More

Mojave Water Debate: Company Wants To Use Cadiz Ranch

By NOAKI SCHWARTZ and GARANCE BURKE   11/ 6/11 11:42 AM ET   AP

CADIZ, Calif. -- Off historic Route 66 in the heart of the California desert the barren landscape of dry scrub and rock abruptly gives way to an oasis of tall green trees heavy with lemons and grape vines awaiting next month's harvest.

Some believe this lush farm in the unlikeliest of places also sits atop a partial solution to Southern California's water woes.

By tapping into an aquifer the size of Rhode Island under the 35,000-acre Cadiz ranch, proponents say they can supply 400,000 people with drinking water in only a few years.

If the plan sounds familiar, it is. A decade ago, Los Angeles' Metropolitan Water District narrowly rejected it when it faced widespread environmental opposition. A scaled back version has resurfaced with a greener pitch, momentum from five water agencies and what the company claims is better science to win over skeptics.

"Do we need additional water supplies? Yes. Do we need groundwater storage? Yes," said Winston Hickox, a Cadiz board member who headed the California Environmental Protection Agency. "The question is `OK, environmental community, what are your remaining concerns?' I don't know."

But conservationists including the Sierra Club remain worried. Critics say the company has misrepresented the size of the aquifer and that mining it could harm the threatened desert tortoise, bighorn sheep, as well as the nearby Mojave National Preserve which has some of the densest and oldest Joshua tree forests in the world. Concerns over rare desert species were also echoed by state Department of Fish and Game biologists in March.

Conservationists also worry tampering with an aquifer in a place where water is so scarce could cause dust storms.

"There's a lot of unknowns here but we think this project has the potential to adversely affect air quality, draw down water resources and alter the flow of groundwater beneath the Mojave Preserve," said Seth Shteir with the National Parks and Conservation Association, which plans to scrutinize an environmental review of the project, expected to be released this month.

Groundwater has long played a part in the West's age-old water wars, which are increasingly being waged underground. These large unseen reserves of underground water nourish a place that would appear to most observers as dead.

California has few regulations when it comes to groundwater pumping, according to Carolyn Remick, who heads the Berkeley Water Center at the University of California. Consequently it is often weaker local agencies that largely oversee such extraction, leading to a raft of problems ranging from groundwater contamination to over-pumping and ground sinking.

Last year a conservation group sued the state water board in an effort to force the agency to regulate groundwater pumping that has depleted Northern California's Scott River, threatening salmon populations. In arid Kern County, north of the Mojave Preserve, a local water utility filed suit against wealthy farming interests claiming their enormous withdrawals of water lowered the water table and caused service disruptions.

Cadiz officials say they are aware of the concerns and promise an extensive monitoring system. The water in question begins in springs high atop desert mountains and travels under the Cadiz ranch before it resurfaces in dusty lake beds dozens of miles away where it evaporates.

The plan could cost as much as $225 million to sink 34 wells into the desert and build a 44-mile pipeline along a railroad right-of-way that intersects with the Colorado River Aqueduct.

In dry years, water would be pumped to burgeoning communities in Southern California. During years with above-average rainfall, Colorado River water could be pumped to the aquifer for storage. Proponents say the water would offer a much-needed alternative to boost supplies in a region hard hit with water cutbacks during the state's recent three-year drought.

For years the project was led by a colorful British businessman, Los Angeles-based Cadiz founder Keith Brackpool, who has since taken a more behind-the-scenes role. Brackpool, who also heads the California Racing Board, has deep political connections, contributing to past gubernatorial candidates, serving as a water consultant to former Gov. Gray Davis and whose company once employed Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa as a consultant.

Brackpool, however, became something of a distraction when it was revealed by the Los Angeles Times that years earlier he pleaded guilty in London to criminal charges that included dealing in securities without a license and that his expertise before becoming the governor's water consultant was overseeing a food company. His company reports having $145 million in assets, but generated revenue of just $1 million last year. It also is being investigated by shareholders unhappy with recent executive bonuses.

Brackpool, through a company spokesman, refused repeated requests for an interview with The Associated Press. Cadiz ranch is the company's only water project.

The Cadiz proposal was rejected in early 2000 by the Metropolitan Water District in part after conservationists raised concerns over possible environmental damage. A scaled-back version resurfaced in 2008 with a new spokesman, Scott Slater, a new greener pitch that they were conserving water that would otherwise evaporate and new studies that showed how much water they could safely pump.

"We're not taking water from anyone," Slater said. "It sincerely is depriving only the atmosphere of water that would actually evaporate."

Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has called the proposal "a path-breaking, new, sustainable groundwater conservation and storage project." But Sen. Dianne Feinstein called it a "serious threat to the desert" in a 2008 letter to the Department of the Interior, potentially depleting water supplies which plants and wildlife rely upon for survival

Since 2010, the Santa Margarita Water District, Three Valleys Water District, Golden State Water Company, Suburban Water Systems and Jurupa Community Services District entered into agreements with Cadiz to receive water. These agencies supply water to parts of Los Angeles County, Orange County, Riverside County and eastern San Gabriel Valley.

The company has invested $7 million in hiring top-flight consultants to study the science behind the project and in drilling wells. Cadiz also put together a panel of experts who reviewed the project and recently deemed it safe.

A comprehensive environmental report is expected to be released this month and if the project clears all required permits, the districts hope to get water within two years.

And if voters approve a $11 billion water bond measure intended to rebuild California's crumbling water system and fund new dams, water districts may apply for public funds available for new infrastructure to save up the precious resource for dry years. Schwarzenegger signed the bond bill in 2009, but it won't become law unless voters approve it a year from now next November.

John Schatz, Santa Margarita's general manager, calls the new vision a "conservation project," but he acknowledged potential hurdles in selling the greener pitch.

"We don't have any illusions that there may be some issues with environmental groups and what's happened in the past," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

CADIZ, Calif. -- Off historic Route 66 in the heart of the California desert the barren landscape of dry scrub and rock abruptly gives way to an oasis of tall green trees heavy with lemons and grape v...
CADIZ, Calif. -- Off historic Route 66 in the heart of the California desert the barren landscape of dry scrub and rock abruptly gives way to an oasis of tall green trees heavy with lemons and grape v...
CADIZ, Calif. -- Off historic Route 66 in the heart of the California desert the barren landscape of dry scrub and rock abruptly gives way to an oasis of tall green trees heavy with lemons and grape v...
CADIZ, Calif. -- Off historic Route 66 in the heart of the California desert the barren landscape of dry scrub and rock abruptly gives way to an oasis of tall green trees heavy with lemons and grape v...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 82
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:41 PM on 11/09/2011
Pathetic,companies just want to make more money.
08:42 PM on 11/09/2011
Hell no!!!don't destroy what it took millions to form.California it's destroying it's natural beauty.
04:59 PM on 11/09/2011
We are all going to be living like the astronauts and living on recycled water. WE HAVE TO PRESERVE AND SAVE OUR PRECIOUS WATER SUPPLIES AND OUR ENVIRONMENT. The Colorado river, The aquifer that runs down the California Valley changed the North American landscape forever. What is this greedy generation going to have to leave to it's children. Only terrible problems? When It comes to Mother Earth, I say greed no more. My grandfather told me when he was a child you could walk across this Continent at one time and it was tree to tree....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:09 PM on 11/08/2011
First of all, why not stop WASTING water? I know, how to water agencies get their slush funds if we don't keep wasting water, but isn't it time to start doing serious catchment and greywater and stop with the endless waste of potable water?

Further to that, people should be aware that the BIG waste of water is thermal electricity generation (49% of extracted water goes to coal, nuke, gas and geothermal electricity and now the blight of solar thermal will ADD to the problem). In CA, in a PERFECT circle for the agencies involved, 25% of our electricity is then used to.... move water! Localizing water and electricity sourcing, focusing on the built environment would HUGELY slash both electricity waste and water waste, but don't look at Big Energy (including DWP!), Big Government or Big Water (or Big Ag, etc.) to do the right thing - they designed these systems for their own power and profit and we will have to pry them from their cold, dead hands!

Time to start working a LOT harder on local, non-wasteful, self-sufficient, clean and effective energy and water solutions - nobody is gonna do it for us.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
06:52 AM on 11/07/2011
It's that typical corporate meme 'we must have more and more'.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
06:51 AM on 11/07/2011
In dry years, water would be pumped to burgeoning communities in Southern California. During years with above-average rainfall, Colorado River water could be pumped to the aquifer for storage.

So in otherwords RARELY!

Just another scheme of the real estate development crowd. Watch if this gets approved it'll be sucked dry.

I thought this proposal died, sadly apparently not.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:58 AM on 11/07/2011
has nobody learned anything from ogallala ?
photo
drbob601
Soylent Green is People
10:01 PM on 11/06/2011
"And if voters approve a $11 billion water bond measure intended to rebuild California's crumbling water system and fund new dams, water districts may apply for public funds available for new infrastructure to save up the precious resource for dry years. Schwarzenegger signed the bond bill in 2009, but it won't become law unless voters approve it a year from now next November."

Building more infrastructure using taxpayer dollars for the benefit (and profits) of a private company.
I'm sure they won't overcharge the end-users though, since corporations are inherently fair and decent people, and only have our best interests in mind. Oh, and just ignore the concerns expressed by their shareholders about executive bonuses. I'm sure these execs aren't in it for the money.
I'm waiting for the pitch about how many jobs it will supposedly create. That seems to be corporate America's favorite tactic these days in their bid to extract every penny of profit from our dwindling natural resources. Works especially well when unemployment rates are at historic highs.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Davis 747
11:52 PM on 11/06/2011
The three aqueducts transporting water to Southern California, the DWP from the Eastern Sierra Mountains is owned by the City of Los Angeles; the Colorado River aqueduct is publically owned and the Feather River, California Water Project which transports water from the Sacramento Delta is also publically owned. There are private water companies but they only account for a small amount of the water piped into Southern California.
09:53 PM on 11/06/2011
Big business doesn't care. The taxpayers will be left holding the bag, as usual.
photo
carolineeaton
I am a Goddess who runs with the wolves
08:36 PM on 11/06/2011
After that aquifer has been sucked dry, then what? Mother of jesus, when are people going to get that it is time to stop sucking everything out of the earth, only to leave a dead planet? Look what happened to Florida's aquifer. I expect someone is gong to say next that it's in the middle of nowhere. But once the aquifer is tapped you don't think real estate is going to want to develop there? Do people actually think this isn't going to have repercussions? We have to begin to think outside the box and become more creative about our whole approach to resources, and figure out how to make do with what we have.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Davis 747
12:05 AM on 11/07/2011
How about the Ogallala Aquifer? The Ogallala Aquifer is the largest aquifer in the country. It runs from the Canadian border through the Midwest to the Mexican border. It is being pumped dry by farmers who irrigate in the Midwest. When that water is gone; it is gone. It takes about 100 years for water to percolate down to the aquifer.
photo
carolineeaton
I am a Goddess who runs with the wolves
12:13 AM on 11/07/2011
Exactly. And the more people that voice their concerns, the more momentum we are going to have.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:58 AM on 11/07/2011
i think 100 tears is optimistic.
01:28 AM on 11/07/2011
Where should we get water from?
photo
carolineeaton
I am a Goddess who runs with the wolves
01:42 AM on 11/07/2011
We have to begin to use our gray matter and develop other ways, ways that do not make us dependent on destroying everything. There are suggestions in this comments section. If we remain open to all the ideas that are available to us, we can find other alternatives, not just"settle." Rather than criticizing new ideas and waiting for others to do it for us, we can endorse other ways, make suggestions.
07:31 AM on 11/07/2011
The ocean. I know that sounds wrong but it is possible. The treatment is called reverse osmosis and it is used in various places around the world. It is expensive but it works and it is right next to CA.
07:17 PM on 11/06/2011
So few comments - that should tell you something.

At one point, back with Teddy Roosevelt, the idea was to interlink the entire country with a series of aqueducts (Roman Empire style - read up on how it was done 2000 years ago). Aqueducts would carry the overflow above the ground from areas that got too much rain. Flood control. Pathetic, actually, that no one knows what is possible anymore. New Jersey got 17 inches of rain in the month of August. No reason it could not have ended up in Texas, except, of course, for the whole *vision* issue....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
coveark
Obstructionists, get off the hill !!!
11:25 PM on 11/06/2011
Interesting. I wholeheartedly agree. We can pipe oil and gas all over.

Too much water floods the midwest etc. If those waters could be transported rather than destroying life, it could enhance life.

Most of these excess waters runoff into the oceans.......too bad we could not use some of them first.

Even in LA when there are large rains........where does it go? down the cement streams and rivers into the sea.

As you ask, are we too limited to grab that vision ? Seems so.

Such a thing could be a national project that would take many years and could employ 1000's. We could make our own steel and our own components.............it could be likened to a war effort. A war to save our planet, our people and our economy. If we actually maintained it.......work would be available for decades.

It had crossed my mind many years ago ........thanks for bringing it up. The Italian aqueducts are still amazing......
10:17 AM on 11/07/2011
We don't have to use steel - high tech ceramics would do, like the ceramics that were used to bring the Shuttle back and forth from the ISS....

The reason the flood control project was halted was because of WWII. The reason no one knows that this plan even existed in 2011...? Dude who owns the ranch is a greedy and cheap idiot - it's not HIS water, get real....water is a PUBLIC utility and there is plenty of it to go around if we control the above ground distribution of it through a national network of aqueducts providing flood control (all major rivers in USA linked).

But this isn't the only project that needs to get done that would employ 1000s of people in very interesting and HEALTHY honest labor, is it?
photo
demisfine
Often correct, NEVER right.
05:51 PM on 11/06/2011
Wasn't this a James Bond movie a few years back?
Bad idea, even with the hot international spy and amazing special effects.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
05:36 PM on 11/06/2011
I've read the comments on this thread and the majority of us feel this is a BAD idea! That fossil water in the aquifer under Cadiz ranch needs to be left alone as it is too small for commercial usage, will cost too much to pump out but more importantly is likely to cause great harm to the environment if removed. This is California we are talking about, we have the Pacific Ocean for a water supply, all that is needed is a Desalinization Plant and the water it produces can be used for irrigation and other needs. At least this way once this plant was built it would have a sustainable source of water, until the Ocean gets screwed up in the far future......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
05:44 PM on 11/06/2011
Great comment and I agree we should not use fossil water or even allow bottle water companies near the water. I respectfully question the last part about screwing up the ocean. The plastic we dump in the Pacific is getting ground into smaller and smaller granules and I am wondering if a desalination plant can remove these tiny particles when in full operation or will these particles clog up the plant.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
06:06 PM on 11/06/2011
Undoubtedly such a plant would have to have a screened intake because there is a lot of solid waste and refuse floating in the Pacific. That's not a hard problem for a clever engineer to solve.
photo
carolineeaton
I am a Goddess who runs with the wolves
08:48 PM on 11/06/2011
Sorry, a late posting. The ocean already is screwed up. A vast majority of the fish are contaminated with mercury. I am older and a lot of my friends have mercury poisoning from the fish they ate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mudshark12
Now who are you jiving with that cosmik debris?
09:15 PM on 11/06/2011
It is very unfortunate but ALL fish available in the US whether they are freshwater of saltwater have some level of mercury contamination in them, the sad thing is that you have to do internet research to determine where the safest fish are if you're interested in eating them, I like fish they're yummy.

Here's a helpful excerpt from Wikipedia:

Species with characteristically low levels of mercury include shrimp, tilapia, salmon, pollock, and catfish (FDA March 2004). The FDA characterizes shrimp, catfish, pollock, salmon, sardines, and canned light tuna as low-mercury seafood, although recent tests have indicated that up to 6 percent of canned light tuna may contain high levels. A study published in 2008 found that mercury distribution in tuna meat is inversely related to the lipid content, suggesting that the lipid concentration within edible tuna tissues has a diluting effect on mercury content. These findings suggest that choosing to consume a type of tuna that has a higher natural fat content may help reduce the amount of mercury intake, compared to consuming tuna with a low fat content. Also, many of the fish chosen for sushi contain high levels of mercury.

And a few links, good luck:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_in_fish

http://planetgreen.discovery.com/food-health/safer-seafood.html

http://www.mnn.com/food/healthy-eating/questions/is-there-such-a-thing-as-mercury-free-fish
photo
carolineeaton
I am a Goddess who runs with the wolves
09:57 PM on 11/06/2011
To mudshark12 whose comment hasn't been posted yet, but which I read, thanks. I've read those sites before, but what I really appreciate is that you are thinking outside the box instead of trying to exploit resources that should not be exploited. I wish we had more people like you, thanks. If they tap that aquifer my guess is the real estate developers will be next, and then 'quel bordel,' what a mess, and waste of resources. Stay strong and keep up the good ideas.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
SarcasticFringehead
Mute Nostril Agony
05:13 PM on 11/06/2011
But wait -- where will we get the water we need to keep all those golf courses in the desert green?

Sounds like class warfare -- denying the 1% their favorite pastime.
07:13 PM on 11/06/2011
Sounds like a good idea but how could you stop them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Foodgrade
Learn to grow banannas
05:03 PM on 11/06/2011
And the same thing will happen that happened to the rest of the SO Cal aquifers. The claim for the Central Valley project to wheel water from Northern California to Southern California to grow cotton in the desert, and voted in because Southern California has more representatives than northern California was to be used to replenish the aquifers. Instead it was used to irrigate more desert and the aquifers are corrupted. The water is very bad and muxh of it can't be used for irrigation. Now the growers are whining because they don't get enough water and they want a peripheral canal project that will destroy the Sacramento Delta and San Francisco Bay. Samr water con, same jerks making the money. NO. Stop it now.