iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Hillary Clinton Receiving Donations Of $20.12 From Voters Who Want Her To Challenge President Obama

First Posted: 10/18/2011 1:22 pm Updated: 12/18/2011 4:12 am

WASHINGTON -- Some of Hillary Clinton's most ardent supporters just are not willing to let go -- and they've mounted a push to get her into next year's White House race by making donations of $20.12 to her old presidential campaign committee.

A review of Clinton's most recent Federal Election Commission filing finds dozens of $20.12 donors, all of whom have donated before, since contributions that small are not reported until a giver's total exceeds $200. There are likely others whose totals fall below that threshold.

"The purpose was to to encourage her to reconsider her candidacy for 2012," said Will Bower, a Clinton die-hard who ponied up his $20.12 on Aug. 13, around the time many of the other like-minded donors cut checks.

"Many of us still believe she was the victor in 2008, if not on paper, in spirit," said Bower, who ended up voting for Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) in 2008.

Clinton had been the focus of a flurry of speculation about a possible Democratic challenger for President Obama shortly before the burst of contributions.

"It was essentially a call of encouragement," Bower said. "There's a strong Facebook community for it," he added, noting that one he is involved with boasts about 1,500 members.

Most recognize that it is very unlikely that Clinton, the current secretary of state, will run for president again in 2012 -- Clinton has said repeatedly she's done with electoral politics.

But Bower and others like him are not giving up hope. "We feel that she would have been the better president, and would be," Bower said.

Even if Clinton was planning to mount a bid, her 2008 campaign fund isn't currently in good enough shape to get her going. It's down to just $109,039.87, and the campaign still owes $274,010 to the consulting firm Penn Schoen Berland, whose CEO, Mark Penn, served as the Clinton campaign's chief strategist.

Small-dollar donors are not exactly keeping the campaign fund afloat; they contributed just $4,772.88 of the committee's $40,750.01 in receipts in the third quarter. The rest came from bank interest and from renting out the committee's most valuable remaining asset -- its list of donors who wanted to see Clinton become president.

Many professional fundraisers have paid the committee for access to those names, as have numerous Democratic candidates. The most recent financial disclosure report revealed that one such candidate is Elizabeth Warren, who is challenging Republican Sen. Scott Brown for his seat in Massachusetts.

Warren's campaign shelled out $8,275.98 for access to the Clinton list. Clinton ran well in Massachusetts in 2008, winning 55 percent of the Democratic primary vote, and Warren's campaign could also use the national network of Clinton donors to tap activists looking for a new female icon in politics on the left.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,353
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (53 total)
06:13 PM on 11/21/2011
It ain't too late fer Hillery ta primery that thar Kenneth Moozlum and split the Democrat Party fer good! A vote fer Hillery is a vote fer Romney, ΥEE-ΗAW!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosiesgal29
05:03 PM on 10/23/2011
good God in heaven are you people nuts???????????. 12.2 million dollars would feed a lot of homeless people i would never vote for this women or support any one who supported her.Has this country lost its whole mind??????????????
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:13 PM on 10/20/2011
I hope Hillary will run. She should

1. resign now, along with all of political cronies and hangers on she has packed into State Department.
2."lend" herself $50 million or so to get started, from the millions in personal wealth Bill has raised peddling their influence abroad.
3.re-assemble her inept "dream team" of hapless advisors, strategists and fawning sicophants
4. and launch another train reck of a campaign

where do I send my $20.12 to encourage her?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fgrammit
04:30 PM on 10/19/2011
unfortunatley most states such as florida will not allow you to write in a candidate for president. i know florida wont because i wanted to when i lived there temporarily
10:39 AM on 10/19/2011
At least she is a real American.
10:32 AM on 10/19/2011
anybody but Obama.......
10:23 AM on 10/19/2011
Thanks all the same, but we already have enough apologists in the current Administration, without electing this one.
10:22 AM on 10/19/2011
I'm a dem., but we are way to overconfident. The pugs could run Jeffrey Dahmer for pres. and they would still vote for him, just to get rid of Obama. We need to make sure the middle knows what's really going on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stressedtothebone
Fatalist and cynic
10:20 AM on 10/19/2011
The media again trying to create a non story. And, lots of naive people are prepared to accept the lie as fact.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leadsled
Love-child of the ghosts of FDR and Napoleon
04:17 PM on 10/20/2011
What lie is that? I certainly would love for Obama to actually face a primary challenge from the left, if only so that he moves back within sight of the political center from his current far right positions.
10:20 AM on 10/19/2011
I like Biden, but he ought to bow out and have Hillary run as VP. This would be a huge boost to Obama's chances.
10:38 AM on 10/19/2011
Ms. Clinton doesn't be needing Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosiesgal29
05:05 PM on 10/23/2011
and if she were elected would she arrange for obamas demise so she could be president by default?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sue-in-Jersey
Now I am in Pennsylvania. Hope they let me vote.
10:14 AM on 10/19/2011
Another misleading headline from the PUMAs R US site...
photo
walt edwards
If it's not for profit, it's a hobby
10:09 AM on 10/19/2011
I think she would be a great President. Then we could have a watered down version of Bill.

Did I say that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosiesgal29
05:06 PM on 10/23/2011
puke
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:06 AM on 10/19/2011
Leave it to the greedy, unsatiated Clintons to instigate trouble
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosiesgal29
05:06 PM on 10/23/2011
what they have always done best
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Willhoite
10:00 AM on 10/19/2011
Run Obama. The Repugnantcan presidential candidates are so pitiable that he'll easily win. BUT Hillary in 2016!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KMoore4318
Sarcasm/Satire; Google it !!!
10:37 AM on 10/19/2011
You are like most democrats you have not done the Math. That is the problem with spending and the budget, and the problem with Hillary in 2016. Born October 26, 1947 (age 63), In 2016 she will be 69, a term or two would make her 73-77; For her to pull off a run she will have to present herself as strong and capable, probably even more so than a man, like it or not there is a double standard. If you ever want her to be president she should run now. If you really than Obama deserves another term, he will be young enough to do it he was born in 1961 in 2020 we will younger than Hillary is now.
09:49 AM on 10/19/2011
This is silly. Clinton would have been completely abused by the Republicans, as Obama has been. Here's what ought to happen now: Biden should announce that he's stepping down from the Vice Presidency. Clinton should be appointed VP and help Obama get re-elected. Then, she can work to turn things around in the economy and get elected POTUS in 2016.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Willhoite
10:01 AM on 10/19/2011
Omigod. Terrific idea!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fgrammit
04:34 PM on 10/19/2011
EXCEPT SHE IS not FIRST IN LINE TO be APPOINTED.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rosiesgal29
05:07 PM on 10/23/2011
well thank god for small favors