iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Occupy Boston Mass Arrests: Police Jail 100 (VIDEO)

First Posted: 10/11/11 02:44 PM ET Updated: 12/11/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Early this morning, the Boston Police Department arrested at least 100 Occupy Boston activists after they refused to abandon a second encampment at the Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway. The police blamed "anarchist" elements among the demonstrators for drawing the response, and argued that the city did not want the newly renovated space trampled on by activists.

Before 11 p.m., The Huffington Post spoke with one Occupy Boston organizer who refused to give her name. The source explained that they had to create a second encampment after the first site at Dewey Square became too crowded. "This was our only option," she said. "This is an inclusive movement. To turn people away is not something that can be a part of the movement. It was a health and safety issue. We were way too packed. There was literally, absolutely no room."

The only space left was a gravelly area where they held general assembly meetings. Tents were set up one against another. She said that that every tent had an address; rows were numbered and lettered in an effort to use the space as efficiently as possible. "We want to respect the city," she said, adding that they have done their best to care for both it and the Greenway.

Joshua Eaton, 27, a member of Occupy Boston, told HuffPost that the group had something of an arrangement with the Greenway Conservancy, which manages the property. "We did have an informal agreement with the Greenway Conservancy, that as long as we didn't damage the flowers or the shrubbery, we were fine to be where we were," he told HuffPost. "It was a very informal agreement. But we did have one."

The Greenway website confirms that it did have an agreement with the protestors. "Occupy Boston organizers have been cooperative with the Conservancy and the Boston Police Department to date, and have agreed to avoid the planting beds and adhere to common sense rules." Calls to the Greenway seeking comment were not returned.

Eaton added that they had made sure to warn demonstrators away from the flower beds. They had already set up a fund a week ago to pay for any of the damaged grass. Eaton also argued that the encampment's expansion had not been as dramatic as it appeared -- they simply expanded from one spot on the Greenway to a spot across the street. They had only held that spot for a couple of hours before the police started making noise.

Indeed, the police response was massive and brutal.

After a supposed midnight deadline passed, police blocked surrounding streets, while others outfitted in riot gear idled a block out of sight and emergency medical technicians set up near the activists in case of injuries. Even they had riot helmets.

Officers handed out a flyer that gave reasons for the imminent arrests. It read: "The Boston Police Department has continued to respect your right to peacefully protest. The BPD is also obligated to maintain public order and safety. We ask for your ongoing cooperation."

Hours earlier, Occupy Boston posted a press release on its website addressing the standoff: "Today's threats by the Boston Police Department represent a sudden shift away from that dialogue. Since making camp on September 30, Occupy Boston has maintained that it will non-violently resist any attempt to end the protest before we have achieved the change we seek."

After midnight, activists linked arm-in-arm and waited. Marty Wrin, 43, an elementary school teacher who came down to support the protests, reported to HuffPost that volunteers were handing out water bottles. Down the street, 50 or so SWAT team members waited. "They're just reading the paper," Wrin said, "and chatting."

At about 1:30 a.m., the Boston police gave the activists a final warning. They had five minutes to leave, or else. "You will be locked up for trespassing and unlawful assembly," an officer shouted through a bullhorn. "This is our last notice before we move in and clear the park. All right? Now is the time to move."

Ten minutes later, the Occupy Boston live stream showed one block filled with more than a dozen police cars. The screen was a blur of flashing cop lights. Officers surrounded the encampment. They appeared to move first on the Veterans For Peace group. A source on the scene reported that the cops "beat Veterans for Peace to the ground. I watched them beat the veterans to the ground." Video has confirmed that the police took the vets to the ground.

She said: "I don't know what this is, but it should be all over news."

Another photo posted online showed an activist being carted off by the police. His face appears to have been bruised.

Malden Patch reported:

"I was just standing there -– peacefully -– with everyone else, just standing,” Bill Frank, a Jamaica Plain-based activist, said. "And they come up –- big, big people come up -– push you right in the face, and we all fell on top of each other."

Frank said he stayed still as he and about 15 other protestors were "pig-piled" onto one another, and managed to slip away by remaining still and inconspicuous.

"There were grabbing people by their handkerchiefs and shirts, tearing their shirts, grabbing people by their neck, choke-slamming people to the ground and stepping on people," he said.

In one incident, an officer was observed pushing a non-resistant female into some bushes near a ledge approximately 4 feet off the ground.

The Boston Globe reported that some 200 officers had descended on the activists, who had done little more than occupy a park and chant the by-now familiar slogans of the Occupy movement.

But the city's police brass and mayor saw it differently. Mayor Thomas M. Menino said in a phone interview with the Globe that he didn't want the activists to "tie up the city."

Early this morning, the Boston Police Department Commissioner Ed Davis told reporters that the Occupy group had behaved well but blamed "anarchists" for the arrests.

Davis said that members of Occupy Boston had complained to his officers. "They said the anarchists have taken over and there's really not much we can do."

Continue to follow updates on all the Occupy Wall Street activities on our live blog.

+ Add a slide
Do you have photos or videos from Occupy Boston? Add them here!
Click "Add a slide" to add your own photos or videos from Occupy Boston to this gallery. If you want to add photos from events in other cities, please add them to the gallery here.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Early this morning, the Boston Police Department arrested at least 100 Occupy Boston activists after they refused to abandon a second encampment at the Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway. ...
WASHINGTON -- Early this morning, the Boston Police Department arrested at least 100 Occupy Boston activists after they refused to abandon a second encampment at the Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 205
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BNevrgivup
Bravebear
03:04 AM on 10/14/2011
On public demonstrations: First you insure that if you are going to picket any location you do it legally, by contacting a Civil Rights Lawyer, or an attorney who can review your actions to insure they comply with the Law. You file whatever notices with the City or even County if need be that you will be uitlizing a certain location for a public demonstration, then even if you don't agree give the Local Police a heads up that you will be picketing at such and such a location. This allows them to coordinate the necessary resources to insure public safety, that includes the safety of the demonstrators.
You train people to stop anyone who gets unrully because they are jeapordizing your efforts and safety of everyone. If they don't listen you ask them to leave peacefully and advise them if arrested they will not be afforded legal protection. If despite all your efforts the police ask you to leave, you do not defy them even if you think they are wrong, you contact your attorney and then you peacefully leave the area. You can return on another day and fight the action in court. The Police act under orders and that's the bottom line, they are not choosing sides they are trained to follow orders. A non-violent response through any circumstance speaks volumes over the alternative. Read about the Civil Rights movement, check with the NAACP, ACLU etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cruisedoc
Physician, centrist, independent (x-dem)
07:08 PM on 10/27/2011
Very nice, adult post.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
04:11 PM on 10/12/2011
I live near Boston and you would not believe how little attention is being paid to this event by the media. So much for the "liberal lame stream media" myth. There is very little news of this in the papers and TV news.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cruisedoc
Physician, centrist, independent (x-dem)
06:55 PM on 10/27/2011
I see OWS clips on the news every night. It is getting appropriate coverage. It's hugely important to those involved, but in the scope of things, not front page news. We know they are there, the news has beat it to death, and unless something happens that's newsworthy, it will fizzle somewhat. What then often happens is they get frustrated because the world goes on, nothing changes, and they are largely ignored except by locals it affects ....they ramp it up, and real trouble ensues.
Look, Beck had 500,000 (with estimates as high as 1.5 million) and it got a day or two of press, and that's it. A thousand here, a thousand there is not big news. Geez, McCartney drew 180,000 in NYC.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
padrushka
question authority
08:40 AM on 10/12/2011
what exactly is "unlawful assembly" ??
i remember kent state. we have the right to assemble and protest. our gov't has been hijacked,it is too bad "we the people" cannot resort to the methods our fascist gov't uses to leverage desired results.
why is media downplaying this news? i have been gone for over a month and looking for details about the protests has been interesting. it should be front page news instead of looking once again at the many photos of goppers running for 'office' more than a year away..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cruisedoc
Physician, centrist, independent (x-dem)
06:59 PM on 10/27/2011
You have the right to 'peacefully assemble' - that's it. ....period. You do not have the right to tresspass, break any laws, camp out, or occupy anything. The clause came from James Madison, based on a British law that prohibited more than 6 people gathering in a town square and talking together.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
padrushka
question authority
05:17 AM on 10/28/2011
"The people of the U.S. owe their Independence & their liberty, to the wisdom of descrying in the minute tax of 3 pence on tea, the magnitude of the evil comprised in the precedent. Let them exert the same wisdom, in watching against every evil lurking under plausible disguises, and growing up from small beginnings." --James Madison" where they destroyed property, tresspassed,stole,broke laws.
ruburnt
Live Free or Die....
07:55 AM on 10/12/2011
SHAME?....It's more like a SHAM.....These protestors are trying to get arrested....The city should charge them a processing fee.......
07:31 AM on 10/12/2011
DOesnt the Constitution guarantee Freedom Of Assembly?
Whats with all these arrests?
Dont like the message I guess.
Police are control freaks usually.
ITching to use their power to whack someone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cruisedoc
Physician, centrist, independent (x-dem)
07:02 PM on 10/27/2011
Does that mean I can gather friends on your front lawn? ...how about set up a few tents? ...of course not. You have to follow laws, permitting laws, sanitation laws, and do it legally in a designated area.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mixey
Hillary Clinton for President 2016
03:12 AM on 10/12/2011
I AM NOT MOVING - Short Film - Occupy Wall Street
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGRXCgMdz9A
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anthonyNtx
live and let live
02:23 AM on 10/12/2011
I don't recall any of those Republican Tea Party protestors being subjected to Mass Arrests. In fact; I recall many of those folks openly carring weapons. And police standing by doing nothing. But the demographics are different.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ncweb76
04:43 AM on 10/12/2011
You are correct there...lunatics with guns are ok...others protesting the wrongs of the country are beaten down like some regime oversears
photo
intellectualTradition
corruptisima re publica plurimae leges
06:40 AM on 10/12/2011
you are both wrong. many folks do not consider nor will they regard left driven activities as american.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
10:45 AM on 10/12/2011
Here's another little tidbit - a group of illegals were trespassing on a rancher's property in AZ. The rancher held them at gunpoint (did NOT shoot anyone) and called for law enforcement who came and arrested the illegals.

Who was punished? You guessed it - the rancher had to pay $78,000 to the ILLEGALS for violating their "rights"!!!!! So they have the "right" to trespass on any property in the country and if you don't welcome these trespassers, get ready to pay them for breaking the laws.

Now we have LEGAL protests and the law is working against them, too.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:05 AM on 10/12/2011
The GOP took out ..$$$$$$>>THE GLASS STEAGALL ACT
photo
Kai-HK
Don't Share My Wealth! Share My Work Ethic!
06:17 PM on 10/12/2011
You mean that repeal that Clinton signed? So what? How would Glass-Steagall have stopped the fed-induced Housing Bubble and follow-on Financial Crisis?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
11:47 PM on 10/11/2011
The "newly renovated space of the Rose Kennedy Greenway" is a pitiful thing. It is a long, ugly swath of scrubby grass where an ugly highway used to be. Filling the park with passionate Bostonians seeking justice would be a vast improvement.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:28 AM on 10/12/2011
I was there yesterday, I think you're confused.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
11:38 PM on 10/11/2011
If you get time read this.
It shows the Federal Reserve could have stopped the SubPrime Loans in 2006 but COVERED UP the Crashing Economy !!!!!!!

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11696.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carolab
Just another hostage of the poopy heads
11:53 PM on 10/11/2011
Not only that, Greenspan pushed subprimes and kept the interest rate low so that the banks could keep up the scam.

Did you notice that after Fannie and Freddie's share in subprimes went way down in 2006, the private lenders stepped up their game?  There were all manner of flyers, ads, special "deals" including no interest so that there would be more "fodder" for their CDOs.   I was there, selling homes.  I watched it.  I saw all kinds of people qualify for loans they couldn't handle.  I saw the first wave of foreclosures (Latinos and Asian immigrants, easy targets).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
12:00 AM on 10/12/2011
The only Sub Prime Loans Fannie and Freddie could buy had to be Conforming Loans.
That means the people met all the Requirement to buy a home with a Fixed Rate Loan with Jobs, Income and Credit Rating.
NonConforming Loans were what the Predators sold to Wall Street as AAA Investment Packages.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Binea
Only a fool denies she is a fool, I am no fool
12:02 AM on 10/12/2011
the banks need to give the homes to these people free and clear.They deliberately got them into the mess,probably destroyed their life..they owe them.Seems all they want to do is lower the mortgage..and the people are supossed to pay with what job ?
photo
Kai-HK
Don't Share My Wealth! Share My Work Ethic!
06:28 PM on 10/12/2011
dadw5boys:

I skimmed through the document but did not see where it explicitly stated that Fed Reserve could have stopped subprime loans in 2006. Could you reference the page for me, thanks.

Also, I am a huge opponent of the Fed, since I view them as the primary reason for the housing bubble...however, how would stopping subprime in 2006 have stopped the hosting crisis, most sub primes that started crashing in 2007 were issued in years preceding 2006.

Kai
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
07:28 PM on 10/12/2011
From the FBI
related to mortgage fraud grew 20-fold between 1996 and 2005 and then more than doubled again between 2005 and 2009.
If the Fed had not started buying up those Failed AAA Investment Packages in the Summer of 2006 the All of Country Wide Employees would be in jail along with all the employees of 20 + other Sub Prime Lenders who went Bankrupt. They covered up the Fraud .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
01:15 AM on 10/13/2011
To varying degrees, these emergency actions involved the
Reserve Banks in activities that went beyond their traditional
responsibilities.

top of page 139 !!!!!
09:01 PM on 10/11/2011
True conservatives should be out their supporting freedom of assembly and speech, even when they don't always agree with the messenger.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
11:48 PM on 10/11/2011
Everything's upside down. The true conservatives are on the left. The anarchists have teabags hanging from their hats.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ncweb76
04:44 AM on 10/12/2011
so true...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ncweb76
04:45 AM on 10/12/2011
They only believe in the constitution when it fits their side of the argument. If they don't agree with it then the hell with the constitution. Conservatives stand for nothing but repression.
07:37 AM on 10/12/2011
CONS stand for the staus QUo.
No matter how corrupt or demented it is.
Best stuff for Average citizens has always come from the left.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:32 PM on 10/12/2011
Funny how libs are the same way when it comes to the Constitution.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bynddrvn5
My Micro-bio is unwritten...
08:28 PM on 10/11/2011
How can these officer trample a citizen's First Amendment rights? Where are all the Tea Baggers and their US Constitutions now?

The US Constitution allows the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

This is flat out illegal, everyone who was arrested should get an attorney and sue for violations of their First Amendment rights!
photo
LuLou Murder
Don't blame God, it's not Her fault.
03:55 AM on 10/12/2011
The Teabag Constitution only consists of the Second Amendment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bynddrvn5
My Micro-bio is unwritten...
08:00 AM on 10/12/2011
rolf, so true!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
laura r
08:21 PM on 10/11/2011
In case Fox Newspeak wants to understand the true nature of the protest----Like they care about truth.

"They have barely begin to understand that we are denying the consent of the governed to the present political class, and that millions of people already recognize that corporate CEOs are the unelected government."

"The Political captains continue to chart a course dictated by unelected corporate rulers. And all the while millions of drowning people overwhelm the lifeboats, while the Titanic parties of capitalism slowly sink in a vast cold night of starry ideals and the next looming icebergs."

It's all about what the Plutocracy wants---"not what we the people want"---So, the people took to the streets to scream " We are mad at hell and are not going to take it anymore". They refuse to go down with the Titanic.
photo
calltoaction
Keep your silly mirco-bio.
07:39 PM on 10/11/2011
Fox News only covering the 'arrest' count as news worthy of the occupy wall street protests around the country. bias and slanted.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ncweb76
04:46 AM on 10/12/2011
oh course...that's Fox news for you...if it was a protest in support of tax cuts for the wealthy they would be all over it like they were with the lunatic terrorist tea party members.
photo
Sunlogic
What Liberal Media!?
07:27 PM on 10/11/2011
"Anarchists", otherwise known as agent provocateurs in my opinion; a convenient excuse to break up the movement for a moment or two until all return. In my opinion, this movement will not be stopped by a few back cops with no conscience who will provoke an incident.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_provocateur
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]