iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'Personhood' Anti-Abortion Movement Gains National Momentum

Personhood Mississippi

First Posted: 11/08/11 03:14 PM ET Updated: 11/08/11 03:23 PM ET

As Mississippians line up at the polls Tuesday to vote on a historic ballot measure that would give full legal rights to undeveloped zygotes, the "personhood" movement has gained momentum in nine other states across the country and in Congress.

The controversial Proposition 26 in Mississippi would redefine the word "person" in the state constitution to include "every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning, or the functional equivalent thereof." In addition to effectively criminalizing abortion, the measure would ban intrauterine devices and certain forms of birth control, complicate the legality of stem cell research and in vitro fertilization and expose pregnant women and their doctors to daunting lawsuits and investigations.

According to Personhood USA, the campaign is currently gathering signatures to put similar measures on the ballot in Montana, Florida and Oregon. Personhood advocates have filed personhood language measures in Ohio, Nevada and California, and lawmakers have initiated or soon plan to initiate equivalent legislation in Alabama, Wisconsin and Michigan. Voters defeated a personhood measure twice in Colorado -- the only state besides Mississippi that has gathered enough signatures to force a vote.

The movement is also gaining momentum in Congress: GOP lawmakers have introduced three bills that would extend personhood rights to fertilized eggs. Sixty-three House Republicans signed onto Rep. Paul Broun's (R-Ga.) "Sanctity of Human Life Act," which mirrors the Mississippi personhood language. GOP presidential candidate Michele Bachmann (Minn.) cosponsored Rep. Duncan Hunter's (R-Calif.) personhood bill, which would allow "the prosecution of any woman for the death of her unborn child," and Mississippi's own Sen. Roger Wicker (R) introduced a bill in the Senate that defines a person from the moment of fertilization.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, warned about the consequences of a personhood measure in a conference call with reporters last week. Personhood Florida has gained about 20,000 signatures so far in its effort to get a measure on the ballot there.

"We're sounding the alarm bells now because it's absolutely critical that Floridians understand just how extreme this personhood campaign is," she said.

The personhood measures could cause legal mayhem for the states. A statewide ban on abortion would challenge Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that prevents states from banning abortion before the fetus is viable outside the womb, and legal experts charge that the personhood language is too abstract to be defended or properly enforced.

Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union have already filed two lawsuits challenging personhood initiatives in Nevada this year, charging that the language is vague and misleading. The ACLU already defeated a personhood measure in a Nevada district court last year, and it is confident that the judge will rule the same way on the current cases.

"You can't propose a ballot measure that encompasses more than a single subject," said Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, an ACLU attorney on the case. "In trying to ban abortion, ban treatment for ectopic pregnancies, ban stem cell research, ban IVF, these measures clearly encompass more than one subject."

Les Riley, the leader of Mississippi's personhood movement, has said legal challenges are welcome and that he is hoping lawyers will take the personhood law up to the Supreme Court. Riley argues that the Roe v. Wade decision was handed down when scientists were less clear about the moment when life begins -- it is now due for an update.

"We think that God has already told us when life begins, and science has confirmed it, and the court has just not dealt with it," Riley told HuffPost in September. "We hope the Mississippi voters will force them to take another look at that decision."

The vote in Mississippi is looking extremely close so far. According to a Public Policy Polling survey released Monday, 45 percent of voters support the initiative and 44 percent oppose it.

Jennifer Mason, a spokesperson for Personhood USA, said she believes Mississippians will vote for the measure if they are able to tune out all the buzz about its potential consequences.

"It's just one sentence that says every human being is a person," Mason told HuffPost on Tuesday. "We're out combating the lies and getting the truth out, so we'll see what happens."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
As Mississippians line up at the polls Tuesday to vote on a historic ballot measure that would give full legal rights to undeveloped zygotes, the "personhood" movement has gained momentum in nine othe...
As Mississippians line up at the polls Tuesday to vote on a historic ballot measure that would give full legal rights to undeveloped zygotes, the "personhood" movement has gained momentum in nine othe...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,576
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (56 total)
11:03 PM on 11/09/2011
Margaret Sanger is founder of Planned Parenthood, and the one who inspired Adolf Hitler in his views of eugenics and "murdering socially undesirable people."
Margaret Sanger, through Planned Parenthood, advocated abortions on Afro-Americans in order to eliminate what she called "socially undesirable people". This site is an excellent Afro-American response against Sanger's racist eugenics: Genocide against Afro-Americans
12:47 PM on 11/10/2011
Actually, Margaret Sanger was against abortion. After leaving Germany, She advocated and taught women about birth control methods and ways, other than abortion, to help them from having unwanted children. In 1933, while still in Germany, she wrote about being worried how her country's views of hate of others was way out of hand. Sanger had a right to be worried. That was the year Hitler was running for office and sought out and received an endorsement from Pope Pius XII in order to get elected. He was also backed by the Protestant Church that had 300 years of Martin Luther's Jew-hating to live by. He ran on anti-abortion, anti-gay and was for mandatory shhool prayer
10:53 PM on 11/10/2011
You need to study your History!!! Margaret Sanger felt that African Americans needed to be wiped out and that they were a "threat to society" and that was the whole reason abortion was put in place from the beggining . She was in agreement with Hitler and his killing of the Jewish people and whom was the worst murderer (same as Pol Pot & Stalin - murderers) Hitler wanted to get rid of "unwanted children" and Jews because he felt they were below him. You obviously need to read up on these atrocities. I have my degrees in American Ethnic Studies and also of African American decent and have studied extensively on racism, slavery, the disadvantaged and including the movement of Margaret Sanger. Next time go check where all the Abortion clinics are...always in the neighborhoods of the disadvantaged...HMMM that she be an obvious clue to you right there!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimbo2001
Founding Father wannabe
10:51 AM on 11/09/2011
So, If I deliver a baby, then decide I don't want it, I should be able to kill it and bury it in my back yard, Right? Surely you won't argue against this. If you don't believe in killing newborn babies, don't do it. But, stay out of my home.
10:27 AM on 11/09/2011
Here's my issue with these kinds of things. There is anti abortion but there is no pro abortion. I see a lot more anti abortion people standing outside of health clinics harrasing women and a lot more pro-choice people not doing anything at all and generally being content with life. There are no pro-choice rallies or pro-choice signs sitting infront of government buildings.
One side is quietly stating their beliefs and the other is forcing it down peoples throats.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stardust memories
the music of the years gone by
11:16 AM on 11/09/2011
f/f agreed. Once again if you don't believe in abortion don't have one. I don't see pro-choice folks congregating around my ob/gyn's office trying to convince expectant mothers to abort so leave those women that have to make life changing decisions alone, it's not your business.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimbo2001
Founding Father wannabe
11:21 AM on 11/09/2011
You are, of course, kidding? The pro-abortion people are the loudest, the most obnoxious, and the most hateful. The whole pro-abortion movement began with liberal men, who wanted to "help" women become more promiscuous. It worked quite well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skotyman
My micro-bio tches
04:46 PM on 11/09/2011
O MY GAWD....That's a new one. You evangeldiculous are getting pretty creative....LOL!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smp276dp
free us from the craziness
10:13 AM on 11/09/2011
You know that head line is truly full of it. If it lost in all places Mississippi. This thing is dead any place it comes up for a vote. The republican's are always trying to accuse the left of wanting big goevrnment. But Democrat's don't want to be in a women's body. Or looking into American's bedrooms. That is the over reach of the republican conservatives don't even know what the hell to call them any more. Baggers seems to be very popular. Woman have to band together against this long arm of the right. Slap it good and make them repsect your right to choose.
09:47 AM on 11/09/2011
A woman's right to chose does not mean a woman has to chose birth control.

The repeal of DADT does not mean a man or woman has to change his or her sexual orientation.

If predeterminates are events controlling the outcome of future decisions, free will is the ability to make choices without the restraints of predeterminates.
09:19 AM on 11/09/2011
So dont have an abortion! Isnt it nice to have a choice?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimbo2001
Founding Father wannabe
10:56 AM on 11/09/2011
Unfortunately, the baby has no choice. Aren't you glad your mother didn't CHOOSE to abort you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ronniesbrain
man is the only animal that blushes, or needs to.
01:02 PM on 11/09/2011
I'm only sorry your mother didn't consider abortion.
photo
ghostrider57
Unable to find reality.sys Universe halted
02:12 PM on 11/09/2011
My mother had 2 miscarries, she didn't choose those either.
09:08 AM on 11/09/2011
Here we go yet again and even deeper into personal rights, liberties and lives ... Once more the Christian Right and Conservatives are trying to FORCE US ALL to live by THEIR interpretation of THEIR religion / religious-based opinions ... "We think that God has already told us when life begins, and science has confirmed it, and the court has just not dealt with it," Riley told HuffPost in September. "We hope the Mississippi voters will force them to take another look at that decision." .... Clearly stated in their own words - "We think that GOD has already told us-" So once more we are all being subjucted to THEIR religious intolerance for any opinion/beleif outside THEIR own and legislation sought to usurp, strip, rape from us our rights to live by our own thoughts, opinions beliefs ... As conferred upon us by the Constitution without totalitarian dictatorship = communism of relgious intolerance of those who believe other than THEIR Christian Right and Conservative INTERPRETATION of some supreme entity ... We need to once and for all stop the dictatorship =pogram continuously being thrust upon us and demanding we cowtow and SUBMIT to their religious communist dictatorship.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimbo2001
Founding Father wannabe
11:16 AM on 11/09/2011
Personally, I am not from Mississippi, and I disagree with this proposed law. But, they are VOTING on it. That is certainly not dictatorship. This is unlike when 5 liberal people on the supreme court somehow decided that the Founding Fathers were pro-abortion and made it a right, and therefore, all of us are supposed to accept baby-killing.

By the way, most of us atheists are opposed to arbitrary abortions. Although we might be receptive to retroactive abortions for pro-abortionists.
10:52 PM on 11/09/2011
I dont think this has anything to do with being a "Christian or God" This is about being a decent human being and about the life of another!
12:06 PM on 11/10/2011
The speaker in tha article stated "we think that God - etc" He already made it a religious-based issue/matter, as have so many other religious-based groups and churces ... This is not about being a decent human being if you are anti abortion and indecent if not .. It's about personal right to decide for yourself on the isse of when life begins and at what point if any short of live birth, there is the "another" you refer to.
09:03 AM on 11/09/2011
Liberals always ignore the obvious for the sake of convenience.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smp276dp
free us from the craziness
10:20 AM on 11/09/2011
You have to take your head out of the sand. Women decide what they do with their body. Not the government. Funny during the republican debates all you hear is how government has too many arms going into everyones business. But the democrat's leave the woman's body to the women. And we do want to dictate what happens in your own bedroom. The right has had there face slapped all over the place lately. Ohio with union busting desires. Mississippi with reaching into a women's body. Arizona with immigration. Ask yourself why? Justice will be served like it or not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stardust memories
the music of the years gone by
11:18 AM on 11/09/2011
are you going to give us a hint as to what you are prattling about?
12:06 PM on 11/09/2011
Nope. You liberals are SOOOOOO intelligent, you should be able to figure it out.
09:02 AM on 11/09/2011
i have a question, will every miscarage be investagated by the police as a possible homicide?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimbo2001
Founding Father wannabe
10:45 AM on 11/09/2011
No. Any other ridiculous questions?
photo
ghostrider57
Unable to find reality.sys Universe halted
02:15 PM on 11/09/2011
With the way the law was written that could very well happen. Or do you have some special incite into how the law will be enforced that the rest of us don't?

The question was far from ridiculous.
09:03 AM on 11/09/2011
Ok I get the abortion laws being argued again. But what does IUD's and birth control have to do with it. Why would they make those illegal? They prevent pregnancy not kill a baby after conception. What do they think is going to happen if people can no longer prevent pregnancy's. For some they take birth control to prevent the pregnancy. They don't wait till they are pregnant and then have an abortion. I think it is my choice to take medication to prevent having my 7th child! You can't make law that prevents someone from having an abortion as well as prevent them from taking medication or preventing the pregnancy in the first place. Can you imagine how many unwanted children there would be that NO ONE IS WILLING TO PROVIDE FOR OR TO TAKE CARE OF?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimbo2001
Founding Father wannabe
10:47 AM on 11/09/2011
You're totally correct. So I guess it's a good thing no one is suggesting that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Just4theHalibut
06:05 PM on 11/18/2011
I see that the one response you got earlier, said that nobody is trying to stop IUDs. That statement was completely false. The personhood claim says that when the egg is fertilized, it is a person. So when it tries to implant and an IUD is preventing it, you have killed a person. The personhood-claimers privately admit that is their stand, but publicly lie, like Jimbo. The voters of Mississippi, thank goodness, were able to see through those lies. We are going to have to fight this Colorado-based group in Oregon now; it will fail here too. But what a waste of time and money that we could be using to care for actual babies.
08:58 AM on 11/09/2011
Can anybody tell us what we humans have that that fetus doesn't? truth is NOTHING. It even has its own identity separate from the mother's. just because it cannot survive outside the womb is meaningless. If they take any of us out to the ocean and toss us out, we would be shark food on a short time, because we will never grow gills. However, if a fetus is allowed to grow, it will become independent of the mother and be just like you and me.
02:58 PM on 11/09/2011
Ok, so if I'm allowed to go to college, I have the potential to get a PhD in biochemistry, cure cancer, and save the planet. That does not mean I get to have a Nobel prize now, nor does it mean I get to rack up money from a biochem company for a job there based on the potential of a PhD I do not posess now.

Our society is based on NOW. I cannot get paid for a job I don't have. I can't avoid taxes because I'm "pre-dead". I don't pay taxes on a house I don't own yet. So why are zygotes special?
03:40 PM on 11/09/2011
Your argument is baseless and very hard to understand. OK tell me what makes that thing in the woman NOT A LIVING THING, and since we work so hard in this country to protect bugs and fish and such, in many cases you can go to jail if you harm an animal that is on the endangered list and that animal was pregnant, you can be held responsible for the welfare of the fetus, did you know that? so why isn't the human fetus guaranteed the same protection
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimbo2001
Founding Father wannabe
06:22 PM on 11/09/2011
You need to understand that this is irrelevant to Democrats. Remember, democrats are the people who believe blacks are less than whites. We had to defeat them in a war to get rid of their slaves. Then they created the Klan. Then they created Jim Crow laws. Then, after we passed the civil rights laws, they realized they need black votes, so they started pandering, and pretending they were the original civil rights activists. Why would anyone think democrats might care about unborn babies? Get real.
11:02 PM on 11/09/2011
Oh yea, not to mention that the original lady who wanted abortion legal in the 18th early 19th century originally wanted abortion instituted to eliminate the African American Community.Margaret Sanger is founder of Planned Parenthood, and the one who inspired Adolf Hitler in his views of eugenics and "murdering socially undesirable people."

Margaret Sanger, through Planned Parenthood, advocated abortions on Afro-Americans in order to eliminate what she called "socially undesirable people". This site is an excellent Afro-American response against Sanger's racist eugenics: Genocide against Afro-Americans If you look at the majority of abortion clinics they are always right in the inner city or where people of disadvantaged communities live. --- Its interesting have you ever seen an abortion clinic in the upper class neighborhoods next to the Louis Vioutton store..Nope!
10:28 AM on 11/10/2011
First of all, the democratic party from the 18th and 19th century is COMPLETELY different then it is now. Get your history right. Second of all, not all democrats think blacks are less then whites. Don't make an assumption if you don't know what your talking about. Third of all, don't assume democrats don't care about an unborn child. All the democratic party is pointing out is that it should be the woman's individual decision whether or not to get an abortion. Making the choice to have one is a extremely difficult one to make. If you don't agree with getting one, don't get one. Don't force your beliefs on me. We don't do it to you do we? NO. So keep it to yourself if you don't agree.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zeflik84
08:57 AM on 11/09/2011
As the matter of fact, it lost the momentum - in Mississippi!!!!!
08:56 AM on 11/09/2011
There are already enough unwanted children in this country already..why add more...so they can live miserable lives....I guess some people dont mind finding babies in trash cans or Porta- Potties! Even thou i would never consider abortion...It's none of my bussiness to tell someone else whats right an what wrong..
08:55 AM on 11/09/2011
More innocent babies will live now that the libs will be defeated.
08:53 AM on 11/09/2011
Cro-Magnons Unite! lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimbo2001
Founding Father wannabe
01:43 PM on 11/09/2011
I presume you are equating "Cro-Magnon" with "baby-killer". Actually the cave people cared far more about their babies than todays libs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jessica Ham
07:28 PM on 11/18/2011
Jimbo2001- You have NO IDEA what you're talking about. My degree is in anthropology and I can assure you that this statement is ENTIRELY false. Infanticide was fairly frequent in our species even up to a very civilized social state. Primitive man most certainly did NOT consider an individual (very old, very sick or very young) who could not contribute to the survival of the group an asset and if the group would suffer by continuing to support those individuals then they would get left behind, point blank. It was a matter of survival to them, and typically accepted as the right course of action for the good of all. *Shakes head* you've totally lost all credibility and respect from me entirely for any comment further on this threat with the statement you just made above.