More

Conrad Murray Trial: Closing Arguments Finished, Jurors With A Big Decision On Their Hands (VIDEO)

LINDA DEUTSCH   11/ 3/11 09:25 PM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES — The case of Michael Jackson's doctor was placed in a jury's hands Thursday after contentious legal arguments over who was to blame for the superstar's death – the celebrity who craved sleep at any cost or the doctor accused of providing the drugs that killed him.

In final statements delivered in a packed courtroom, a defense attorney cast Dr. Conrad Murray as a victim of Jackson's celebrity, saying he would never have been charged with involuntary manslaughter if his patient was someone other than Jackson.

"They want you to convict Dr. Murray for the actions of Michael Jackson," attorney Ed Chernoff said. "This is not a reality show. It is reality."

Prosecutor David Walgren portrayed Murray as a liar and greedy opportunist who put his own welfare before that of Jackson.

"Conrad Murray is criminally liable for the death of Michael Jackson," he told jurors. "Not because it was Michael Jackson but because Conrad Murray is guilty of criminal negligence."

Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor submitted the case to jurors after a full day of arguments and told them to begin deliberations Friday.

If convicted, Murray could receive a minimum sentence of probation or a maximum of four years. He would be unlikely to serve that much time, however, because of jail overcrowding.

Earlier, Walgren, in a carefully structured argument enhanced by video excerpts of witness testimony, spoke of the special relationship between a doctor and patient and said Murray had corrupted it by giving Jackson the anesthetic propofol as a sleep aid.

He ridiculed the defense theory that Jackson had injected himself with the fatal dose of the anesthetic and denounced the testimony of defense expert Paul White who blamed Jackson for his own death.

"What you were presented by Dr. White was junk science. It was garbage science," Walgren said.

Chernoff countered that Dr. Steven Shafer, a propofol expert who testified that evidence showed Murray killed Jackson, was wrong and overstepped his role as a scientist by becoming an advocate for Murray's conviction.

He said Shafer ignored Murray's statement to police in which the physician said he gave the singer a small dose of propofol and left the room after the drug should have worn off.

Walgren also projected images of Jackson's grief-stricken children on a giant screen and told jurors that Murray took away their father.

With Jackson's mother and siblings watching from the courtroom gallery, Walgren showed a photo of Jackson at his last rehearsal before the picture of the three Jackson children – Prince, Paris and Blanket – at their father's memorial.

He also reminded jurors of the scene in Jackson's bedroom when Paris came upon Murray frantically trying to revive her lifeless father and screamed, "Daddy!"

"For Michael Jackson's children this case goes on forever because they do not have a father," Walgren said.

The prosecutor repeatedly called Murray's treatment of Jackson bizarre and said there was no precedent for the cardiologist giving the singer propofol to help him sleep.

Still, Jackson trusted him and that eventually cost the singer his life, Walgren said.

"Conrad Murray looked out for himself and himself alone," the prosecutor said.

Walgren said Murray was more concerned with earning $150,000 a month as Jackson's personal physician and traveling to London for his "This Is It" concert than with the welfare of his patient.

He cited evidence showing Murray did not call 911 after finding Jackson unresponsive. Instead he called Jackson's personal assistant, a decision the prosecutor said was just one of the doctor's bizarre actions on the day the singer died.

He suggested Murray delayed the call until he could hide medical equipment and bottles that might incriminate him.

Evan after paramedics arrived, the doctor made no mention of giving Jackson propofol because of "a consciousness of guilt," Walgren said.

The prosecutor also played statements of several doctors who testified that they would never have agreed to give Jackson propofol for insomnia in a private home.

"The setting represents an extreme violation of the standard of care," Walgren said. "No one ever did it until it was done to Michael Jackson. It is gross negligence and it is a cause of Michael Jackson's death."

At one point, Walgren suggested Murray was conducting "an obscene experiment" on Jackson.

Chernoff contended that prosecutors hadn't proven that Murray committed a crime by giving Jackson doses of propofol in the singer's bedroom. He also suggested multiple prosecution witnesses had lied and that Shafer was "a cop" with an agenda.

The prosecutor responded with sarcasm to Chernoff's claim that Murray was the victim in the case and listed an array of witnesses who had been blamed by the defense.

"Poor Conrad Murray," he said repeatedly in a mocking tone. "Everyone is just allied against him."

Walgren told jurors the case is not complicated.

"What's unusual," he said, "is that Michael Jackson lived as long as he did under the care of Conrad Murray."

With only Jackson and Murray present in the singer's room on the day he died, there are things that will never be known about his death, Walgren said. But he said it was clear that Murray, untrained in anesthesiology, was incompetent.

"The people won't prove exactly what happened behind those closed doors," he said. "Michael Jackson could give answers, but he is dead.'"'

___

AP Entertainment Writer Anthony McCartney contributed to this report.

___

McCartney can be reached at . http://twitter.com/mccartneyAP

Check out our who's who guide to the courtroom characters in the Conrad Murray Trial. All images courtesy of Getty.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

LOS ANGELES — The case of Michael Jackson's doctor was placed in a jury's hands Thursday after contentious legal arguments over who was to blame for the superstar's death – the celebrity w...
LOS ANGELES — The case of Michael Jackson's doctor was placed in a jury's hands Thursday after contentious legal arguments over who was to blame for the superstar's death – the celebrity w...
Filed by Anna Almendrala  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 98
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
04:30 PM on 11/05/2011
I see all the usual people are here blaming the victim and asking for the doctor to be "left alone".

Not on your life. His life is going to be a living misery for the rest of his life. He's as guilty as Roberto Bonilla:

Inglewood doctor surrenders license after patient's death
July 27, 2011 | 6:36 pm

An Inglewood surgeon convicted of involuntary manslaughter in connection with the death of a 30-year-old patient agreed Wednesday to surrender his medical license.

Dr. Roberto Bonilla, 63, had been accused of negligence and incompetence in connection with the death of Osvaldo Hernandez, on whom he performed gallbladder surgery at his office June 4, 2008, according to a Medical Board of California accusation filed two years ago. On Wednesday, Bonilla agreed to surrender his license, admitting to the accusations.
Bonilla was accused of performing major surgery in his office without necessary equipment or staff, administering an overdose of anesthetic and then failing to summon paramedics, according to the accusation. The medical board restricted his license at the time, but allowed him to continue practicing after completing a training course.

In February, Bonilla was found guilty in connection Hernandez’s death after he admitted using only a local anesthetic, lidocaine, which several experts testified was unusual -- the surgery is usually done with general anesthesia at a hospital, they said. Bonilla said he was assisted by three medical assistants but no anesthesiologist or nurse anesthetist.
GOODDOC1
"civil war" is an oxymoron
06:35 PM on 11/05/2011
This guy is utterly ridiculous! Did he get prison time too, or just have to surrender his icense? Thanks for the info.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crossoverwriter
11:53 AM on 11/05/2011
I know my opinion is not the popular one, but I think Conrad Murray should NOT be found guilty of CRIMINAL manslaughter. MJ was an entrenched addict, getting Demerol almost daily from his dermo guy. Plus, he had a dozen prescriptions in a dozen aliases from a dozen pharmacies. Addicts are secretive, and devious, and will do ANYTHING to get their drug if they're jonesing. The only reason any of this is in question, is because MJ was so famous. Arnie Klein should have been on that stand! But of course, famous people get kid glove treatment. MJ's veins were those of an old person's from injecting so many drugs. Murray had no clue what a cesspool he was walking into. Chernoff was so right when he said "He (Murray) was just a little fish in a big, dirty pond."
GOODDOC1
"civil war" is an oxymoron
06:36 PM on 11/05/2011
Murray walked into that cesspoo with his eyes wide open and of his own accord. He never tried to get out, either. He killed his patient.
12:54 AM on 11/05/2011
Here's thie thing. Nobody want's to believe that Michael Jackson is gone. Even if you are not a M.J. fan, you know that something is amiss here. Dr. Conrad Murray did something wrong, there was enough evidence to put hin in a court of law, to determine his fate. If not, why is the whole world watching? I know that if a "regular" person had their demise this way, not a story. Everyone who is a fan of M.J. just wants justice done. Michael had nonting to do with his own death, may have been an extreme lack of judgement on Dr. Murray's part, but, I also think the world has to blame someone. POINT
GOODDOC1
"civil war" is an oxymoron
12:26 PM on 11/05/2011
It went WAY past a lack of judgement. Jackson is dead as a direct result of Murray's actions and inactions.
04:18 PM on 11/05/2011
grovont: You're wrong, this case wasn't brought because it was MJ, it would have been brought anyway because of Murray's criminal actions. There was another similar case brought against another California doctor which resulted in a conviction, he was found GUILTY OF INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER of an illegal Mexican dishwasher. Don't believe the defense LIES.

http://lat­imesblogs.­latimes.co­m/lanow/20­11/07/ingl­ewood-doct­or-license­-surrender­ed-patient­-death.htm­l

TO THOSE OF YOU BLAMING THE VICTIM FOR HIS OWN DEATH. PLEASE DON'T BUY INTO THE DEFENSE'S ARGUMENT THAT THIS CASE WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN BROUGHT IF THE VICTIM HADN'T BEEN MICHAEL JACKSON. MJ has nothing to do with this case being brought against Murray. Murray is a Quack Dr. just like Dr. Bonilla who killed his patient with a Lidocaine injection (which he was using in a home setting as Anesthesia­). Murray's defense wants you to believe that bad doctors are never criminally prosecuted -- HE'S LYING!!
makemesmile
it makes you wonder
07:45 PM on 11/04/2011
I hope that the jurors take the time to review what was said in the courtroom and what evidence was presented before they make a decision. Michael was a drug addict and Dr. Murray was a careless doctor.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibelFreeZone
08:18 PM on 11/04/2011
There's no evidence whatsoever that Jackson was an active drug addict. He may have been dependent on medication to control pain--after all, he was a dancer for 40 years--but that's a lot different than "drug addict"--unless, of course, you call everyone who takes pain medication an addict.
makemesmile
it makes you wonder
04:05 PM on 11/06/2011
Everyone who takes pain medication isn't addicted to it. It's a fact that some people are addicted to prescription drugs like Valium and Vicodin.
03:40 PM on 11/04/2011
MJ brought Conrad Murphy into his life, probably knowing full well that his reputation as a Dr. wasn't great!! And that was because MJ had exhausted every other avenue! It was really MJ's fault!
He was a walking pharmacy!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibelFreeZone
06:20 PM on 11/04/2011
There's no evidence whatsoever that Michael Jackson was an active drug abuser. He may have been dependent on pain medication, but that's an entirely different matter than abusing drugs. Of course, anyone's entitled to jump to conclusions, which is apparently what hazelsjam has done but, according to the coroner's report, Jackson was above average in health for a man his age, and he had no drugs in his body other than what Conrad Murray put there. Doesn't sound like a "walking pharmacy" to me.

I would invite anyone who's jumping to conclusions to read the coroner's report for him or herself. The truth--not faulty conclusions--is contained therein.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/michael-jackson-autopsy-report

Also, review the testimony of the coroner at this site.

http://youarethejudge.com/index.php/168-cmtestimoney31

Or, like hazelsjam, you can stay ignorant.
01:04 PM on 11/04/2011
Like many, i'm torn on this. Is he guilty? Probably. Are kids safer? Probably.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibelFreeZone
06:24 PM on 11/04/2011
There's no evidence whatsoever that Michael Jackson was a child molester. There were accusations, as we all know, but two grand juries, a decades long FBI investigation and a jury of mainly white jurors concluded there was no evidence to convict Jackson. One may say that settling out of court is prima facie "evidence" but many high profile people settle out of court rather than be dragged through a 5-month trial (such as the 2005 trial), only to be ultimately acquitted, as Jackson was. To say kids are "probably" safer is to know nothing about Michael Jackson or the facts of the 2005 trial. Such a conclusion is certainly not informed by the facts.
12:16 PM on 11/04/2011
put him in the chair and pull the switch !!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kat Ingalls
Don't believe everything you read
04:01 PM on 11/04/2011
Not gonna happen.
05:03 PM on 11/04/2011
You really think he should be put to DEATH?? REALLY?? This comment is just as bad as everyone thinking he killed him when Michael wouldn't have needed him in the first place if he wasn't a junkie. Please don't tell me he had insomnia..bs...Possession is a more appropriate charge and negligence
GOODDOC1
"civil war" is an oxymoron
12:28 PM on 11/05/2011
Criminally negligent homicide is a more appropriate charge in my opinion. Prison and an inability to practice medicine EVER is a good start on treatment. If he gets off, other doctors treating celebrity patients will have no deterrant to doing the same in the future.
11:15 AM on 11/04/2011
GUILTYGUILTYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYGUILTY
11:09 AM on 11/04/2011
I do think that Michael Jackson was adult enough to make his own decisions about what was going on in his life and he may be at some fault for what had happened.

But being the MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL that CONRAD MURRAY was SUPPOSED TO BE.... He should have stepped in and spoke up. He knew something bad was happening and he most definitely contributed to it.... ALL OUT OF GREED! So I personally believe he is very guilty of involuntary man slaughter.... THE FACT THAT MURRAY TRIED TO HIDE EVERYTHING BEFORE HE CALLED PARAMEDICS SHOULD BE PROOF ENOUGH THAT HE IS GUILTY OF SOMETHING. I think Murray was making them clean up because MJ had already died. That's what I think. Because the time line is just not right anyway.

Death hoax investigators may be nutty... But MJ's fans out there make some outrageous points about the whole case whether MJ really died or not.
11:00 AM on 11/04/2011
If anyone is to blame for MJ's down-ward spiral and ultimate demise, my opinion is the fingers should point to MJ, himself and his entire family. Except for the children, of course!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibelFreeZone
06:34 PM on 11/04/2011
hazelsjam, you don't think too good, do you?
10:41 PM on 11/04/2011
I'm thinking logical...you should try it some time!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:31 AM on 11/04/2011
so if i overdosed and died on crack/meth/cocaine/herion/acid/shrooms/pain killers etc.(not all at once otherwise that be one hell of a high) you going to blame me for my addiction and cause of death was my own fault OR will you go out of your way to find the dealer/doctor and blame them for my death?? hell how many people die everyday from cigarettes and alcohol? why aren't there creators trialed and jailed? point is MJ was a grown man, he made his own decisions, he knew what was good for him and what was bad. Conrad=not guilty, if anything though, have his medical license should be pulled. time some of yall start taking responsibilities for your own actions instead of blaming others for your mistakes.. R.I.P MJ
01:38 PM on 11/04/2011
No because they don't have a duty of care. Conrad Murray had a duty of care. That's the difference, "do no harm."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
crossoverwriter
11:57 AM on 11/05/2011
Proud4x4 Rebel, you are sooo right. The addict is responsible for his own addictions and how bad he/she falls. Acquit the doctor. Okay, so he did some not so smart things, but he is NOT guilty of criminal intent.
09:39 AM on 11/04/2011
It is apparent that MJ had a drug problem, and I do agree that it if it wasn't Conrad it would have been someone else. HOWEVER, I also believe that this happens alot more in the Hollywood world than we think. It was unethical what Dr Conrad did and if nothing else should get his medical license pulled, if nothing else than to show other doctors in Hollywood that you can not over sedate movie stars and contribute to their drug downfall for a profit. Don't doctors take an oath to do no harm? So what, that doesn't apply when there is thousands of dollars at stake. Conrad wasn't completely to blame, but he sure did have a hand in MJ's death. Thanks for reading my opinion!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LibelFreeZone
06:35 PM on 11/04/2011
There's no evidence whatsoever that Michael Jackson was an active drug abuser.
09:12 AM on 11/04/2011
I have followed Michaels entire career and the current trial. The prosecuting attorney Waldgren is excellent and focused as a laser on the truth of what happened here. Regardless of whether or not MJ was indeed addicted, this greedy, moron Murray was the "dr." who took the job, and yes he did in essence kill MJ. Yes, if it was not Murray it would have been some other greedy SOB.....he did it, he got caught....the evidence in this case is overwhelming. He should do 10+ years in my estimation. However in the world of "beyond a reasonable doubt", OJ Simpson and Casey Anthony I will be surprised if he is found guilty.....it's a crying shame. He will burn at some point in time as his Karma will inevitably catch up with him sooner or later.
11:02 AM on 11/04/2011
If he is found non-guilty, it's not like he's going back to a pleasant life style...he's a terrible doctor and he is very much in debt!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kat Ingalls
Don't believe everything you read
04:05 PM on 11/04/2011
Karma won't make hime burn. You are mixing ideologies here.
08:34 AM on 11/04/2011
It took Dr. Murray way too long to call for help, but it was already too late; he walked away from someone who was paying him $150,000.00 a month to monitor his dosage of drugs but his personal life took priority; Michael died because his Doctor was not THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Besides, before calling or having someone else call 911, he made sure he put all the pill bottles in a bag and instructed those around him to help him to do that...............
11:59 AM on 11/04/2011
But isn't that what MJ would have done? Cover it up?
08:07 AM on 11/04/2011
Not Guilty!!!!!!!!!!!
04:24 PM on 11/05/2011
bigraystone45, you are free to become Murray's patient when he relocates to Grenada after his license is revoked in the U.S. He should never practice medicine in the US again.

And he is GUILTY.