More

HuffPost Social Reading

Pentagon: Afghanistan Strategy Remains 'Risky'

First Posted: 10/28/2011 6:48 pm Updated: 12/28/2011 5:12 am

WASHINGTON -- As the U.S. war in Afghanistan enters its second decade, a new Pentagon assessment acknowledged that the Taliban insurgency remains "resilient" and able to mount spectacular attacks and assassinations even in the heavily fortified capital city of Kabul.

A senior defense official insisted that President Obama's plan to withdraw all 33,000 "surge" troops deployed last year by the end of 2012 is "on track."

"We are succeeding," said the official, who cannot be identified under Pentagon ground rules. "We're going to advance our goals [and] draw down as we've said."

But the official, who briefed reporters at the Pentagon Friday, acknowledged that "the whole effort remains risky.'' Asked to be more specific, he replied: "We see risk everywhere."

For instance, a key U.S. objective has been to protect ordinary Afghan civilians from the Taliban. To that end, the U.S. and its allies have poured $29 billion and years of effort into building the Afghan army and police forces. Under the U.S. counterinsurgency strategy, American troops have pursued the same goal by walking foot patrols in villages, meeting with village elders and trying to foster cooperation on development projects.

But Afghan civilians are dying in record numbers, according to the report. Civilian casualties -- most caused by the Taliban -- reached an all-time high this summer with approximately 450 civilians killed in July. Attacks using homemade bombs, or IEDs, also reached an all-time high this past summer, with about 750 IED detonations recorded in July.

The numbers reflect what Pentagon officials say has been a shift in Taliban tactics. With some 97,000 U.S. troops deployed around the country, the insurgents are shunning large armed confrontations with American and Afghan troops. Instead they are setting up more IED ambushes, mounting sporadic but high-profile attacks such as the attack on the U.S. embassy in Kabul in September, and on high-level assassinations, such as the killing in September of former Afghan president Burhanuddin Rabbani.

Despite the massive effort to recruit, train equip and deploy competent Afghan security forces, the new Pentagon report said that none of the 218 major Afghan National Police units were able to operate independently. Of 204 Afghan army battalions, one one was rated able to operate on its own.

Senior U.S. military officers have said in the past that high civilian casualties erode Afghans' confidence in the ability of their government -- and American forces -- to protect them. In interviews, many Afghans have said they refuse to cooperate with U.S. troops by alerting them to the presence of Taliban fighters or arms caches because they fear Taliban retaliation. The high numbers of civilian casualties underscore that point.

"The change in Taliban tactics has kept up the number of civilian casualties," said the senior defense official. Even though there are fewer Taliban attacks overall, he said, the Taliban "are killing more Afghan civilians."

Among other risk factors detailed by the report are "widespread" Afghan corruption, which the United States has been unable to control, and the inability of the government in Kabul or the provinces to effectively govern.

The new Pentagon assessment came as a new poll showed that U.S. public support for the war has sunk to its lowest point. Only 34 percent of respondents said they were in favor of the war, while 63% of respondents opposed it.

The new Pentagon report is the latest in a series of semi-annual reports mandated by Congress since 2008. In contrast to past reports, this one does not use the phrase "fragile and reversible" to characterize progress in the war. That, said the senior official, was a deliberate effort to suggest that U.S. initiatives in Afghanistan, including the clearing out of Afghan safe havens, seizing of Taliban arms caches and disruption of their supply lines to Pakistan, are having a permanent effect.

Although the new Pentagon report is more upbeat, it reflects the generally dismal security trends detailed in independent assessments of the programs in the war.

A report by the International Crisis Group, for instance, examined security incidents around the country as well as progress in building Afghan security forces and governmental capacity. The report concluded that the U.S.-led intervention in Afghanistan is failing.

"Time is running out before the international community transfers control to Kabul by the end of 2014, and many key objectives are unlikely to be achieved by then," the report said.

The international coalition of nations that have contributed forces to Afghanistan agreed last year to a plan to transfer all security responsibilities to Afghanistan by the end of 2014. That would mark the withdrawal of almost all foreign forces, according to the agreement.

President Obama, in a speech last June, laid out a plan to withdraw 5,000 forces immediately, an additional 5,000 by the end of this year, and the remainder of the "surge" of 33,000 troops by the end of next year.

That would leave approximately 55,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan through 2013.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,993
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (59 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
TXfemmom 12:28 PM on 10/29/2011
If the Pentagon had its' way, we would be spending twice as much as we currently spend on defense. They are corrupt, inefficient and doomsayers who see boo behind everything. Get our troops out of Afghanistan...Pakistan is and always has been the real problem, and if we want to teach Pakistan a lesson, get our troops out of Afghanistan and then use the new weapons which are supposed to come on line in about  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Goforth
01:12 PM on 11/26/2011
I think they are trying to tell us this is a hopeless war and bring us home please. Our active military personal is hardly rolling in money but seems to find enough to contribute to Ron Paul's campaign more than all the others combined and is a major source of funding. I think we should listen to them and vote for Ron Paul. Isn't about time we did something that made sense in our foreign policy?
08:31 PM on 11/19/2011
Afghanistan is a strategic crossroads of massive geopolitical forces. Russia, China, Pakistan, India, Iran all see it as their back yard and each support different tribes. No nation state as such ever existed in Afghanistan, because each tribe always has an open flank to their allies in the neighboring countries. A place where they can retreat and gain sanctuary. Pakistan protects the Taliban for this reason, seeing in them a way to keep India out. In order to convince the Taliban to enter the political system and give up jihad, they have to lose their support in Pakistan. The only coherent force keeping Pakistan together is their military which is basically in a state of war with India. Working towards peace between India and Pakistan is the key to our being able to leave for good.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
11:08 PM on 11/07/2011
Get everyone out. We have no business in Afghanistan, or Kuwait, or any of 100 plus countries around the world. Want to reduce the deficit? Close the 700 fracking bases we have all over the world. Cut the Pentagon budget by 10% a year for the next 5 years and cap it at $360 billlon a year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The ORF in Largo
Louder than a fart a hurricane
01:32 PM on 10/30/2011
The true 'risk' of the Pentagon plan is the decreasing profit stream to the MIC as we plan to exit
this sh*thole. The original mission was to get OBL and that has been accomplished; there is no
need for us to be involved in their tribal wars which have gone on for centuries. Get out now and
defoliate the poppy fields to prevent regrowing for the rest of this century
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blackorpheus
the decisive blows are always struck left-handed
12:41 PM on 10/30/2011
Now we're supposed to believe that the Pentagon actually had a "strategy" in Afghanistan.
photo
flaconoire
Anartist
10:55 AM on 10/30/2011
No S**t ?! We have heard the same refrain for the past decade. US out of everywhere!!
photo
ewldest
I don't care "whose" war it is - end it now
05:05 PM on 10/29/2011
Colonial wars always end in defeat for the colonialists eventually.
We're wasting lives and money for nothing but the pride and profit of private corporations and their military industrial government lackies.
04:53 PM on 10/29/2011
LET AFGAN GO TO THE DOGS........PULL OUT A L L OF OUR TROOPS NOW.
04:53 PM on 10/29/2011
We are succeeding. We see risk everywhere.

Please pick just one of these and stop the spin. Not a winnable war. Stop spending lives and $ today.
04:37 PM on 10/29/2011
ITS SIMPLE, FIRST PULL OUT OUR MONEY, OUR PROPERTY OR DESTROY IT, AND THEN THE TROOPS........LET AFGAN SINK
EndTheGOP
Smedley Butler is ashamed of us.
04:19 PM on 10/29/2011
And our Nobel peace winning president decided to double down in Afghanistan, sending in more troops. How'd that work out for ya, prez?
photo
plebian43
Go back to sleep, it's your duty.
04:13 PM on 10/29/2011
Strategy, we don't need no stinking strategy.

Here's a strategy, stop squandering our Blood Treasure and bleeding our treasury in a mountainous waste that is eight thousand miles away has absolutely nothing to do with the security or sanctity of the U.S. Deploy Congress and our Executive to Afghanistan in place of our Troops.

http://www.warisaracket.org
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
proudtohaveserved
04:12 PM on 10/29/2011
let's get the hell out of afghanistan NOW, TODAY, ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
photo
Hamburger Time
Outright Terror, Bold and Brilliant
04:04 PM on 10/29/2011
"Everywhere" except the US...
04:30 PM on 10/29/2011
The US MUST get out of the UN. The US MUST abolish the federal reserve, and end the BIS, IMF, WTO and fight to kill off the ECB.
03:55 PM on 10/29/2011
How many years did the protests against the Viet Nam war last? These Occupy Wall St. protests are just getting started and just getting focused. Let's show America what Americans are about people! Scratch that--let's show the world what human beings and humanity is about!