Steve Jobs: Why His Biggest Success Was Learning From Failure

Steve Jobs Success

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/05/2011 2:33 pm EDT Updated: 01/05/2012 5:12 am EST

It's been a month since Steve Jobs' death, and in the weeks since, the world has mourned and shared its admiration and appreciation for the man who brought us beautiful gadgets that changed our lives. Thanks to Walter Isaacson's new biography, the Apple visionary continues to inspire.

His life's work taught us many lessons. Among them -- that perseverance and adaptability (with a bit of foolishness) are vital partners with vision (and in Jobs' case, of course, genius).

Jobs also taught us brilliantly about failure. Many of today's digital natives moving seamlessly from iPhone 4S to the MacBook Air to the iPad have no recollection of the early history of Apple.

Regardless about how you felt about the "old" Apple products, the company in its first generation brought innovation to the PC market, but nearly went bankrupt. Apple as a fully integrated, proprietary hardware/software company -- arguably with superior design -- was beaten out by a cannier software competitor and the network effects that that competitor managed to create.
What is remarkable to me about Jobs' return to Apple, and the great success he subsequently achieved, is how he pursued a very similar philosophy -- disruptive and customer-focused vision, obsessive focus on design, highly proprietary hardware and software products. Except he did it with a crucial adaptation: he built the network effects, the very effects that had led to Apple v1's failure, into the infrastructure of Apple v2's strategy and products. With the iPod, the iTunes ecosystem created powerful network with a comprehensive set of music and video content suppliers. For customers, an entirely new product category was made compelling not only by "cool" proprietary hardware and software design (traditional Apple strengths), but also by a comprehensive content source that could monetize what had previously been offered for free. Content providers were thus motivated to use iTunes due to its content network (and subsequent customer network). Likewise, the iPhone and iPad are design-led, but their success has been driven by an App Store ecosystem which is compelling for users and developers alike, simply because there are so many users (i.e. a larger interactive user network) and developers (i.e. a larger modular developer network) constantly innovating within the system.

One could argue that, ironically, Apple has now gone full circle. The area of Apple's greatest past failure -- "traditional" personal computing -- has been enjoying greater success, with the MacBook's growing market share not only due to fabulous design, but also due to the network effects of their easier interoperability with (as well as the "halo effect" of ) the market-dominating iPads, iPhones and iPods.

Steve Jobs was always a visionary genius, but what makes him so compelling to me is the fact that after creating great products that only reached the few, he returned, learned and adapted his vast creative talents to create whole new product categories, distribution models, creative platforms and customer experiences that have positively impacted the lives of millions. His passion for products was contagious and inspired our own. He made his greatest failure into his greatest success. We will all miss him.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SMALL BUSINESS

It's been a month since Steve Jobs' death, and in the weeks since, the world has mourned and shared its admiration and appreciation for the man who brought us beautiful gadgets that changed our lives.
It's been a month since Steve Jobs' death, and in the weeks since, the world has mourned and shared its admiration and appreciation for the man who brought us beautiful gadgets that changed our lives.
 
 
  • Comments
  • 96
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:27 PM on 11/07/2011
He took an idea which alreday existed. He changed it enough to be considered one of its kind and he marketed it so that most wanted it. And....here comes the main part....he did it over and over for various products. He is the geratest Innovator of out times
http://www.wiserus.com/blog/2011/10/11/the-legacy-of-steve-jobs/
04:34 PM on 11/06/2011
why doesnt anyone talk about what steve jobs did in hiring all those poor chinese people into near slave conditions? maybe that was his real "genius" being cruel enough to use oppressive conditions in a foreign country to manufacture products for america
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elicourey
It takes a nation of millions to hold me back!
08:45 PM on 11/06/2011
because they aren't true.
01:02 AM on 11/07/2011
yeah cause he was "smart" enough to use another company to do it for him?
photo
elsquibbs
Socially liberal, fiscally prudent atheist.
04:31 PM on 11/06/2011
Dennis Ritchie died a week after Steve Jobs. Despite Ritchie inventing C and Unix and leaving his fingerprints all over every computer in the world, his death was ignored. However, C and Unix aren't shiny trinkets, so I understand.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cybernia
03:51 PM on 11/06/2011
Jobs' true genius was to create an overpriced, locked down/proprietary system. I have no problem with the tech itself, I just don't like that Apple has total control over what it sells. Apple is like any other huge corporation in its business tactics. It wants total control and it treats its customers as suckers.

Before Apple bought Siri, it was able to work on all systems. After they bought it they made it exclusive to Apple and only able to work on new the iPhone. Before they bought it, it would work on earlier versions of the iPhone. Not anymore. So, if you have an older iPhone, you are forced to upgrade if you want that feature.

btw: Does Foxconn ring a bell? Apple's propaganda paints them as "different." Well, they're not. What's makes it most egregious is the so-called Buddhist ethos that Jobs was supposed to follow. He knew what the conditions in those factories were and with his stature and power, he could have led the way in forcing change in the conditions, but he didn't. He turned his back and that's sad.

It is interesting that all the accolades he's been receiving have totally focused on his business savvy and "vision." Very little has been said positively about his conduct as a human being. He wielded great power and influence yet he never used it to help others. When it comes down to it, isn't that the true measure of a man?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wickedtwisted2
get a clue, get a life
03:02 PM on 11/06/2011
most apple products made overseas... enough said
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NakedMoleRat
11:58 PM on 11/06/2011
Most products sold in the US are manufactured overseas. So what is your point? Enough said.
01:26 PM on 11/06/2011
"One month later, he's still inspiring" Wow, I guess with modern social media a month is a REALLY LONG TIME.
layman
Live and Let Live !
12:42 PM on 11/06/2011
The video is like an infomercial for Issacson's book ???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plasmaborne4rel
Secular Egalitarian Antitheist Liberal [SEAL]
12:02 PM on 11/06/2011
Steve Jobs biggest success was his ability to make people believe the ideas he had were his own. The GUI and mouse he stole from Xerox. OSX was based on open source free software Linux. Internet's Web, where Steve Jobs next move, iCloud was base,d was technology freely given to humanity while steve Jobs himself took every patient he could for his own. A person who uses other people's ideas and other people free inventions given to the world and try to make his own private profit is an uncaring hypocrite with a giant psychopathic ego.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clocknova
12:36 PM on 11/06/2011
Blah, blah, blah. Hate, hate, hate. We've heard it all before. He's still inspiring. Move on. Nothing to see here.
03:58 PM on 11/06/2011
Here we go again. Xerox management was given the opportunity to buy 100000 shares of Apple pre-IPO for $10 for two visits to PARC. Apple received nothing else from PARC except what their eyes could see and perhaps some crib notes. After going public the stock was worth $17 a share and if Xerox had held it, it could have been worth much more.

OSX is based on BSD Unix not Linux. The underlying non-gui portion of OSX is called Darwin and remains open source.

From the Wikipedia:

"Linux is a Unix-like computer operating system "

Linux is actually based on ideas from Minix.

LINUX = Linux Is Not UniX. Got it?

BTW, I do appreciate the fact you were willing to spew such a hate filled comment because it allows me to rebut the kinds of myths that permeate the "Apple stole everything" topic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plasmaborne4rel
Secular Egalitarian Antitheist Liberal [SEAL]
05:18 PM on 11/06/2011
Even Steve Jobs admits he stole from Xerox. He says they could have been "The Apple Corporation" had they developed the GUI and the mouse themselves.

The Linux OS X connection https://ccrma.stanford.edu/guides/planetccrma/OS_X.html

I don't hate Steve Jobs or Apple. Again, I have a Nov07 white macbook and an iPad 2. I just don't believe Steve Jobs is God nor that Apple products are pure heaven. I do prefer them and my neXT computer will be a 2012 macbook air when they are introduced.
photo
bryanzth
Honest to Goodness USA Patriot!
11:29 AM on 11/06/2011
And that success is everyone's success! BZ.
photo
thewirah
Freedom is a dish best served cold
10:58 AM on 11/06/2011
People are so hungry for successful examples of the american dream. Now the real genius is for someone who designed electronic appliances to get that much respect. Who remembers the name of the people who designed the first washing machine, the frist oven and the first toaster. It's in every house, even more so that Apple products.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plasmaborne4rel
Secular Egalitarian Antitheist Liberal [SEAL]
12:07 PM on 11/06/2011
Steve Jobs will be remembered because Apple will treat him as Kentucky Fried Chicken treated Colonial Sanders, as part of the brand. Then likeThomas Edison he'll be slowly forgotten.

As we move pass the iphone, the ipad Steve Jobs won't be relevant anymore.
photo
Sixtracks
Pleased to Meet Me
10:55 AM on 11/06/2011
One Century Later:
Jobs will STILL be inspiring.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
09:24 AM on 11/06/2011
stop calling him a genius. it doesnt take a genius to hire people who are smarter and more educated than you, make them design products for you, and give their inventions an up or down. i approve of einsteins theory of general relativity. does that make me a genius?
photo
bryanzth
Honest to Goodness USA Patriot!
11:29 AM on 11/06/2011
You could be a genius! Tell us what you have done for the world lately! A little elevator speech, if you please... BZ.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
plasmaborne4rel
Secular Egalitarian Antitheist Liberal [SEAL]
12:13 PM on 11/06/2011
I've been asking my Linux friends why Steve Jobs was able to come up with OS X using Linux as a base yet no one in the Linus community, even today, has made an equally stunning offering? It must take a psychopath who will motivate, cajole, pamper, others to think different. Steve Jobs talent was in details. He didn't invent anything himself he made other people's ideas into commodities.
macchugsid
Conservative Progressive: Hey, it could work.
02:03 PM on 11/06/2011
I Agree! And therein lies Steve Jobs genius. His single-minded quest for the best he could get out of the minds he had working for him. Even if it meant failing he would go at it again and again. That was the genius of Steve Jobs. He saw what people wanted before they did and he pushed his people to create it. You can call him whatever you like but he was the driving force behind one of the most successful companies in history. No one can deny his success, even though some may try.
04:02 PM on 11/06/2011
Perhaps your Linux friends are puzzled by your cluelessness?

From my previous response to another post by you

OSX is based on BSD Unix not Linux. The underlying non-gui portion of OSX is called Darwin and remains open source.

From the Wikipedia:

"Linux is a Unix-like computer operating system "

Linux is actually based on ideas from Minix.

LINUX = Linux Is Not UniX. Got it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Knute5
08:46 AM on 11/06/2011
I think his greatest success was putting Apple (and Pixar) out there as a no-compromise voice in several compromise-heavy markets. Upon arrival, Apple products routinely expose design problems with the status quo, which is forced to react, and the products and market advance. Apple, for a large, mature company (relatively speaking) to be such a firebrand is pretty amazing.Will be curious to see if this passion/focus can remain in his absence.
08:07 AM on 11/06/2011
It was Pixar___it probably succeeded mainly because Jobs saw its value but didn't know enough to interfere...
photo
helioszephyr
What do you mean by "micro"?!
08:57 AM on 11/06/2011
well, he actually did "interfere" when he bought it from Lucas and had a vision of what it might/could be, placed the right talent in control, and short of motivating them, let them run with it.
09:05 AM on 11/06/2011
"...let them run with it".
05:31 AM on 11/06/2011
I think it was the iPod. Putting all you music in your pocket is amazing. No more CD towers to clutter your living room. CDs flying all over your car, melting in your car, getting scratched.
photo
Stilyagi
Making a board with a bigger nail in it.
09:08 AM on 11/06/2011
yeah, no more pretense even to sound quality. Let's all revel in sonic mediocrity, yay!
photo
KeyopsBack
Obama 332 Romney 206
09:31 AM on 11/06/2011
Exactly, when i play a real cd in my car compared to listening to the ipod hooked its a night and day diference. Ill take a cd any day over a file on an ipod.
01:43 PM on 11/06/2011
So if one doesn't enjoy music the way you do, those persons are inferior, correct? Only artists who can get signed with a big label can have those "high quality" CDs you think are so superior. Most local artists record in studios that don't produce the sound with which you speak. Have you heard the CDs they sell at their shows, I have, they suck. The artists are better than mainstream artists IMHO and I don't have to have Ryan Seacrest tell me what's good music.
photo
thewirah
Freedom is a dish best served cold
10:48 AM on 11/06/2011
Invention that is already obsolete.