More

Libya After Gaddafi: What The Plight Of One Persecuted Group Says About The Future Of Libya

Gaddafi Killed Libya

First Posted: 10/20/11 06:51 PM ET Updated: 12/20/11 05:12 AM ET

When Matt Pennington, an advocate with Refugees International, was in Libya two weeks ago, he visited a refugee camp near the eastern city of Benghazi.

The camp was so new it didn't have a name, but its 3,000-some residents all bore a singular identity: They were black-skinned Libyans, almost all of them from one town, Tawarga.

As it turned out, Tawarga had the misfortune of being located just 25 miles from Misrata, a city where some of the most devastating fighting of the country's uprising took place.

After the Misratan rebels liberated their city, some of their ranks continued on down to Tawarga, where residents were believed to have lived comfortably during Gaddafi's time, in order to deliver some vengeance upon the town they suspected of loyalist sympathies.

The result was catastrophic.

When a reporter from the Guardian visited Tawarga in mid-September, he found "a ghost town" in which most of the buildings had been set ablaze.

Tawarga is a poor dormitory town 20 minutes from Misrata, whose mostly black population fled in August when rebel forces captured it. Today it is a ghost town, its modest grey breeze block houses empty, the doors broken open, with green flags indicating support for the Gaddafi regime still fluttering from rooftops. Misratans have long blamed the people of Tawarga for murders, rapes and looting in alliance with pro-Gaddafi forces during fighting in March and April. It is common to hear Misratans making derogatory remarks about Tawarga's black population, coupled with the hope that the population, who fled to southern Libya, will never return. On Tuesday homes and shops were set ablaze around the town, some fires starting even as journalists arrived to investigate.

At the camp near Benghazi, Pennington interviewed some of the Tawargan refugees. They told him of being attacked by rebels from the fearsome Misrata Brigade -- the same militia that had led the conquest of Tripoli a month or so earlier -- and then fleeing south along the coast, and finally east in the direction of Benghazi.

"In the end, the Benghazi brigades had to intervene to protect these guys from the Misrata brigades," Pennington told The Huffington Post, shortly after Gaddafi was killed on Thursday.

The plight of the Tawargan has been particularly dire, Pennington said, but it also illustrates a central challenge that will face the interim authorities as they attempt to piece together a government in the aftermath of Gaddafi's reign.

During the worst parts of the revolution, upwards of 40 independent militias operated in the country under the loose banner of the "rebellion."

But many of them had competing ideologies and competing grudges, and with the common enemy of Gaddafi out of the way, the potential for freelance score-settling -- and questions about the government's ability to rein in the various groups -- has analysts worried.

"This is easily going to be one of the largest challenges going forward, unifying these rebel groups," Pennington said. "It's an incredibly fragile state right now, and these groups remain highly vulnerable."

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said something similar just a few days before Gaddafi was killed, during a surprise visit to Tripoli University.

"One of the problems you will face is how to reconcile different people, how you will bring people into a new Libya and not spend your time trying to settle scores from the past," she said. "How do you overcome all of those terrible experiences and feelings and stay focused on the future? That will be a hard task for Libya. But I know you can do it."

But this may underestimate the extent of the ill will, or how fresh it is, analysts say.

"The more important divide is how the different areas of the country experienced the war," said Michael Wahid Hanna, a fellow with The Century Foundation, a N.Y.-based think tank. "One of the bigger divides is between Misrata and Benghazi, and I think there is a real sense from Misratans that they paid for the revolution with their blood and I think that has fed a real sense of entitlement."

In early September, shortly after the fall of Tripoli, in which the Misrata brigades played an instrumental role, a top Misrata commander openly castigated the interim interior minister, accusing him of assailing "the dignity of the revolutionaries."

The ability of the interim government to bridge these divides in the coming months will be a deciding factor in the success of the Libyan revolution.

"This version of the NTC is going to dissolve itself really soon and the negotiation over the next transitional government is going to go a long way to either making things much worse, or giving a sense of inclusivity that soothes everyone's nerves," Hanna said.

For Pennington, the experience of the Tawarga refugees thus far is not exactly heartening.

Not too long ago, he said, the National Transitional Council's Chairman Mustafa Abdel Jalil visited Misrata to seek permission from tribal elders to let the Tawargas return to their homes.

"The elders said no," Pennington said. "The government has no long-term plan for them. Now they're looking at possibly just building a new city for them, but then in effect you're just further ghettoizing that community."

"What's going to happen to these people? How are you going to bring them in to the new Libya?" Pennington asked. "Now more than ever is the time for the Libyan leadership to demonstrate its credibility on the international scene by taking these responsibilities seriously."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

When Matt Pennington, an advocate with Refugees International, was in Libya two weeks ago, he visited a refugee camp near the eastern city of Benghazi. The camp was so new it didn't have a name, bu...
When Matt Pennington, an advocate with Refugees International, was in Libya two weeks ago, he visited a refugee camp near the eastern city of Benghazi. The camp was so new it didn't have a name, bu...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 49
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jayrag123
as salaam 3laykum
11:54 PM on 10/21/2011
Any of you people speak arabic.....I do. Any of you been to North Africa....I have.

Africa is hundreds of tribes and ethnic groups. The Arabs invaded Egypt and Noth Africa back in the 5th or 6th centuty. North Africa was always a mix race area, berbers, arabs and various tribes that are black.

The death of the king of kings will cause proplems for Libya for a long time
08:55 PM on 10/21/2011
Everyone knows the Libyan Arabs are the most ruthless of people. Partly because of ignorance but mostly it is their culture. That's why they banned all languages but Arabic, also no cultural expression is allowed but Arabic. These are people who decapitates with the smallest knife they can find.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KMBerger
"Cui adhaereo, prae est,"
04:47 PM on 10/21/2011
What about the plight of the Libyan Jews? When is HP going to report on how many were expelled from Libya without any compensation? Same with other Arab Jews in Egypt and elsewhere. When is there going to be unbiased reporting at HP on middle-eastern affairs?
wetcoastm
Free Speech As Dictated By Our Sponsors
01:52 PM on 10/21/2011
I love how the author has to throw in the idea that these people who have always lived in Lybia and are Africans are disliked because they were raping people. No there is a history of tensions because of slavery and racism in northern Lybia. And every man woman and child is a mercenary right? Why not talk about the lynchings too. And there are Black Lybians all over the country who have had to flee or been murdered. This is not an isolated city.
06:59 PM on 10/21/2011
they are descendants of slaves, not natives.

and yes, black libyans went on a rape and killing rampage during the civil war.

sorry, that is the fact, you can blame it on racism or whatever, but they did it.

and now they are reaping what they sowed
08:51 PM on 10/21/2011
Just like you will reap the benefits of your bovine manure, you liar.
08:59 PM on 10/21/2011
Everyone knows your people are murderers so stop thrashing the Blacks, who rapes more than your people. You should remember why no one respects you in the world.
12:59 PM on 10/21/2011
The Libyans may have won the battle, but they will lose the war in the long run. The clear winners of this western sponsored so-called revolution are NATO and the western corporations. Also, while the Libyan rebels will be fighting for power, the west will be making money. In fact, a weak Libyan government will give the west an absolute control over the Libyan oil, gold, and banking system.
Intelligentia
Anti-Racist
12:13 PM on 10/21/2011
Yeah, right! All these documents were just sitting there waiting for you. You people are nothing but Masters and Mistresses of Mendacity. Fabrication is your well-refined art! We, the informed, do not believe a single word of your lies and propaganda. I'm sure, your dead-brains will believe everything you say.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marchmont
05:25 AM on 10/21/2011
David Cameron hailed as a glorious landmark the execution of Muammar Gaddafi by a screaming mob of al-Qaeda’s Libyan divisions deployed back from Iraq and Afghanistan. In contrast to this slaughter, Gaddafi overthrew the Anglo-American puppet King Idris in bloodless coup 42 years ago and dismantled the corrupt remnants of western colonialism. As a result he replaced Nasser as the West’s bogeyman, was styled “The Mad Gadaffi” and every act of terrorism up and to and including Lockerbie was laid at his door. Certainly without western neo-colonial interference Libya would have remained stable but now every town has its own armed thugs in a country riven by tribal rivalries. Cameron and Sarkozy should enjoy their moment of triumph because protecting women and minorities - far less establishing ‘democracy’ - is going to be a neat trick.
photo
adamben
yes i said yes i will yes
10:49 AM on 10/21/2011
stability is relative. if you count the 1200 people he masaquered in a "prison riot" and countless others then i guess that's stable. funding international terrorists? ira/plo/hamas/hezbollah/taylors murderous liberians (how many countries were terrorized in west africa?)/ivory coast... meddling in uganda and most other parts of africa? let me get my websters/oed to double check on the word "stabile"
Intelligentia
Anti-Racist
11:51 AM on 10/21/2011
While you list countries he intervened, who was supplying the weapons? There are no weapons factory in Libya. Despite his alleged terrorism, somebody was supplying him with weapons, right? Since everybody is concerned about human rights, why has NATO not intervened in Georgia, to give only one example?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:05 PM on 10/21/2011
I've been browsing the comments and they seem to me extraordinarily blinded.
- Nothing about the fact the "allies" are peppered with Al Qaeda members
- Nothing about that, by killing the guy who was trying to normalize his relations with the West (renouncing terrorism, renouncing nuclear power, freeing prisoners and fighting human traffic) we give every dictator (we don't support yet) the message that we cannot be trusted in such processes.
- Nothing about the first "rebels", who were fighting just to protect their business of transporting illegal migrants for money, in terrible conditions, from Africa to Southern Europe.

I'd like to had that our "beloved French philosopher" BHL, who has heavily pushed for the attack on Libya, inherited his fortune from his father, exploiting timber companies in Africa.
Colonialist to the bone...
F&F
F&F
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
12:54 AM on 10/21/2011
It is terrible what happened, but it was Gaddafi's fault, for pitting tribes against each other. So now let's hope it ends well, and not like Somalia, or with another dictator.
photo
adamben
yes i said yes i will yes
10:50 AM on 10/21/2011
setting tribes against each other is and will always be the norm, but the masaquering and torturing of libyans is probably more of a reason.
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
11:28 AM on 10/21/2011
Of course they were mad that this black tribe and other tribes allied with Gaddafi were massacring and torturing Libyans, but setting tribes against each other is not always the norm in Arab countries. I haven't heard of it in Qatar or in the United Arab Emirates, these are still tribal countries. But I am no expert on the Arab countries. Anyway, in some Arab countries I think the Arabs are generally not in tribes, for example Egypt or Syria, the divisions there are religious. But certainly Assad is exploiting the religious divisions in Syria, and there is some suspicion that the current Egyptian government is doing the same, allegedly encouraging attacks on Christians.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MoreFreedom
10:52 PM on 10/20/2011
I expect that groups within Libya will scapegoat the US as creating problems there, even though some will support us. If we promote one group or another, then we become targets of the other, and we open ourselves to criticism for meddling and playing politics in Libya. Meddling in foreign countries with our military has led to blowback again and again. Even 9/11, yet we continue. For the terrorists own words on why they attacked us, see: http://www.lewrockwell.com/vance/vance257.html
photo
adamben
yes i said yes i will yes
10:51 AM on 10/21/2011
i think that it will be groups outside of libya; the former rebels love us.
wetcoastm
Free Speech As Dictated By Our Sponsors
01:59 PM on 10/21/2011
No they don't love you. These guys are radical fundies many of whom are members of Al-queda they don't love or like you. And this is history repeating itself.
10:40 PM on 10/20/2011
uh the Tawarga went on a mass spree of rapes and killings including Children in western Misurata for almost a month.

sorry, they got everything they deserved
08:49 PM on 10/21/2011
Bovine manure, and you know it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
10:30 PM on 10/20/2011
Still it is too early to judge whether cruel and unlawful killing of Gaddafi by the West and rebellious Libyans is a serious mistake or a blessing for the people of Libya.

In the final analysis it depends on the intentions of the intervening powers.

It is an undeniable fact that the United States, Britain and France are hated in the region for very good reasons and hence more antagonism towards the Western powers by most of the common folk in the region. Libyans themselves will divided because divide and rule has been an excellent strategy by the oil seeking powers.

Are the victims in Arab lands allowed to judge the intentions of the world dominating powers?
For instance in Egypt itself, public opinion polls have shown about 90 per cent of the population thinks the US is the worst threat they face. Why do the Egyptians hate the US and Mubaruk? No one gives the real answers.

USA must be seriously planning its strategy to reposition its lost powers across North Africa and other countries in the Middle East.

The US has yet to figure out how to control the new rising elements. But controlling is important by hooks or crooks. It involves shifting western alliances from authoritarian regimes to some sort of democracy simply because it is impossible for the west to support its favourite dictators.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
11:29 PM on 10/20/2011
The US, Britain and France are hated because of jealousy...because the Arab people can't get over their anger that their glory days close to 800 years ago have ended and that the Arab world has contributed little to the world since then.

That's the real reason for the anger.

You know, the US and Britain occupied Germany, split it up with Russia, and the US occupied Japan and forced upon it an American style of government. In both cases, despite the crushing defeats of both Germany and Japan, millions of deaths, and in the case of Japan, the destruction of two cities with nuclear bombs, both the Germans and the Japanese never blamed the US for their troubles. They took US advice as well as aid and rebuilt themselves as progressive, prosperous democracies, and most importantly to your mistaken post, as close allies and true friends of the US and Britain.

The Arabs need to get over themselves, do something to deserve respect by the world community, and stop playing victim. They are the authors of their own misfortunes.

If Germany and Japan could quickly get over it, so should the Arab world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PatrickforO
America needs a Labor Party
02:51 AM on 10/21/2011
That's not quite fair, CDN. Germany and Japan had the Marshall plan, which was designed to help them strengthen certain industries and rebuild their economies along capitalist lines. Now, the EU, led by Germany, the US and the Pacific Rim, dominated by Japan, are the economic rulers of the world. As to Arabs playing the victim, let's see what happens now that Gaddafi is out. If the Libyans set up a post-Gaddafi government that provides benefits for the people, upholds the rights of workers and generally lifts the standard of living while still allowing a vigorous business climate by keeping capital flight to a minimum, then it suggests non-US involvement. If the Libyans set up another military junta, and through it deregulate their economy, allow transnational corporations to 'assist' in privatizing everything, and gut social programs, then it will signal active US involvement because that is our modus operendi in the Third World.
photo
adamben
yes i said yes i will yes
10:58 AM on 10/21/2011
the arabs will never get over themselves until we get off of the oil economy. once they stop getting all this money for nothing will they become introspective. once all of their economies crash then they can rebuild and enter the modern age, yes like germany and japan after their wwii follies left them devastated.
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
12:57 AM on 10/21/2011
The main reason why it is that most Arabs hate the US, is because most Arabs are bigots, they hate the Jews and want them expelled from Israel, and so they hate the US too, because it protects Israel from a genocide.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
01:30 AM on 10/21/2011
Let the Jewish people reflect on thousands of tragic death stories that had happened to the refugees of all nations and the Diaspora Palestinians who were chased out of their homeland decades ago as morbid dogs living as refugees and expatriates in very many countries all over the world.

One Palestinian doctor who had a clinic in near Lydda a town in Ephraim in Palestine describes his life when he became a refugee.

“I was walking with about thirty thousand people, women, children, old, sick, and Israeli soldiers pushing them using their rifle butts, children tucking on to their mothers’ skirts, some fell on the way, some never got up.
And I thought, what was the point of healing the sick if these can happen to the healthy. Something must be done to change things, a revolution if necessary (the West may call it terrorism without understanding the root cause of such metamorphosis in victims like me )”

The Jews one of the most intelligent people ever to occupy the earth; look at Israel from a sinful selfish single perspective. Will God ever forgive them if they believed in the God whose covenant the Jews broke? Is it not sad that the Jews who were the persecuted pariahs of Europe, have in turn are persecuting, dispossessing, uprooting the natives of Israel , the natives who had absolutely no role to play in the German holocaust.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
02:16 AM on 10/21/2011
I have seen your reply to the other post.

There is the law of citizenship in Israel which says that Palestinians who may have brothers and sisters and relatives all over the Arab world are not allowed to reunite with their families, but Jews all around the world have all the rights to come and become full citizens from the moment they are born.

Then the law of social welfare, which says that only people who have served in the army are entitled to the full welfare social system.

Arabs are not allowed to serve in the army [with few exceptions, as with the Druze], and therefore they are not allowed full social services..

One question remains: How the hell does Israel get away with all this? Why is Israel, time after time, being called the only democracy in the Middle East, while its non-Jewish Arab citizens are forbidden to live on 80% of its land?

To some extent, this is because of the image of Israel that has dominated Western media during the last 60 years.

But there's another factor that cannot be overseen: Criticizing Israel is likely to damage a journalist's career.

The power of the lobby is often ignored or underestimated. Editors are afraid of being accused of bias by the pro-Israeli lobbyists. People think it is all rubbish.
photo
greenToBlue
A life without AHA moment is the cause of TP think
08:54 PM on 10/20/2011
From the distance, it sure looks like Libya will be a troubled spot.
06:38 PM on 10/20/2011
There's a Western queue out there somewhere in Libya, ready to exploit what they can from the wreckage.