduates this past June.
11:10 AM on 10/11/2011
but these are FEDERAL dollars.... MY DOLLARS and I want accountability.......
10:55 AM on 10/11/2011
NCLB was a Bush Two give away to educational testing firms most of which are owned by large corporations and whose CEOs were Bush Pioneers.
10:29 AM on 10/11/2011
Federal Government involvement has only made U. S. education progressively worse. The Federal Government should completely terminate its involvement in U. S. education.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric Mann
Do you want to be on the opposite side of Progress
10:35 AM on 10/11/2011
Well, lately, you are correct. However Federal involvement includes making sure special education students are properly serviced as authorized by the ADA. Schools receive funds to provide things like free breakfast and lunch to kids from the Federal government, as well as additional funding for the extra staff for special education students.
11:20 AM on 10/11/2011
Yes, the requirements of having to teach science and math are so extreme and detrimental to the education process
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:29 AM on 10/11/2011
Visualize a future america, competing against high tech, highly educated work forces in other nations, and in that america, 50, 60, 75 percent of our work force, doesn't have a high school education, because in our infinite wisdom, we decided education was just "to expensive". How will america compete in that future world??? This is the result of this brilliant short term, cut everything thinking, a doomed future america.