More

Republican Endorsements? Romney Leads But The Party Has Not Decided

Republican Presidential Endorsements

First Posted: 10/13/11 04:29 PM ET Updated: 12/13/11 05:12 AM ET

The recent endorsements of Mitt Romney by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran and others, have some questioning whether endorsements matter, and others buzzing that that Romney has become an "inevitable candidate."

But an analysis by the Huffington Post shows that the current rate of endorsements for all candidates, Romney included, remains behind the pace of the last five contested Republican nominations. Christie's nomination may serve as an important signal to Republican insiders, but by the yardstick of modern campaigns, the Republican party establishment is far from a consensus. Many of the major officeholders that traditionally endorse a presidential candidate are still on the sidelines.

Few elected officials can "deliver" votes in the manner of the mythical party bosses who controlled large blocks of convention delegates. But political scientists have demonstrated that endorsements by party leaders and activists are an important indicator of the state of consensus on a presidential nominee. And while an individual endorsement may not swing many votes, a larger pattern of endorsements can send a message about whether a candidate has what it takes to win the general election and serve as president.

In their book, "The Party Decides," political scientists Marty Cohen, David Karol, Hans Noel and John Zaller found that a candidate's share of endorsements just before early primary elections is often a better predictor of the ultimate nominee than early polling.

This year, however, the pace of endorsements is lower than the last five Republican contests. Our tally finds that as of Oct. 1, just 13 percent of Republican governors, members of the U.S. Senate and House, and party state chairs have publicly endorsed a candidate for president. The rate falls far behind the pace of endorsements as of the same date in previous Republican nomination battles.

2011-10-13-Blumenthal-Endorsementrate.png

While the nods to Romney by Christie, Cochran and a handful of others have nudged the current overall endorsement rate as of this writing up to 14 percent, it still lags behind the pace of past contests as of Oct. 1. Unlike the authors of "The Party Decides," we did not examine endorsements made by other party activists at the local level, but we did tally the public endorsements made by the 250 local Republican activists, party leaders and elected officials that participate in the weekly HuffPost-Patch Power Outsiders survey. As of Oct. 1, just ten percent -- 25 of 250 -- had made a public endorsement.

This pattern of indecision matches the attitudes of rank-and-file Republican voters. The latest CBS News poll, for example, found in early October that although many Republicans can name a candidate they are leaning toward supporting, only 19 percent say they have their minds made up. Three out of four -- 76 percent -- say, "it is too early to say for sure."

Since 1980, as shown in the chart below, every leader in the endorsement race at this point in the Republican contest has ultimately won the nomination. The 2008 race is a possible exception, although in that year endorsements were a better gauge of McCain's strength than national public opinion polls.

2011-10-13-Blumenthal-endorsementsofnominee.png

As of Oct. 1, 2007, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Mitt Romney were tied in their raw number of endorsements from major officeholders -- 30 percent each of all such endorsements -- with former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani close behind, with 25 percent. McCain had a razor-thin lead over Romney -- 35 to 34 percent -- and Guiliani trailed, with 21 percent -- in all endorsements at all the levels gathered by the authors of "The Party Decides" (and applying their weights by the political importance of the endorser). As the authors wrote, "The Republican field had no candidate acceptable to all wings of the party."

However, at the same point in 2007, most national surveys of Republicans still gave Giuliani a wide lead over both McCain and Romney. So the endorsements were more telling than the polls.

Currently, Romney wins a substantial share -- 47 percent -- of the endorsements made among the major officeholders we examined, followed by Rick Perry (28 percent) and Newt Gingrich (13 percent). Romney is also the choice of 10 of the 25 Power Outsiders who have made public endorsements. But again, since the the overall pace of endorsements has been slow, Romney's aggregate totals are low. In fact, as of today, we count just one more endorsement for Romney from governors, senators, House members and state chairs than he had at this point in 2007.

Georgetown political scientist Hans Noel believes the current state of the Republican nomination is similar to where the Democratic contest stood in 2004. At this point in 2004, national polls showed a close contest, with Howard Dean and Wesley Clark typically leading over John Kerry and Richard Gephardt, but with no candidate receiving more than 20 percent of the vote. Endorsements were nearly evenly divided between Dean, Kerry, Gephardt and John Edwards.

"The [Republican] party really wants to win," Noel wrote via email, "but they don't have a good candidate who can unite the party."

He argues that Romney, like Dean, has, "serious flaws, as far as the party sees it, but who could be better? The 2004 Dems had a few likely second choices (Edwards, Kerry), and the 2012 Republicans also have some choices. But this is why they are still trying to find another candidate."

Romney fares better in the endorsement race at this point than Dean did in 2004, but the implications for the outcome are still unclear.

Only one thing is certain: The party has not yet decided.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
The recent endorsements of Mitt Romney by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran and others, have some questioning ...
The recent endorsements of Mitt Romney by New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran and others, have some questioning ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 694
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kathy smelser
10:07 AM on 11/02/2011
wow they are having a hard time deciding between 999/ 20 /flat and my fav.i will die on this hill or i will let people die on the street because i am creating jobs .... i know i left some one out but i have not spoken to the mirror yet
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sasseyfrass
09:49 PM on 10/29/2011
I believe Newt Gaingrich is the most qualtified to do the job. He would have my vote. The media is ignoring him for some reason. I hope the American people don't let the media make their minds up for them again. I hope we don't allow the media to talk us into another Obama. One who says one thing knowing he has no intention of doing what he promises like Herman Cain and Rick Perry are doing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
capitaldysfunction
White male never voted Republican
06:30 PM on 10/27/2011
Romney is currently enjoying better polling because he has the intelligence to shut up about his positioning on many issues while his Republican opponents are poking their heads up only to get them slammed down. If Romney wins the presidency and brings a Republican house and senate with him, there will not be significant differences between his policy positions and the ultra right of his party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bart DePalma
Bart DePalma
01:58 PM on 10/18/2011
During this Tea Party rebellion against the GOP establishment, pay more attention to likely voter polling than establishment endorsements. Right now, Cain has solid leads in LV polling as compared to the ties he has with Romney in the RV and adult polling. This can change, but we are coming up rapidly on 2012's extra early GOP primary season.
12:09 AM on 10/16/2011
Herman Cain is without doubt the next president. believe it or not. NO i am NOT voting for him nor supporting him. simply stating the fore knowledgeable fact.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Gudrun
My micro-bio is empty
01:41 PM on 10/16/2011
No, he's not going the distance.
11:50 PM on 10/16/2011
I don't know you but can tell that when you're wrong you go all out.
01:12 PM on 10/14/2011
no surprise that Christie supports Romney - both elected by a liberal voter base.
Look who elected the liberal republicans! Romney? Ted Kennedy supporters!
anyone who ever spent more than a week in New Jersey knows they are HARD CORE liberal
more than New York!

These two are as Republican as Arlen Specter was!

Let's get honest here!

This is why the right has no credibility - you have become too complacent and lost direction on common sense stuff!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Margo Arrowsmith
Elizabeth Warren in 2016!
05:38 AM on 10/14/2011
Is it just me or when Romney to talking to voters does he sound like he thinks he was sent in to talk to a 5th grade class?  


But then I guess if he thinks that a group of unemployed adults will accept that he is one of them, he does see the voters all as 5th graders.
jishosan
Average Everyday Everyone
12:57 AM on 10/14/2011
Honestly, and I hate to say it as a Democrat, they don't need a unity candidate, because Mitt Romney could actually win. Most of us know that he's not really a die hard right-winger, because his rhetoric only picked up in the last couple of years to appease the Republican base. Before that, he was slightly right moderate. And he knows a thing or two about finances, personally. I think he could swing a major independent component over to his side due to their disappointment with Obama. Since he's the one candidate SAFE enough to likely leave the place no worse than he found it even if he can't fix it, they would be free to vote AGAINST Obama rather than FOR Romney.

Half the right won't turn up to vote for Cain, and the independents will avoid him like plague. We need real solution providers willing to consider every option, not soundbite warriors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
election2012
An independent voice for the greater good.
12:34 AM on 10/14/2011
Apparently slow and steady wins the GOP race for Mitt Romney. Even in light of the media's fixation with Cain winning a few Southern polls.
11:56 PM on 10/13/2011
Republicans have a great candidate who can unite the party - his name is Barack Obama.
10:18 PM on 10/13/2011
You're worried about uniting the party?.. What about uniting the nation. You GOP dudes have lost sight of what our country needs.
photo
colah
Sometimes I sit & think. Sometimes I just sit.
09:57 PM on 10/13/2011
Beware of the false prophet Joseph W Smith.

`
(that was fun!)
photo
dre7861
What the 'ell is a micro-bio?
09:42 PM on 10/13/2011
Not only are we ruled by a plutocracy in this country but now it seems are elections are chosen by a punditoracy. I guess the pundits have gotten bored with the GOP primaries months before the first vote has been cast. They have decided who the winner will be and will stop covering the other candidates. The punditoracy has moved on like an ADD kid with the remote control and want talk about the 2012 election well over a year before anyone votes. Of course we know that a month or two into making perdictions from on high their lofty mountain tehy will grow bored with the 2012 election and want to start talking about the midterms of 2014 or better yet the 2016 presidential election. By the time next summer comes you'll be able to read breathlessly about whether Glzzpik, the ultra-ultra-ultra-ultra conservative Pearl Necklace candidate will win against Ooo-Loooo, the ultra-ultra-ultra conservative Felching candidate for Grand Lord and Boobah of the last mountain top on the planet poking above the flood waters election of 3894!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HHarvey
Do not feed the trolls
09:40 PM on 10/13/2011
thinking republicans know that Romney is the only one that could potentially beat Obama in the general, but they have a whole lot of fringes in their party right now who will split the vote. Romney is not safe and it's quite possible that a lesser known candidate will emerge which will certainly increase the chances of Obama being elected in the WH another 4 years. Can't say I'm real broke up about that.
09:56 PM on 10/13/2011
Really? Gumby, er Romney couldn't beat his shadow in a political contest. Obama would tear him apart in any debate. You have to know issues and have solutions to discuss things. Obama knows the issues and he has solutions - none ever get acted upon, but hey he's "Hope and Change" not "Doing and Fixing."

There are only two candidates in the race that have a chance to beat Obama - Cain and Gingrich. Cain has some ideas that are out in left field right now but as he matures as a candidate he is getting better. Newt is the smartest of the batch, but has considerable baggage. I think he's smart enough to let any shots at his past roll over him and drag the topic back to real issues, however, and people will respond to that.

My personal choice would be Cain with Condi Rice as VP, primarily to watch the media implode trying to say bad things about them without getting too personal. I think Condi could keep Cain from going too far off the deep end as well. Toss Gingrich in as Chief of Staff and this adminstration might get something done. A lot of people wouldn't like what they got done, but that's going to happen anyway.
jishosan
Average Everyday Everyone
01:04 AM on 10/14/2011
I'm sorry, there is no way Cain wins. None. A good (not a majority, just a sizeable number) contingent of southern evangelicals are straight-up racists to boot, and would never vote for Cain, not even hold their nose and do it. Cain also can't win with independents. Moderate conservatives and centrist democrats aren't interested in his soundbite approach to politics, and Obama will destroy Cain in every debate.

Gingrich is done. He only runs for the PAC money. There is NOTHING to respect about his character or the way he conducts his personal life. Clinton may have philandered, but Hilary wasn't dying of cancer when it happened. (P.S. Screw you, John Edwards).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Silvey
Writer/Bleeding Heart Liberal
02:12 PM on 10/16/2011
Cain and Abel --opps I mean Gingrich !!! You have to be Joking !!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yikes11
09:22 PM on 10/13/2011
Let the side show begin, hurry, hurry- step right on in.
11:55 PM on 10/16/2011
Can't afford to pass it by
Guaranteed to make you cry