More

Chicago Speed Cameras: Emanuel Exaggerates Safety Impact, Downplays Projected Revenue

First Posted: 11/08/11 01:06 PM ET Updated: 11/08/11 03:32 PM ET

Emanuelspeedcameras

Now that his proposal to use red-light cameras to record and issue tickets for speeding infractions has passed the state Senate, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel focused on pushing the bill through the House at a news conference Monday.

The mayor highlighted two recent accidents where children were killed or seriously injured in collisions, including the Oct. 29 death of Diamond Robinson, 6, according to the Chicago Tribune. Video monitors displayed live feeds from red-light cameras at several particularly dangerous intersections in the city.

"While we're speaking, Diamond Robinson, who was hit by a car near a school … they're actually having her funeral," Emanuel said, according to the Tribune. "That is a reminder of what we're talking about today and the full price and consequences of what we're talking about today."

But the incidents the mayor cited both occurred at intersections that wouldn't have speed cameras under the current terms in Emanuel's legislation, the Tribune reports.

The bill that passed the Senate would approve the use of speed cameras at 79 red-light camera intersections within one-eighth of a mile around schools and parks, and would operate between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., the Chicago Sun-Times reports. Previous studies of the areas qualified for speed cameras found that 66 percent of the city would fall into enforceable boundaries.

Chicago Transport Commissioner Gabe Klein told the Sun-Times that $100 fines or graduated fines depending on speed would be automatically mailed to the license plate holder of vehicles traveling five miles or more over the speed limit, after a 30-day adjustment period where warning tickets would be issued.

Emanuel has consistently argued that the speed camera plan is intended to be a deterrent, and a safety measure, not a revenue-generator, but has said that the money generated by fines would continue to further safety initiatives.

"Any revenue goes back to school programs. It doesn’t go to fund the deficit, if we ever get anything," Emanuel said, according to Fox Chicago. "After school programs, speed bumps, there’s a host of things you can do to protect children. So the revenue is dedicated to our children’s safety in and around schools."

But the mayor has been accused of downplaying the revenue-generating power of the speed cameras, which a joint investigation by CBS2 and The Expired Meter blog suggests could far exceed red-light camera yields.

The Chicago Department of Transportation cast feelers with a two-month study of seven intersection approaches--single legs leading into intersections with two or more streets, monitoring vehicle speeds from 6 a.m. to 11 a.m. and noon until 4 p.m. on weekdays, The Expired Meter reports. During those nine hours per day, over 43 days, 1,418,797 vehicles were recorded, 131,034 of which would have been issued tickets under the proposed system. That sample group alone would have generated $13.1 million in fines.

Under the current version of the speed monitoring bill, cameras would be operational from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m., an additional seven hours of enforcement time, according to The Expired Meter, and safety zones near park districts would operate seven days a week for even longer hours. Based on the average 48 violations per hour per camera recorded in the exploratory test, each camera would produce 768 violations a day, totaling $11.5 million monthly between seven cameras. At nearly $100 million annually, those seven cameras would far outpace annual revenue generated by all 382 red-light cameras.

Speed camera opponent Brian Costin at the Illinois Policy Institute told The Expired Meter that the terms of enforcement suggest the plan is "blatantly about revenue."

"I am gravely concerned when the City of Chicago says they're doing something to improve traffic safety," says Costin. “Their track record it horrible. You can tell it's not really about safety when you look at the hours of operation (proposed hours of enforcement) are not during just school hours but when most people drive to maximize revenue."

Commissioner Gabe Klein has argued that the city hopes this revenue stream will taper as the cameras become a deterrent to unsafe driving practices.

"The goal is to change people's behavior," said Klein, according to WBEZ. "You have education, engineering and enforcement. And if you don't have enforcement the other two aren't as effective."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CHICAGO

Now that his proposal to use red-light cameras to record and issue tickets for speeding infractions has passed the state Senate, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel focused on pushing the bill through the Hous...
Now that his proposal to use red-light cameras to record and issue tickets for speeding infractions has passed the state Senate, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel focused on pushing the bill through the Hous...
Filed by Lizzie Schiffman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
09:26 PM on 11/10/2011
The red light speed cameras have nothing to do with revenue; they actually work at lowering collisions in other cities. http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/Red-Light-Cameras-Decrease-Collisions-Report-132821378.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EdCorey1971
10:28 AM on 11/10/2011
I'm not foolish enough to think this is about safety. But if Eman really want to raise revenue for the city he would hire more cops and ticket J-Walkers.
07:30 PM on 11/09/2011
Aren't school zone speed limits active "when children are present"? How will the camera know that?
07:11 PM on 11/09/2011
If you want to help avoid the red light cameras and let others know where they are check out trapster. It a FREE app for smartphones. Will help you with knowing where speed traps, red light cameras, and more are. Great free app to the avoid tickets and giving hard earned money to the city for red light cameras.
06:32 PM on 11/09/2011
Trapster has proven itself to be the Best phone and web-based software for identifying speed traps, live police, and many other driving hazards - it's incredible with constant updates and ugrades - the Trapster guys think of it all!
06:26 PM on 11/09/2011
As many of the suburbs abandon their RLC programs, Chicago goes in the wrong direction. Typical.
06:28 PM on 11/09/2011
+1 on Trapster! Like Heath, I've been using it for years. Check it out!
06:23 PM on 11/09/2011
Anyone ever heard of Trapster? I found this on my blackberry a few years back and now have it on my Android phone. It's AMAZING!!!!!! This app tells you where all the reported red light cameras are and speed cameras. You can report live police traps, accidents, and other road hazards to other trapster users! It's friggin awesome and highly recommended to anyone with a smartphone!!!!
04:24 PM on 11/09/2011
I hope he also plans to spend more on the public transit system because I know I'm not the only one who has already switched to it. The red light cameras did me in. For years and years, I would drive out of my little sub-division and up to the light at the corner and I would stop, look both ways, and turn right. Then one day, I got a red light ticket for that very corner. At issue: The new sign that they planted, probably on the same day as they installed the camera, that said: "No turn on red." So I started counting the street corners in my neighborhood which were not previously posted as "no turn on red" and it looked very much like wherever a camera had been installed, so too had a brand new sign prohibiting a right turn on red. Habit is a hard thing to break and this is one I can't afford to retrain myself in.
photo
PalaceOfWisdom
Obama signed away habeus corpus
12:10 PM on 11/09/2011
"You can tell it's not really about safety when you look at the hours of operation (proposed hours of enforcement) are not during just school hours but when most people drive to maximize revenue."

Checkmate. As if traffic isn't brutal enough, now we're all supposed to drive at artificially slow speeds for fear of Big Brother wringing us out. Those of you who voted for Rahm brought this about. You shouted about the parking meters and red light cameras, then voted for someone just like Daley only worse.

A good leader would look to generate revenue by bringing good jobs to Chicago. Instead we get more tickets, gambling pitches, and Wal-Mart. If a law is on the books, they exploit it to fleece us. If a law is unfavorable, they change it to fleece us. The city will collapse if it keeps being run this way.
04:32 PM on 11/09/2011
Well, the 13million dollars he had in his campaign fund was more than enough to mobilize all the votes he needed...what did everyone else have? Half a million? I hate to see the city trying to make up its deficit through fines.
10:01 AM on 11/09/2011
I'm confused about what the opposition is.
If drivers don't want to pay the fines ... slow the *dirty word* down.
I hope the city makes a ton of money on this, or, Chicagoans drive with in the limits.
Go ahead and use the money for the deficet or school funding. Hell, make the fine $200.00!
Bwuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuhuuuuuuuuu.......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
04:37 AM on 11/09/2011
Hey, Rahm: how much money did the camera vendors give to your campaign? Your spin with, "While we're speaking, Diamond Robinson, who was hit by a car near a school … they're actually having her funeral," Emanuel said," isn't washing very well with the informed masses.

Why don't you just tell the truth?
photo
bitsy79
Think Outside the FOX
12:57 AM on 11/09/2011
With mayors like Bloomberg and Emanuel, urban areas have become bastions of privatization and corporatist economics

BY DAVID SIROTA
http://www.salon.com/2011/11/07/the_myth_of_the_progressive_city/
photo
bitsy79
Think Outside the FOX
12:50 AM on 11/09/2011
"Child safety" my arse. Just another smoke screen. It's about money and privatization. "Contracts between private camera vendors and cities can include payment incentives that put profit above traffic safety." -- from the PIRG study. (http://www.illinoispirg.org/uploads/f8/58/f858f9a8aa43f4503e219047808738dc/Caution-Red-Light-Cameras-Ahead.pdf)

If safety were really a concern, they'd have told Redflex's 100 lobbyists to stick it and would have used the funds to put more cops on the streets. From the PIRG report: "Redflex Traffic Systems...holds the largest single contract, with the city of Chicago, which involves 380 cameras...." The Wall St. dem is capitalizing on "safety." It's disgusting -- like most everything else he's been up to. His penchant for "running the city like a business" -- so ludicrous. Civic systems are not business structures. He is a corporatist through and through. He is out to privatize as much as he can. What would make kids and everyone else safe is to add to our thinly stretched police force. But who would profit from that? He claims revenues will go towards funding speed bumps, etc. You know what could go to that? The camera budget. TIF money. 20% raises and no pension reform for six-figure mayoral aides. Has anyone disclosed the proportion of ticket revenue that goes to the Redflex company? Who determines the locations? Of course not. One thing we do know is that it's about the shareholders, not children. Emanuel's probably a shareholder himself.
12:01 AM on 11/09/2011
If they're talking about installing speed cameras around schools for safety and not revenue, they should funnel ALL of that money directly to the schools.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ChiGuy
Just an earthbound misfit, I
10:44 PM on 11/08/2011
It doesn't matter one bit that the particular intersection where the child was struck won't be one that gets a camera. The fact is that we here in Chicago have a reputation for being very aggressive drivers. And ANYTHING that can be done to help prevent ANY child ANYWHERE from being killed is a good thing in my book.