More

Texas Wildfires: Bastrop State Park A 'Moonscape'

Texas Wildfires Bastrop State Park

By MICHAEL GRACZYK   10/12/11 02:58 PM ET   AP

BASTROP, Texas -- Todd McClanahan surveys the fire-blackened tree trunks poking out of a thick carpet of ash, a normally green world turned black and gray.

"You should have seen it in color," says McClanahan, superintendent of Bastrop State Park, mentioning a phrase repeated in Jamey Johnson's award-winning country song "In Color."

The park, one of the most popular in Texas, was ravaged when wind-whipped wildfires scorched 50 square miles east of Austin last month, destroying more than 1,500 homes and torching swaths of the park's signature "Lost Pines" forest that may never fully recover. Rather than a lush green brush under a canopy of towering pines, McClanahan says much of the 5,900-acre park has become "moonscape" – in some spots, for as far as the eye can see.

"It's really kind of depressing," McClanahan says as he evaluates the park's remains from his pickup truck.

More than a month after the inferno, the extent of the damage is still being determined, but McClanahan estimates about 70 percent of the trees in the park were lost. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department crews are clearing burned tree trunks away from roads and campsites and hiking trails so when the park reopens – tentatively set for December – the threat of falling trees in areas frequented by visitors will be minimized.

"This park is still a significant place," McClanahan says. "It's just going to look different. It's going to feel different.

"In some areas, it's going to take a really long time ... and it may not ever return to what it was."

There are some small signs of recovery. A couple weeks ago, McClanahan was "out in the middle of the black," as he calls it. "There was nothing around except dead standing snags, and I looked down and there was an oak tree that's re-sprouting, almost 18 inches tall," he says.

"But this is the `Lost Pines.' And that's what's kind of uncertain."

The park's signature forest, a draw for the 160,000 people who visit Bastrop each year, was a unique stand of loblolly pines related to but genetically different from the great East Texas pine forest that extends into the Southeastern United States. The loss of those trees is particularly painful.

"A significant part of `Lost Pines' is lost," McClanahan said. "And that's a fact."

The "Lost Pines," according to the Texas State Historical Association, are believed part of an ancient forest that shrank during or after the Ice Age. Spanish explorers described it in 1691, and the area that is now the state park was part of the original 1832 land grant to Stephen F. Austin's first colony.

Extensive logging took place in the later 1800s and when land for the park was acquired, the Civilian Conservation Corps built cabins and other park facilities during the Great Depression that are still used today.

Volunteers and private companies with water trucks saved all 13 cabins during the wildfires that began Labor Day weekend, leaving a kind of green oasis in the middle of the park. The fire burning away thick undergrowth revealed features like retaining walls, old latrines and water fountains that no one knew existed.

"You can walk out and see things you've never seen before," McClanahan said. "I don't want to sound morbid ... but there's a beauty in this, in its own strange way. You see things. It's just different. It provides a different opportunity to see the forest in ways you've never seen before."

Some people with good intentions already are pushing to plant pine seedlings to rebuild the burned forest, he said, but a pine tree isn't necessarily a "lost pine" tree. A Texas Forest Service seed farm is the only large-scale source for the trees specific to Bastrop State Park, and trees in the numbers that would be necessary are only in seed form.

"At best, we're looking at 15 months out to have a seedling-size tree to plant," McClanahan said. "And even if we had an abundance of seedlings right now, I'm not sure this is the best time to be planting, based on dry conditions."

In 2008, more than 50,000 such seedlings were planted in the park. Abundant moisture and prescribed burns provided ideal conditions for growth.

"After that fall, it started drying up," he said. "It just didn't rain any more.

"We lost every one of those seedlings."

Troyanne Bush of the Bastrop Chamber of Commerce expects the damage to the park will also bring an economic loss to the area, at least for a while.

"As far as long-term effects, there's really no way to gauge right now," she said. "Traffic hasn't been lighter, but you have to understand we've had a lot of people help with rebuilding efforts. We've got tons of volunteers. The activity is different. If anything, it's greater, but it's a different crowd."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BASTROP, Texas -- Todd McClanahan surveys the fire-blackened tree trunks poking out of a thick carpet of ash, a normally green world turned black and gray. "You should have seen it in color," says Mc...
BASTROP, Texas -- Todd McClanahan surveys the fire-blackened tree trunks poking out of a thick carpet of ash, a normally green world turned black and gray. "You should have seen it in color," says Mc...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
10:44 PM on 10/24/2011
Lots of blather on this sites already. How about some constructive ideas guys and gals?

The Bastrop pines will probably never recover, but the area can be saved. How? Plant Giant Sequoias or Ponderosa Pines, both of these are highly fire adapted with thick bark. They actually need bare burnt ground for the seeds to grow. Proper pruning will prevent the kind of spindly growth that leads to more fires. Instead of trying to recreate the past the biologists should look to see what grows in fire-dependent forests and import them to Bastrop.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
08:50 AM on 10/25/2011
Do you have ANY idea how much water they would need to keep those trees from dying? There's a reason they don't live down there...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
11:43 PM on 10/28/2011
Yeah, they don't grow east of the Rockies because the ice ages wiped them out except for the refuges in the Sierras. However, having lived in Bastrop, and lived in Ponderosa Pine country, and lived in Sequoia NP, I think the climate is similar enough that they would have a better chance of surviving than if they tried to restore the area with pines from East Texas.

The Lost Pines area, where Bastrop is located, is a small hilly area where, due to some quirk in the topography, it is much cooler with more rain and lots more fog than anywhere else in the area. The pines that grew there were called the Lost Pines because the nearest stands of those trees is in East Texas hundreds of miles away. They were a leftover remnant of the Ice Age forests.

However, do to the increasing heat and high fire risk I doubt if restoring the forest that once stood there is now possible. That is why I am suggesting heat and fire resistant trees like Sequoias and Ponderosa Pines that grow in warmer and dryer places like Southern Cal. and Arizona.

Best wishes to all.
TomP100
Read My Lips...No New Texans!
10:28 PM on 10/13/2011
One must remember that after the 1988 fires, much of Yellowstone was a "moonscape" as well, but the recovery there has been going quite nicely.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
10:38 PM on 10/24/2011
The difference is the species of pine. The Lodgepole pines that grow in Yellowstone are fire adapted. Most of their cones don't open unless they are heated in a fire. The pines in Bastrop are not fire adapted, they are adapted to a cooler and wetter climate, like the article said, they are ice age remnants. They only survived in Bastrop because some quirk of climate made it a cool foggy island in a warm sunny area. So this is the end of an era.

I used to live in Bastrop and this news fills me with sadness. Many rare and precious things are being lost.
photo
steve11407
pending approval and won't be displayed until ...
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
01:21 AM on 10/16/2011
Texas has had droughts before, but from your link: "the last 12 months have been the driest one-year period on record in the Lone Star State".

So, it has never been this dry before. By definition, that is unprecedented.

In June of 2011, Texas had the all time hottest month the state has ever experienced in recorded history. In fact, it was the all time hottest month that any state has ever experienced in recorded history. So, by definition, that was unprecedented.

In July, Texas beat the brand new heat record that was just set in June. In August, Texas beat the brand new heat record that was just set in July. Never before in recorded history has that ever happened over three consecutive months. So, by definition that is unprecedented.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
08:52 AM on 10/25/2011
I have but one thing to add to Blackbird's comment:

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
-Inigo Montoya
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lambdin1
What's this?
03:01 PM on 10/13/2011
It won't be long before Perry and his cronies will be asking the US Federal government for help. We should have let them go when we had a chance!
07:19 PM on 10/22/2011
Already done: As part of Perry's GOP wannabe campaign, he has called for smaller FED. And while most were not watching, he requested $200M in FEMA grants for Bastdrop.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
REMEMBER2050
Frikkin' P.O.'d at the GOP's War on Women!!!!!!
01:09 PM on 10/13/2011
Obama just said something amusing to the effect that it's kind of weird Perry keeps denying global warming when his whole state's on fire. God! I love election season!

My pet theory is that in just a few years, definitely less than two decades, our national bills for disaster relief will start averaging in the trillions. That's probably all it will take for America to stop regarding science as a do-it-yourself project and realize they were played for rubes to buy that happy crap that there's actually still a "debate."

Sure, all those scientists in thrift-shop shirts and fraying Dockers are really going to clean up big-time. It's gonna suck if they get stinking rich on something they've been warning us about since the 1970s. But damn, we're just going to have to eat it and let them be greedy capitalists too, although luckily they'll never get anywhere close to being as wealthy as our current crop of bought-and-paid-for AGW deniers. Bought and paid for by big oil and coal and gas, and all those insane deregulators like the Koch Brothers who just never got the memo that the Cold War ended two decades ago.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
08:56 AM on 10/25/2011
the addendum to that is that when things get bad enough, the GOP will try to take "leadership" on the issue for political points, while still going against the advice of scientists. We'll see them demanding geoengineering (by private firms), and making power grabs "because of the emergency" just like they're doing with the financial stuff now.

Remember - everything they accuse the left of doing, THEY do. They're accusing us of trying to use AGW as an excuse for draconian power grabs. I'd say it's just a matter of time.
08:51 PM on 10/12/2011
Global warming effects
08:03 PM on 10/12/2011
So.... no pictures?
photo
julieintx
We are the 53%.
06:54 PM on 10/12/2011
Also, the fire burned a lot of the habitat of the endangered Houston toad. They burrow underground, so probably many survived the fires, but when they came out, they were in a different world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RickW44
06:41 PM on 10/12/2011
Hey Rick Perry, evolution is a lie and AGW is a hoax!!
photo
julieintx
We are the 53%.
06:55 PM on 10/12/2011
Repellent use of a disaster for crass politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RickW44
07:26 PM on 10/12/2011
Yes, I'm pointing out a disastrous event that scientists have stated will increase as a result of anthropogenic global warming. Rick Perry has let it be known that he does not accept the science; therefore I question his ability to understand complex environmental problems. I want politicians that think about the habitat humanity lives in; I don't want my children to live in a world destabilized by climatic disruptions. The GOP and the Obama administration both bear responsibility for our inaction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
REMEMBER2050
Frikkin' P.O.'d at the GOP's War on Women!!!!!!
01:13 PM on 10/13/2011
Okey dokey, Julie. So you're whole state's on fire and you're ok with that? No questions whatsoever? Go for it, girl. We all know about those Texas textbooks.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
06:35 PM on 10/12/2011
Oh, no.

Terrible.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
P51MUSTANG
From the planet Sarcasia
05:24 PM on 10/12/2011
Good thing there's no such thing as GW down in Texas.
photo
julieintx
We are the 53%.
06:56 PM on 10/12/2011
Unscientific. NOAA says this event cannot be linked to AGW.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Always Thinkin
Nogoodnik
01:20 AM on 10/13/2011
Unscientific Julie. Due to a higher temperatures every weather pattern is now affected more heat means more powerful storms or more powerful droughts due to more evaporation from the land and oceans. No we cannot say any fire, drought, flood, or tornado is CAUSED by global warming. We can say however that any weather will be more amplified with devastating results. See Texas drought of 2011, Bastrop fires of 2011.
11:00 AM on 10/13/2011
Julie, Julie, Julie. This drought, and the devastating wildfires that have resulted, are exactly the kind of phenomena that global warming is going to bring about. Folks know that, even down Gonzales way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lark817
expat in Mexico
06:23 PM on 10/13/2011
GW?...Bush?...Oh, global warming. ;) I guess we're supposed to call it climate change now. lol