More

East Jerusalem Settlement Plan Clears Hurdle, Threatens Peace Process

Israel Settlement

By KARIN LAUB and DAN PERRY   10/17/11 05:48 PM ET   AP

JERUSALEM -- A plan for settling thousands more Jews in a strategic part of Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem has quietly cleared a key bureaucratic hurdle, threatening to cut a link between Jerusalem and the West Bank and endanger already slim peace prospects.

The proposed Givat Hamatos development would complete a Jewish band around a part of east Jerusalem, the Palestinians' hoped-for capital, complicating any future partition of the city.

"This is a game changer," Daniel Seidemann, a Jerusalem expert, said of Givat Hamatos. While relatively small in size, "this is a mega-settlement in terms of impact," he added.

The plan calls for about 2,600 apartments, including about 1,800 for Givat Hamatos and 800 for an expansion of Beit Safafa, an adjacent Palestinian neighborhood, Seidemann said. Construction could begin by the second half of 2012, he said.

Because of Israel's construction of a half-ring of Jewish enclaves in east Jerusalem, only a few land corridors are left its core Arab neighborhoods and the West Bank. Givat Hamatos would cut off one of the key remaining ones – cutting off the area of Beit Safafa from the West Bank town of Bethlehem.

The new building plan drew condemnation over the weekend from U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton. The U.N. and EU, along with the U.S. and Russia, make up the Quartet of Mideast mediators, who hope to restart Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.

Quartet envoys are set to meet next week in the region to nudge the two sides back to the table, but prospects are were dim before, and even more so now.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has said he will not return to talks as long as Israel keeps building on territory it captured in the 1967 war, and Palestinian officials said the plans for Givat Hamatos reinforced that decision.

"It's another slap in the face of all those international efforts being made toward the resumption of a meaningful political process," Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad told The Associated Press on Monday. "It's not only damaging to our own interests, it's damaging to all those who have a vested interest in a two-state solution," referring to a Palestinian state next to Israel.

In any future peace deal, guidelines first established by former U.S. President Bill Clinton a decade ago would likely still apply to a partition of Jerusalem – Arab neighborhoods to Palestine and Jewish neighborhoods to Israel. Such arrangements would be complex, likely requiring the construction of bridges and tunnels to create contiguity between disjointed Arab and Jewish areas.

Both Israel and the Palestinians accepted the concept at the time, but peace talks broke down over other issues.

The Palestinians, along with the international community, make no distinction between construction for Jews in the West Bank and in the occupied sector of Jerusalem. Israel annexed east Jerusalem – plus a swath of West Bank land around it – after the 1967 war and since then has settled 200,000 Jews in a ring of new developments around the Arab core.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, while offering to negotiate the terms of a Palestinian state, opposes a partition of Jerusalem. His ruling coalition is dominated by hard-liners and supporters of settlement.

In a reflection of their power, the Netanyahu government last week decided to set up a task force to review West Bank land ownership, possibly creating a way to legalize dozens of unauthorized settlement outposts on lands until now regarded as private Palestinian property.

And last Tuesday, Jerusalem city officials also deposited the Givat Hamatos plan for a 60-day public review period. Court appeals could delay the process for a few more months, but construction could start within a year, according to the Israeli anti-settlement watchdog Peace Now, calling last week's decision the final planning stage.

Jerusalem municipal spokesman Stephan Miller said more steps have to be taken before construction can begin, but declined to give details. The plan could also be canceled at the government level.

Israelis insist the post-1967 housing developments are mere "Jewish neighborhoods," a term sounding benign and residential. The Palestinians, along with officials from the United Nations, the European Union and others, refer to them as settlements, a word which, in the shorthand of the conflict, implies illegitimacy.

Semantics aside, the world community overwhelmingly opposes the east Jerusalem construction – and it is a red line for the Palestinians who consider the eastern part of the city as their capital.

About half a million Israelis already live on occupied land, including the 200,000 in areas Israel annexed to Jewish west Jerusalem. The annexed lands include the original east Jerusalem, which under Jordanian rule was a hilly hamlet of some six square kilometers (2.5 square miles), as well another 64 square kilometers of the West Bank.

Givat Hamatos would be the first new Jewish settlement – or neighborhood – to be built in east Jerusalem since the Har Homa enclave was started in 1997. It could hardly come at a more delicate time: last month the Palestinians asked the United Nations Security council to recognize a Palestinian state encompassing the West Bank, Gaza, and east Jerusalem.

Ashton, the EU foreign policy chief, said she "deplored" the latest Israeli decision and urged the government to halt the project, citing concern it would cut off Arab Jerusalem off from Bethlehem. Both Ashton and Ban Ki-moon, the U.N. chief, reiterated that Israeli settlement activity in east Jerusalem is contrary to international law.

Israel has argued that east Jerusalem should not be considered occupied because it has extended citizenship rights to its Arab residents, although only several thousand of the city's quarter million Arab residents have taken advantage of this. The international community has not recognized Israel's annexations.

Israel claims Geneva Conventions forbidding colonization of occupied land should not apply because the West Bank and Gaza exist in sovereignty limbo – no longer claimed by Jordan and Egypt, who ruled them before 1967, while the Palestinians have never had a state.

Miller, the Jerusalem city spokesman, said anyone could move into apartments there. But Jerusalem's newer housing developments have effectively been segregated by the acquiescence of all concerned – although in recent years, some Palestinians have moved into Jewish neighborhoods because of housing shortages in Arab areas.

___

Associated Press writer Daniella Cheslow in Jerusalem contributed reporting.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

JERUSALEM -- A plan for settling thousands more Jews in a strategic part of Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem has quietly cleared a key bureaucratic hurdle, threatening to cut a link between Jerusalem an...
JERUSALEM -- A plan for settling thousands more Jews in a strategic part of Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem has quietly cleared a key bureaucratic hurdle, threatening to cut a link between Jerusalem an...
Filed by Clare Richardson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,206
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (27 total)
07:58 AM on 12/02/2011
stop competing just ask esau where was he when jacob returned back from slavery in egypt
09:40 AM on 10/22/2011
Israel is building on Israeli land. This land belonged to Israel from thousands of years ago and stretched beyond Jordan and Syria and Lebanon. Israeli people were displaced from their own land by invaders-Babylonians, Romans, Moslem Crusaders. They had to flee to North Africa, Europe and Russia. So Israel is not building on occupied land. This land belongs to Israel, from thousands of years ago. Solomon's Temple is beneath the Gold Dome of the Muslims who always build upon shrines of other religions. They have built upon Christian churches and Jewish synagogues (temples). No one should ever refer to this land as "occupied". It was only "occupied" by a group of nomadic beduion Arabs who now call themselves Palestinians. Let us face it. An Arab is an Arab no matter where they come from in the Middle East. The Palestinians, another group of Arabs, can easily be welcomed into other Arab countries, but no Arab country wants them. The other Arab states want to keep Israel as a sticking point so people will look away from their own cruelty to their people and not pay attention to their Jihadism. Let us never refer to Israel building on "occupied" land. This is Israel's land, for now and always and was taken back in the 1967 war when attacked from all sides by the Arab states.
photo
SpoonieLuv
I am defending myself, in favor of THAT
12:20 PM on 10/22/2011
Superstition has no place in the twenty-first century. The Israelis justify their terrorism by citing the expulsion of people who may or may not have been their descendants millennia ago. Instead of fighting a holy war to claim the West Bank and Gaza, why don't Israelis instead join the community of peaceful, modern nations?
01:04 PM on 10/22/2011
It is early. Have not had your coffee yet? Palestinians claimed Gaza and they got it. No one wants Gaza, not Israel, not Egypt. The Muslim are the ones fighting a Holy War, and refuse to make PEACE. They have stuck their heads in the sand, like Ostriches, and will not see what is reality: Israel IS The Jewish State. Israel is also a modern nation. After Palestinians have traded over a thousand terrorists for one Israeli solider, Fatah's Abbas is whining. Hamas has scored a victory, and that can not be. To *even matters out for him politically*, Israel must release as many, if not more, Fatah terrorists, or else..Or else, I guess, no negotiations for Peace and Palestine. Too bad, I believe I have read the UN requires it. It is just amazing how Palgroupies always turn matters upside down, turn black into white, lie into truth, and vice versa. Of course, Abbas did, at the time, squeeze itout of Olmert, but for a purpose, and that purpose was not met, and has been replaced. As always, Abbas (Palestinians), a day late, a dollar (or more) short. Palestinians SAY they want their own State, but what they DO contradicts it. What they want is money, attention, and others paying their bills and cleaning up after them.
05:58 PM on 10/22/2011
Do you have any idea how many various peoples have inhabited one area for hundreds or even thousands of years, and then been removed? and again and again? It may be unfortunate, but it in the modern world, we simply do not make determinations about international law based on some peoples ideas about their ownership of land they have not had controll of for decades or even hundreds of years.

The entire WORLD sees Israels borders as the 67 borders, and the Geneva Convention forbids the settlement of occupied territoriy, which is what the West Bank and East jerusalem are.

There is not a single nation on earth that recognizes Israels right to have setters there, and they in violation of International law. That is the way the world works. Furthermore, when Palestine is recognized in the general assembly of the UN, (and they will be recognized there regardless of any US veto in the security council) they will have access to the International courts, and they will be able to sue the settlements out of existence, because, as I mentioned before, they are considered by virtually every other nation on earth to be a violation of the Geneva Convention. I hop those settlers are consulting the Palestinians about paint colors and capet choices, because its the Palestinians that are going to be living in those houses in the not very long run.
photo
wcgfairfield
reaching out to genuine Christians
12:52 AM on 10/22/2011
Won't matter whether Jerusalem is Jewish or Arab -- Jerusalem will soon enough be declared an international city. That has to happen to open the way for Biblical events there to occur.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trollstein
Once you go Schwartz, you never go back baby
05:52 PM on 10/21/2011
"Threatens Peace Process"
What "Peace Process"?
There is only a 'war process', which goes on pause from time-to-time. The 'pause' button is only used because Israel has a superior military.
This so called "Peace Process" has been quoted and used for propaganda points for 62 years whilst the Arabs attacked Israel and its civilians. Even if Abbas and even if Hamas signed a deal with Israel tomorrow, (unlikely as that is) it would only be a pause in the war. Israel is doing the correct strategic thing by punishing its attackers for attacking a human REFUGE. Otherwise, they have no incentive to stop.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
discocapper
Israel Only Fires Back!
12:51 PM on 10/21/2011
The title of this article alone makes two false assumptions:

1) That there is a peace process
2) That Settlements are an obstacle to this process

As Arab leaders have attacked Israel since its rebirth, and Palestinian leaders have stated their position clearly that they consider all of Israel occupied Palestine, the issue is existential, not territorial. I don't blame the Palestinian people, just the Arab leaders who have created and maintained this conflict since 1948. When the Palestinian leaders decide they can tolerate a peaceful state alongside Israel rather than continuing the goal of building a state on top of Israel, how large this or that neighborhood will be will become a much smaller issue. It's not about Settlements.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trollstein
Once you go Schwartz, you never go back baby
05:53 PM on 10/21/2011
Precisely.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Nwo2012
Sue me, I boycott products from the settlements
03:24 PM on 10/23/2011
Settlement­s are an obstacle to this process because the world says it is.
11:22 AM on 10/20/2011
Jerusalem, in its entirety (no such thing as East or West), belongs to Israel. It has never at any time been under the sovereignty of the Palestinians and no matter how many comments people will post on the internet will change that. This conflict is the only conflict in history were the LOSERS make demands and threaten to continue the war if they don't get their way...
10:44 PM on 10/19/2011
Israelis are being selfish. They know that Arabs need land to live on and they still insist on occupying more land. Netanyahu government wants to review the West Bank settlement to “possibly create a way to legalize dozens of unauthorized settlement outposts on lands until now regarded as private Palestinian property.” This is not fair on behalf of the Palestinians because they rightfully own the land. It is as if some came to your house and told you to get out because they changed the plans this is unethical on many standards. Arabs are fighting back not because thy hate the Israelis but because they know that they bought their homes with their own money and that they clearly own them. This will ultimately stop the peace making process because of how unethical the Israelis are being.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
discocapper
Israel Only Fires Back!
12:54 PM on 10/21/2011
If comedy was your intention you hit the mark. 99.5% of the ME is not enough land for the Arabs to live on. WOW!
01:08 PM on 10/22/2011
I believe it is 99.99%. Yes, those Palgroupies are true comedians. They also view the world standing on their heads.
09:44 AM on 10/22/2011
The Arab states occupy 99.9% of the Middle East. Saudi Arabia has the most square miles and could easily welcome the Palestinian Arabs into their country. There is no reason that Israel should give up land rightfully belonging to it for thousands of years under persecution by the Romans and the Moslem Crusaders. There is no other Arab country that has ever welcomed the Palestinians. Israel welcomes all Jewish people, throughout the world, to come live in Israel. Do your hear me Arabs? Welcome in your fellow Arab bretherin, the Palestinians, who wandered into Israel's land as nomads.
07:38 PM on 10/19/2011
ARABS STOLE (part of) JEWISH HOMELAND;
The original Balfour Declaration of 1917 gave MUCH MORE land to The Jewish Homeland
The League of Nations and the British had designated the land called "Palestine" for the "Jewish National Home" -- east and west of the Jordan River from the Mediterranean to Arabia and Iraq, and north and south from Egypt to Lebanon and Syria

Stolen land -aye FROM THE JEWS!
Tony Andrews
Ὁ βίος βραχύς, ἡ δὲ τέχν
08:26 PM on 10/19/2011
You have still not provided the smallest level of confirmation for your, by now, willfully inaccurate assertions.

Since you don't seem to have read it yourself, here it is:

Foreign Office,
November 2nd, 1917.

Dear Lord Rothschild­,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government­, the following declaratio­n of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspiration­s which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet:
"His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishm­ent in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievemen­t of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communitie­s in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country".
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaratio­n to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation­.

Yours sincerely
Arthur James Balfour

Now you can repeat from it all of the phrases that confirm what you say, which will be difficult, since there are none.
09:02 PM on 10/19/2011
nice try history revisionist; this letter is the culmination of a decade of discussion between Balfour and Weitzman.

The ORIGINAL agreement was :His Majesty's Government, after considering the aims of the Zionist Organization, accepts the principle of recognizing Palestine as the National Home of the Jewish people and the right of the Jewish people to build up its national life in Palestine
His Majesty's Government regards as essential for the realization of this principle the grant of internal autonomy to the Jewish nationality in Palestine, freedom of immigration for Jews, and the establishment of a Jewish National Colonizing Corporation for the resettlement and economic development of the country.

until the friggin Brit anti semites got their grubby little hands on it

Later Balfour even clarified the documents INTENT: The Four Great Powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism is rooted in age-long traditions,..... In my opinion that is right.

Palestine must be made available for the largest number of Jewish immigrants. It is therefore eminently desirable that it should obtain the command of the water-power which naturally belongs to it WHETHER BY EXTENDING ITS BORDERS TO THE NORTH, or by treaty with the mandatory of Syria, to whom the southward flowing waters of Hamon could not in any event be of much value.
For the same reason PALESTINE SHOULD BE EXTENDED INTO THE LANDS LYING EAST OF THE JORDAN

dont bring a a sword to a gun fight Palsabarist!

next
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trollstein
Once you go Schwartz, you never go back baby
06:10 PM on 10/21/2011
I know robots with more originality (and more honesty) then yourself. (And each year, the robots keep getting better and you keep getting worse). As you are well aware, the Balfour document was a unilateral act of British national law. As such, it has NO MOMENT in international law. The first act of binding international (multi-lateral) law occurred with the Paris Peace Conference of 1919. A succession of subsequent treaties both augmented (supported) and attempted to weaken the Zionist position. But as you know, this controversy has never been adjudicated. The UNGA lacks the jurisdiction to do so under its own Charter. The Security Council has no legislative powers either. Why would they? The UNSC consists of 5 permanent members (with special 'veto' power) and 10 rotating members. Why would 15 nations have LEGISLATIVE power over the other 177 UN members? They wouldn't and they don't. What the UNSC has is power to invoke a sort of marshal law, superimposed over existing law, but this authority is reserved for situations where 'threats to world peace' are involved. Even still, the UNSC can't create delete or modify sovereign borders. This has been the situation for over 60 years. Its time you got used to it.
03:39 PM on 10/19/2011
This poor excuse of a country needs to be resisted at every junction. There is just something about injustice that puts a fire in one's heart. I can't believe that the people in Israel is just sitting idle and not resisting this tyrannical government.

Well, we will have to it for them and the results will not be pretty.
04:14 PM on 10/19/2011
We're shaking in our booties.
photo
cosmiczulu
let the good times roll
06:49 PM on 10/19/2011
seems like that attitude has caused the Arabs a lot of their current problems
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rallis
Virtue is Harmony
12:51 PM on 10/19/2011
Is Elie Wiesel A Fraud?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiRKv8Fd3HM
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WheresMyParty
Wear cardigans responsibly.
08:00 PM on 10/19/2011
No, but this idiot and his ramblings about the "so-called Holocaust" clearly is.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cynthia Rays
peace in the valley seeker
12:01 PM on 10/19/2011
Israel keeps declaring more and more Palestinian territory as being "Jerusalem".
The area near Beit Jalla and Beit Sahoor, near Bethlehem is being ethnically cleansed with more settlements.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gui Montag
Former Palestinian Supporter
12:17 PM on 10/19/2011
While Palestinians declare more and more territory to be "theirs." Won't be long before they declare Washington DC to be "occupied Palestine."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NadineColbert
Fox News is unadulterated fiction
12:21 PM on 10/19/2011
Orthodox jews are as self serving and as bigoted as any other extreme people.
They feel they have the right to take whatever they want and under their own self-described "rights".
12:54 PM on 10/19/2011
I disagree with your chacterization of ethnically cleansed -- nobody is being evicted.

I bet Abbas is wishing he had accepted Olmert's offer.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cynthia Rays
peace in the valley seeker
04:25 PM on 10/19/2011
n East Jerusalem alone from January to July 2009 at least 194 persons were forcibly displaced as a result of home demolitions. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) in August cited “conservative estimates” of more than 1,500 pending demolition orders in East Jerusalem.

"Some neighbourhoods face the prospects of mass demolitions. In the Silwan neighbourhood of East Jerusalem, some 90 houses are threatened, potentially displacing about 1,000 people. In Sheik Jarrah, an area in central East Jerusalem, 475 residents could face potential eviction as the ownership of their homes is contested by Israeli settlers."
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=32967&Cr=palestin&Cr1
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Omega2012
10:04 AM on 10/19/2011
Benji should just declare that Israel is for the Jews only and cleanse all gentiles out of Judea as to bring about the inevitable coming of Moshia. The scriptures must be fulfilled.
Rosin the Bow
Hail to the Victors Valiant
10:22 AM on 10/19/2011
You're projecting again. Ask Hamas and the PA how many Jews will be allowed to live in the state of Palestine.
03:52 PM on 10/19/2011
For as long as they live in that open air prison, none. But in actuality all the settlers are already in Palestine and deny Palestinians the land that is supposed to be West Bank, with more of them coming in on a daily basis. Your argument is moot and childish.
photo
Boduognat
Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'entrate.
06:35 AM on 10/21/2011
If you had any idea of what you are talking about, you would know that ir is illegal, according to ISRAELI law, for Israelis to live in Gaza.

Amira Hass, the well known Isralei journalist used to live in Gaza, and she experienced less troubles from Hamas than she did with her own Israeli Government and Shin Beth.
11:06 AM on 10/19/2011
1.3 Muslim-Christian Arabs living happily in Israel would find u funny and pathetic
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
Layman23
Do we want to live in the past?
03:06 AM on 10/19/2011
So why was germany wrong in taking poland and what happened after that? Oh.. i read about israeli settlements expanding and i forget history.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gui Montag
Former Palestinian Supporter
09:50 AM on 10/19/2011
You do know that Germany lost land after the war right? That's probably a better comparison.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anton123
09:57 AM on 10/19/2011
For a starter - Poland was and is a state.
Palestine is not - they refused it in 1948. And until they negotiate it with Israel, there will be no state.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NadineColbert
Fox News is unadulterated fiction
12:15 PM on 10/19/2011
Israel was created by Western Governments after WW2. That was the problem. Forced occupation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:27 AM on 10/19/2011
"In a reflection of their power, the Netanyahu government last week decided to set up a task force to review West Bank land ownership, possibly creating a way to legalize dozens of unauthorized settlement outposts on lands until now regarded as private Palestinian property."
12:14 PM on 10/21/2011
Reviewing Land Ownershipis a means of determining who owns what. If there is no ownership of certain lands, and it does not belong to anyone, the endless accusations of theft, and invasion, can be legally countered. On the other hand, if there IS land ownership, Israel should keep to the legal boundaries and means, or offer compensation. There is not now private Palestinian Property, as there is no Palestine, but individual ownership may exist of Palestinians. In that case, Israel should do what is right and compensate the owner.