iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Poverty Rates Rose In Most U.S. States, Cities: Census

Foodbank

First Posted: 10/20/11 06:59 PM ET Updated: 10/20/11 07:21 PM ET

The ranks of the poor rose in almost all U.S. states and cities in 2010, despite the end of the longest and deepest economic downturn since the Great Depression the year before, U.S. Census data released on Thursday showed.

Mississippi and New Mexico had the highest poverty rates, with more than one out of every five people in each state living in poverty. Mississippi's poverty rate led, at 22.4 percent, followed by New Mexico at 20.4 percent.

New Hampshire had the lowest poverty rate, at 8.3 percent, making it the only state with a poverty rate below 10 percent.

Twelve states had poverty rates above 17 percent, up from five in 2009, while poverty rates in 10 metropolitan areas topped 18 percent, the data showed.

"We saw the recession hit and unemployment increase, but we haven't seen a dramatic drop in unemployment," said Elizabeth Kneebone, a senior research associate focusing on metropolitan issues at the Brookings Institution.

"Because we're still in this weak recovery, we could see these numbers get worse before they get better," she added.

The U.S. recession that began in 2007 took a steep toll across the country, sparing only a few places from rising joblessness and crashing incomes. More than a year after the recession officially ended in 2009, the U.S. unemployment rate remains above 9 percent; the poverty rate rose to 15.3 percent in 2010 from 14.3 percent in 2009.

"No state had a statistically significant decline in either the number of people in poverty or the poverty rate between 2009 and 2010." the Census reported.

Kneebone, of the Brookings Institution, noted that many of the big increases in the poverty rate in the first year of the recession were centered in the inner-mountain west and the Sunbelt.

"As the recession deepened and spread to other industries, other regions of the country also saw their numbers increase," she said, noting that areas reliant on manufacturing had not fully recovered from a downturn earlier in the decade when the recession struck.

The depth of poverty levels increased in 2010, with 6.8 percent of people having incomes that were no more than half of the federal government's official poverty threshold. That was up from 6.3 percent in 2009.

Poverty ran deepest in Washington, D.C., where one in 10 people had incomes less than 50 percent the threshold.

The Census also looked at the 366 metropolitan areas that account for more than 80 percent of the U.S. population.

The Texas region defined by the cities of McAllen, Edinburg and Mission had the highest poverty rate in the country -- 33.4 percent. It was followed the Fresno, California, area at 26.8 percent.

Poverty rates topped 18 percent in metropolitan areas centered around El Paso, Texas; the cities of Bakersfield, Modesto and Stockton in California; Augusta, Georgia; Memphis, Tennessee; and both Durham and Greensboro in North Carolina as economic problems spread from core urban areas to the suburbs over the decade.

"Many communities are facing this challenge in a magnitude they've never had to deal with before," said Kneebone, who said there are now 2.7 million more people in suburbs than cities.

Despite the deep poverty levels in the District of Columbia, the nation's capital, the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area had the lowest poverty rate in the nation, at 8.4 percent, due to its wealthier suburbs. Honolulu had the second lowest, 9.1 percent.

The numbers of people collecting food stamps and relying on Medicaid, the government healthcare program for the poor, skyrocketed in recent years. The Census also found that in 2010 more people collected other forms of public assistance than in 2009.

In 2010, 3.3 million people received public assistance at some time in the year, an increase of 300,000 from 2009. Among U.S. households, about 2.9 percent received public assistance in 2010, up from 2.7 percent in 2009.

The states with the highest public assistance participation included Alaska, Maine, Vermont and Washington. The states with the lowest rates were Louisiana, Alabama and Wyoming.

Although Alaska and Maryland had poverty rates of 9.9 percent in 2010, the margins of error for those states were greater than 0.3 percent.

(Editing by Leslie Adler)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The ranks of the poor rose in almost all U.S. states and cities in 2010, despite the end of the longest and deepest economic downturn since the Great Depression the year before, U.S. Census data r...
The ranks of the poor rose in almost all U.S. states and cities in 2010, despite the end of the longest and deepest economic downturn since the Great Depression the year before, U.S. Census data r...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 162
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:12 PM on 10/22/2011
To say the recession has ended is a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Don Glenn
Tree Hugging Novelist With Guns
07:05 PM on 10/21/2011
The ranks of the poor rose in almost all U.S. states and cities in 2010,
So! Cain said go get a job and get rich like him. Were they not paying attention. The Upper 2% have been increasing their net worth something must be working. *(I am being sarcastic,)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoanMeijer
Author of Relentless: The Search For Typhoid Mary
12:45 PM on 10/21/2011
This isn't surprising - but we have to harness the rage and turn it into votes against those who vote against us.... hint - it's not Obama.
12:03 PM on 10/21/2011
Didn't I see Obama on television asking people to send more money to some charity food, bank? Just exactly what corporation sponsors this food bank.
We come second to a corporation making money off of us.

More important-People are taking jobs that pay less with fewer hours. Didn't the politicans state that this is the way out of the recession?

Recovery? More people seeking charity to eat and working for less? Sounds like slavery to me.
11:56 AM on 10/21/2011
With 1 in 6 Americans now living in poverty, can someone please tell me when Obama's Hope and Change is supposed to finally kick in? We are going on nearly 3 years in office and Hope and Change has escaped us like Obama's runaway teleprompter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoanMeijer
Author of Relentless: The Search For Typhoid Mary
12:48 PM on 10/21/2011
The Republicans have blocked Obama at every turn. You have your eye on the wrong villain... look to Congress - Boehner and company. Congress must pass the laws the President asks for... the power to help us is in Congress - the power to keep us in poverty is in Congress. Check out how your Congressman voted and if you don't like poverty and he's a Republican vote against him - or her.
03:39 PM on 10/21/2011
You tell them Joanie! The Republicans kept the president from repealing the Bush tax cuts the first two years ,because mumble glarph snickle.And,the Republicnas with there high growth,low unemployment states are a continuing embarrassment to the president's stimulus/tarp/solar energy rebound.The fact your arguments are inane shouldn't stop you from making them on HP. In fact,it's a plus !
08:56 PM on 10/21/2011
Get real. Obama got the $800 Stimulus Bill passed, Obama Care passed and Wall Street reform passed. He got  his big stuff passed but they all failed. This is why even the Democrat controlled Senate vote against Obama's jobs bill and the GOP alternative in the Senate got 57 votes, more than Obama's jobs bill, because Democrats sided with the GOP against Obama. The truth hurts, doesn't it?
08:54 PM on 10/21/2011
Dear supergenius02 his time came and went and he didn't do a dam thing when he could have, the people that he picked to be around him made sure of that.Failure of courage destroyed hope and change. Many outside the United States were depending on him too. That may be surprizing to you but that's the way it is.
11:48 AM on 10/21/2011
The Senate just filibustered part of Obama's jobs bill, so 400,000 teachers, policemen, and fire-fighters will join the ranks of the unemployed. PLUS thousands of Postal Workers will lose their jobs.
This will help boost the poverty rate. But this is only the beginning.

When the GOP takes over, jobs with union benefits will become a thing of the past - so will minimum wage. Employers will rely on part-time employment agencies - which will pay their clients less than minimum wage and also cheat their clients whenever they please.

The GOP always talks about "competitive" wages - They mean salaries somewhere between the wages of workers in Bangla-Desh and Nigeria.

My solution. Re-elect Obama and elect a progressive Congress that will work with him or not against him. Before you vote GOP, I'd suggest you take trip to Dacca or Lagos so that you can see what your future holds in store.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
11:35 AM on 10/21/2011
The rich had a recession for ten minutes. For most of the rest of US it is still going on. Wait until we see the poverty rates for 2015, if you think they are bad now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wikwox
So there I was, playing the piano....
11:29 AM on 10/21/2011
Not surprising at all, there are simply no jobs to be had for most of the unemployed.Many of the "employed" now have no benefits and many do not reach the 40 hour per week level. Many have taken jobs that pay less than a half of what they used to make. I am unemployed yet again and the prospects are dim. Expect poverty rates to rise as unemployment benefits are exhausted. Thanks Republicans, we need jobs and you give us tax cuts for the rich.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
feelingdisposable
Obama 332 - Romney 206
10:54 AM on 10/21/2011
I'm still amazed that the recession has ended (officially in 2009), according to our "experts". Was that just for the banks or who? From what I'm seeing & reading, it seems to be getting much worse, not better.
11:17 AM on 10/21/2011
You're just seeing another symptom of the 99%/1% disconnect. The recession determination is based on "the economy as participated in by the 1%" not "the people". The "1% economy" has adjusted to no longer being dependent upon these people who are in poverty. These people no longer exist as far as the "1% economy" is concerned. That's why, at any point in history, you can always shove those in povert under the rug so long as they do not become so numerous they are a revolutionary threat.

It's actually very simple. You siphon off the money from a big chunk of the 99%. That chunk no longer can afford to buy anything. Corporations (not people) decline into a recession. Corporations then adapt by laying off a chunk of the 99%. That chunk no longer can afford to buy anything, so you get a little viscious cycle for a little while. But eventually it stabalizes with a large chunk of the 99% thrown into poverty. They can't buy anything, but corporations have adjusted by having an equally lower payroll. The "1% economy" is now "healthy" again by simply excluding a big chunk of the 99% from being part of the economy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
11:39 AM on 10/21/2011
You hit the nail on the head, my French Friend. Don't try it on a GOP head. You'll break your hammer.
F/F
09:36 AM on 10/21/2011
Poverty is rising, while bagger congressmen refuse to appropriate government monies to renovate our aging infrastructure.

A growing percentage of people in poverty and a shoddy and broken infrastructure are both characteristics of a 3rd world nation.

Trickle-down economics and tea bagger ideological refusal to spend money in investing in America is sending our nation rapidly into the ranks of the 3rd world.

.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patrick Senart
Government is not the solution to the problem
11:34 AM on 10/21/2011
Can't spend what we don't have. Ask your Messiah for some of that money he has wasted on big government
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
silverstreet
All you need is love
11:51 AM on 10/21/2011
You mean trillion dollar bank bail outs and trillion dollar wars. Always plenty of money for TBTF banks -- and wars -- gotta keep the military industrial complex rich
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
11:41 AM on 10/21/2011
For many of US, we are there. The rich aren't affected. They have no desire to know.
photo
Erdgeist
per omnia extrema
09:24 AM on 10/21/2011
The historian Charles Austin Beard said the Great Depression was essentially caused by the banks. Wow, we are repeating history. I guess America never learns. We are in poverty again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
11:46 AM on 10/21/2011
If the GOPer's get their cuts, unemployment will match 1938's. 25%
F/F
09:04 AM on 10/21/2011
"and it’s very clear that private sector jobs are doing just fine. It’s the public sector jobs where we’ve lost huge numbers, and that’s what this legislation’s all about."

The clueless Harry Reid
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
09:28 AM on 10/21/2011
That does sound kinda clueless.
10:19 AM on 10/21/2011
Exactly what can Reid do to force republicans to allow even just debate on the jobs bill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patrick Senart
Government is not the solution to the problem
11:36 AM on 10/21/2011
Look on Reids desk. He has many bills sent to him by Republicans. Ah - the untold story.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StuntHunt
07:30 AM on 10/21/2011
The second great depression is being televised. I hope the winners of this perverted game of Monopoly are satisfied.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:33 AM on 10/21/2011
They all prefer to talk about poverty to pay lip service to the poor. They all talk about the curse of unemployment just for the sake of it. They all talk about government spending on social security and entitlements etc etc but without putting forward the workable formula to get rid of these curses.
President Obama's jobs bill is hanging fire; nobody cares. Our exports are not growing, our govt. revenues are falling short, our tourism industry, despite best infrastructure and recreational attractions, is in doldrums, nobody cares.The big corporations and rich individuals are reportedly hiding trillions of dollars in their safe-haven accounts to evade tax. The G-20 summits have repeatedly discussed these losses, but individually the countries concerned, especially ours, have failed to trace and recover these dollars. All these things are being allowed knowingly and yet they talk about poverty. So, what is the use of such information if the intention is not to increase earnings?
The latest reports suggest that world population will rise up to 7 billion which might cause shrinkage in food and energy supply in future.Where are we going America? Who is in charge of this 'chattering train'?
04:15 PM on 10/21/2011
GOP plans for the economy, if they take back the WH in 2012, will make today's economy look like a picnic. Even before that, we're teetering on the precipice of social unrest that will rival or top the '60s. The GOP plans to block extension of unemployment benefits, just for starters. There are other safety net cuts in the works, and the Super Committee will either make major cuts in crucial programs, or the "sequestration" clause will kick in and slash Medicare. If I had to guess, I'd bet that major cuts to Medicare might trigger a real uprising.
Failure to extend unemployment benefits at the same time as drastially decreasing food stamp funding and eliminating or eviscerating other safety net programs could also lead to massive social unrest.

A wise man once said that it only takes 7 missed meals to bring about revolution.
04:47 AM on 10/21/2011
Yes we can, or better yet, keep the change, don't want it.