iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iran's Ahmadinejad Calls UN Nuclear Chief, Yukiya Amano, U.S. Pawn

Ahmadinejad

First Posted: 11/08/11 07:36 AM ET Updated: 11/09/11 01:40 PM ET

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Tuesday criticized the head of the U.N.'s nuclear agency as an American pawn in the run-up to its expected release of a document said to document Tehran's nuclear weapons program.

Ahmadinejad said Iran will not stop its nuclear development, adopting a defiant position in advance of the report which could spur efforts for new sanctions against his country.

"If you think you can change the situation of the world through putting pressures on Iran, you are deadly wrong. The Iranian nation will not withdraw an iota," Ahmadinejad said.

Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, not weapons production.

The report, expected to be issued Wednesday, suggests that Iran made computer models of a nuclear warhead and includes satellite imagery of a large steel container the IAEA believes is used for nuclear arms-related high explosives tests, diplomats told The Associated Press.

In remarks broadcast on state television, Ahmadinejad said that International Atomic Energy Agency chief Yukiya Amano was simply repeating U.S. allegations. "He delivers the papers that American officials hand on him," Ahmadinejad said.

"I am sorry that a person is heading the agency who has no power by himself and violates the agency's regulations, too," the Iranian president said.

He repeated Iran's stance that it is not involved in making a nuclear weapon. "They should know that if we want to remove the hand of the U.S. from the world, we do not need bombs and hardware. We work based on thoughts, culture and logic," he said.

Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi said Tuesday if Iran wanted to develop nuclear weapons, it would declare so openly, "but our reason and experience tell us that, for us, nuclear weapons would not serve as a deterrent." Salehi spoke during a visit to neighboring Armenia.

Ahmadinejad said the U.S. has recently added $81 billion to its current budget on nuclear weapons, some 300 times the entire Iranian nuclear budget.

These figures would put Iran's nuclear budget at roughly $270 million per year. Up to now Iranian officials have rarely referred to the budget for the program.

U.S. officials say the government will use the International Atomic Energy Agency report as leverage in making its case to other countries that sanctions against Iran should be expanded and toughened and that the enforcement of current sanctions should be tightened.

In the run-up to the report's release, Israel has been referring to the possibility of a military attack.

Israeli defense minister Ehud Barak told Israel Radio Tuesday he is skeptical the international community would impose crippling sanctions on Iran after the report's release, and Israel will continue to recommend that no option be taken off the table. Israel considers Iran its most dangerous enemy.

In an apparent response to Barak, Iran's defense minister Gen. Ahmad Vahidi on Tuesday warned Iran would hit back if attacked.
"Any adventurous and hostile act against Iran will face a strong, swift and stern response by the Iranian armed forces," Vahidi was quoted by the official IRNA news agency as saying.

Russian President Dimitry Medvedev warned against threatening Iran with the use of force. Speaking in Berlin Tuesday, Medvedev said threats could lead to a war, "and for the Middle East this would be a catastrophe."

China's Foreign Ministry Spokesman Hong Lei said Tuesday that while Beijing is firmly opposed to any use of force, "the Iranian side should also show flexibility and sincerity."

China is Iran's biggest trading partner but has supported previous U.N. sanctions related to Iran's nuclear program.

In its latest report on Iran, the International Atomic Energy Agency outlines the sum of its knowledge on the Islamic Republic's alleged secret nuclear weapons work, including:

_Clandestine procurement of equipment and design information needed to make such arms;

_High explosives testing and detonator development to set off a nuclear charge;

_Computer modeling of a core of a nuclear warhead;

_Preparatory work for a nuclear weapons test, and

_Developing and mounting a nuclear payload onto its Shahab 3 intermediate range missile – a weapon that can reach Israel, Iran's arch foe.

Ahead of the report's release, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned of a possible Israeli military strike against Iran's nuclear program.

He told Israel Radio that he did not expect any new U.N. sanctions on Tehran to persuade it to stop its nuclear defiance, adding: We continue to recommend to our friends in the world and to ourselves, not to take any option off the table."

The "all options on the table" phrase is often used by Israeli politicians to mean a military assault, and Israeli government members have engaged in increased saber rattling recently suggesting that an attack was likely a more effective way to stop Iran's nuclear program than continued diplomacy..

While some of the suspected secret nuclear work outlined in the annex could also be used for peaceful purposes, "others are specific to nuclear weapons," said the confidential report obtained by The Associated Press.

Some of the information contained in the annex was new – including evidence of a large metal chamber at a military site for nuclear-related explosives testing. The bulk, however, was a compilation and expansion of alleged work already partially revealed by the agency.

But a senior diplomat familiar with the report said its significance lay in its comprehensiveness, thereby reflecting that Iran apparently had engaged in all aspects of testing that were needed to develop such a weapon. Also significant was the agency's decision to share most of what it knows or suspect about Iran's secret work the 35-nation IAEA board and the U.N. Security Council after being stonewalled by Tehran in its attempts to probe such allegations.

Copies of the report went to board members and the council, which has imposed four sets of U.N. sanction on Tehran for refusing to stop activities that could be used to make a nuclear weapon and refusing to cooperate with IAEA attempts to fully understand its nuclear program.

The agency said the annex was based on more than 1,000 pages of intelligence and other information forwarded by more than 10 nations and material gathered by the IAEA itself.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Tuesday criticized the head of the U.N.'s nuclear agency as an American pawn in the run-up to its expected release of a document said to docum...
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Tuesday criticized the head of the U.N.'s nuclear agency as an American pawn in the run-up to its expected release of a document said to docum...
Filed by Clare Richardson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 322
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patrick Fogarty
01:01 PM on 11/09/2011
In dealing with Iran now and in the forever , as far as this writer is concerned , the U.S. will not be able to ignore the Russian , Chinese or Middle Eastern Converece as they have in the past . What ever we would like to do or would like to see done will be tempered by the influence of the "Big Three" or the RCME . To ignore this , will end in major humiliation and further loss of credibility . We can not continue as if we were the only players in the sand box. If you are looking for someone to blame for this you can ; the arrogance of the Right and the ignorance of the Left and vice-versa ,
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ramkshrestha
Welcome to Nepal - the birthplace of Buddha
12:53 PM on 11/09/2011
Could this be the another cause for NATO money collapse and another recession?
photo
Sam Adamson
Stands for what's right
11:49 AM on 11/09/2011
From his perspective he is right. Life were so much easier back in the days when the UN Nuclear Chief was an Iranian pawn.
photo
Quinterius
Accept no dogmas
05:02 PM on 11/09/2011
When was that?
photo
Sam Adamson
Stands for what's right
09:19 PM on 11/09/2011
1997 - 2009
photo
karim banned
A fool's mind is at the mercy of his tongue and a
02:01 AM on 11/09/2011
"Another fault which shoots another hole in the claim is that the documents were written in English, a language barely used in official Iranian documents let alone in documents of such paramount sensitivity. "

http://presstv.com/detail/209074.html

Bare in mind that even highly educated people in Iran mostly cannot carry a day to day conversation in English let alone communicating in English and send memos in English. The whole document is a forgery if the originals are in English, Guaranteed. Another WMD claim made by Zionist bankers to create wars to bankrupt Muslims and Christians alike so they can rule the world.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:07 PM on 11/09/2011
"Bare in mind that even highly educated people in Iran mostly cannot carry a day to day conversati­on in English."

Quit insulting the Iranian people.
photo
Quinterius
Accept no dogmas
05:05 PM on 11/09/2011
Have you heard Iranian Foreign Minister Salehi speak English? You are using the stupidest reason to justify your contention, with which I agree. They don't use English for formal documents as a matter of policy and pride in their own language. Not, because they are incapable of of using English. Well, what percentage of American any language other than English? George Bush didn't even know English.
photo
karim banned
A fool's mind is at the mercy of his tongue and a
08:42 AM on 11/10/2011
Salehi is an exception. He has his PH.D. from MIT in US, that's why he can speak in English fluently.

English just recently added to school curriculum. It was taught in High Schools, but most students could not make a correct sentence in English when they graduated.
photo
skialethia
αω vs military might
01:29 AM on 11/09/2011
Sounds like aluminum tubes and yellow cake redux. And so what if it turns out to be true? Everyone who feels threatened gets them.

When the USSR got them....oh me-oh my, when the Chinese got them...ay, ay ay, when the Pakistanis got them...God help us: the end is near, when Kim Jong-il got them...it's the end; this crackpot will use them. When Iran gets them we'll go to bed predicting Armageddon and get up the next morning, go to work, come home, sleep and repeat the same routine.

Iran has been gradually surrounded by bases on all sides with Israel demonizing it every second day. Can't blame those Iranians if they want to take out the same insurance policy everyone else has.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gayle Williams
08:07 AM on 11/09/2011
Only one BIG differance. Iran wants nukes to destroy Israel. I don't think Iran has a chance to do this to Israel, because, Israel would take out Iran if threatened with nuclear attack. The only problem with that is if the other Arab countries joined in, Israel would also take them out and settle the matter once and for all. Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Saudia Arabia, These are really large countries that could take in the Palestinians, however, that has never been the problem. The problem is, the arabs can't stand to have a Jewish State in their midst. Because of this, there will never be peace, and if Iran is stupid enough to attack Israel, then there really will be a holocaust, but this time it will not be the jewish people on the recieving end.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
11:48 PM on 11/08/2011
Everyone,meaning the majority of the worlds powers have all known about this for a long time now.They also said that they did not want to see Iran go nuclear.The thing is very simple,everybody is not wrong,thats the way it's always been about any and everything and still is to this day and will be for decades or longer to come.I say we hold back like we shoul;d.If anything is going to happen wait for them to make the first move.This go's for the U.N. and all country's that belong to it and agree that Iran can not bet trusted with thi kind of power.Technolog has come a very long way's.There's a lot of things we and certain others have that nobody knows about and it will always be that way which it should be.We and certain others do hve the capability of shooting down any type of missle or rocket that someone fires at an allie or other countr's that certain other country'd would love to be able to take over them(iran wants iraq)this has been a known fact for a long time as well.Lets just see what develops before we jump right into anything
11:38 PM on 11/08/2011
Huffpost sucks, must be an Muslim controlled board. You can keep it!
photo
SheilaKhani
normal is an illusion
09:48 PM on 11/08/2011
I can't understand how Iran would attack Israel with Nukes!?! Even if Iran was able to bypass Israel's counter-attack, nuking a small region like Israel will destroy every country in that area potentially harming Iran itself and not to mention Hezbollah camps.
02:10 AM on 11/09/2011
ISRAEL is DREAMING.. to attack Iran and every country in the area.. IN that instance both MUSLIMS AND CHRISTIANS would destroy Israel.. Don't think that muslims are the only ones who hate israel, there are a lot Christian countries who can't stand ISRAEL...
06:21 PM on 11/08/2011
Hello, Iran ? This is the United States. And we have decided to help you in your quest to obtain a nuclear bomb by giving you one ! It will be sent by plane and dropped in the near future. Good Luck !
07:48 PM on 11/08/2011
More ons like you make a great case for an Iranian nuke.
08:46 AM on 11/09/2011
MAGIC 62,

Spoken like a true ARM CHAIR WARRIOR.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yomero
08:29 PM on 11/08/2011
You are a war monger...go yourself and die there .if you lovr war.
02:11 AM on 11/09/2011
Thank you...
photo
jrp1947
made you show yourself if you respond, got ya!
06:01 PM on 11/08/2011
In all honesty what is the world going to do if someone takes Iran out with "so-called" clean nukes whether it is israel or someone else? Are the Arabs going to come rushing in? Is Russia or China going to do anything? Not hardly and China can't afford to have those loans defaulted on. What is the rest of the world going to do? Condemn us for doing what they wished they had the guts to do? and if they get mad at us all we have to do is quit supporting 2.3s of the United nations projects and use that money to pay off our debts while collecting what the world owes us.

It is alright for a Muslim to lie to an infidel and what do you think Iran is doing to the Infidel world. Muslims are the biggest liars on the face of the earth and they dmit to lying to infidels. They lie to each other and most certainly to us. Why are we playing games with someone you cannot trust even when you are signing agreements with them? And as far as Saudi Arabia goes one nuke in Mecca and no point in facing east anymore at prayer time. It is time America gets some backbone before we end up with something ten times worse than 9/11. they will smuggle in a nuke here and not think twice about it.
07:51 PM on 11/08/2011
It's about what Iran will do in response. They don't need china or Russia to help them rain ballistic missiles on Tel Aviv, or turn our bases into parking lots and sink all our ships in Persian Gulf, or drive our economies into a depression by blocking the strait of Hormuz. Think about it.
photo
SheilaKhani
normal is an illusion
09:39 PM on 11/08/2011
the rest of the world doesn't have the guts cause they don't want to go to war with another country over whether or not they nukes, or WMD, or Taliban, or Gaddafi, or communists...
outnow
Ban the bomb
05:26 PM on 11/08/2011
The problem with using the idea of a peaceful atom is the similarity in technology and the easy shift to weaponization. Then you have to constantly monitor a hostile country.

Another problem with the peaceful atom: look at the problems in Fukushima, Japan, following three meltdowns. These operations are part of the cycle. The implications are not lost on anybody.

To make matters worse, any country could be secretly enriching under the cover of a peaceful nuclear energy program.

To use bunkerbusters on such a program is ill-advised. The risk of a nuclear mishap is one factor.

An attack would also be an unnecessary risk for a third World War.

60% of the oil flows through the Straits of Hormuz each day. This must be balanced against the security of Israel. These countries are like cats and dogs. Still, diplomacy is more likely to bring resolution. The brinkmanship by both sides is very dangerous. I fear there is a substantial possibility of just such an attack. It seems inevitable. But diplomacy has resolved much more seemingly insoluble problems whereas war never solves anything. Iraq and Iran fought. What was solved? Nothing.
photo
SheilaKhani
normal is an illusion
09:42 PM on 11/08/2011
would it not be in the interest of US to take over the Strait of the Hormuz? They sort've been doing it for the past few decades with massive naval force in Persian Gulf and the surrounding waters. Iran's control over that area may be hindering certain activities...
photo
escher3360
A nation in distress
05:12 PM on 11/08/2011
Ahmadinejad is correct about the U.N. Nuclear Policy Agency. It is a puppet of the American government. For years we have manipulated and fine tuned world affairs overtly and in secret. Typically those political leaders who have the courage to condemn this country and stand by their convictions are far from centrist. Why is this? Why are so many people in the world not big fans of this country?

Not long ago Iran was far from the foe that we now encounter. What led to the current state of affairs? A revolution strikingly similar to those that we have recently supported in the Middle East and Northern Africa. A revolution against repression and corruption supported and hand crafted by the United States. A revolution that went in an unanticipated direction. This country's self serving expansionist policies go way back. Only recently have we begun to pay a price for those policies. September 11 comes to mind.

How can this country rise above past transgressions? With the advent of social networking and split second communication borders that seemed impenetrable have all but disappeared. A new world order quickly develops. Without meaningful change this country will rightfully lose it's dominant position. We must accept responsibility for past mistakes and work to gain respect from former victims. Without change there is scant hope for a meaningful future for anyone. Anywhere.
03:51 PM on 11/08/2011
In the meantime Is_rael can continue working on the next 200 nuclear warheads!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rotinfx16
03:36 PM on 11/08/2011
Did we already dismantle that neutron bomb? Iran would seem the perfect place to test it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CrestedSparrow
06:35 PM on 11/08/2011
Why? Cause he's not white or cause he's not protestant?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rotinfx16
11:41 AM on 11/09/2011
Racists such as you, amaze me. Now if memory serves, Hitler was both white and Protestant. Germany was not a happy place under 24 hour bombardment that made no distinction between military and civilians.
03:01 PM on 11/08/2011
So now the apologists have moved from the arguement that Iran isn't building a nuke, to saying that they have a right to build a nuke. They say Iran isn't planning on attacking Israel, but maybe that can be excused too.
06:00 PM on 11/08/2011
It's pretty clear that they are not building a nuke. But under costan political, economic, covert military and cyber attack, they would be stupid if they didn't look into it.
photo
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
06:21 PM on 11/08/2011
You have figured out there 'modus operandi'.