More

Obama's Student Loan Plan Guide

AP/Huffington Post   KIMBERLY HEFLING   First Posted: 10/27/11 09:53 AM ET   Updated: 10/27/11 01:15 PM ET

WASHINGTON — Recognizing that college students and recent graduates are facing rising tuition prices and burdensome student loan debt, President Barack Obama announced a plan that seeks to lessen the burden of paying back student loans.

Some questions and answers about student loans:

Q: How big a problem is student loan debt?

A: Total outstanding student debt has passed $1 trillion, more than the nation's credit card debt, and average indebtedness for students is rising. The College Board said Wednesday that the average in-state tuition and fees at four-year public colleges rose an additional $631 this fall, or about 8 percent, compared with a year ago. The cost of a full credit load has passed $8,000 – an all-time high. The board said about 56 percent of bachelor's degree recipients at public schools graduated with debt averaging about $22,000. From private nonprofit universities, 65 percent graduated with debt averaging about $28,000. Experts say those average amounts usually are still manageable, at least for those who finish a degree. But they are concerned about the rate of increase, the growing numbers with substantially more debt and the increase in those apparently in over their heads repaying them. The Education Department said in September that the national student loan default rate for the 2009 budget year had risen to 8.8 percent.

Q: What does Obama's plan do?

A: Obama will accelerate a law passed by Congress last year that lowers the maximum required payment on student loans from 15 percent of discretionary income annually to 10 percent for eligible borrowers. It goes into effect next year, instead of 2014. Also, the remaining debt would be forgiven after 20 years, instead of 25. The White House said about 1.6 million borrowers could be affected.

Obama also will allow borrowers who have a loan from the Federal Family Education Loan Program and a direct loan from the government to consolidate them at an interest rate of up to a half percentage point less. This could affect 5.8 million borrowers, according to the White House.

Q: How much does it save borrowers?

A: Some borrowers will save several hundred dollars a month in payments.

Q: What's the difference between government-backed student loans and private student loans? And, does Obama's plan impact private loan borrowers?

A: Before the law change, borrowers wanting a student loan backed by the government could get loans directly from the government or from the Federal Family Education Loan Program. Those from the Federal Family Education Loan Program were issued by private lenders, but basically backed by the government. The law eliminated the private lenders' role as middlemen and made all such loans direct loans. The law was passed with the overhaul of the health care system with the anticipation that it would save about $60 billion over a decade. Private loans are one students typically get when they get all they can get from the government. They're typically from banks, and they are where students tend to get into the most trouble because they don't have the same government protections and they usually have higher interest rates. Obama's plan won't help students stuck in those. The amount of private lending has fallen sharply in recent years as lenders have cut back and demanded higher credit scores. However, for extremely expensive colleges, students may hit the maximum federal borrowing limits and have no choice but to look for private loans.

Q: Are there others who don't benefit?

A: Borrowers already in default won't qualify. The accelerated component of the income-based repayment plan only applies to borrowers who take out a loan in 2012 or later and who also took out a loan sometime between 2008 and 2012, according to the Education Department. To be eligible for the consolidated loan component, a borrower must have both a direct loan from the government and a loan from the Federal Family Education Loan Program.

Q: The White House says the plan is free to taxpayers. How can that be?

A: A White House official says it doesn't cost taxpayers anything because when the loans are consolidated, the government no longer has to pay a subsidy to private lenders on the Federal Family Education Loan Program loans.

Q: What do Republicans say?

A: Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., the ranking Republican on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, said in a statement that Obama crafted his plan behind closed doors and "we are left with more questions than answers." Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., a former U.S. education secretary, said the real way to reduce the burden of student-loan debt is to slow down the growth of tuition and the best way to do that is to "reduce health care costs and mandates that are soaking up state dollars that in the past have gone to support public colleges and universities."

___

Kimberly Hefling can be followed at http://twitter.com/khefling


Jason Watson, 23, Law Student, University of South Carolina
1 of 22
I will owe more than $150,000 by the time I graduate law school. The debt feels crushing to say the least and it leaves me wondering whether the benefit of a legal education will be worth its cost. I'm not sure how I will be able to provide for my wife and son while coping with debt I've amassed in six short years.
Total comments: 581 | Post a Comment
1 of 22
Rate This Slide

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Current Top 5 Slides
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

WASHINGTON — Recognizing that college students and recent graduates are facing rising tuition prices and burdensome student loan debt, President Barack Obama announced a plan that seeks to lessen th...
WASHINGTON — Recognizing that college students and recent graduates are facing rising tuition prices and burdensome student loan debt, President Barack Obama announced a plan that seeks to lessen th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 581
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
01:52 PM on 12/26/2011
I am a 59-year old with 55K in student loan debt. I graduated in 2001 with a 24K loan balance and have been making payments when I could; however, with capitalized interest, my loan balance has doubled! I will be on Social Security still making student loan payments, and the balance will be even larger, as my income-contingent payments don't even pay the interest. Oh, and by the way, I have no health insurance thru my part-time employer, and can't afford to buy my own.
07:35 PM on 11/14/2011
Here is an article I read that attempts to explain this incredibly narrow and stupid new plan:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/27/your-money/student-loans/explaining-new-federal-student-loan-rules.html?_r=1

Thus, to qualify for this "new" plan you have to (1) take out a loan between 2008 and 2012; (2) take out another loan in 2012; and (3) graduate at some point before June 30, 2012 and enroll in this program.

But what also isn't mentioned, is that there is generally a sixth month grace period before repayment begins. Which suggests that the window to enroll, which expires June 30, 2012, will come and pass almost five months before an eligible students' first payment is due. When I graduated I think it was about two to three months before I got my first notice saying, "enroll in one of these repayment plans because your payment is going to be due in another three months."

Not only does this plan not do ANYTHING FOR THE REST OF US WHO ARE DROWNING IN DEBT RIGHT NOW AND DON'T QUALIFY (thanks for that), but it basically seems like an opportunity that will be missed by probably 70 - 80% of the small minority of students who have a chance at it.

What about people who graduate in the fall of 2012? Am I missing something here, or is this plan basically limited to ONLY current seniors in college who graduate this spring?
12:17 AM on 11/26/2011
nobody forced you or anyone else to get a degree you couldn't afford
07:36 AM on 11/09/2011
Q: How much does it save borrowers?

A: Some borrowers will save several hundred dollars a month in payments.

Isn't it true that he people who will save hundreds are the people being protested by the Occupy movement, and the people in the Occupy movement that are not being paid to keep it going are not going to save a dime?

Isn't it also true that in the end, the interest generated by the reduced payments will actually drive up the costs of student loans?
07:50 AM on 11/06/2011
One Republican commented that we should look at reducing state health care costs so that money that went to colleges and universities could still be there. So it's like stealing from one thing to pay for another. Health care costs are high because instead of focusing on people getting well, we are focused on how much money can be made from someone being sick. There is never a logical solution in Congress just alot of bantoring back and forth that dosen't amount to anything. Then everyone goes and plays a round of golf and retires to there nice homes. People need a good health care system that intergrates alternative health modalities as a step towards wellness instead of the run around people get from a broken health care system. We should be working to make sure that people have the oppurtunity to be healthy not just have a healthcare system that is there when people are sick. Student loans should be affordable and I am glad that Obama accelerated this program because I am 51 years old and am in my last semester of undergraduate studies, I work full time and could use the help. It's not like he's giving a hand out. He is fullfulling his promise to make college more affordable. That's why I voted for him. If he would have waited for Congress to decide on something it would never happen. Good for you Mr. Obama!
08:36 AM on 11/02/2011
to the guy who joined the marines to have 0 tuition and 0 debt...good for you but not everyone is physically fit or capable to do the military route. Not to mention if you stayed in for 4 years to go to school for another 3 to 4, well you might as well have stayed with the Marines with the way the economy is going.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwalter
The State is a gang of thieves writ large.
02:33 PM on 10/31/2011
Why else do you think the University of California and Harvard University were among Obama's largest campaign contributors. To guarantee more free government money of course!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwalter
The State is a gang of thieves writ large.
02:30 PM on 10/31/2011
The headline should read: Obama pledges support for higher college tuition costs.

Does no one in government understand what Federally guaranteed student loans have done to the price of education? This is precisely how the government destroyed the housing market.
04:50 PM on 10/28/2011
Who paid for Barry's education ?
02:14 PM on 10/28/2011
I went to a state school while working full time to pay my rent, food, clothing, school supplies, etc. I did get gov't tuition loans, but I paid for everything else. I'm now left with a significantly lower debt amount than people who just HAD to go to NY to get an arts degree... The thing is, students are borrowing money for school and to live on because they don't want to have to work during the semester. I don't get it.
01:47 PM on 10/28/2011
The Federal Government should be out of the way for the total control of The Student Loan Industry, the problem is in the high tuition that universities charge for credits, if the Feds really wants to help, that is the field to work, but NO, No, No that area is untouchable for the federal Government , majority of universities are centers for liberal indoctrination and our liberals friends from the White House and Senate and some Liberals Republicans don't want fix the problem, it is like in the medical field if they don't produce legislation limiting the medical malpractice demands, insurance are going to continue high and medical cost too, but the majority of our politician are lawyers and that is one of the reasons for ignoring one of the primary causes of the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bungerman
Sarcasm is my middle name.
11:35 PM on 10/27/2011
Why aren't the Right mad at the free loading banks who are getting subsidies?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:49 AM on 10/28/2011
blame the political elite. they choose power over everything else.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:10 PM on 10/27/2011
Here's an idea. How about passing laws that let us get back to having an economy that doesn't force everybody to go to college in order to earn a decent living? If that means that politicians have to start saying no to big corporations' desire for cheap labor, so be it.
12:21 AM on 11/26/2011
I don't think you understand the definition of "force"
08:22 PM on 10/27/2011
Well I guess I don't have to worry about passing down a massive debt to my children. They're now allowed to do it to themselves.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:50 AM on 10/28/2011
encouraged and rewarded to spend and get into debt by the federal government. is this okay with everyone? is this congress' job to reward spending and debt via the tax code and punish saving and investment via the tax code?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OnlyaKing
08:03 PM on 10/27/2011
Maybe some of thesr people shoul look at the average pay of job their deploma offers. Taking pictures of screaming kids and their families or of weddings does not pay enough to validate 277,000
05:22 PM on 10/27/2011
This plan doesn't get to the heart of the issue of increasing student loan debt: increasing tuition and education costs! Why not have academic institutions bear some responsibilty for the student loan debt their students incur by guaranteeing a portion of that debt? This would provide a huge disinsentive against tuition hikes, especially if their alumni have no way of paying off those loans later on. While my wife and I are still working through our own student loans, at least we can pay them. I'm far more concerned that--in spite of our savings--we have no hope in paying for kids' educations.