More

South Carolina Voter ID Law Could Hit GOP Seniors

South Carolina Voter Id Law

By JIM DAVENPORT   11/ 7/11 04:05 PM ET   AP

BLUFFTON, S.C. -- South Carolina's new voter ID law could affect an unlikely group: older white voters who have higher incomes, are reliably Republican and live in retirement homes and gated golf communities along the state's southern coast, according to an analysis by The Associated Press.

There are roughly 217,000 active voters in the state who do not have a driver's license or state ID card, election officials said. Of those, almost a third are 65 or older, and nearly 1,600 of them live in precincts in Beaufort County's Sun City retirement community or affluent neighborhoods nearby, according to AP's analysis.

The law has drawn criticism from Democrats and others who say it will hit the state's black, poor, elderly and disabled voters the hardest because they don't have a photo ID and face many challenges to get one.

Voters will need a state-issued ID or a U.S. passport or military ID to cast a ballot in person when the law takes effect, likely next year. It's unclear how many active voters currently do not have any of the required forms of IDs.

Sun City GOP club president Bill Fearns is confident a lot of residents in his community have IDs that will work because they travel so much or are retired military.

"I think the majority of Sun City residents were kind of in favor of photo ID," Fearns said.

The U.S. Justice Department is reviewing the law to see if it complies with the Voting Rights Act. It will not impact local elections Tuesday and is increasingly unlikely to affect the Jan. 21 GOP presidential primary. If it survives legal challenges, it would come in to play for statewide primaries in June and Election Day next year.

South Carolina is among the five states that passed laws this year requiring some form of ID at the polls, while such laws were already on the books in Indiana and Georgia. Voter ID laws are often a popular talking point for presidential candidates and GOP lawmakers, who claim it prevents fraud.

Opponents say there has been no proven fraud and even though the legislation provides for free state ID cards, voters have complained about the hassles they have getting birth certificates and other records the state requires for that photo ID.

AP's analysis also showed an income gap between white and black voters affected by the law. Precincts with the highest number of black voters that could be affected have far more poverty than precincts where white voters are most affected.

Among the 10 precincts with the largest number of white voters without photo ID, just one is an area where 20 percent or more of residents live in poverty. All but two of the 10 precincts with the most black voters without a photo ID are in areas where a fifth or more of their residents live in poverty.

The AP used the most recent data available for income from the 2005-2009 American Community Survey for the analysis.

Leading the list of high-impact white precincts is Columbia's Ward 1, where 405 white voters lack state ID, or a quarter of the Richland County precinct's 1,800 voters. The University of South Carolina anchors the precinct and ballots are cast at a senior center near the sprawling school. The median income there is $27,146.

A little over a mile away, Columbia's Ward 8 has 1,272 black voters without state-issued ID, the most in the state. That precinct is historically black Benedict College, where almost half the voters don't have state-issued ID. The historically black college is surrounded by mostly lower-income neighborhoods and four of ten residents in the area live in poverty, with the median income $19,067.

The picture is much different in Beaufort County at Bluffton 3A. The precinct at Moss Creek is next to marshland and across the street from a golf course. There, all but 17 of the 1,481 voters are white and the median income is $80,613. Just 2 percent live in poverty.

Jay Odom, 70, helped lead the building efforts for Sun City in the 1990s and was surprised by the numbers of voters in the area without state IDs.

"That's a high cotton community," Odom said.

___

AP writer Jack Gillum in Washington contributed to this report.

___

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
BLUFFTON, S.C. -- South Carolina's new voter ID law could affect an unlikely group: older white voters who have higher incomes, are reliably Republican and live in retirement homes and gated golf comm...
BLUFFTON, S.C. -- South Carolina's new voter ID law could affect an unlikely group: older white voters who have higher incomes, are reliably Republican and live in retirement homes and gated golf comm...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:03 AM on 12/26/2011
Huffingtonpost where is my comment. It contained no offensive language? It was not complementary of the President but is that a requirement?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldgraymare
Congress is the opposite of Progress
10:16 AM on 11/09/2011
When you think about the fact that the supposed "voter fraud" that the Republicans are so terrified of is practically NON-EXISTANT, it becomes perfectly clear that these kinds of initiatives are merely another way to make it harder for the poor and elderly to vote. As backwards as my state is (Virginia), you can sign an "affirmation of identity" statement (saying you are who you say you are) and vote without ANY form of ID. Most of the poll workers (like myself) know the folks in that district....and our voting system precludes someone from trying to vote in more than one district.
10:47 AM on 11/08/2011
Old,young,white,black,brown,gay,straight,Christain atheist,democrat or republican. If you want to vote in South Carolina,get some form of legal state identification,or no vote.
09:39 AM on 11/08/2011
Why will requiring ID disenfranchise Democratic voters? Because they are likely to not remember to wear pants?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
07:46 PM on 11/08/2011
Clue.less, offensive and humorless. No wonder you're in the GOP.
11:14 PM on 11/09/2011
It's most likely to affect poor and minority voters that are less likely to have state-issued IDs or drivers licenses, which cost money and require going to a DMV office that might be hard to travel to if you don't have a car. There are additional political obstacles to gettinng the IDs as well. For instance in Wisconsin, Walker's administration shortened DMV hours and closed a number of DMV locations in democratic districts after they approved a photo ID requirement for voting. Also, I haven't heard how they're handling to cost, but if they're forced to pay for an ID it could present an additional financial obstacle, although I doubt they'd make them pay since that would amount to a type of poll tax.
09:38 AM on 11/08/2011
Why not use fog a mirror cast a vote?. The same method Barney Frank required to get a home loan. We all know how well that worked out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
knot2
09:22 AM on 11/08/2011
Every US Citizen above the age of seventeen has been given the right and privilege to vote; with a few exceptions of where that right has been removed. Usually, the statistics that that track voting turnout rates use two methods. One method is Voting Eligible Population (meaning those who still have the “right to vote”) and the other method is Voting Age Population (meaning those can vote because they are 18 years or older)

Below is the Voter turn out percentages for both methods for the past couple of years.
Note: these rates are at a national level.

Year Voting-eligible populationTurnoutRate Voting-AgeTurnoutRate
2010 40.9% 37.8%
2008 61.6% 56.9%
2006 40.4% 37.2%
2004 60.1% 55.4%
2002 39.5% 36.3%
2000 54.2% 50.0%
1998 38.1% 35.3%
1996 51.7% 48.1%
1994 41.1% 38.5%
1992 58.1% 54.7%
1990 38.4% 36.5%
1988 52.8% 50.3%

These national turn out rates show that there are many eligible voters who do not vote. In fact as you can see; if it is not an Presidential election – then the majority of US citizens DO NOT VOTE.
On this Election Day; Please to not waste your vote by not voting!
06:18 AM on 11/08/2011
I remember when you could use a piece of mail with your name and address printed on the envelope as ID. Why didn't they included Medicare Id's or ss# cards for idenification. Would to many people have this information laying around the house.
02:14 AM on 11/08/2011
Rumor has it that the voting booths in Republican districts and Republicans manning voting booths in Democratic districts have been instructed that these new laws are not for White people; they are designed for African Americans, Latin American and anyone foreign looking that shows up to vote. Republicans feel that the laws aren't for them. Along the lines of what Ohio Republican Represetative said about sharing the burden of cuts in Ohio: " Republicans earn their money, apparently Democrats don't...maybe we will just cut the Democrat's Pay.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MountainPenelope
Hands off my micro-bio (& my Medicare)!
09:18 AM on 11/08/2011
The Democratic poll watchers will challenga any voter who is allowed to vote without the ID.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nicko68
11:08 AM on 11/08/2011
Enforced by the Black Panther Party
01:07 AM on 11/08/2011
I just don't understand this. In Oregon, we get ballots mailed to us. Voting is absurdly easy. How can anybody actually agree to making it tougher to vote?

I think we need to make it more like Australia, where voting is on a Saturday, and considered a requirement. Seems like the GOP just wants to make it harder and harder for people to vote so they have more control.
hopeisalive
Old enough to know better, but young enough to try
08:56 AM on 11/08/2011
Seems like it? It is the same blatant attempt to disenfranchise people who tend to vote Democratic. A continuation of the same "Dirty Tricks" of the past.
10:52 AM on 11/08/2011
Dirty tricks of the past (correct), about the Supreme Court justices who betrayed America. Scary thing, Thomas,Kennedy,and Scaliia are still on the court.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
07:49 PM on 11/08/2011
Hear hear! Every State should take Oregon's approach. Like you say, it's absurdly easy. It's been in place for years and has had no problems. One can only wonder how long it will take the rest of America to get a clue.
photo
ojolsen
my micro-bio is empty
11:00 PM on 11/07/2011
There will me more backlash than just some rich white people in gated communities, people do not like this stuff, ID's, no same day registration, no student ID's... it pissesusoff
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ekwati
Words matter, as does reality!
09:50 PM on 11/07/2011
This is probably a really silly question, but why doesn't everyone just get IDs?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wandering girl
grownup
10:23 PM on 11/07/2011
a lot of elderly people don't drive, so they don't have driver's licenses, and since they don't drive, they can't get to motor vehicle departments that issue ID cards. and some people can't qualify for either, because they can't present proof of citizenship, such as birth certificates, because they were born in either locales or decades where those just weren't issued, or were destroyed (mine was destroyed in a fire; all I have is the hospital certificate, which isn't "legal proof").

not everyone lives in an urban area with public transportation, public health departments, or even post offices.

interestingly enough, organizations like ACORN actually used to be able to *help* people get IDs, but of course that's "community organizing," which Republicans can't stand because it enfranchises minorities who "would only vote Democrat."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MountainPenelope
Hands off my micro-bio (& my Medicare)!
09:22 AM on 11/08/2011
Not a silly question, but think about it.

The state issued IDs will be free, but BIRTH CERTIFICATES are not. Many states charge $25 or more these days to get a copy of a birth certificate. It's also a hassle if you are elderly and not residing in the state in which you were born.

The fee for a birth certificate is daunting is you are surviving on less that $20,000 per year and have to pay rent, medicines, utilities, and food out of that $20,000.
10:44 AM on 11/08/2011
Great answers above. Add in the time factor. If you live in a city with good public transportation, you may have let your driver's license lapse or you may be a student from out of state. Lots of workers struggle to get to the DMV during the hours that its open - because those are the same hours that they're at work. (Or, if you're elderly, those are the hours your children work so you may not be easily able to get there.)

As an aside, I tried to use my unexpired US Passport to vote last time around to simplify things. They let me vote, but only after a 10 minute discussion among the poll workers including calling over two supervisors to determine if it was an "allowable form of ID." I really think adding more rules just adds more confusion to a process that shouldn't be difficult - its not like there's any evidence of rampant voter fraud. Certainly not at levels that could actually sway an election.
09:38 PM on 11/07/2011
There is no shortage of money in politics. So a lack of money should never be a reason that a voter is suppressed. The GOP is going to try, sure they are..but if our vote is suppressed it is our own parties fault.

For the sake of my point lets assume that eveyone of those 1,272 poor black registerd voters that do not have a picture ID are democrats... ok, My question is.. who is is stopping the SCDP from doing something to help these voters get a picture ID. The answer is no one...The SCDP has plenty of money, and can certanily afford to pay the $6360 it would cost for the whole lot of them to get a new ID card, (here in FL that would cost $31,800) and if those voters need a ride to the DMV well then the SCDP can afford to pay for that too.

The same can be said for every states Democratic party. They all have money for campaign ads, shirts, yard signs, bumper stickers etc. etc. etc. The democratic party can afford to, and NEED to help our parties poor, elderly, disabled voters get inside a voting booth period.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wandering girl
grownup
10:25 PM on 11/07/2011
I challenge you to prove that "there is no shortage of money in politics."
11:52 AM on 11/08/2011
How can you think other wise, for example: Since we are talking about SC in particular.
10 people just paid $35,800 a plate, (A PLATE) so they could meet VP Joe Biden in Charlston SC this past September WOW!! Now I dont know about you, but that sure dont sound like a shortage of money in politcs to me. And btw the chariman of the SCDP was one of those 10 people....
01:08 AM on 11/08/2011
I think the point is that we shouldn't be making it harder to vote in the first place.
12:14 PM on 11/08/2011
Amen, but the GOP is making it harder to vote, right or wrong, they are doing it.

Complaning about it alone, wont get our poor, elderly, and disabled into a voting booth come election day...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chuck Rowin
08:51 PM on 11/07/2011
these stories are to keep you focused on things that do not matter and are of no consequence. whats the real news? you dont know do you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wandering girl
grownup
10:27 PM on 11/07/2011
of course we do. the real news is people like you who try to distract us from the real news.

disenfranchising voters is a much more real problem than "voter fraud."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chuck Rowin
02:30 AM on 11/15/2011
keep wandering girl. maybe someday youll find a nice freeway to live under.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chuck Rowin
08:44 PM on 11/07/2011
i have lived and voted in hawaii, alaska, wahington, california, montana and arizona. i have been asked for proof of identification each and every time since my first trip to the polls in 1978. why is this even news? you have to prove who you are to vote already. states do not make it hard to obtain id. this story is so full of crap its turing brown.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wandering girl
grownup
10:28 PM on 11/07/2011
goody for you. I have lived and voted in just as many states since 1968, and I have *never* had to provide ID. I tell them my name, I sign my name next to mine on their list, and I receive the opportunity to vote.

this may be hard for you to comprehend, Chuck, but *your* life is not the standard for everyone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chuck Rowin
02:32 AM on 11/15/2011
i can comprehend that you are lying. you have to show your id and that is a fact. if not then any fool claiming to be you could take your vote.
01:09 AM on 11/08/2011
In other words, you've never been disabled, elderly, or too poor to take time off to get a photo ID. Screw those who are, they don't deserve a vote anyway!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sweendoggedly
Progress isn't a four letter word.
08:09 PM on 11/07/2011
As much as it would make me happy for every GOP voter to stay home and not vote, I would still fight for their right to vote. These laws are a despicable, underhanded way of disenfranchising the poor, and should be struck down, or repealed.