More

Initiative 1183: Washington State Voters To Decide Fate Of Privatizing Liquor Sales

1183 Costco

First Posted: 11/07/11 03:00 PM ET Updated: 11/07/11 03:23 PM ET

Washington State voters are being asked to consider privatizing the state's alcohol sales system during Tuesday's election.

A year after a similar referendum failed, pro-alcohol sales forces have come back with Initiative 1183, dubbed the "Costco initiative" to end state-run liquor stores in the state. Sales in the state are currently only through stores run by the state's Liquor Control Board, a Prohibition-era policy.

"Washington is one of a few states that does not have some sort of privatization on the books," said Kathryn Stanger, spokeswoman for the group Yes on 1183. "Initiative 1183 frees [the liquor board] up to focus on regulation and enforcement. This will strengthen the laws governing enforcement of the sale of liquor."

Currently eight states have only state-run liquor stores.

Pro-referendum forces are being backed heavily by Costco, the Washington state-based wholesale store, which would be able to sell alcohol in its local stores if the referendum passes. Costco has been the biggest backer of the pro-1183 campaign, with contributions totaling $22 million, the largest ever spent on a statewide alcohol referendum in Washington history. This includes an $8.9 million contribution made at the end of October.

"This initiative was written by a single company, Costco, for its benefit," said Alex Fryer, the spokesman for Protect Our Communities, the group advocating rejection of 1183. "It's a tremendous change for Washington state."

The opposition forces have received $3.6 million in contributions from the Wine and Spirits Wholesalers of America, which oppose the change in laws that would allow other stores to buy directly from alcohol distributors if the referendum passes. Currently private liquor stores have to purchase products from alcohol wholesalers, who serve as a middleman between the stores and the distributors.

Fryer said the distribution aspect is a concern to his group, saying that Protect Our Communities sees this as a way for Costco to make more money as a wholesaler to other smaller liquor stores. He said he could imagine Costco wanting to pass similar laws in other states.

"They have said they will run a similar initiative in Oregon," Fryer said. "They will move across the country, upending decades of liquor control structure."

Costco did not respond to a request for comment from The Huffington Post.

Stanger confirmed that Costco has been a big supporter of the referendum, but said the measure is not just for them. She said that the new law would allow any store over 10,000 square feet to sell alcohol, along with continuing to allow the small contract stores under the current system to sell. Stanger said that convienance stores and gas stations would not be able to sell alcohol, however -- something that Fryer contended.

Stanger noted that Trader Joe's, a supermarket chain that sells alcohol in other states, has stores that average 10,000 square feet.

"If this was about one store, I don't think we'd have more than a dozen chambers of commerce supporting us," Stanger said. "We have chambers of commerce across the state. The state chamber gave us 95 percent support."

Public safety has also been an issue in the race, with opposition forces saying that the proposed move would cause an upswing in alcohol-related issues in the state. Stanger said the referendum addresses public safety, including $10 million a year in revenue from private liquor stores to the state government that would be set aside for local public safety grants. Fryer contended that the need to set aside the money says that issues could arise. The referendum specifies that the money would be distributed to local government in the form of grants and could cover everything from the creation of DARE programs to new fire trucks.

Stanger has also said the privatization move would allow the state liquor agency to focus on enforcement instead of sales. Fryer said the move would continue to staff the liquor agency with 50 enforcement officers, to handle more stores.

"Does a new fire truck or DARE program mitigate things?" Fryer said. "You are reacting to a problem you are creating."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Washington State voters are being asked to consider privatizing the state's alcohol sales system during Tuesday's election. A year after a similar referendum failed, pro-alcohol sales forces have c...
Washington State voters are being asked to consider privatizing the state's alcohol sales system during Tuesday's election. A year after a similar referendum failed, pro-alcohol sales forces have c...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,008
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (18 total)
03:27 PM on 11/09/2011
We have a spoiled community who expect everything and whenever they want it, no matter what harm may come of it, as witnessed by the extra 'money set aside' for states to increase fire trucks and more DARE programs, to counter the problem, as Fryer says, 'that they are creating'.

Big money strikes again.

I suspect we'll see big groups in our state coming out in large numbers to protest this, as they should. We are a country thinking that their 'privledge' is more important that morals. Drinking harms our body as do drugs ( most of them) and prostitution corrupts our very soul by showcasing our body as trash bins instead of the beauty god intended. But those types of 'stores' are legal too, no matter the harm they cause.

More of the same, and its going to cause riots by those that know, that alcohol KILLS, as the new money set aside, clearly indicates.
11:29 AM on 11/10/2011
And the sky is falling too..neighborlee..42 other states sell it this way....It won't make me buy alcohol any more than I buy beer.....My wife buys it to make her awesome beer bread. Abuse of alcohol kills. People that need it do what it takes to get it, do you remember how well proabition worked. You don't like how it is....find a city that supports blue laws. There are a few in Southern Idaho and Utah.
12:51 PM on 11/10/2011
I think we know the answer to the prohibition question, and if you need clues as to the moral of this nations new 'adults', look no further than the Penn State mess. Speaks volumes about the lack of maturity and the god like status of some 'sports' , to the exclusion of the innocent victims of the sex maniac they let run loose. That's the mentality you're sticking up for, and further proof of the heinous nature of this bill, as noted by Fryer, is the all too obvious need to 'set money aside' to increase fire trucks and more DARE programs, to counter the problem, 'that they are creating'. Here is your falling sky:

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/blood-pressure/AN00318
http://www.livestrong.com/article/17748-drinking-alcohol-affect-body/

So it seems there are consequences , for actions, and if your bragging for alcoholic consumption, and supporting this bill ( moot now, its passed), then you owe it to yourself, and your fellow man whom I presume you care about, to know these facts.

http://www.gci.org/series/alcohol/bible, is also educational as a background to this issue, and not to be mocked as 'religious' , because often there is much to be learned from sources other than just modern day ones.

It's clear what problems arise from the excesses of our world, but its up to all of us to be role models, not exacerbate and otherwise be enablers of bad behavior.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaineIndependant
If corporations were people they'd get jail time
09:22 AM on 11/09/2011
There seems to be a huge effort to push disinformation about this initiative. The initiative would allow stores with more than 10,000 sf of retail space to sell alcohol. What it does NOT do is prevent stores with less than 10,000 sf of retail space from selling alcohol. I've seen a lot of people making that assertion and it is an absolute falsehood.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mimssandi
08:08 AM on 11/09/2011
I predict, if they privatize, then the State will soon start charging for state park admissions. Why kill a profitable business for the state? Just so some private people can reap the profits at the expense of the rest of the state? Truly an idiotoligical argument. Oh maybe I meant ideological.
07:23 PM on 11/13/2011
Washington state already charges for admission to state parks - you have to purchase a "Discover Pass" or get a ticket.
06:50 AM on 11/09/2011
I wonder how much money it costs taxpayers every year for alchohol related accidents, od's treatment, domestic violence, etc. It must be staggering. No pun intended.
photo
OhMyBoehner
Beat that screen name!
02:02 AM on 11/09/2011
60% Vote to get rid of state run liquor stores!
01:32 AM on 11/09/2011
voter turnout less than 32% it was an easy passage for this initiative unfortunately due to low voter turnout
photo
disgruntled american
Tea parties are for little girls. Vote Dem.
01:13 PM on 11/10/2011
Oh what ever. I came back by to say - Nee Ner Nee Ner.
01:31 AM on 11/09/2011
there goes 1000 family wage jobs as a result of this measure passing and it will affect more than the 1000 employees .im sure they have families to support best wishes to them finding work in this slow economy.
01:47 AM on 11/09/2011
Stores can't start selling till March of next year.
The sky is not falling Chicken Little.

Besides, the initiative states that retailers will have to as a condition to receiving and renewing a retail spirits license the licensee must provide training for individuals who sell spirits or who manage others who sell spirits.
So who better to hire on for all the new jobs, than those who are already familiar with existing state liquor laws. State liquor employees won't require much additional training.
It makes better business sense to hire them.
08:45 AM on 11/09/2011
No it doesn't because Costco et all will not pay them the same wage, will not recognize their years of experience, etc. etc. This is purely another corporate heist.
01:27 AM on 11/09/2011
just goes to show if you have the money you can buy legislation and the voters
01:49 AM on 11/09/2011
Also goes to show that no matter how many times a "pedaba" user spams a thread with his/her opinion, voters will think for themselves.
01:53 AM on 11/09/2011
low turn out is the cause of it passing has nothing to do with anything anyone posts online rest assured on this fact
01:56 AM on 11/09/2011
i would laugh if the final tally sways in the opposite direction theres still 356,377 votes yet to be counted
01:13 AM on 11/09/2011
Initiative Measure 1183 Concerning liquor: beer, wine, and spirits (hard liquor).County Results &
Yes 680,296 59.7%
No 459,159 40.3%
Total Votes 1,139,455 100%
01:12 AM on 11/09/2011
too late the low voter turnout has passed this initiative , the apathy voters as usual wait until the feel the effect of this measure passing LOL they arent going to be happy with it ...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Baneblade
Better Left than wrong
12:43 AM on 11/09/2011
The State knows best.

No, really.
06:52 AM on 11/09/2011
Just ask all the people executed. No,really
12:34 AM on 11/09/2011
Seriously? You want a state run monopoly?
Why not also have beer and wine state run? Close all the small mom & pop home-brew and wine tasting shops and have tax-payer paid minimum-wage drones doling out the low quality name-brand crap box-wine and pils.
Then why not also shut down all pharmacies and have state run pharma-stores too.
Think of the hundreds of pharmacist jobs that will be lost.
03:17 PM on 11/09/2011
Mom and pop wine tasting shops? Do those even exist? Most people buy mass-produced wine in supermarkets.
06:23 PM on 12/09/2011
Maybe you should ask the 50 plus wineries in Woodenville, WA....
11:10 PM on 11/08/2011
we shall see in a few days how the people of washington feeel about this measure and how they voted if the seen through the hoodwinking the repeated last years reponse to no way no how its we the people and we said no .....voting is complete tallys to follow
11:05 PM on 11/08/2011
as of right 8 pm if you havent mailed your ballot or dropped in one of the drop boxes your too late for your vote to be counted
11:04 PM on 11/08/2011
drop boxes for ballotrs are closed