iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

House Republicans Pass Coal Ash Regulations, Shift Power Away From EPA

House Republicans Coal Ash

JIM ABRAMS   10/14/11 06:45 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — House Republicans pushed through legislation Friday that gives the states the power to regulate coal ash from power plants as if it were municipal garbage, pre-empting pending federal regulations that could be much tougher.

The vote on coal ash disposal was the latest of several passed by the GOP-controlled House that would shift authority away from the Environmental Protection Agency and reduce federal regulations that Republicans say are burdensome, hamper economic growth and cost jobs.

Other bills have dealt with toxic emissions from power plants, cement plants and incinerators. Like those bills, the coal ash bill is unlikely to be considered in the Democratic-controlled Senate.

Under the measure, sponsored by West Virginia Rep. David McKinley, states would have to apply the same regulations to coal ash that they use for municipal garbage. Generally, that means it would have to be put in landfills that have liners to protect groundwater, monitors to test water for contamination and equipment to control dust. The bill would not cover coal ash sitting in surface ponds or impoundments now. The vote was 267-144, with 37 Democrats voting "yes."

McKinley said his legislation was "a jobs bill and a public health bill; protecting the livelihoods and the health of our working men and women are not mutually exclusive ideas." His office pointed out that, unlike the other GOP-sponsored EPA bills, the White House had not issued a veto threat and that 14 Senate Democrats had expressed support for the bill's approach.

The Environmental Protection Agency is currently considering several options on how to regulate coal ash, from giving it a special status as a hazardous waste so it could still be recycled to classifying it as a solid waste, which comes with fewer requirements. The industry has said that even a solid waste classification would prompt the closure of some existing coal ash ponds and landfills, costing jobs and raising energy bills.

"The results of EPA's regulations would have been devastating on the effects of jobs, higher utility rates at home, and cripple a very successful emerging biproducts industry," said Rep. John Shimkus, R-Ill., chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee's environment and economy panel.

The bill allows the EPA to get involved if a state chooses not to act or the agency finds the state program deficient. But the White House said it strongly opposed the bill, saying it was insufficient to address the risks of coal ash disposal and undermined the federal government's ability to ensure requirements that adequately protect human health and the environment.

Without a minimum federal health standard, "the result will inevitably be uneven and inconsistent rules by the states; some states will do a good job, others will do a poor jobs," said Rep. Henry Waxman of California, top Democrat on the Energy and Commerce Committee. "And when they do a poor job, the public will pay the price."

The EPA's role in coal ash increased after a 2008 spill from a disposal pond at a Tennessee Valley Authority power plant in Kingston, Tenn., flooded hundreds of acres of land, damaged homes and killed fish in nearby rivers.

A federal survey conducted after the spill found the toxic leftovers of burning coal for power at nearly 600 sites in 35 states. Spills have occurred at 34 of those sites over the past decade, the agency said. Without federal guidelines, regulations of the ash disposal vary by state. Most sites lack liners and have no monitors to ensure that ash and its contents don't seep into underground aquifers.

Over the years, the volume of waste has grown as demand for electricity increased and the federal government clamped down on emissions from power plants.

In 2001, the EPA said it wanted to set a national standard for ponds or landfills used to dispose of wastes produced from burning coal.

Ash is produced in the burning of coal and is caught by scrubbers required to reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide.

The coal ash regulation is one of a host of environmental regulations targeted by Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., in a memo to House Republicans in August.

But unlike previous bills, which target regulations the EPA has either proposed or finalized, the agency hasn't made any decision on coal ash. An inspector general's report released earlier this year found that the EPA promoted the reuse of coal ash in wallboard and as filler in road embankments without properly assessing the environmental risks.

Coal ash contains arsenic, selenium, lead and mercury in low concentrations. But like many other types of energy waste – such as drilling muds – is not classified as hazardous under waste laws.

___

The bill is H.R. 2273

___

Online:

http://thomas.loc.gov

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — House Republicans pushed through legislation Friday that gives the states the power to regulate coal ash from power plants as if it were municipal garbage, pre-empting pending feder...
WASHINGTON — House Republicans pushed through legislation Friday that gives the states the power to regulate coal ash from power plants as if it were municipal garbage, pre-empting pending feder...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 528
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (16 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
03:29 PM on 10/24/2011
Another reason to make lobbyists illegal. Here's a former tobacco con doing the nasty for tar sands: http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/politics/stories/meet-the-tar-sands-pr-wizard
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:23 PM on 10/17/2011
fatalistic gangster policy. have bribes will pass anything. it doesnt matter how many americans will be killed. dont expect the rationale to make sense. lies are just a cover up for the bribes. get the money out of politics. police white collar crime.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:22 PM on 10/17/2011
It is obvious that the GOP is attacking the EPA for the benefit of corporate profits, not to increase the number of jobs available. The only question is whether they are doing it knowingly, or because of their innate ignorance.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:24 PM on 10/17/2011
its not the GOP it the gangsters that are bribing the GOP. they work for bribes. ignorance is an excuse to cover up their crimes.
11:56 PM on 10/16/2011
SINCE THE GREEDY ARE MAKING THE DECISIONS ABOUT OUT HEALTH, I SAY IF ITS ALLTHAT SAFE, WHY NOT PUT THAT COAL PLANT IN YOUR AFFLUENT NEIGHBORHOODS. They won't because it could cause THEIR families to get sick and die. Kind of like they will give orientals startup money for their convenience stores but they are not allowed to open a store in white areas. You will never find and oriental store in the rich neighborhoods. They allow them to open in poor areas where they can take advantage of their customers. Hell, some of them think they are BETTER THAN AMERICANS. I have gotten more then one store managers straight.
photo
AZDave2
Truth is rare...protect it!
06:35 PM on 10/16/2011
Do Republicans have any idea what the cost will be in human health if they get away with this. It will be hundreds and thousands of times the cost of the scrubbers that the EPA wants put on smoke stacks. And just who will pay for that....Hmmmm.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:26 PM on 10/17/2011
Obama made a similar decision re clean air. it doesnt matter what party - only the bribes matter. it policy by auction. thats why the reasons dont make any sense. they are merely a lie to confuse people.
05:27 PM on 10/16/2011
Republicans are not interested in clean air or safe drinking water.

They are the "you are on your own " party.
04:20 PM on 10/16/2011
This is a prime example of the GOP doing the bidding of the Koch Brothers. How much more clear does it have to be to people.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:04 PM on 10/16/2011
What Is the Keystone XL Pipeline — and Why Is It So Controversial?

Lois Beckett, News Analysis: The project has sparked major environmental concerns, particularly in Nebraska, where the pipeline would pass over an aquifer that provides drinking water and irrigation to much of the Midwest. It has also drawn scrutiny because of the company's political connections and conflicts of interest. A key lobbyist for TransCanada, which would build the pipeline, also worked for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on her presidential campaign. And the company that conducted the project's environmental impact report had financial ties to TransCanada.
03:22 PM on 10/16/2011
no surprize, didn't obama go with this?
photo
99er2049er
Democrats create jobs and build strong economies
02:01 PM on 10/16/2011
Anyone see these lame republican supported tv commercials saying to the EPA, leave our economy alone. Yeah right. OK republicans, remove the EPA and we will all just swallow more polluted water and breathe more polluted air, all in the name of corporate profits. Great plan GOP.
NYC619
Tri-corn hats cannot fit block heads
01:13 PM on 10/16/2011
This story just further convinces me that a majority of TeaGOP are some heartless reptilian hybrid creatures who don't need oxygen.
photo
99er2049er
Democrats create jobs and build strong economies
02:02 PM on 10/16/2011
Or X-File rejects from another world that wants to pollute our Earth, so we the humans die and they the aliens can take over. We know the republican leaders don't have hearts, so they must be aliens trying to destroy our planet, right?
12:01 AM on 10/17/2011
They are a product of the KOCH BROTHERS. And when it is revealed, because it will be revealed, everyone will see that THE TEA PARTY WAS NOT A GRASSROOTS ORG. IT WAS A WELL ORGANIZED, WELL FUNDED OPERATION PUT TOGETHER BUNCH OF EITHER RICH PEOPLE OR PAY PARTICIPANTS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Twelve
Uber Liberal And Proud Of It
01:11 PM on 10/16/2011
Sure, let's just let the coal industry regulate themselves - yeah, that'll work..... Good grief!
photo
99er2049er
Democrats create jobs and build strong economies
02:03 PM on 10/16/2011
But we can trust the corporations and oil companies, right??? Trust me, they would never do anything to harm our planet or pollute the environment or screw the American people. Sure, go ahead and regulate themselves and here is my SS# and access to my bank account. Go ahead, we trust you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Twelve
Uber Liberal And Proud Of It
08:25 AM on 10/17/2011
Exactly. How can people be so dumb as to believe these companies will regulate themselves?
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
12:59 PM on 10/16/2011
Still serving the Koch Master General.
12:36 PM on 10/16/2011
Electing Republicans has consequences. Not good news for air breathers and water drinkers, particularily in west part of states with republican controled upwind neighbor states.
I can predict the scapegoating when the environmental consequences ensue. Right wingers will find a way to blame it on some program that benefitted minorities or poor people. Maybe the air is polluted because of gay people...if only we had'nt let gay immigrants in the army we could still drink the water.
libmenace2012
1776-2012. It was a good run...
12:01 PM on 10/16/2011
Thank you House GOP!! Get the job destroying EPA under control and out of the way of business.
photo
99er2049er
Democrats create jobs and build strong economies
02:04 PM on 10/16/2011
You are being sarcastic, right? Because if you are serious, then you are throwing away one of our final lifelines of protection away all so your wealthy corporate execs can get a little more cash in their greedy pockets.