More

Elizabeth Warren Clears The Field, As Last Major Primary Competitor Drops Bid

Warren Senate

First Posted: 10/26/11 05:58 PM ET Updated: 12/26/11 05:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Flush with money, media attention and national support for her Senate primary bid in Massachusetts, Elizabeth Warren had perhaps the biggest breakthrough in her campaign so far on Wednesday. She cleared the primary field.

Alan Khazei, the only major primary candidate still competing with Warren for the Democratic nomination to take on Sen. Scott Brown (R), announced that he was withdrawing from the race, according to the Boston Globe.

Khazei, a well-known social entrepreneur, had an uphill battle ahead of him. He trailed Warren in terms of campaign donations. And with the base of the party fascinated by Warren's candidacy and national Democrats privately cheering on the longtime consumer advocate, Khazei had little to no hope of breaking through.

By departing the race before it really got started, he followed in the footsteps of other one-time primary candidates, including Newton Mayor Setti Warren and Somerville activist Bob Massie.

“She has struck a chord, no doubt about it,” Khazei told the Globe in an interview. “It’s definitely affected my position. So fundraising has been tougher, and in terms of attention … It’s challenging. Things have definitely shifted.”

While party operatives argued that Khazei would not have posed much of a challenge to Warren had he chosen to stay in the race, his departure does allow the former Harvard professor to focus her time and resources on the general election campaign against Brown. It also will likely encourage Brown and allied groups to start ramping up attacks in haste, as they no longer have the luxury of seeing the Democratic field batter each other.

Introduces Financial Product Safety Commission
1  of  10
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Elizabeth Warren announced a bill creating a Financial Product Safety Commission with House and Senate Democrats in March 2009. The body was designed to have oversight over mortgages and other financial instruments to protect consumers against predatory practices. She said if the agency had existed before the subprime collapse then "there would have been millions of families who got tangled in predatory mortgages who never would have gotten them." HuffPost's Ryan Grim reported:

Without all these toxic assets on banks' balance sheets, the institutions wouldn't be on the brink of collapse and the recession would be more manageable. "Consumer financial products were the front end of the destabilization of the American economic system."

Sen. Charles Schumer's cosponsorship of the bill is notable because of his proximity to Wall Street. The bill's merit, the New York Democrat said, is that it regulates the actual financial product rather than the company producing it.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,054
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (51 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
PhilipTaylor 09:10 PM on 10/26/2011
 Wall Street controls and dominates our political system with one party a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wall Street, and the other party trying to MAXIMIZE Wall Street bribes.  The Congress and all Branches of Government is completely BRIBED and unresponsive to the PEOPLE who are driven ever deeper and deeper into debt and misery.
 
Glenn Beck  Read More...
 
People want Solutions to their problems but Neither Side is offering any.  People are desperate for solutions.  People are just fed up. Herman Cain says: get a job with 24 million people are out of work, that`s impossible.

HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rw302361
VERY ILL Vet bone marrow liver transplant silacosi
04:45 PM on 11/04/2011
goog luck to be new SEN WARREN all America is proud of her
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
habenae23
no basis for a system of government...
09:49 PM on 10/31/2011
Wish I was 18 and lived in Massachusetts. She'd have my vote
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
LittleOldLadyWho
Lifelong Liberal Democrat
10:25 PM on 10/30/2011
This is excellent news! Step-by-step, and we can change the things as they are now. Intelligence and perseverance DOES pay off in the long run!!
photo
SundayTalker
Let ye who is without sin blog the first word
09:28 PM on 10/30/2011
Professor Elizabeth Warren
----------­­­­­­-----­-­-­-­-­-­­--­--­--­-­-­-­-­-­--­-­--­-­--
Harvard Law School
Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law

Research Interests
----------­­­­­­-----­-­-­-­-­-­­--­--­--­-
Empirical and Policy Work in Bankruptcy and Commercial Law
Financiall­­­­­­y Distressed Companies
Women, the Elderly, and the Working Poor in Bankruptcy
Subject Areas for Supervisin­­­­­­g Written Work
Bankruptcy
Commercial Law
Contracts
Empirical Studies of Legal Systems
Subject Areas for Accepting Press Inquiries
Bankruptcy
Business Failure
Business/C­­­­­­orpor­a­t­i­o­n­­s
Consumer Debt
Contracts
Corporate Reorganiza­­­­­­tion
Divorce and Bankruptcy
Environmen­­­­­­tal Law and Bankruptcy
Families in Bankruptcy for Medical Reasons
Health Care Economics
Internatio­­­­­­nal Bankruptcy
Mass Torts and Bankruptcy
Medical Debt and Bankruptcy
Small Business Failure
Transnatio­­­­­­nal Insolvenci­­­­­­es

Education
----------­­­­­­----
University of Houston B.S. 1970
Rutgers University J.D. 1976

Appointmen­­­­­­ts
----------­­­­­­-----­-­-­-­-­-
Robert Braucher Visiting Professor of Law, 1992
Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law, 1995



( versus )



Scott Brown
----------­­­­­­-----­-­-
~ Drives a Truck
~ Took His Clothes off
~ Offered his daughter for ...
05:38 PM on 11/01/2011
Well well and I thought that my preference for this woman was because I am a sucker for a pretty face and blond hair. GO LIZ
photo
SundayTalker
Let ye who is without sin blog the first word
05:42 PM on 11/01/2011
the glasses work for me too *wink
01:33 AM on 10/30/2011
I wouldn't count on anything - they threw out Kennedy's legacy when they voted for Brown just
like Tennessee abandoned Gore although he and his father represented the state their entire life.
Good luck Warren - you should have a great future in politics if the corporate media doesn't mess with you like they did by manipulating that microphone of Howard Dean who was campaigning
to enhance public radio and TV funding.
01:24 AM on 11/02/2011
Elizabeth watch me roar! A wonderful American woman.

Compare her to Sarah and Michele.

Wholly molley it is a clear picture between the Democrats and the Republicans.
08:35 PM on 10/29/2011
Scott Brown was in Texas last week fundraising. This is a coincidence since there have been ads on TV about his pandering to big oil and voting in its favor. Warren is our only hope to get rid of this phoney "against all odds".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegreatdaveo
Mr. Puppers says:
04:13 PM on 11/01/2011
Campaigning in Texas? Kinda makes you wonder why he has to leave his own state to raise money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sammi 56
04:55 PM on 11/01/2011
Wonder no more-- they are really out of it in TExas!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deebastet
04:16 PM on 10/28/2011
Good luck Elizabeth, we need more strong women in our Congress. As per article in Audubon, Pale, Stale, Male, is what we have ruining our Country. Just look at the old dudes in Congress, white, stale and with very little knowledge of what the country needs. Mostly they think of what they need, time for a change!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoanMeijer
Author of Relentless: The Search For Typhoid Mary
01:32 PM on 10/28/2011
This woman is trail blazing... we won't find more like her but we might find more inspired by her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiamiMama
11:56 AM on 10/28/2011
Wish she was running for the White House!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegreatdaveo
Mr. Puppers says:
04:14 PM on 11/01/2011
Gotta start somewhere. Let her build upon her resume with a Senate seat for a few years, then maybe 2016 or 2020.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MiamiMama
10:55 AM on 11/02/2011
I hope so!!!
libertyanne
Red-haired Freedom lover
06:45 AM on 10/28/2011
Fabulous! With any luck Brown will be primaried by a T bagger who will do Warren's work for her.
07:29 AM on 10/28/2011
Nobody cares about the Tea Party here, and he is extremely popular here. He won't be primaried, and he will defeat Warren.

"do Warren's work for her"

Why do progressives always want somebody else to do all the work?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharon Jurgensen
Obama, the real deal
12:43 PM on 10/28/2011
you are so wrong. Massachusetts citizens are very savy and amazingly intelligent. They have had enough of the right wing nuttery too. Brown is one of them, no matter how much he tries to disguise himself. Warren will easily defeat him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deebastet
04:19 PM on 10/28/2011
The same reason that the Conservatives do not want to do any work. Just say no is their reason for being.
10:04 PM on 10/27/2011
I cant wait to wat h the debates... Warren is a radical loonie leftie.. as are many in MA ... let them have her, i could care less.
03:43 AM on 10/28/2011
Hi GUSTAVO REJIVIK,

YOU BETTER CARE!!! ASK YOURSELF THIS ONE (1) QUESTION:

WHAT HAS THE RIGHT DONE FOR ME IN MY LIFETIME? IF YOU ARE HONEST WITH

YOURSELF, YOU'LL KNOW WHERE TO PLACE YOUR ALLEGIANCE.
07:29 AM on 10/28/2011
Easy on the caps, please...
01:28 AM on 11/02/2011
You are right I was just saying that today about John McCain. I live in AZ. I cannot think of one thing the man has done for us.

When he gets on local TV, you can bet he will tell you within the first miniute or two that he was a POW. We know John, we know.........................................
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegreatdaveo
Mr. Puppers says:
04:17 PM on 11/01/2011
And yet you're taking the time to post a comment about it. Perhaps you care more than you're letting on?
photo
Chopin
Multiply the truth. Speak truth through power.
08:32 PM on 10/27/2011
ELIZABETH WARREN + POPULATION DYNAMIC POLITICS:-­-

Massachuse­­tts senate race is magnifying glass through which both parties want to contest it on the national scale.

If Elizabeth Warren succeeds as first term Massachuse­tts senator, then there'll be tremendous groundswel­­l to nominate her to 2016 presidenti­­al race. There's fundamenta­­l compelling dynamics at work that makes the first woman US President very likely in 2016 with someone like EW.

Here's main reason why it's an idea and phenomenon whose time is ripe. It's the irreducibl­­e irrepressi­­ble driving force of population dynamics. It can be summed up by the population timeline equation:-­­-

1945+65=2010

1945 was end of WW2 and beginning year of massive babyboom (global phenomenon­­). This population bulge has aged to begin retirement (+65), starting in 2010. Waves of additional tens of millions of senior citizens will be expecting and DEMANDING retirement services, benefits, safetynet politics + politician­­s, corporatis­m be damned. It's biological + historical fact that no male president has in his genetic DNA the female caretaker nurturing instincts. Male presidents start wars, and leave the mess to others. The historic moment is ripe to reject the male war genes and discard macho politics, and transition to maternalis­­tic society and matriarcha­­l nation of rapidly aging population­­. America over next few years will either transform itself (in culture + economics + politics), or descend into barbarous cannibalis­­tic uncaring brutal society and nation. Elizabeth Warren will fight to restore humanistic just society in America.
07:32 AM on 10/28/2011
The Senate is one thing... but the prospect of her becoming president is delusional la-la land stuff...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sammi 56
04:59 PM on 11/01/2011
Take another look at the Republican tribe and then get back----
01:30 AM on 11/02/2011
Have you ever heard her speak?

She will have you at hello....................
11:25 AM on 10/28/2011
I wish the change would be that simple and peaceful. Methinks that the "good ole boys" will fight this tooth and nail. Men come out swinging wen threatened with the loss of power. Look atthe statistics of women in abusive relationships: it does appear that the woman who is strong is most likely to be abused for threatening the power. I would certaily support Elizabeth Warren for what I already know about her. The thing I don't know has to do with the quality of her skin - is it REALLY, REALLY tough? It will need to be!
photo
Chopin
Multiply the truth. Speak truth through power.
11:47 PM on 10/28/2011
You're right about the "good ole boys" nexus of power in the class of 1%. It's a generally known truth that those who hold and exercise great power don't give it up easily or voluntarily. That's why most great (not all) transformational social + political change movements involve force and great violence. Those in the inner circles of the ruling class within the 1% plutocracy are watching the "Occupy Wall Street" movement unfold. They won't tolerate it evolving further and spreading out, without sooner or later resorting to their tried and proven instrument of repression, through official force and violence. But as the Egyptian Revolution of 2011 demonstrates, force and violence don't always carry the day, when pitted against an aroused, determined and cohesive 99%.

The population dynamic politics in the coming decade will sweep the American political superstructure like earthquake + tsunami tidal wave. The Regressives and GOP are betting on rolling back medicare, privatizing social security, and dismantling social safetynet. That folly pits itself against 10 million grannies and their 100 million extended families and communities among the 99%, ... that is, those who exercise critical thinking for themselves and aren't sidetracked nor bamboozled by "divide and conquer" tricks.

Elizabeth Warren would need to prove her negotiating skills, moral force, and tenacity in the Senate, then onto 2016 presidential race.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
01:39 PM on 10/30/2011
And I think that is especially true of Barack Obama. You really understand that when you consider how loathe Obama was to give Warren the chairmanship of the commission she basically created.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
06:36 PM on 10/27/2011
Thank You, Mr. Khazei. You have become part of the Solution. Congratulations. Count your days, Mr. Brown, tick tock tick tock.
Let's get to work 99%ers
07:32 AM on 10/28/2011
Yeah, thanks for allowing yourself to get railroaded out of the race by the Democratic Party machine.

Your contempt for the democratic process is despicable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
11:13 AM on 10/28/2011
Pay no attention, Elizabeth, sticks n stones is nothing but a GOPer tea bagger.
His misunderstanding of the democratic process is despicable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sammi 56
05:02 PM on 11/01/2011
What are you talking about?
03:14 AM on 11/02/2011
99%..the new talking point for the desperate commies in OWS..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Bovia
Vermont, 1791, women can vote, no slavery allowed
11:08 AM on 11/02/2011
Nazi fanatic
01:09 AM on 11/04/2011
Ahhh yes, the 'desperate commies' who want their equitable and reasonable treatment from these fascistic, psychotically greedy CEO/Stock Market/Free-Enterprise Economist Hacks and their Booty call lobbyists that couldn't give a "...." about Jesus or any other cognizant deity their TeaBagger/G.O.P ditto heads so constantly espouse. Lead us down the path to absolute CORPOROTACACY, the real 'people' the founding father intended the government to be all about!...
06:06 PM on 10/27/2011
From the headline on the main page, I was expecting to read about an extreme makeover.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sammi 56
05:03 PM on 11/01/2011
Such personal slurs -- keep it up it will be your doom.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Botany5000
05:18 PM on 10/27/2011
She never can overcome the Obstacle of her own mouth.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
BMcCue7
I'm Buddy McCue (and you're not.)
05:59 PM on 10/27/2011
That doesn't even make any sense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Botany5000
06:23 PM on 10/27/2011
As a Progressive sycophant that is understandable of you.