More

Sandwich Arrest At Safeway Stirs Debate

First Posted: 11/04/11 10:55 AM ET Updated: 11/04/11 12:21 PM ET

By JENNIFER SINCO KELLEHER, Associated Press

HONOLULU -- It happens daily in supermarket and convenience stores nationwide - digging into a bag of chips while waiting in line, sampling a couple of grapes in the produce section, opening a bottle of milk to appease a crying child.

The highly-publicized story of a pregnant Honolulu mom who was arrested last week with her husband after she ate a sandwich in a Safeway store and forgot to pay, leading to the couple's 2-year-old daughter being taken away by Child Welfare Services, has sparked a national debate on the issue.

It also raised the question: Is it OK to consume food and beverages in the store before paying?

The woman in Hawaii who ate the sandwich has no problem with it.

"I didn't know it was such a taboo thing," said Nicole Leszczynski who was charged with fourth-degree theft, a petty misdemeanor, along with her husband, Marcin. The charges have since been dropped by Safeway. "Where I grew up in a small town it's not seen as stealing for sure."

Others are not so sure.

The story generated a robust debate on Facebook and Yahoo in comments following stories on the theft. Some argued that it's wrong to eat what you haven't paid for, and that police did the proper thing in arresting them. Others said eating while shopping has become a perfectly acceptable practice. Many denounced the arrest as a heavy-handed response.

At the Safeway where the Leszczynskis were arrested, Linda Mercado and her friend Christine Lutley didn't get too far from the exit Wednesday before they began digging into their food purchases. Mercado polished off a package of sushi as she discussed her views on the issue.

"Pay before you eat," the 66-year-old Mercado said. "It's bad manners."

However, Mercado acknowledged drinking beverages in the past while waiting in line.

"I don't walk around the store drinking it," she explained. "By the time I'm done shopping I'm thirsty."

Shoppers Gerard and Ruth Viggayan said they consider eating before paying to be stealing.

"If you want to eat it, you have to purchase it," the 34-year-old Gerard said. "It's not like Costco where you get free samples."

His wife was craving a bag of potato chips, but she said she would wait until they got to the car to open it. "If it looks good, we pay for it," Ruth, 33, said, "and then eat."

Wahiawa resident Jadene Espinueva, 34, has consumed cookies, grapes and bottled water before paying. "Just as long as you're going to pay for it and you've got the money, why not?" she said. "If I'm hungry or thirsty, yeah, I'm of it. I don't see what's the big deal."

Eating before checking out has clearly become part of supermarket culture. From supermarkets to Costco handing out food samples in aisles, shoppers associate stores with being an acceptable place to munch, said Dana Alden, a marketing professor at the University of Hawaii's business school and an expert in consumer psychology and branding.

Alden said it wouldn't be prudent customer relations for stores to crack down. He likened the acceptance of eating before paying to dropping a jar of peanut butter, but still not being forced to pay for it.

Consumer behavior expert Debbie MacInnis, a marketing professor at the University of Southern California, said a trip to the grocery store is a familiar routine, and can be seen as a place where it's acceptable to eat.

"That creates a certain sense of it's OK for me to do that because I'm hungry and I have every intention of paying for it," she said. "From a psychology standpoint, it's mine even though the formal transaction hasn't transpired."

As for the 28-year-old Leszczynski, the former Air Force staff sergeant who is 30 weeks pregnant was feeling faint and famished after a long walk to the Safeway near downtown Honolulu and decided to eat a chicken salad sandwich while shopping and saved the wrapper to have it scanned at the register. But she and her husband forgot to pay for the sandwiches as they checked out with about $50 worth of groceries.

When confronted by security, they offered to pay, but Honolulu police were called and the couple were arrested and booked. Their daughter Zofia was taken away. Leszczynski said she was embarrassed and horrified.

They posted $50 bail each and were reunited with their daughter after an 18-hour separation.

Honolulu police said it was routine procedure to call Child Welfare Services if a child is present when both parents are arrested.

Safeway called Leszczynski on Tuesday and apologized for what she went through. The company also informed police the same day that it wouldn't press charges.

Safeway said management followed routine shoplifting procedure by contacting police, but the company regrets not foreseeing that doing so would cause a child to be separated from her parents.

Safeway said it has no policy that prohibits consumption of merchandise in the stores, "but customers are expected to be able to identify and pay for the consumed merchandise before leaving."

Foodland Super Market Ltd., Hawaii's largest locally owned grocer, prefers customers pay for items before consuming them to avoid confusion or appearance of theft, spokeswoman Sheryl Toda said.

"However, we do understand that emergencies occur where a child or individual needs to consume a product immediately," she said. "In those instances, we expect that wrappers or containers will be saved and presented to the cashier for payment before the customer leaves the store."

Quick Poll

Do you eat while you shop?

Never

Sometimes

Usually


FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

By JENNIFER SINCO KELLEHER, Associated Press HONOLULU -- It happens daily in supermarket and convenience stores nationwide - digging into a bag of chips while waiting in line, sampling a couple of ...
By JENNIFER SINCO KELLEHER, Associated Press HONOLULU -- It happens daily in supermarket and convenience stores nationwide - digging into a bag of chips while waiting in line, sampling a couple of ...
Filed by Simon McCormack  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 724
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LangstonA
Attempting to stand in the gap
09:03 PM on 11/11/2011
Fresh and Easy has absolutely delicious chocolate chip cookies that they place right at the entrance to the store. I frequently open a package and eat it as I shop. Then I scan the package when I check out.

Whole Foods has a terrific bakery case. Sometimes I reach right in and grab a cookie. Then when I check out I simply tell the checker to charge me for a cookie I ate.

I can't even tell you the number of times I've been at a grocery store after commuting home during the summer in my non-AC car. I've grabbed a bottled water, opened it up and drank it right there in the aisle. Then I just put the empty bottle in my cart to be scanned with my other purchases.

I've never been told by the Whole Foods checker or by the bagger at Fresh and Easy who is throwing away the wrapper to my already consumed cookie or by the checker scanning my empty bottled water at a Kroger owned store that it is "store policy" or whatever to pay for the item before I consume it.

The issue isn't that she ate before paying. The issue is that she walked out of the store without paying at all. That is theft. But the reaction was overblown.
01:12 AM on 11/09/2011
I feel it's stealing if you eat before you pay. But there have been times when my sugar dropped because I'm a diabetic that I had to eat or drink something in a grocery store but I always payed and even apologized for eating without paying first. But almost all the cashiers know me and have told me many times that they know I will pay and it's ok. They shouldn't have told me that, now I eat that cup of popcorn chicken before I get to the registers. lol But I always pay for it. :o)
12:03 PM on 11/08/2011
So the debate spurred by this story is whether it is ok to eat something that will momentarily be paid for - and not the fact that there are police who would arrest someone and TAKE HER CHILD over something that could have been rectified in like one minute by walking back into the store and paying for the sandwich?

I really think we're focusing on the wrong issue here, people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KadejaLatefah
That's right...I said it!
08:25 PM on 11/11/2011
when people commit crimes with a minor present - the minor is removed to protect the child.

switch out grocery store for a bank and sandwiches for cash - see protect the kids from stupid parents
photo
butchcliff
The future is unwritten
07:00 AM on 11/08/2011
Forgot to pay? What did she do with the wrapper? Simply theft
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KadejaLatefah
That's right...I said it!
08:28 PM on 11/11/2011
exactly. And that Dana Alden, a marketing professor at the University of Hawaii's business school and an 'expert" in consumer psychology and branding said it wouldn't be prudent customer relations for stores to crack down. 'He likened the acceptance of eating before paying to dropping a jar of peanut butter, but still not being forced to pay for it.'
But dropping a product is an accident. eating & not paying is not an accident - it's stealing. it's like saying Bernie Madoff was a bad bookkeeper!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FactsvsFear
01:28 AM on 11/08/2011
This could not be more clear cut they just forgot. For all we know if given a couple minutes putting away their groceries in the car they may have seen the wrapper and went back in and pa
11:52 PM on 11/07/2011
This is not news. It's being blown out of proportion because she was pregnant and had a kid with her. This self-entitled mommy got caught and now she is outraged that anyone would think she did something wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Rotert
09:18 PM on 11/07/2011
Let's see. They go to an overpriced Safeway, spend 50 bucks and steal a 3 dollar sandwich. Usually it's the other way around. You go into a place and purchase an inexpensive item to look legit while you steal something far more valuable. Yeah people, these are true career criminals here.
09:08 PM on 11/07/2011
Her crime is stealing. Plain and simple. It's shoplifting and it is one of the reasons prices go up in stores - to offset the loss by thieves like this woman in Honolulu. That being said, I think law enforcement way over-reacted in taking away her child! Good grief! Charge her with petty theft and be done with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
07:37 AM on 11/08/2011
With all of the scanner errors that occur at Safeway, which always favor the store, that's theft, as well. I've seen scanner error far in excess of the cost of a sandwich. So I guess it's okay for Safeway to steal from their customers in this fashion, but if a customer forgets to pay for some lousy processed sandwich, look out, Jack...you're goin' down...

Warped priorities, man.
08:31 PM on 11/07/2011
So much prepared food is sold in 'super'markets in the 21st century no sane grocer assumes no shoppers will eat as they shop.

The questions are what they eat, how much, and what they do with the packaging. The story does not say what happened to the sandwich wrapper, and that is what is most important in a Store Security decision.

Even then where payment is offered upon confrontation the payment should be accepted and the matter concluded.

Even if a wrapper was pocketed the matter should end with a lecture/warning and maybe writing name and particulars. Negative publicity from over-reaction arrests send customers to the competition.

Except when a wrapper or container is left on a shelf or wadded and dropped, it is unwise to assume shoplifting.

I've seen mothers with children place food wrappings on the checkout belt and seen them scooped off and thrown away by the clerk. A couple such times the mother asked if the wrappings were scanned and they were rescued. Other times they were forgotten. I've also seen customers see and stop the tossing.

The Honolulu grocer will lose more than a sandwich-worth of customers for its mis-handling the incident, and deserves to.
08:03 PM on 11/07/2011
I'm ambivalent about Safeway's response -- as the accused noted, they dropped the charges.

The state kidnapping their child under the color of authority however is unpardonable.
photo
climbing panda
there's a log in my cabin
06:33 PM on 11/07/2011
i cannot stand vultures who hover for free samples. grazers outright enrage me, especially when it's done in a small local grocer.

that being said, they should have given the pregnant woman a pass. not just because she's pregnant, but because it's ridiculous to separate a 3 year old from her parents over a $5 theft.

then again, these parents are unfit simply for naming their child zofia. don't people remember what it was like in school?
01:49 PM on 11/07/2011
Rule #1. DON'T go to the grocery store if you are hungry. EAT BEFORE YOU SHOP FOR GROCERIES! I learned that when I was a teenager. Grocery stores are not restaurants. You don't go there and pick up something and eat it while you shop. When you pay for something, then it's yours but not until. That is the same as stealing. You just don't help yourself to whatever is there because it's NOT YOURS! DUH! Don't parents teach their children anything any more?
12:50 PM on 11/07/2011
So the woman was 7 months pregnant, and an Air Force vet, who also did pay for $50 worth of groceries, in a brilliant con game designed to steal the $3 sandwich? This is the problem with the corporate supermarkets-no store I would ever shop at would react this way. Of course, conservatives want to lock them up and throw away the key...they'd love Saudi Arabia.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
krallfan
06:32 PM on 11/07/2011
I worked as a cashier at Walmart while I was in college. Shoplifters pay for stuff, they just don't pay for everything. They get a thrill from what they can get away with.

I vividly remember a shoplifter who purchased a grocery cart full of items and paid for them. I remember this because I wanted to make sure I caught everything in her basket (the security guy was standing in the background and I did not want to get into trouble). When she left the store, he arrested her for stealing patterns. I asked him where she hid them and he told me that her child was sitting on top of them. She had put the patterns on the seat with her purse on top, followed by her child.

The lady in the story may have forgotten to pay for her food; however, it does not mean the store was wrong. It would have been easy for her to go up to the register, pay for the sandwich then continue with her shopping.
12:11 PM on 11/08/2011
Please. It means EXACTLY that the store was wrong.
photo
fpwillson
Fighter for justice and the truth
11:56 AM on 11/07/2011
Being a candy lover, I'll often grab a candy bar and eat it. BUT... I put the empty wrapper in the basket so I don't forget to pay for it. I see no harm in that and I suspect the store doesn't either.
10:08 AM on 11/07/2011
Just have meal before you shopping. It save your trouble.