Occupy Wall Street Erects A Tent City In Zuccotti Park, With Little Reaction From NYPD

Zuccotti Park Tents

First Posted: 10/26/11 09:32 PM ET Updated: 12/26/11 05:12 AM ET

NEW YORK -- A little more than a month ago, when the occupation of Zuccotti Park was in its early days, the New York City Police Department was not in the business of letting protesters pitch tents.

One demonstrator, Justin Wedes, recalled watching as police swooped in to arrest protesters for camping during the occupation's first week. He himself was caught up in the dragnet for using a bullhorn to warn protesters about the raid. At that time, Wedes said, the NYPD's attitude toward tents seemed to be "arrest now and ask questions later."

Now, more than a month into the occupation, protesters have turned a full city block in the heart of Lower Manhattan into a campground. A sea of dozens of blue, red and orange tents dominates Zuccotti Park. Whether in an official policy shift or a simple bow to reality on the ground, the NYPD appears to have quietly acceded to the creation of New York City's newest residential block.

The NYPD did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

There are so many tents in the park, in fact, that the people living there have created miniature streets between them. Someone in the park lives at the corner of Jefferson Street and Trotsky Alley, for example.

But it may be only public opinion -- perhaps the neighborhood's firm desire to avoid a messy end to Occupy Wall Street -- that keeps Trotsky Alley open. The Bloomberg administration has argued that it has the right to enforce the rules and regulations posted by Zuccotti Park's owner, Brookfield Office Properties, which prohibit camping. And while First Amendment case law does suggest that protesters have a right to erect tents in a symbolic manner, it does not imply that they can actually sleep in those tents.

"There is litigation that's gone all the way up to the Supreme Court as to the right of people to have tents as an element of political expression," Mara Verheyden-Hilliard of the National Lawyers Guild told HuffPost last Wednesday.

She referred to a case called Clark v. Community for Creative Nonviolence, in which the court decided protesters seeking to raise awareness of homelessness could set up tents on the National Mall, but not sleep in them.

"Whether or not you can camp and sleep and put bedding in them is a different issue that's dealt with by local jurisdictional ordinances," Verheyden-Hilliard said.

So if the city thinks Brookfield is in the right to forbid camping on its property, it could use that as justification for tearing the tents down. But the New York Civil Liberties Union has called on the NYPD to leave the protesters' tents, and the park, alone.

"The First Amendment ought not be the ceiling, it ought to be the floor" for freedom of expression, said Donna Lieberman, executive director of the NYCLU. "It's entirely appropriate for the city to look the other way and to accommodate this form of protest."

"Occupy Wall Street has the right to occupy Zuccotti Park 24/7," she asserted, "and whether there's a rule against tents or not, it kind of defeats the spirit of allowing people in there 24/7 to ... to preclude them from being there in a way that is warm."

Wedes said he believed the NYPD may have relented on the tent issue because of another First Amendment right: the freedom of religion. Two weeks ago, as a police move on the park seemed imminent, some in the park had erected a sukkah, a traditional Jewish religious hut used to celebrate the festival of Sukkot.

"We are all Jews tonight," Wedes recalled other protesters telling the police during Sukkot. Their structures, too, were allowed to remain standing.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST NEW YORK

NEW YORK -- A little more than a month ago, when the occupation of Zuccotti Park was in its early days, the New York City Police Department was not in the business of letting protesters pitch tents. ...
NEW YORK -- A little more than a month ago, when the occupation of Zuccotti Park was in its early days, the New York City Police Department was not in the business of letting protesters pitch tents. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 422
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
02:26 PM on 10/28/2011
Wait until winter. Most of the protesters will be filing out of NYC then.
03:55 PM on 10/28/2011
The NY fire department officials just confiscated all of their heaters and generators this morning. And it's going to snow and freeze tomorrow...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colliertng
Freedom-Loving Conservative-Libertarian Independen
10:23 AM on 10/28/2011
"The First Amendment ought not be the ceiling, it ought to be the floor" for freedom of expression, said Donna Lieberman, executive director of the NYCLU. "It's entirely appropriate for the city to look the other way and to accommodate this form of protest."

"Occupy Wall Street has the right to occupy Zuccotti Park 24/7," she asserted, "and whether there's a rule against tents or not, it kind of defeats the spirit of allowing people in there 24/7 to ... to preclude them from being there in a way that is warm." Message to Donna Lieberman: "I hate to rain on your Parade, Donna. However, Zuccotti Park is a 'Private Park,' not a 'Public Park.' In other words, It's 'Private Property.' You might want to have your 'Clients' move to Central Park. Also, let's see how 'warm' it is come the middle of Winter when your 'Clients' are freezing to Death. I bet that they didn't think about that when they decide to 'Occupy' the Park, Did They????"
12:43 PM on 10/28/2011
Central Park is a city park, and they have closing times (1 am in most cases).

Also, Central Park borders very wealthy residential areas, and the city would not allow those people to be inconvenienced. The city is perfectly willing for small businesses in lower Manhattan to be hurt, but the limos transporting the power brokers must glide down 5th Ave. unimpeded.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colliertng
Freedom-Loving Conservative-Libertarian Independen
05:16 PM on 10/28/2011
Whether it's a "Private Park" or a "Park with Closing Times" hasn't stopped these People yet. There's a big Snowstorm on the way to the Northeast. They better start "securing down the Hatches." It's going to start getting Cold in New York City. Heck of a time to hold a Protest.
10:08 AM on 10/30/2011
Zuccotti park is a privately managed public park. I had no idea what that meant when I kept seeing it, so I looked it up and here's what I found: In the 60's, the city was trying to come up with ways to cut the budget. So what they did was allow companies to get waivers on zoning ordinances (for things such as the height of the building) in exchange for the owner of the building being required for the upkeep of a public park. So Brookfield doesn't own the park, it is just required to keep it clean, sort of like corporate community service.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
colliertng
Freedom-Loving Conservative-Libertarian Independen
02:23 PM on 10/30/2011
Well, the Company that running it is doing a "Real, Good Job." I wonder how the Protesters are managing, right now? It must've been a "big surprise" now that the Cold Weather has set in. "It's Going To Be A Long Winter." hmmmmm? :-D
08:49 PM on 10/27/2011
There a HUGE negative reaction from the local community who is fed up with the protestors. The camping out element of their protest has caused great damage to our neighborhood. But our community board has not acted in our interest.
One 20-something protestor stood up at at CB1 meeting in front of Chairperson Julie Menin and said to the 40-something residents "You guys shouldn't be worried about petty things like peeing on your doors when we're running a revolution..." and Julie Menin smiled. And she's our community representative?
City officials - by intimidating Brookfield Properties to not enforce their very modest park rules that would have restored the peace that many people moved to this neighborhood for, and pay taxes and rent for - should be held accountable for the negative impact this has had on the local community.
I call upon Mayor Bloomberg and Brookfield Properties to release the names of the city officials that intimidated Brookfield into preventing the park clean up which would have in no way prevented anyone's right to free speech BY THE WAY.
The residents of FIDI would like to send these corrupt officials 1) police reports of the buildings the protestors have vandalized and broken into, 2) evidence of a 30% drop in local business revenues, 3) statistics about plummeting lease renewals in the neighborhood 4) our photo documentation of human excrement everywhere it absolutely should not be and 5) a potential law suit.
09:34 PM on 10/27/2011
The city does not care, and is glad to have the situation contained far away from.the powerful people. Protesters in Zuccotti Park aren't bothering anyone who is important. Can you imagine OWS being tolerated around, say Fifth Ave. and 80th St. -- where the filthy rich live? Not a chance that would happen.

In some ways, it's a good deal. OWS can convince their naive supporters that they are sticking it to the man by chasing away our tiny farmer's market, and the power elite can go about their daily lives in peace and comfort.
10:11 PM on 10/27/2011
According to the NY Times, Council Speaker Christine Quinn and Borough President Scott Stringer leaned on Brookfield. You should definitely send them whatever information you have.

Stringer lives on the Upper West Side, another neighborhood where OWS would not be tolerated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
04:39 PM on 10/27/2011
I read the New Yorker article about the Koch brothers. Their proof that the Koch brothers founded the Tea Party? Quoting a Republican who says it is so. Wow.

Do the Koch brothers support the Tea Party? Sure, why is this a big deal? Both are libertarian in nature. Billionaire liberals like Soros support OWS, what is the difference?

There are plenty of groups that support the OWS movement, it doesn't mean they covertly founded it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
04:24 PM on 10/27/2011
As a Tea Party supporter I'm amused by the OWS calling for redistribution of wealth.

Now that the homeless are getting free food, the OWS wants to throw them out because they "aren't contributing". They even invented a new name for them; "the professional homeless".

Too funny for words, ivory tower liberal theories meets reality on the street.
05:47 PM on 10/27/2011
I don't know if that story reflects the feelings of the group -- might be just the view of a few individuals who were interviewed by the Post. I hope they keep on helping homeless people. They are getting lots of donations.
03:46 PM on 10/28/2011
The Food committee has stopped serving meals because they are tired of having to feed the undeserving. So now instead of their organic chicken paella and fall vegetable medley, they will now be serving rice and beans and PBJ sandwiches.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ari Winkleman
hipsterjew.com
01:37 AM on 10/28/2011
We help the homeless in Philly. In fact at every GA they make sure to say "This is not our home, but thankfully others are letting us stay here with them"
MWA1111
I'll let you set the tone for our conversation
09:09 AM on 10/28/2011
LOL, how magnanimous.
photo
BloodStripe
Earned My EGA at PI
04:14 PM on 10/27/2011
naw ... NYPD is waiting for all the tents to be pitched and everyone becoming complacent before SWAT strikes between 0230 and 0530 hrs. when disorientation sets in. Lot of arrests and destroyed tents and possession in one swoop ... oh, did I say when its nasty outside... like pouring rain or snow. The Devil don't always wear a blue Dress.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
saltpeter
There are no jobs in my Va Jay Jay. I checked.
02:37 PM on 10/27/2011
Bloomberg and the NYPD also allowed a protest to go on last night without much incident. They are obviously being told to hold back and stop being aggressive to non-violent protesters. In other words, they're being told to DO THEIR JOB correctly, finally. The NYPD has too many on-going scandals and too many expensive law suits to add the kind of Tony Baloney free for alls that the NYPD had been engaging in with the OWS protesters.
02:43 PM on 10/27/2011
Last night's ruckus didn't get much publicity, either. Maybe the city is hoping less attention will make them go away sooner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
saltpeter
There are no jobs in my Va Jay Jay. I checked.
03:10 PM on 10/27/2011
Or maybe they're tired of paying out families of murdered and abused citizens at the hands of the NYPD. They still have the Sean Bell fiasco to pay for and now they have their own RUNNING GUNS illegally. The NYPD's police brutality cases and rogue cops are starting to cost the city money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
04:45 PM on 10/27/2011
Yep. Given that their whole reason for their response was the local community in the area, they pretty much lost that whole excuse when Community Board 1 voted 33-3 on a resolution that blamed the police for a number of problems in the area, in addition to scolding them for being brutal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
saltpeter
There are no jobs in my Va Jay Jay. I checked.
04:47 PM on 10/27/2011
Must be some very influential members (ie Bloomberg campaign contributers) of that community board.
05:33 PM on 10/27/2011
The police-related problems were from barricades. Unfortunately, what OWS did last night will provide justification for leaving the barricades in place.
01:14 PM on 10/27/2011
I just don't get what their end game looks like. What will make them happy enough to go home? What exactly is changing with their tent cities? Nothing. To create the kind of formidable change needed you need to do a lot more than camp out and walk up and down streets carrying signs. Yes it's raising awareness but there are other ways to enact change without destroying neighborhoods. Look at the Tea Party - yes the Tea Party. They are organized and actually have political candidates in their ranks. I don't see anyone running on a OWS platform. Or at least willing to admit it.
01:48 PM on 10/27/2011
This is the most intelligent comment I've seen. Serious political action is the only thing that will make a difference. I cannot understand why people think standing around in a park is going to have a profound effect.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
saltpeter
There are no jobs in my Va Jay Jay. I checked.
02:28 PM on 10/27/2011
Yes, let's look at the Tea Party. They were sponsored by the very same funders and conservative has-been hacks who already had power and influence in the GOP. Their "candidates" are nothing more than the same kind of tired GOP politicians who built a career out of pandering to the lowest common denominator reactionaries and then completely ignoring those reactionaries once elected. How about we don't look at the Tea Party. They've changed NOTHING.
03:29 PM on 10/27/2011
I think we have to realize that the Tea Party has caused a major shift in the politics of the Republican Party. Although they have been moving more right of center for a long time, it seems to me that the Tea Party is a major and influential voice within the Republican Party, one many of the GOP candidates have to appease. That influences what they stand for and what the will pursue once in office. The OWS protests are a reaction to this sort of influence, and will themselves hopefully influence candidates on the other side of the spectrum.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
04:27 PM on 10/27/2011
Conspiracy theorists abound. If you are going to contend that the Tea Party was some corporate plot then you'll have to allow that OWS is a labor union invention backed by Obama.

Both movements are based on grass roots, neither has a sponsor and neither recognizes anyone as their titular "head". Put away your tin foil hats.
12:55 PM on 10/27/2011
We will see. enough oney has been stolen t knock off anyone anywhere in the world. The role the banks played in looting the balkans or mid 20th century Europe is an indicator of what they will do simly for :"more."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
04:28 PM on 10/27/2011
It wasn't the banks that looted, everything was done legally. It was the govt. that looted from us, the taxpayers to bail out the banks.

Don't blame the person who offers the bribe, blame the person who accepts it for favors.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:13 PM on 10/27/2011
our WHOLE GOVERNMENT IS BROKEN !!!! GET THE MONEY OUT OF POLITICS!!!
photo
GNO65
Retired Navy SCPO
03:27 PM on 10/28/2011
Right after Congress imposes term limits on themselves.
photo
Just Ask Jheri
Tomorrow is a mystery, and today is a gift.
11:56 AM on 10/27/2011
No one likes the race card, but Atlanta and Oakland have a large diverse
community and the mindset of the police is "arrest now and don't care."
Philimanjaro
Hate is law in the two-party system.
11:46 AM on 10/27/2011
Liberals and Conservatives. TeaParty and OWS.

You all argue like children.

"You guys are paid for by Koch! Wahhh!" "Well, you're paid for by George Soros! Wahhh!"

"Rabble rabble rabble FOX news!" "Rabble rabble rabble MSNBC!"

Pathetic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
saltpeter
There are no jobs in my Va Jay Jay. I checked.
02:29 PM on 10/27/2011
You realize that just as many people at the OWS take issue with the Democratic Party as the GOP. But thanks for the willful ignorance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladyangelnyc
03:30 PM on 10/27/2011
I don't think the poster was commenting so much on OWS than the people of this board. There are people in this country who consider themselves moderate and think all this fighting represents America's current cycle of political narcissism and partisan tactics that have crippled our government. But thanks for the willful ignorance :-).
Philimanjaro
Hate is law in the two-party system.
11:42 AM on 10/27/2011
"Trotskey Alley"?

Really?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TaxpayingVoter
Wait....whut?
11:28 AM on 10/27/2011
It's in everyone's best interests - including the city lawmakers and police - to leave the park alone for the duration.

Oakland will be suffering a huge black eye after recent events and public backlash will likely be pretty harsh.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CT Independent
11:27 AM on 10/27/2011
"Occupy Wall Street has the right to occupy Zuccotti Park 24/7," she asserted,

No one has the right to occupy private property. The only reason NYPD has not acted against OWS protesters is because the Brooklyn Office Properties has decided to let them be for the time being to avoid bad publicity. Let's not confuse a Concession with Right.
02:23 PM on 10/27/2011
You are exactly right (except it's Brookfield).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Eris23
Justice is in indefinite detention.
04:02 PM on 10/27/2011
"No one has the right to occupy private property."

Except it's not private property. It's privately owned, but must be open to the public and public use 24/7.