iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Unemployment Benefits: Most Of The Unemployed No Longer Receive Benefits

By CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER   11/05/11 11:13 AM ET  AP

WASHINGTON -- The jobs crisis has left so many people out of work for so long that most of America's unemployed are no longer receiving unemployment benefits.

Early last year, 75 percent were receiving checks. The figure is now 48 percent – a shift that points to a growing crisis of long-term unemployment. Nearly one-third of America's 14 million unemployed have had no job for a year or more.

Congress is expected to decide by year's end whether to continue providing emergency unemployment benefits for up to 99 weeks in the hardest-hit states. If the emergency benefits expire, the proportion of the unemployed receiving aid would fall further.

The ranks of the poor would also rise. The Census Bureau says unemployment benefits kept 3.2 million people from slipping into poverty last year. It defines poverty as annual income below $22,314 for a family of four.

Yet for a growing share of the unemployed, a vote in Congress to extend the benefits to 99 weeks is irrelevant. They've had no job for more than 99 weeks. They're no longer eligible for benefits.

Their options include food stamps or other social programs. Nearly 46 million people received food stamps in August, a record total. That figure could grow as more people lose unemployment benefits.

So could the government's disability rolls. Applications for the disability insurance program have jumped about 50 percent since 2007.

"There's going to be increased hardship," said Wayne Vroman, an economist at the Urban Institute.

The number of unemployed has been roughly stable this year. Yet the number receiving benefits has plunged 30 percent.

Government unemployment benefits weren't designed to sustain people for long stretches without work. They usually don't have to. In the recoveries from the previous three recessions, the longest average duration of unemployment was 21 weeks, in July 1983.

By contrast, in the wake of the Great Recession, the figure reached 41 weeks in September. That's the longest on records dating to 1948. The figure is now 39 weeks.

"It was a good safety net for a shorter recession," said Carl Van Horn, an economist at Rutgers University. It assumes "the economy will experience short interruptions and then go back to normal."

Weekly unemployment checks average about $300 nationwide. If the extended benefits aren't renewed, growth could slow by up to a half-percentage point next year, economists say.

The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that each $1 spent on unemployment benefits generates up to $1.90 in economic growth. The CBO has found that the program is the most effective government policy for increasing growth among 11 options it's analyzed.

Jon Polis lives in East Greenwich, R.I., one of the 20 states where 99 weeks of benefits are available. He used them all up after losing his job as a warehouse worker in 2008. His benefits paid for groceries, car maintenance and health insurance.

Now, Polis, 55, receives disability insurance payments, food stamps and lives in government-subsidized housing. He's been unable to find work because employers in his field want computer skills he doesn't have.

"Employers are crying that they can't find qualified help," he said. But the ones he interviewed with "weren't willing to train anybody."

From late 2007, when the recession began, to early 2010, the number of people receiving unemployment benefits rose more than four-fold, to 11.5 million.

But the economy has remained so weak that an analysis of long-term unemployment data suggests that about 2 million people have used up 99 weeks of checks and still can't find work.

Contributing to the smaller share of the unemployed who are receiving benefits: Some of them are college graduates or others seeking jobs for the first time. They aren't eligible. Only those who have lost a job through no fault of their own qualify.

The proportion of the unemployed receiving benefits usually falls below 50 percent during an economic recovery. Many have either quit jobs or are new to the job market and don't qualify.

Today, the proportion is falling for a very different reason: Jobs remain scarce. So more of the unemployed are exhausting their benefits.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has noted that the long-term unemployed increasingly find it hard to find work as their skills and professional networks erode. In a speech last month, Bernanke called long-term unemployment a "national crisis" that should be a top priority for Congress.

Lawmakers will have to decide whether to continue the extended benefits by the end of this year. If the program ends, nearly 2.2 million people will be cut off by February.

Congress has extended the program nine times. But it might balk at the $45 billion cost. It will be the first time the Republican-led House will vote on the issue.

Here are the states with the highest levels of unemployment:
FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Filed by Melissa Jeltsen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,224
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (108 total)
12:13 PM on 12/20/2011
It is a dire delima indeed. People are at the end of their ropes and most want to be working, just can't find a job. Companies lay people off with larger salaries and rehire at lower salaries, leaving those folks now without a job. We aren't talking 3 digit figures here. Most below 50,000 annually. Middle class has been wiped off the map. You have the well off and poor left in our nation. Unless companies are created thus creating jobs, and we deal with our own national starving and less with the nations of the world ... we are doomed.
11:42 AM on 11/18/2011
Mr. Rugaber,

I think you need to get your facts together before publishing an article.
The REASON why there is less unemployment is because they are turning people away. I and few of my acquaintances have been TURNED DOWN!!!! Why??? Because we have exhausted our benefits. We are in our sixties and CANNOT get a job. Companies are being prejudice and no one does anything about it. Get your facts straight!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScaningTheWaves
08:14 PM on 11/09/2011
Well under tyhis obama regime they limited the checks down from 99 to what its it now 25. Thats more conservative than socialism
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LA Crystal
09:39 PM on 11/08/2011
I know of a couple of hundred people I'd like to see out of a job in DC. That would help the economy tremendously!
09:05 PM on 11/07/2011
any hope to turn off the illegals and underachievers?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Touche007
05:05 PM on 11/07/2011
Why so many disrespectful comments towards the unemployed? It's extremely sad when we start talking about the unemployed as if they are a drag on society. The unemployed are not taking money away from those who are blessed to have a damn job. Those who are getting a paycheck, are not making any less because of the unemployed. There are 14 million or more people who would love to go to work and earn a good living each day. Unfortunately to just say "get a job" is useless.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
04:37 PM on 11/07/2011
I love it "Bernanke called long-term unemployment a "national crisis" that should be a top priority for Congress." I thought bailing out the banks was the top priority. Then buying up Treasury bonds. Now it's finaly getting around to the people. Hey Ben, don't hold your breath.
02:48 PM on 11/07/2011
The "hardest hit) areas are of course, Where Obama's constituency lies... Keep their welf*** I mean unemploymenht going for another 99 weeks, yeah,,,, that's it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blueken
Finger Picking blues man
04:33 PM on 11/07/2011
Try reading the article again. Anyone that goes 99 weeks is no longer eligable. Also you don't capitilize a word after a comma. You can't blame Obama for your education.
JWoode
yes.. my micro bio is meaningless
12:05 PM on 11/07/2011
When McDonald's announces they are hiring and.. everyone shows up.. that should be a clue as to the availability of jobs today.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
roxette
10:48 AM on 11/07/2011
Just asking, Is the useless Congress in recess this week? Will they receive their paycheck?
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
10:27 AM on 11/07/2011
Soylent Green time......... afterall people eat sushi...........
ssyankeeclipper
Glen Beck rules
10:16 AM on 11/07/2011
isn't this the more bang for the buck the now fired house speaker spoke of? guess we misunderstood the bang part
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
redhead55
10:13 AM on 11/07/2011
Obviously, from a supposedly respected right-wing pundit, unemployment is a good thing --- excerpt from Washington Monthly ---

'On ABC’s “This Week,” George Will said there were “two bits of good news” in the monthly jobs report released Friday. “The 80,000 [jobs gained] is a net number,” the conservative columnist noted. “The private sector created 104,000 jobs. The public sector happily shrank by 24,000 jobs. Both of that’s good.”

'For the left, the economic goals are inherently pragmatic — creating jobs is the top priority. When more Americans are working, they’re not only helping themselves and their family, but they’re boosting the economy and helping lower the deficit. For the right, as Will reminds us, the economic goals are philosophical — creating jobs is nice, but the real priority is shrinking government. Maybe, they argue, the economy will improve when more teachers, police officers, and firefighters are unemployed and unable to spend and invest.'
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Taz2212
We need sustainable jobs!
12:45 PM on 11/07/2011
George Will mouthpiece for the 1%
10:47 PM on 11/07/2011
A many of those 24,000 were teachers from rick perry's Texas. So much for the future.
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
10:00 AM on 11/07/2011
Next stop.....................Welfare.

The United States can't afford to employ people to fix a crumbling infrastructure. So we'll spend billions on welfare paying people to embrace poverty and stay at home.

Where is the logic in that?
10:19 AM on 11/07/2011
The solution is to cut off all welfare. People then will have no choice but to get a job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Taz2212
We need sustainable jobs!
12:48 PM on 11/07/2011
A bit of Catch-22? Get a job....there are no jobs...get a job...there are no jobs. How about we start training U.S. jobless citizens instead of allowing foreigners into our country on special visas to take jobs at lower than market wages?
10:48 PM on 11/07/2011
Too many employers will not hire anyone who is out of work .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omega777
Yellow cake is the Bomb
08:03 AM on 11/07/2011
And the employeed say welcome to Walmart or would you like fry's with that with terrible medical if any....
10:50 PM on 11/07/2011
A friend of mine was fired from Walmart after working there for 5 years. His crime was he applied for another job and they called Walmart up. Walmart fired him for conflict of interest.
03:17 PM on 11/15/2011
I hired some one who previously worked at Walmart. She was paid $8.00 an hour, never given more than 32 hours of work a week and thus was never eligible for their health care plan and did not know her work schedule until Sunday night for the following week's work. She was thrilled at $10 an hour (she should have asked for at least $12) and was thrilled to get 40 hours of work each week. She has been a marvelous worked --- very good attitude and very reliable.