More

Bank Of America Overdraft Lawsuit: Judge Approves $410 Million Settlement

Bank Of America Overdraft Suit

CURT ANDERSON   11/ 7/11 05:15 PM ET   AP

MIAMI — A federal judge on Monday gave final approval to a $410 million settlement in a class-action lawsuit affecting more than 13 million Bank of America customers who had debit card overdrafts during the past decade.

Senior U.S. District Judge James Lawrence King said the agreement was fair and reasonable, even though it drew criticism from some customers because they would only receive a fraction of what they paid in overdraft fees. The fees were usually $35 per occurrence.

"It's really undisputed that this is one of the largest settlements ever in a consumer case," said Aaron Podhurst, a lead attorney for the customer class.

The settlement became final a week after Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America backed off a plan to charge a $5 monthly fee for debit-card purchases. The outcry prompted other major banks, including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co., to cancel trial tests of their own debit card fees.

Bank attorney Laurence Hutt said 13.2 million Bank of America customers who had debit cards between January 2001 and May 2011 would get some payment. Those who still have accounts would get an automatic credit and the others would get a check mailed to them. No one would have to take any action or fill out any paperwork.

Barry Himmelstein, an attorney for customers who objected to the deal, said he calculated that the bank actually raked in $4.5 billion through the overdraft fees and was repaying less than 10 percent. He said the average customer in the case had $300 in overdraft fees, making them eligible for a $27 award – less than one overdraft charge – from the lawsuit.

"It's $4.5 billion that's gone missing from people's accounts," Himmelstein said.

Hutt said only 46 customers filed formal objections to the settlement and 350 decided to opt out, meaning they could take separate legal action on their own.

"It's very easy for people to say on the sidelines, `I could do better,'" Hutt said. "Never is a settlement at 100 percent of what somebody thinks they can receive at trial. It's always a compromise."

Customers will receive a minimum of 9 percent of the fees they paid through the settlement, Hutt added. The bank has already paid the money into an escrow account.

The lawsuit claimed that Bank of America processed its debit card transactions in the order of highest to lowest dollar amount so it could maximize the overdraft fees customers paid. An overdraft occurs when the account doesn't have enough money in it to cover a debit card transaction. Similar lawsuits have been filed against more than 30 other banks.

Despite the settlement, Bank of America insists there was nothing improper about the processing sequence. New regulations enacted following the recent financial crisis prohibit banks from charging overdraft fees on debit cards without first getting customer permission.

Many of the objections concerned the fees for the team of class-action attorneys, which would amount to about $123 million. Lawyers for people opposed to the settlement said that amount should be cut down by at least $50 million, with the money going back to the wronged customers.

"The best use is to provide compensation to the class members," said Elliott Kula, who represents some of the objectors.

But King sided with the plaintiffs' attorneys, noting that they spent thousands of hours on the case and achieved "a superb result" for the customers.

"I don't see anything about this case that's simple or garden variety," the judge said.

Another complaint concerned missing records for customers from 2001 through 2003, which has made them impossible to identify. The settlement will take about 14 percent of the total – representing an estimate for the fees paid by those customers – and put the money into nonprofit financial literacy programs.

In addition, the 32 original named plaintiffs who represented the larger class will get bonuses of up to $5,000 each, $2,500 each if both plaintiffs are a married couple.

____

Online:

Settlement Website: http://www.bofaoverdraftsettlement.com

____

Follow Curt Anderson on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Miamicurt

.

.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
MIAMI — A federal judge on Monday gave final approval to a $410 million settlement in a class-action lawsuit affecting more than 13 million Bank of America customers who had debit card overdraft...
MIAMI — A federal judge on Monday gave final approval to a $410 million settlement in a class-action lawsuit affecting more than 13 million Bank of America customers who had debit card overdraft...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 242
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
09:50 AM on 01/03/2012
No one has received a dime on this settlement yet because it is still in appeal. The 410 million is just sitting in an account because one of the class members opposed it and filed an appeal. No matter how it turns out, you are only going to receive a fraction of what you lost and the greedy lawyers will be buying new jets.

From the lawsuit website:

"On November 7, 2011, the Court granted final approval to the Settlement with Bank of America, approved service awards to the Plaintiffs, and awarded attorneys’ fees to Class Counsel. On November 22, 2011, the Court entered a corresponding order and judgment that formalized the Court’s final Settlement approval, as well as the service awards and the fee award. On November 29, 2011, a Settlement Class Member who objected to the Settlement filed a notice of appeal from the order and judgment. Additional appeals may be filed. "
11:50 AM on 12/24/2011
I got my check yesterday for $98.17. I closed my bank account with BOA years ago after I saw what they were doing. My ex hsuband did not always tell me when he wrote checks or withdrew so I had a TON of OD feees.
01:33 PM on 12/17/2011
when do the people who were effected by this get there share of the money awarded?
12:59 PM on 12/06/2011
I had many $35.oo OD-fees which was several times almost the entire amount of my unemployment check and later my paycheck. As stated in one of the articles, the highest amount was taken out first even though the other purchases went through already and even left a balance on my account. In some cases those purchases were $2.19 or around $5.00 and should have been processed. Instead they were kept in a pending status and were attached after a higher amount came in. This resulted often in 5 or more $35.oo fees which would increase if no deposit was made within 5 days.After calls to cust. svc. I received 3 different answers why this was done.this way.
08:44 PM on 12/06/2011
OMG. The same thing happened to me. I purchased a few items on a Friday after 6:00 P.M. I checked my balance and I was in the clear. I had a positive balance. On Monday morning, I had a check to come through, which was more than what was in my account, and Bank Of America chose to pay the larger amount first, and then let the smaller amount go through later. This resulted in almost 10 freaking over draft fees. I left Bank Of America. I don't know why people are still with this bank. They are Bank of America. Not the only bank in America. I wish I know a lawyer who would take may case. $27 is not acceptable after what they did.
02:35 PM on 12/08/2011
This just happened to me. I purchased lunch. I was positive. I transferred money into the account the next day. I was positive when I transferred the money. I woke up to my account missing 35.00. They had processed a check before my deposit. Even though, I had the money transferred before the check went through. I called to complain and show them proof of what I have done and got my 35.00 back.
09:38 PM on 11/29/2011
wait a minute, I understood by reading the agreement that participants in this lawsuit were to recieve $5000.00. If I had known differently I would have opted out. Guess from now on I will have to have an attorney to take care of this. I wouldn't have opened an account with them if my ex hadn't of insisted anyway.
01:35 PM on 11/22/2011
You have got to be kidding me! So, let me get this straight.....the settlement was for $410 million....the lawyers get 30% which is roughly $123 million.....the CONSUMERS that this actually HAPPENED TO get 9% of total OD fees they paid out.....so if my OD fees were ~$300.00, then my reward is about $27.00....which is not even equal to the original OD fee of $35.00.....TELL ME HOW THIS IS FAIR!!!!!!!?????!!!...the CONSUMER is still getting the bad end of the deal....this is one of the best examples of American greed since Bernie Madhoff, and, the corruption on Wal Street. Unbelievable.....so BOA gets a little slap on the wrist, the lawyers get rich, and, the little people get screwed again.....don't be sad! It's the American way!!!!!!! Right??!!!!!
05:36 PM on 12/07/2011
I agree with you!!! that is not fair. I used to work for them before and you have not idea of how many times I came home crying, because of the way the treated their customers and employees. you were only valuable to them if you were bringing more than $5 thousand dollars. some of the things I saw was that if a snowball of OD (it happens when a few transactions comes in the account the same business day, putting the largest withdrawal first that way they can charge you a fee for the rest of the transactions) happened to a customer that didn't have a history of having a good amounts of money in their accounts they were lucky to get one OD fee back, but if you were the son of Dr. Doolittle that had a "good relationship"(mortgages, IRA, cheeking, money markets, etc..) with the bank the kid will get reimburse at managers discretion. and if the employees complain about it they will find the way to get rid of them with a smile face.

So, is not fair what they are doing to the people! I understand that the attorneys have spend a good amount of time in this lawsuit. but I am pretty sure they never got a OD fee charged to their accounts.
08:16 AM on 11/20/2011
it's about time justice prevailed, back in 03, I had an entire payroll check siphoned because of those $35.00 overdraft fees, it's an outrage, i'm still pissed! James J Fleming
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Louie Benson Memorial
03:31 PM on 11/19/2011
when do i get my cut , that's all i want to know ?
02:02 AM on 11/18/2011
So the punishment for getting caught is that they only get to keep 90% of the loot!

Is it unconstitutional if the cruelty is towards the victim's compensation?
04:46 PM on 11/11/2011
In the last 3 weeks, I have had total 9 overdraft charges on my account, so total of $315.
they are consecutive charges as ($35) + ($35+$35) + ($35+$35+$35) + ($35+$35+$35).

So, as you see for the same day, and in a repetitive way, they apply those charges and without your permission.

I called their call center and after talking the first person (he could not help with anything accept verifying my account information); I asked him to transfer me to his supervisor. He pick-up the phone as "it is a FANTASTIC day, how can I help you?.. etc... ", and he did not help at all.
all they do is to give you an advise and explain you how and why charges have been occurred (or happened).
I asked him and explained him that whole scenario is NON-SENSE (because it is nonsense) and he gave different answers each time contradicting himself.
04:45 PM on 11/11/2011
Finally, his intention was anything but helping; and frankly, he was not helping at all and I told him that I am really thinking about to close my account and he even did not do anything, did not care at all. And, finally, I asked him if he can waive them as courtesy, then he said he needs to verify some stuff and started to ask tricky questions such as "if there is any transaction fraudulent " etc.. , but these questions are designed to take you to the position as "Everything looks normal, so the overdraft fees are accurately charged"; and I told him that his questions are tricky and asked him the same way, and he said he cannot do anything.

Similar incident (overdraft charges) happened with my HSBC account about 2 years ago, and I called them talked to the guy; but I had to hang up at that moment. Then, next day or other day, a gentleman called from their support center, he asked me about it and I told him the situation that I am fed-up with it and I do not have time to talk. I was gonna hang-up but He said he will take care of it. Well, the overdraft fees had been waived, and since then, I have not had any overdraft fee issue with them. If I still go to minus side but as long as I make payments; they do not apply any overdraft fees.Excellent service.
04:21 PM on 11/11/2011
So, I am with BoA right now, and I am not sure if it makes sense to encourage people to "STAY AWAY from BoA" but definitely, they are screwing you and you have to cover yourself.

For sure, I will move my accounts from BoA to another bank or a credit union very soon, so they will not be able to benefit from any commissions they gain with my daily transactions, automatic payments etc. That would be a very good loss for them and a good lesson.

In conclusion,
It is true that the way they apply/reflect the charges as from the biggest number to the smallest, so they would be able to charge you with the highest number of overdraft fees at each time.
They practice applying the multiple overdraft charges no matter how your account goes to minus.
For Example: My account went to minus and I only put just enough money to move to positive, then next day there is an overdraft fee, the balance goes to minus again; and on top of that there is another overdraft fee because the previous overdraft fee caused an automatic overdraft on the account. (It looks like a reverse-loophole or something)

BoA has one of the worst customer services, just worthless. Do waste your time even for moving your fingers to dial their number!
02:40 PM on 11/09/2011
It all comes out in the wash, does'nt it?! I remember when that first happened to me; I thought it was a law suit waiting to happen. Thank God it finally has finally been proved that what B or A has done is

w r o n g ! Now after the sharks/lawyers get their share (who really has suffered here) maybe the rest of us will see more than $1 added to our accounts! Maybe that is the next class action to be filed: Excessive fees that lawyers charge, along with excessive medical expenses!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tarpon22
11:40 AM on 11/09/2011
The Judge is Corrupt.

NO FINES.

Only Supenas and Indictments.
MOVE YOUR MONEY NOW

Those of you who do not protest and Occupy will continue to be fed upon by the Coorupt System in place to steal from you and your Family.

WE ARE THE 99%
We do not forget
We do not forgive
We are Legion
EXPECT US
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JPETERB
12:58 AM on 11/09/2011
Peanuts. Pennies on the dollar. Chump change. And everyone knows it. Justice for none.