iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

American Catholics Prep For New Mass Translation

New Mass

RACHEL ZOLL   11/ 5/11 08:05 PM ET   AP

RIVER EDGE, N.J. — Each Sunday for decades, Roman Catholic priests have offered the blessing – "Lord be with you." And each Sunday, parishioners would respond, "And also with you."

Until this month.

Come Nov. 27, the response will be, "And with your spirit." And so will begin a small revolution in a tradition-rich faith.

At the end of the month, parishes in English-speaking countries will begin to use a new translation of the Roman Missal, the ritual text of prayers and instructions for celebrating Mass. International committees of specialists worked under a Vatican directive to hew close to the Latin, sparking often bitter protests by English speakers over phrasing and readability. After years of revisions negotiated by bishops' conferences and the Holy See, dioceses are preparing anxious clergy and parishioners for the rollout, one of the biggest changes in Catholic worship in generations.

"We're tinkering with a very intimate and personal moment," said the Rev. Richard Hilgartner, executive director of the worship office for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. "It's public worship, it's the church's official public prayer, but for the individual faithful, it's one of the primary means of their encounter with the Lord."

The biggest challenge will be for priests, who must learn intricate new speaking parts – often late in their years of service to the church. At an Archdiocese of Newark training at St. Peter the Apostle Church in River Edge, many clergy had just received a final published copy of the Missal, a thick hardcover bound in red, accompanied by an equally dense study guide. Earlier drafts had been available for orientation sessions that have been ongoing for months nationwide.

Many clergy are upset by the new language, calling it awkward and hard to understand. The Rev. Tom Iwanowski, pastor of St. Joseph Roman Catholic Church in Oradell and New Milford, N.J., turned to the section of the new missal that calls funeral rites, "the fraternal offices of burial."

"How can I say those words? It doesn't make sense," said Iwanowski, who has been a priest for 36 years. "It separates religion from real life."

In the new translation, in the Nicene Creed, the phrase "one in Being with the Father," will change to "consubstantial with the Father." When a priest prays over the Holy Communion bread and wine, he will ask God for blessings "by sending down your spirit upon them like the dewfall."

The new missal grew out of changes in liturgy that started with the Second Vatican Council, the 1960s meetings on modernizing the church that permitted Mass in local languages instead of Latin. Bishops in English-speaking countries created the International Commission on English in the Liturgy to undertake the translation. The panel produced a missal by 1973, but that version was considered temporary until better texts could be completed. As the commission worked to make the Mass more familiar in idiomatic English, some of the language strayed from the Latin. Also in some cases, the commission sought to use language that would be gender neutral.

The work took a new direction in 2001, when the Vatican office in charge of worship issued the directive Liturgiam Authenticam, or Authentic Liturgy, which required translations closer to the Latin. The Vatican also appointed another committee, Vox Clara, or Clear Voice, to oversee the English translation, drawing complaints from some clergy and liturgists that the Vatican was controlling what should be a more consultative process. (Cardinal George Pell, the Sydney, Australia, archbishop and chairman of Vox Clara, has called the complaints baseless and ideologically driven.)

The Rev. Anthony Ruff, a Benedictine monk and theology professor at St. John's University in Minnesota, said he was removed last year as head of the music panel of the international translating commission because of criticisms he posted on his blog. In an open letter to U.S. bishops published in the Jesuit magazine America, Ruff cancelled his plans to speak on the text to diocesan priests because, "I cannot promote the new missal translation with integrity."

In South Africa, church officials accidentally introduced much of the new text in parishes ahead of schedule in late 2008, generating similar complaints about ponderous language, although church officials now say most parishioners have adapted.

Jeffrey Tucker, a lay musician at St. Michael the Archangel Catholic Church in Auburn, Ala., said he also had concerns about how the translation was handled. Still, he said he found the new missal "extraordinary." The text and music are truly integrated for the first time since the changes from the Second Vatican Council, Tucker said. He has been introducing the new text to lay people and church leaders in recent months, and has found the reaction to mostly be, "Oh, wow.'"

"The language is more accurate, but that is the most boring thing you can say about it. The more important thing about the language is that it's beautiful," said Tucker who is managing editor of Sacred Music, the journal of the Church Music Association of America. "Hardly anything ever good comes out of a committee. This time it did."

Parishes around the United States have spent the summer trying to prepare church members for what's ahead. Priests have been discussing the changes in homilies, in notices in parish bulletins, and in workshops and webinars. Many clergy plan to use poster-sized laminated cue cards for parishioners as the new text is introduced. The introduction of the new text comes on the first Sunday of Advent, just ahead of the Christmas season – a time when infrequent churchgoers attend services.

The Catholic Community at Pleasanton, Calif., which serves 5,000 families in the Diocese of Oakland, has been organizing ministry training sessions and town hall meetings for parishioners to ask questions and express concerns. Mark J. Sullivan, the church music director, said he has seen reactions range from people fully embracing the change to others asking, "Why now?"

"They say, `I've got everything memorized. Why are you messing with it?'" Sullivan said. "If people do get a little nervous, it because things are in a different place, and it is more content, but it's more for great reasons. We've got more to work with."

The Rev. Michael Ryan, pastor of St. James Cathedral in Seattle, started an online petition called, "What If We Just Said Wait," that drew more than 22,000 signatures from clergy, lay people, liturgists and others around the world, who urged a limited, one-year introduction of the new translation followed by an evaluation before the text was adopted across the country.

Despite the protest, Ryan said he has been preparing parishioners for the change and he will be ready to recite the new text on Nov. 27.

"I'm not going to stand apart from the church," Ryan said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

RIVER EDGE, N.J. — Each Sunday for decades, Roman Catholic priests have offered the blessing – "Lord be with you." And each Sunday, parishioners would respond, "And also with you." Until ...
RIVER EDGE, N.J. — Each Sunday for decades, Roman Catholic priests have offered the blessing – "Lord be with you." And each Sunday, parishioners would respond, "And also with you." Until ...
Filed by Paul Brandeis Raushenbush  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,840
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (92 total)
09:09 PM on 12/06/2011
Please consider the views posted on www.MyWalkToJesus.com. This is the church that does not exclude or alienate anyone. A group known as 490s will rise above the Christian, who is allowed to know as little about Christ as possible and still retain the title of Christian for as long as they would like to use it. The answer to a church that is 'anti' nothing as well as 'pro' nothing is close at hand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
soma77
Author, Speaker, Retreat Facilitator
10:39 PM on 11/28/2011
Spiritual experiences represent the mystical experience that is beyond the mind and body experience and merges all our hopes and dreams into one final climax. This can be seen in the increased heights of the roofs of the old churches. They defy the laws of gravity while the steeples seem to point to a tangential point that is between the abstract and the concrete worlds in which we live. We don't need the Church changing the ritual, we need them to teach, and acknowledge the spiritual experience we all seek. http://thinkunity.com
07:52 PM on 11/25/2011
Read "The Truth Behind the New (Old) Roman Catholic Missal on Indie Theology."

http://tinyurl.com/34nz4zn
07:52 AM on 11/17/2011
A change for Catholics would be to stop ignoring the facts about their man made righteousness and see their qualifications in Romans 10:3.
photo
john1513
Ora et Labora
01:01 AM on 12/05/2011
Learn more Catholicism
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:16 PM on 11/16/2011
May I suggest that people do as Jesus suggested: believe in Him, follow Him and take on His yoke,
- in other words learn from Him. If the yoke is not light and the burden not easy, it's not Jesus. What pleases God is FAITH - without faith it is impossible to please God (Hebrews 11:6). So, believe Jesus is who He says He is, that He TOOK your punishment for sin, that all those who believe and claim Him as Lord have access to God the Father and can go directly to Him. Love Jesus and just talk directly to your God already! You have an entire bible full of the revelation of Jesus, which the Holy Spirit is ready and available to use to lead you and guide you into all truth. He will help you understand - that's His job. Remember all the wonderful bible stories that tell us about individuals and their relationship with God the Father and with Jesus? You can have that too! God can't wait to love you! Jesus died and resurrected for that purpose - honor Him by seeking His Father from your heart. He is a rewarder of them who diligently seek Him. Heavenly Father, I pray that for all who read this any and all hindrances and blindness to receiving Your love through the work of Your son Jesus be bound and removed. You are a good God!
In Christ and I'm not coming out - Tina Marulli
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ablacks657
ABLACKS657
02:27 PM on 11/16/2011
Another of man's decision to make man God.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
iLdoRight
Encouraging The Rightest Rightness
02:08 AM on 11/14/2011
Caption suggestion; " Who Are You Gonna Believe? Me or Jesus? "
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ablacks657
ABLACKS657
02:27 PM on 11/16/2011
AMEN
09:20 AM on 11/11/2011
Ireland you have been robbed of the Mass!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2ztuPBCV88
08:33 AM on 11/10/2011
The thing that gets at me is that so many people are affraid of change. In my opinion it is time for a change in the church. I remember someone telling me that the Catholic Church is a universal church but yet we're doing something different then the others over in Europe. I think for the Chruch to be more universal this "change" needs to happen. As a music leader in my parish I am very excited about these changes along with several other Parishioners. It will be a rough start but as time goes on it will (possibly) get better. The American Catholics adapeted after going from the Latin Mass to the English I'm sure they can adapt to this one.
10:05 AM on 11/10/2011
I do realize I made some spelling errors.
09:19 AM on 11/11/2011
They was the big fraud going from Latin to English, the mass was never meant to be said in English. No significant religion worships God in the vernacular. The Orthodox Church uses biblical Greek not modern Greek, Buddhists use Sanskrit an ancient language, Jews use ancient Hebrew not modern Hebrew and so on.
07:07 PM on 11/11/2011
worship is from ones heart no matter the language
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ablacks657
ABLACKS657
02:26 PM on 11/16/2011
Recall the Tower of Bable
12:35 AM on 11/10/2011
Find out who was really elected pope in 1958. The church has been hijacked!!
Full story here with rare conclave footage

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQp00j4H3Kg
photo
visconti24
See everything; overlook much; correct a little.
03:25 PM on 11/13/2011
This is an old, old story. I have two close relatives, now deceased, who were cardinals at the time and they confirm that Cardinal Siri, a right-winger from Genoa, did get most votes and he was asked as it is normal is he accepted his canonical election as Supreme Pontiff and responded: "NO." That is very normal, many men have refused the papacy. Siri was a very contentious man and would not have been a good pope in my view.
Even the present pope was determined NOT to accept the papacy if he were elected. He wanted to retire and go to Germany. He even attended the conclave wearing a black sweater under his cassock (see the pictures with him in the main balcony of St Peters with black showing under the white. Ratzinger has suffered from arthritis for many years and finds the Vatican too cold in winter (and too warm in summer) and wanted to go play his piano in old age. But he was prevailed to accept. No "hijacking".
06:16 PM on 11/13/2011
Cardinal Siri was papabile at 4 conclaves, so perhaps you should have asked your relatives at which conclaves he refused. Others report that he refused UNDER DURESS in 1963 and in 1978 but those were not valid conclaves as Siri had already been elected in 1958. How do we know he was elected AND ACCEPTED in 1958? Because of the unambiguous smoke signal that appeared 2 days before the election of John XXIII. The white smoke is NEVER released until the pope has accepted the office and taken his papal name. Furthermore there are men who were there who said it was Siri, Father Charles-Roux for example, who said a fight ensued at the stove.
photo
john1513
Ora et Labora
01:04 AM on 12/05/2011
Pope Fiction
09:03 PM on 11/09/2011
Our parish has been practicing the revisions at the daily morning Mass. We've been into it for about 4 weeks and it's still rocky to get the people to conform to the basic new responses. We even have pew cards with the new text. I went to a different parish this Sunday, one that used two large projector screens where the "new" Creed was visible for people to read. The people were praying the new version, but the priest was still reciting the "old" version. It was frustrating.

I'm all for a return to a more dignified language to the Mass, but I do have a "why now" sentiment when there are so many other pressing issues in the Church. Personally, I feel that we should pray the Mass exactly as it is prayed at St. Peter's - in Latin.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
revamk
07:15 PM on 11/27/2011
I say this with all due respect. I was raised in the protestant tradition, and I have always been puzzled by this desire to communicate with God in a language that you do not understand. Or maybe you do understand it? Even if you do, don't you want your communication to be accessible to anyone coming into the church for Mass? Do you think the particular language of the mass matter to God? It's not like God is limited to any particular language. Is Latin somehow more holy than other languages? Why not pray in Aramaic? That's the language of St. Peter and the disciples, and if any language would be considered holy to Christians, it seems like it would be that one. Again, I'm not being disrespectful. I'm just trying to understand this preference for Latin. Can you (or anyone else) explain?
11:11 AM on 11/28/2011
To Revamk's comment about why pray in Latin.

A liturgical language is common to almost ALL faith traditions, not just Christianity. A liturgical language is something that is "set apart" that is used just for God. Jesus, who spoke Aramaic, prayed in Hebrew in the synagogue and at the Temple. So, our Lord, used a liturgical language.

The use of a liturgical language is something that we Catholics use as way to show our reverence for God by using a language that is "set apart" from the banalities of the vernacular. Most traditional Catholics pray their private prayers in the vernacular, but at worship, most traditional Catholics have a fairly good idea of what is being said and not the "call and response" mode of the Mass.

On a more practical level, using a liturgical language is a unifying mode of communication. My parish has 3 English Masses and 1 Spanish Mass. If we all worshiped in Latin, all ethnic groups could participate and this would be community building (IMHO) rather than dividing.

With all respect, the Protestant tradition deviated from "what worked" in Christendom for 1500 years. And, the Protestant tradition continues to self-divide into different denominations since it's inception. Our Lord sadly prophesied that his body would be divided, but has promised that there will be again "one fold and one Shepherd." John 10:16.
03:07 PM on 12/05/2011
To: joseph510:

Your conclusion about 3 English Masses and 1 Spanish Mass is interesting - One Latin Mass that NOBODY can understand and participate in.
Latin was NOT the language of Christ, the Apostles or the early church. It became the language when the church became part of the Roman Empire in order to spread the "word" - only the "word" being spread was power and control in Rome. The real "WORD" was still spoken by the true followers of Christ and the Apostles in many languages.
07:29 PM on 11/09/2011
Its not that big a change. And by the way a few comments down, Catholics do not worship Mary. We honor the mother of Jesus because Jesus honors her, as the commandment says honor thy mother and father. Catholic and other Christian congregation believe Mary was conceived without sin ( Immaculate Conception) by the grace of God, not to honor her but because she is the worldly vessel and womb of Christ, so it is fitting for Him, not for her. You may accept or reject that, but it is false to claim that Mary is worshiped or that the IC is indicative of her merit or her nature.
07:11 PM on 11/11/2011
Praying to Mary, making statues of her, and kneeling to her image is worship. The Catholic bible says there is only one mediator between us and the Father. Jesus, P.S. .She cannot even hear prayers. (with all respect)
10:31 AM on 11/12/2011
Mary is not worshiped in the Catholic church. We do not pray to Mary and we don't pray to the saints, we pray with them and ask them to pray to God for us. It may appear to non Catholics otherwise, but the words we say at the beginning of every mass could not be more clear. We ask the Blessed Mother, all the angels and saints and our brothers and sisters gathered at the mass - "to pray for me to the Lord our God." The Creeds likewise state without ambiguity that there is only one God, revealed to us as Father Son and Holy Spirit and God alone is worshipped and glorified. Luke's Gospel tells that God's angel Gabriel came to Mary personally to tell she is highly favored by God and would give birth to Jesus, therefore she is the human Mother of God and our spiritual mother - because we are all brothers and sisters in Christ.
photo
visconti24
See everything; overlook much; correct a little.
03:28 PM on 11/13/2011
The Virgin Mary is not worshiped. She is not God.
01:53 AM on 11/09/2011
It has been an interesting experience to read these comments. The word that comes to mind is "fetish" -- see [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fetish]. How did the text of the Mass get to be an idol?
photo
john1513
Ora et Labora
01:21 AM on 12/05/2011
The text of the Mass is not worshiped. It is however very important and worthy of careful thought to avoid mistranslations which can lead to elements of the faith being lost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JBaker
fictio cedit veritati
09:11 PM on 11/08/2011
Image yourself in God's place...and how irritating to have all these losers whining away with their endless, selfish prayers, insisting that you fix their sorry complaints. No wonder God ignores the whole lot of them. I would, too.
photo
john1513
Ora et Labora
01:22 AM on 12/05/2011
You misunderstand prayer.
09:05 PM on 11/08/2011
It's not only the translation itself which is monstrous but the way in which this translation was concocted. The restorationist bishops completely suppressed a very good translation produced in 1998 that was the fruit of 20 years of work by scholars from a variety of subject areas. Ironically, the new translation approved by the restorationist bishops in 2008, horrible as it was, was itself changed by a small cadre of the pope’s operatives without the consent or knowledge of the deceitful bishops themselves. Over 10,000 changes were made to their approved work and many Catholics think that the translation that will be forced on them on November 27 is just the result of the restorationist bishops (most do not even know that much). It is poetic justice that those bishops who deliberately blocked an excellent translation had their own translation torn to ribbons with no oversight whatsoever. As usual, most parish priests plan to keep their parishioners in the dark about these byzantine events rather than admit to the corruption in the church hierarchy.