Kim Kardashian Divorce: A Look Back At 72 Days Of Style (PHOTOS)

The day has come -- Kim Kardashian is getting divorced.

After just 72 days of marriage, Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries are parting ways. In an exclusive scoop confirmed by Ryan Seacrest, TMZ reported that the famous reality darling will be filing for divorce today, citing "irreconcilable differences" as the reason.

It's a sad ending to a whirlwind courtship, which captured America's attention not so much for its romance but for its extravagance. Between the giant ring, mega parties, televised ceremony and even some extra plastic surgery, the Kardashian-Humphries wedding was a media circus for the ages.

Which meant, of course, Kim was out and about more than ever, always dressed to the nines. In Louboutins, leopard and fur, Miss Kardashian never looked better.

We hereby present a lookback at Kim Kardashian's 72 days of fashionable (if not wedded) bliss.

Comments

[mmgbizgirl]

10:25 AM on 11/02/2011

The fire, the I really dig this guy thing was never there. She got what she wanted. More of us babbling about her.

[MexDiva]

01:25 AM on 11/02/2011

Is he that big or is she extremely short?

[annasophie1228]

09:48 AM on 11/02/2011

a little of both.

[Annika Vecchione]

05:19 PM on 11/01/2011

What Kim wore the past 72 days: the remorse look on her face once she realized that she might have to spend the rest of her pathetic life with Kris.

[dsa1115]

05:16 PM on 11/01/2011

Could she wear a little more makeup? Good grief.....a real Tammy Baker.

[keith1963]

07:36 PM on 11/01/2011

Everytime it looks like she got attacked by a tagger. Her face does not move.

[Ordinary Citizen]

01:17 PM on 11/01/2011

well a find conclusion to the ongoing promotion of a family of ???? what? who? This entire family has prostituted themselves to the advertisers willing to pay. Don't blame them...broke is broke but to the extent they have prostituted themselves is outrageous!

Clearly this proves...if it were not for advertising and media paid (by us really through the cost of products that support them) to bring these people to our attention....they would be nothing. But instead they walk away with millions of our hard earned dollars for doing .....nothing but show up in front of a camera.

Of course we never see the pictures of them laughing all the way to the bank, cause they know they make their money off the fools that support them.

[shopgirl152]

11:58 AM on 11/01/2011

Well, who could've seen it coming? *rolls eyes*

[ignacio sanabria]

09:19 AM on 11/01/2011

Could the Huffington Post find more interesting people to talk about? In the US alone there are 300 million, 7 billion worldwide.

[sdanca4]

09:04 AM on 11/01/2011

I feel sorry for the boy-child that fell for it.

[kitty9]

02:39 AM on 11/01/2011

What did Kim wear the past 72 days?
Kris's balls.

[Chloe33]

02:34 AM on 11/01/2011

She is one very strange bird.

[Ladislaus Emmanuel]

02:02 AM on 11/01/2011

Sorry but these people have NO SUBSTANCE!...You can see it in their faces, you can see it in their eyes and you can mostly hear it in their voices..they have no real clue or understanding of what it means to be part or even becoming part of the fabric which is called life. All they ever do is shop, cut up their faces/body, have cameras all around, pose and then start again. Hmmm....Nope, no thanks...that is an empty life and when they come face to face with God they are going to be shown what life could of and should of been like for them instead. Funny thing is I have never ever heard anything creative, smart, wise or that intelligent come out any of their mouthes, but then again I "don't keep up". Plus,...well I'm not going to waste anymore of my time on commenting except for this...I have never ever watched their stupid "reality show", not interested and never will be. Why, because mine is better!!!

[Lynnbrown45]

01:22 AM on 11/01/2011

Just another stupid game for the press and TV -- feel sorry for the guy -- WOW she has a big behind -- not proportioned for the rest of her body-- Stairmaster !

[meat-a-saur-us]

01:00 AM on 11/01/2011

What Kim wore for the past 72 days: uhhhh...underwear??!!

[nana4g]

11:52 PM on 10/31/2011

I fail to see the attraction of this "familly". They are not fashion icons, dressing more like high dollar call girls, vulgarly falling out of their clothes, etc. That wedding was just another "skit" for their show. They are not attractive in the face, either. That husband of her's was really dumb.

[jbeachboy]

11:41 PM on 10/31/2011

all you need is a pretty face or a nice booty nowadays to make it

[brawnydoc]

12:29 AM on 11/01/2011

And a sex video with a black rapper on the internet

[jbeachboy]

12:54 PM on 11/01/2011

well it didnt work out as well for montana fishburne or paris hilton since kim is considered more attractive and popular looking