iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tom Harkin Releases No Child Left Behind Overhaul Plan

Tom Harkin Elementary And Secondary Education Act

First Posted: 10/11/11 06:49 PM ET Updated: 12/11/11 05:12 AM ET

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) released his draft of the Elementary and Secondary Achievement Act -- known as "No Child Left Behind" -- on Tuesday, defending its much-criticized rollback of federally mandated targets for student performance as a product of compromise.

"I would have liked to have had performance targets," Harkin said during a Tuesday morning call with reporters. Harkin, who chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee, negotiated for months with Ranking Member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.). "We talked about this for days and weeks on end. Again, this is a compromise."

Harkin said that the bill's federally mandated interventions -- which would require a state to identify five percent of its lowest-performing schools, in addition to five percent of its schools with the highest achievement gaps -- would help keep states' performance on track.

Harkin's bill, which he will tweak until Friday, is set as a starting point for a full HELP committee discussion Oct. 18. With sufficient support, it will face a Senate floor vote and then a conference committee with the House.

The initial education law enacted in 1965 was called the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, and a reauthorization under George W. Bush took on the name, "No Child Left Behind." The law has been up for reauthorization since 2007.

House education committee leader John Kline (R-Minn.) has said he's committed to reauthorizing NCLB in piecemeal bills. Kline's charter-school oversight measure passed the House with bipartisan support. His other bills differ from Harkin's with regard to slashing fewer NCLB programs and states' funding flexibility.

It is as of yet unclear how Harkin's and Kline's two versions can be reconciled.

Harkin said he is hopeful the bill can get through committee next week and get past the Senate floor before Thanksgiving. Harkin is also optimistic that the bill "can be instructive to the House" in terms of NCLB reauthorization.

"If the House takes a strictly partisan approach to this, well then, I guess we're doomed," Harkin said.

Kline's office did not return calls for comment.

Frustrated with Congress's inability to renew the law up to this point, the Obama administration recently announced it would essentially rewrite NCLB without Congress's help by granting waivers to states that agree to certain reforms. Harkin said he hopes his bill could be passed before the waivers -- which would allow a state to opt out of certain NCLB provisions -- go into effect.

Like the current version of NCLB, Harkin's bill requires regular testing of students and disaggregation of test results into student sub-groups. Harkin's bill also mandates "college and career-ready standards" and adequate tests for measuring critical thinking. His proposed legislation also requires "equitable distribution" of teachers among schools with the greatest need.

The biggest difference between Harkin's bill and NCLB is that NCLB currently requires that states use raw numbers of students proficient in math or reading to determine whether "Adequate Yearly Progress" measures are met, or face escalating sanctions. Harkin's bill allows states to develop their own accountability systems instead.

Raul Gonzalez, legislative director for the National Council of La Raza, said his organization was abstaining from taking a stance on the bill until further review, but still voiced his concerns.

"It's moving away from progress targets and moving towards a pre-No Child Left Behind system of continuous, unsubstantial improvement with no targets," he said. He added that he thinks the focus on the achievement gap and low-performing schools would create two school systems, one with a predominantly minority population.

While some have criticized the move for the lack of performance targets, calling it a rollback of the federal government's role in education, Harkin called the move a "subtle shift."

"We are moving into a partnership mode with the states rather than this one where the federal government is telling states you have to do this, this, this and this," Harkin said.

Though with some modifications, the bill mirrors many of the Obama administration's priorities, enshrining programs such as Race to the Top, Investing in Innovation and Promise Neighborhoods.

"A bipartisan bill will not have everything that everyone wants, but it must build on our common interests: high standards; flexibility for states, school districts and schools; and a more focused federal role that promotes equity, accountability and reform," U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said in a statement about Harkin's bill Tuesday. "This bill is a very positive step toward a reauthorization that will provide our students and teachers with the support they need."

The proposal generally follows the administration's blueprint in calling for "college- and career-ready standards" and targeting low-performing schools. But the bill's turnaround plans for these schools vary from the those of the administration. Where the administration would mandate the use of teacher evaluations in personnel decisions, Harkin's bill stops short of that. The bill also specifies that teacher evaluations must include student achievement and classroom observations, but does not require the use of value-added measurements to track student growth.

Harkin's bill allows some funds to be used on class-size reduction in early grades, and focuses on performance of principals. It also creates several new grant programs and eliminates four existing programs.

The bill has so far failed to secure the endorsement of both the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers, the country's two largest teachers' unions.

The NEA said it is waiting until Friday to make any official statement in the hopes that Harkin revises language of the bill regarding teacher evaluations. An NEA official said the organization believes teacher evaluations should be mandated from the local, not federal, level.

The AFT similarly said it was reserving judgement.

“When done correctly, evaluation with tools and supports for teachers can lead toward a path of vibrant instruction," AFT President Randi Weingarten said in a statement Tuesday. "When done incorrectly, it becomes just a human resources sorting mechanism that devalues teachers, limits their growth and undercuts our children’s education.”

A coalition of six civil rights groups, including NCLR, the Children's Defense Fund and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, sent a letter to Harkin and Enzi on Tuesday expressing their concern with the bill.

The coalitions wrote, "The loss of goals and progress targets would dismantle the positive aspects of NCLB’s accountability system and be a significant step backward that we can ill afford to take."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) released his draft of the Elementary and Secondary Achievement Act -- known as "No Child Left Behind" -- on Tuesday, defending its much-criticized rollback of federally mandat...
Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) released his draft of the Elementary and Secondary Achievement Act -- known as "No Child Left Behind" -- on Tuesday, defending its much-criticized rollback of federally mandat...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:48 PM on 10/12/2011
five silly little words.....data driven, project based learning

technology gives you more options than ever before to make a project to "show what you know!"
06:59 PM on 10/12/2011
Clearly this bill has no purpose other than to water down the some old stuff. We still don't understand that learning is personal and goals must be at a local level. In addition kids learn in different ways as well as demonstrate learning in different ways. And, they blossom at different times.

What if kids could progress through a system of education demonstrating proficiencies that are developed at the school level. Guidelines from federal might be helpful but not controlling. Under this plan, those who are truly proficient move on and those who are not will be able to try again as soon as they are ready. And this might be in two weeks rather than two years.

No one would move on with a D- and no one would be pushed out of school as a failure since the next proficiency would be just around the corner, not light years away. It wouldn't be as important WHEN kids learn, it would be important THAT kids learn.

Accountability of kids would be that they continue to gain proficiencies at a rate equal to or better than their past rate. If, however they go slower, more intensity would be given as they would have already shown the ability.

It's actually more complicated than this but this is a sketch of what education should look like. More thoughts at http://www.WholeChildReform.com and a detailed plan in our book "Saving Students From A Shattered System"

Cap Lee
Caplee@wi.rr.com
04:42 PM on 10/12/2011
More harassement so corporations can take over the education system and do as well of a job with it as they did with the banks and mortgage lenders.
The politicans could care less about education or education would be free like in Singapore. All they care is signing people up for high interest loans.
They could care less about ss and medicare-just cannot wait to turn it over to their corporate buddies.
Any time the politican says there is a crisis-it is a crisis in their own pockets.
04:35 PM on 10/12/2011
They should kill the entire program outright and start from scratch.
07:04 PM on 10/12/2011
Exactly
04:13 PM on 10/12/2011
Good to see they are giving 100% attention to jobs...
Rantibus
Cogito, Ergo Rant
04:03 PM on 10/12/2011
Just a short excursive on the previous NCLB program:
In its 2005 budget, the Bush Administration cut 38 educational programs, while the previous budget of 2004 eliminated entirely the budgets for rural education and drop-out prevention, and also cut many of Bush’s own “No Child Left Behind” programs. %. However, to ensure that future drop-outs or those who will never be able to afford a college education are assured of employment, the Bush Administration, in its “No Child Left Behind” Act gave military recruiters access to 100% of all high schools receiving federal aid, even to providing the Pentagon with student’s addresses and phone numbers. (Page 559 of the No Child Left Behind Act)
Let's hope this time around these items get dealt with.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deeannef
03:25 PM on 10/12/2011
Tests cannot be used to evaluate teachers unless the students have a stake in the testing. Currently, there are no consequences for students if they do poorly on the test, thus NO motivation on their part, except personal pride. Why should a child care if they do well on a test, if there is no consequence if they do not try.
01:49 AM on 10/13/2011
Correct, or as a teacher might say: "Harkin, Duncan, and all the others for this concept, you've got an incomplete!"
02:56 PM on 10/12/2011
Actually, the bill does require the use of value-added teacher evaluation system. It's in Section 2123,(b.1. G) [The evaluation system] for teachers shall be based in evidence of improved student achievement and include observation of classroom teaching, and may include other measures if they are valid predictors of student achievement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeff Parfitt
Two democrats walk into a bar. Three walk out.
02:03 PM on 10/12/2011
Everyone should read "The Death and Life of the Great American School System by Dianne Ravitch. It will put things like NCLB in perspective, and show that it really is a failure. First of all, you cannot run public schools like a business. That's not their purpose or how they should work. Secondly, accountability by teachers misses the point that students are the uncontrollable variable in the equation of education outcomes. You can't force children to be the same across the board unless you agree to educate no one. Since that can't happen, you will have discrepancies in learning in any given classroom.

NCLB works off of business-proven principles, but is a failure of education standards. Talk to any education professional who has been in the system since before its implementation, and they will be able to tell you exactly what is wrong and how to fix it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tikiman
Just out taking my dogma for a walk.
03:16 PM on 10/12/2011
Thank you. The corporate model may fit corporations, but they do not fit schools. My district has become top heavy with consultants and mid-managers. In the meantime our class sizes have gone way up. We should avoid the corporate model. This is what a lot of OWS people are upset about. If you put all the money into management and fail to recognize the importance of the people below you are doomed to failure. I look at the two "site coordinators" at my school and all I can think is how their two salaries could fund two more teaching positions at the school. In order for teachers to be effective, class sizes must be kept lower. They just don't get that.
photo
TggerJen
Protect at snowleopard.org
04:56 PM on 10/12/2011
The point that public schools are not a business, don't function as a business or to make a profit, and should not be run as a business is entirely correct and very important.

NCLB should be scrapped entirely and completely and the idea permanently dismissed out of complete contempt for how bad it is.

While most educational professionals can tell you exactly what's wrong with it, most cannot tell you how to fix it. Mostly because there's no way to fix it, but partly because most still try to work out solutions within the totally flawed current framework.

Our public schools are not designed nor organized to work efficiently and effectively to educate our students. The flaws are much deeper than the NCLB focus on 'schools as businesses'- the flaws reach deeper into our industrial history. Our schools are mostly organized on the industrial model and that's where the failure starts. Children are admitted to school based on calendar age; at age five they start kindergarten and at age six they start first grade, etc. They are moved together as a class regardless of the individual skills, competencies, and knowledge-levels of the individual children. Class goes too slow for some, too fast for others, and just right for very few. After summer the first graders become second graders, except for perhaps a few who were held back to repeat the entire first grade as if that's what they need. PFUI
Admitting children by calendar age makes no more sense than admitting them by shoe size or height. They should all be placed according to entry behaviors and characteristics and then moved from one level to the next based only on mastery of the requisite skills and knowledge. Students who have mastered Math 3 move to Math 4 and students who have completed Spelling 8 move to Spelling 9; the same for every other subject. Students don't learn subjects at the same rate as other students and certainly don't learn all subjects at the same rate as all other students in a first or second grade class.

Summer vacation is another issue as is the current level/status of teacher education/preparation/qualifications. There are many areas that require complete redesign based on what we know about human cognition and human information processing. Nothing - absolutely nothing - is correctly or even adequately addressed by NCLB or an iteration of that mess.
i the ys
eternity takes no time at all
01:55 PM on 10/12/2011
While I was going thru school there was a switch from essay questions on tests to multiple choice questions. That marked the decline of education in the Corporate States of Amerika. Thinking and problem solving are not taught anymore although it may be taught in small pockets here & there.

I do not have a link to a "test" I once saw online which was the standardized test for graduation from the 8th grade a hundred years ago and I can say that very few college graduates today could pass this exam. There were no multiple choice questions as it was totally essay answers.
We are dumbing down as a nation and we all should be ashamed and do something to improve our education system not simply turn away from educating our children because we think it costs too much. IF YOU THINK EDUCATION IS EXPENSIVE; TRY IGNORANCE.
photo
AlexNYC
Pumps dont work cause the vandals took the handles
02:07 PM on 10/12/2011
I agree. For the most part students today are not taught to think, create or learn as much as they are memorizing information, terminology and trivia for standardized multiple choise tests. I recall that multiple choice tests were the exception when I was in school, not the norm. Answers were required to be in essay form, which allows expression and opinion, not just vomiting what one had studied during a cramming session. Even math tests required an explanation on how each answer was arrived at. Students aren't really learning today, they are memorizing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deeannef
03:27 PM on 10/12/2011
Believe me, we would teach thinking skills, but in our current state of education, memorization is all that is emphasized. If it is not on the test, we don't cover it. Thus we end up where we are now!
photo
TggerJen
Protect at snowleopard.org
05:04 PM on 10/12/2011
You're correct about part of the problem. There's plenty of empirical data about the effects of multiple-guess questions (as practice and as assessment) compared to constructed-response items (including essays, story problems, open-ended questions, etc.). 

However, I'd just add one point. It's not just the schools that are failing at teaching our children problem-solving. In fact, I'd suggest that in the past most children began to learn about the basics and principles of problem-solving and good decision-making at home. That's not so true any more.

People used to make things and fix things. Children spent much of their time (outside school hours) with their parents, watching and learning. Now people throw broken things away and children watch television and play video games. Think about the imagination required when toys were simple and few. How much imagination is required when the toys are very realistic, fully functional, and either electric or battery-powered?

Schools in the past took up the mantle and continued to teach problem-solving and decision-making- and it's true they no longer do that much. Still, the change starts much earlier- at home, where children are no longer spending as much time with parents/adults, are not as responsible for chores and to assist parents, and spending more time at mind-numbing activities that require no problem-solving skills or even much imagination.
07:37 PM on 10/12/2011
Also schools have become the vehicle to teach basic manners and civility as this is not happening in most homes, and I teach in a middle to upper income area.
01:54 PM on 10/12/2011
Here's a simple idea...how about NO American citizen left behind?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
djaikins
01:45 PM on 10/12/2011
Congress should keep their collective nose out of education. They have proven time and time again that they neither understand the problems facing our public schools nor the solutions required to fix those problems.
01:43 PM on 10/12/2011
Yeah..............we can't have unions being held accountable for anything.
02:00 PM on 10/12/2011
How are unions involved in this? We have no true unions in the South yet we rank last among the states in various rankings related to education and much lower than states with unions.
photo
Red45
We can turn the tide
01:35 PM on 10/12/2011
My preference would be to re-fund education in America and not tell teachers how to do their jobs unless their teaching is harmful or lying in any way, such as teaching "intelligent design" instead of evolution--that should be a firable offense. Let's re-invest in our children and provide all the resources teachers need to provide American children a stellar education--like we used to.
01:35 PM on 10/12/2011
In all honesty, the NCLB Act should just gutted and let the states set their own standards for education. There was never any good intentios with the original Act and nothing good can come out of any versions of that bill.